Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
What if Israel Were in Your Neighborhood?
I left Washington last week when many friends and family members were coming here to celebrate the inauguration of our first African-American President.
My eleven year-old son asked me -- why turn your back on Obama?
I threw back at him Martin Luther King -- It's not the color of his skin, it's the content of his character.
What does it say about Obama's character that he sides with the Israeli slaughter machine against those that it slaughters?
What does it say about the character of his "progressive" supporters, who cry for joy at his inauguration, but say not a peep about the slaughter machine and its victims?
(See, for example, former AIPAC staffer and "progressive Democratic" columnist David Sirota, who broke down and cried watching Obama's inauguration, but has not written one word about the slaughter in Gaza.)
Earlier this month, the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) took out full page ads in major newspapers around the country.
The ad was titled: What if Hamas Was in Your Neighborhood? (link to ad at: http://www.adl.org/Israel/posters/HamasAd_Phoenix.pdf)
The ad showed missiles reigning down on Phoenix, or Boston, or Washington, D.C.
"Imagine if Hamas terrorists were targeting you and your family," the ad read. "No country would allow such danger on its border, and neither will Israel. That's why Israel is fighting back."
In response, the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee (ADC) last week put up an ad on its web site titled -- What If Israel Were in Your Neighborhood? (Link to ad at: http://www.adc.org/PDF/gazaposter.pdf)
Answer?
Death and Destruction with American built F-16 fighter jets and Apache helicopters.
Yes, when Hamas launches rockets that kill innocent civilians, it engages in war crimes.
But Hamas has no Army, no Navy, no Air Force.
The slaughter machine has a modern military with hundreds of nuclear weapons and U.S. supplied F-16s and Apache helicopters.
So, there is a balance of terror.
And the Palestinian bodies tip the scales in the slaughter machine's favor.
Since the first rocket was launched into Israel in 2002 up until the December 17, 2008 invasion of Gaza, the Israel body count was maybe two dozen.
The Palestinian body count was 2,700.
That would be about 100 to one.
Since the invasion, the Israeli body count is 14.
The Palestinian body count was more than 1,400.
That would be about 100 to one.
As the ADC ad puts it: "Israel's assault on the Gaza Strip cannot be justified by self-defense. An armed attack that is not justified by self-defense is a war of aggression. Under the Nuremberg Principles affirmed by U.N. Resolution 95, aggression is a crime against peace. Prosecute Israel for War Crimes."
So, here's one concrete thing you can do to counter the slaughter machine's propaganda.
If you are interested in placing the "What If Israel Were in Your Neighborhood?" ad in your local newspaper, contact ADC's Nabil Mohammad at organizing@adc.org.
Turn the tide of terror.
- Posted in

148 Comments so far
Show AllIt with interest I note and Israeli Professor recently suggested in a speech that Israel has a number of Cities in Europe targetted with Nuclear weapons and that if Israel ever "went down" she would take the rest of the world with them.
He went on to indicate that Greater Israel should be cleansed of Palestinians and Arabs using as a vehicle for such actions the impressment upon the EU, the USA and other states that Israel was "Too dangerous" to cross.
Were this some Muslim Professor suggesting Israel be destroyed, the news would be spread world wide by the ADLS and Aipacs as proof of the barbarity of Muslims.
This is not limited to Professors. A Number of Israeli Politicians have referred to the Samson option when discussing this.
So if a Muslim proclaimed that all Jews in Palestine should be cleansed and forcibly sent elsewhere or eliminated and that if any nation intervened to stop such the Muslims should use suitcase nukes on their cities and take the world down with them, would he be deemed a terrorist ?
"It with interest I note and Israeli Professor recently suggested in a speech that Israel has a number of Cities in Europe targetted with Nuclear weapons and that if Israel ever "went down" she would take the rest of the world with them."
I've never heard of this before...do you have a link?
"So if a Muslim proclaimed that all Jews in Palestine should be cleansed and forcibly sent elsewhere or eliminated and that if any nation intervened to stop such the Muslims should use suitcase nukes on their cities and take the world down with them, would he be deemed a terrorist ?"
And uh, there are Muslims that *do* say this about Israel. As for Israel in its entirety being a terrorist, um, terrorists are individual people. A sovereign state is quite different...I don't know if a charge of terrorism can apply to individuals in a government, but war crimes, genocide, crimes against humanity, etc certainly do. This makes me wonder, has anyone responsible for state terrorism ever been charged with actual terrorism charges?
France under De Gaulle did the same thing.
zmann . . .
It's called "The Samson Option." Seymour Hersh wrote a book about it, with the same title . . . others have written about it at length as well. If I'm not mistaken, GwNorth is specifically referring to a quote by Martin van Creveld, a professor of military history at Israel's Hebrew University.
Here's a link to the Hersh book:
http://www.amazon.com/Samson-Option-Israels-Nuclear-American/dp/0394570065
Thanks.
What it says about his character and the reason I did not vote for him is that he believes that his "God" is the god, and he shares that "God" with his Israeli allies. With this belief comes some pretty horrific idealism about the nature of "Gods" people and the prophecies guiding Zionist believers and supporters, shining light on President Obama's pro-Israeli position. It is indeed time to put away childish things. We have long past moved beyond ancient prophecies that we will be saved, we the chosen people of "God" This entitlement mania has it's apex in the slaughter of thousands to be in material possession of an imaginary land of "God" When belief in such an unrealistic and childish higher power takes a back seat to our accumulated wisdom, we will indeed see a new day rising. For some of us that day has arrived, but if guided by their example of leadership, it has not arrived for our chosen leaders. They are still caught up in the idea of putting away childish things, the hope of all nations.
What happens when snowflakes stick together?...............friends come together and have snow ball fights. :)
Leea
That "entitlement" comes from a tribal perspective, something which the US claims to have left behind, and something that many people in the world would consider one of the most "childish things."
As for snowball fights, I am glad that where I grew up it rarely snowed. My brother would have put rocks in his snowballs as he did in his mudballs. He is, and has been since a tender age, a Republican.
Yep, and their tribal name is The Greedy and a child can never have enough and does not want to share.
As far as rock slinging brothers go, I had one of those, and he wouldn't claim to be a republican, but maybe he's a troll!
Cheers.
What happens when snowflakes stick together?...............friends come together and have snow ball fights. :)
Leea
Greetings from xglampf and rglorpf who watch the Earth from afar. We have been alarmed by a recent post on your excellent blog suggesting that Israel's micromanaging Deity might be reconsidering the location of the Promised Land. Whether it is the case that the neighbors of these chosen ones, wherever they may be, are simply bedeviled by jealousy or moved by some inner madness to strike out at these gentle and obviously superior beings, or that they are not in fact superior beings but rather a pack of self-inflated, quarrelsome misfits, nevertheless the wish to move them far away from their fellow hominids is understandable. It has been suggested that they might be happier with their own planetary body, such as the moon. Their marvelous God would of course cause water to spring forth from the pumice, which would soon be teeming with gefilte fisch and other tasty stuff, and they would never again be required to share space with questionable or unclean people.
rglorpf and I are opposed to this idea, so we are just letting you know. You've been dumping your refuse in space for too long already. Deal with it yourselves. Anyone who tries to park them up here is asking for a big fat death ray.
(smile) good one
What happens when snowflakes stick together?...............friends come together and have snow ball fights. :)
Leea
Love it! Great post xglampf! When the Overlords come to reclaim this part of their solar system...you shall be spared.
What if Israel Were in Your Neighborhood?
They would be building a wall on my property and shooting my kids when they throw rocks.
Repeal UNGA Resolution 181. Only a ONE STATE solution can ever stop this eternal turmoil.
Maybe Muammar Qaddafi isn't as crasy as we were told....
Qaddafi said "Assimilation is already a fact of life in Israel. There are more than one million Muslim Arabs in Israel; they possess Israeli nationality and take part in political life with the Jews, forming political parties. On the other side, there are Israeli settlements in the West Bank. Israeli factories depend on Palestinian labor, and goods and services are exchanged. This successful assimilation can be a model for Isratine." Do you actually believe that this is the reality in Israel?
It's pure propaganda. There's this thing called a "wall", and there are good highways that only Israelis can use, and there are the intrusions of Israeli settlements and bulldozers, and there are checkpoints, etc.
The Israelis consider themselves as first-class citizens - and they consider the Palestinians as third-class servants, or worse. To sum it up: Israel is the occupier and the Palestinians its victims.
A one state solution would only be possible in the lifetime of future generations. Can the world afford to wait that long?
--------------------
"Snowflakes should be our friends. We should bond with them, and become Snow People. In this way, we will win the War on Global Warming."
I don't think we can afford to wait, in fact are we affording waiting even right now?
P.S. I like your signature line.......sounds virtuous.
What happens when snowflakes stick together?...............friends come together and have snow ball fights. :)
Leea
Yeah, sure. Arabs do form political parties in Israel. Only problem is, they are not allowed to run candidates in the elections.
see:
Israel bans Arab parties from running in upcoming elections
at:
http://haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1054867.html
Can UN resolutions be repealed?
I mean, is there a legal mechanism in place to repeal them? Like, another GA vote to repeal their previous resolution? As far as I am aware, there is no legal power to end a state's existence.
And the fucking zionist want every Jew sent to Israel.
"It is essential that the sufferings of Jews.. . become worse. . . this will
assist in realization of our plans. . .I have an excellent idea. . . I shall
induce anti-Semites to liquidate Jewish wealth. . . The anti-Semites will
assist us thereby in that they will strengthen the persecution and
oppression of Jews. The anti-Semites shall be our best friends". (From his
Diary, Part I, pp. 16) - Theo Herzl
The world must stand up to the beast of zionism/nazism/fascism.
Sophie Scholl-The Final Days
I'm afraid that those searching for black and white perspectives on this situation are blinding themselves. It's easy to criticize Israel's reaction, but ask yourself, if you lived in a city where rockets were being launched on a daily basis, what would you want your government to do? I agree that the response was draconian and murderous, but it's also worth keeping in mind that Hamas is not simply a rogue group working alone, without support of the people or other sovereign nations. Hamas is a part of a power sharing government in the Palestinian territories, elected fairly by the people, and Hamas also receives material and financial support from Iran and Syria. Their attack on the Southern cities is not therefore "just" a terrorist attack, it's an attack on behalf of part of an undermined provisional government. So, if you were the Israeli leaders, what exactly would you do? Stand by as Hamas broke the 6 month long cease fire in December by lobbing rockets into southern cities? Watch as Iran increases its influence in Gaza and potentially later on, the West Bank? We're not talking about a big country here, a few wrong moves and Hamas/Hezbollah/proxy Iran and Syria would have the capability to reach any spot in Israel with rockets. While I was horrified by the aggression and manner in which the Gaza operation was carried out, I'm not under the delusion that there are simple and easy responses to the situation. Unfortunately, we are looking at a situation where neither side has many good options- Palestinians face a growing economic and health crisis in Gaza,existentially stubborn fanatical settlers in the West Bank, and a political climate in Israel that cheers military retribution. Israel faces the real possibility of a threat to its existence, not to mention the more localized danger of an increase in suicide bombings and rocket attacks. What should be done is anyone's guess I'm afraid. But this article, subsequent comments, and many others like them, I think are classic examples of a human failing- the need to demonize one side of a conflict and place the other on a pedestal. The truth is, as with so many heartbreaking conflicts around the world, that there is plenty of blame to go around. Pray for peace for the Palestinians and Israelis, and all we can hope for is that the Obama administration is able to begin the process back towards peace, so neglected for 8 yrs by Bush.
bwv1010, you ignore several facts:
1. The Qassams (glorified fireworks that have caused FIFTEEN Israeli fatalities since 2005) have ALWAYS been fired after an Israeli provocation of some kind - targetted assasinations, airstrikes in gaza, Israeli "operations, etc, etc. I challenge you to google and find one Qassam launch that was not preceded by an Israeli provocation.
2. The Israeli propagandist, Mark Regev, conceded to the British media that Hamas did not fire rockets during the cease-fire - it is universally accepted that the politically-motivated IDF murder of six Gazans on Nov. 4 precipitated the Qassam response.
3. Two weeks before the expiry of the cease-fire, Hamas officials offered to continue it if Israel agreed to open the border points - Israel immediately refused.
Well, look at it this way. You say that Iran was increasing its influence. Has Israel's bombardment of civilians resulted in a lessening of Iranian influence. Or has it possibly even increased Iranian influence.
You argue that people should look at this from the Israeli viewpoint. Sure. Pragmatically, what has the bombardment of civilians achieved? Israel has tarnished its reputation significantly globally; it isn't just anti semites who are disturbed ./ horrified / angry. For what? Has Hamas been wiped out? And even if Hamas is wiped out, what is to prevent the rise of another yet even more extremist group?
By your logic, any attack on Israelis is permissible because not only do the overwhelming majority of Israelis support the carnage their IDF is inflicting on Gaza, but most Israeli adults are members of this army.
It's amazing, how ineffective rocket attacks on abandoned buildings are used to justify shelling and bombing neighborhoods full of children. But you Likudniks out there probably already have a nicely-packaged response to this, courtesy of AIPAC.
"but most Israeli adults are members of this army."
That is a hell of a point that almost nobody ever brings up...certainly makes for interesting thinking on what constitutes an Israeli civilian.
Somebody has GOT to start talking and listening instead of shooting!
Oppressed people fight back. The greater the oppression, the harder they fight. The longer this goes on, the less trust there is.
There are NGO's that are trying to bring Israelis and Palestinians together, such as the Creativity for Peace program, which brings adolescents from Palestine and Israel to Santa Fe each summer for a two-week program to promote peace. There is another man who reaches out to children on both sides through music. This sort of program works. The children learn that they are children, with similar needs and interests. They become friends. Then they go home to hatred, bombs, starvation, propaganda, and it all starts over again.
The ones trying to promote peace are doing it on a shoestring. Those who promote war get many billions a year! Can't we, once the "can do" nation divert at least a little of these vast sums from death dealing to life giving? That could solve the problem.
I note with some interest that the author, and none of those who weigh in, have not the slightest word to say about the USA, the likely instigator and accomplice of almost everything the Israelis do.
A hundred to one, they say in chorus, or more? How many innocent Iragis have died and how many Americans?
The latest estimate from Just Foreign Policy is more than one million, three hundred thousand Iraqis to perhaps four thousand Americans, many of whom seem to have died in traffic accidents and the like rather than slain by hostile fire.
"Proportional?"
Israel is, in fact, a piker at slaughter by comparison to her US masters, and has been the US stalking horse in the Middle East since its founding, used as a surrogate for the projection of US power into the region, caused in part through US desire to control an oil resource, but also by US evangelical fervour to ensure a hospitable "landing ground" for the Second Coming, which requires Jewish control of the entirety of Palestine, the razing of the Muslim structures on Temple Mount, the a rebuilt Temple.
Where do you think the money and political support comes from? The "International Jewish Conspiracy" so beloved of many of the haters, or the tens of millions of Christian Millenialists? This conflict, like so many around the world, is part of a global system of aggressive Realpolitik funded and supported by a major world power, not the blusterings of a pipsqueak country with little or no natural resources *other* than external support.
It's in US interests to have perpetual terrorists held ready in the wings, and Hamas furnishes a convenient example. I wouldn't be at all surprised to find US money behind them as well, firing by proxy their Gunpowder Plots to justify a few more millions dead somewhere else in the world.
Lioness
Sioux Rose
LIONESS: Sound analysis. Thank you for sharing it. Israel has attracted a feeding frenzy of anger and justifiable outrage on C.D; whereas the parallel outrages in other regions are now getting short shrift. We, as progressives, are either against aggression everywhere or we are hypocrites. To focus on ONE target nation misses the point of the greater influence of global trafficking in weaponry, and those who directly profit from permanent war(s) and in fact are fomenting such policy.
And thank you as well. Many seem well-prepared to bluster or spue hatred, but few want to look at the bigger picture, possibly because they themselves are implicated in it, profit from it, or depend on the staus quo. Israel makes a very convenient whipping boy for speeches they ought properly to address to their own governments.
We *all* of us profit from the arms industry, merchants of death, and link arms with them in solidarity with more killing everywhere, as long as it's not in our backyards.
Here are the *major* death dealers: Argentina, Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brazil, Canada, China, Denmark, Egypt, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Israel, Italy, Myanmar, Norway, Poland, Pakistan, Portugal, Russia, Serbia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Thailand, Turkey, Ukraine, United Kingdom, and the United States.
Anyone here lucky enough not to share in their profits?
What's in *your* wallet?
Lioness
Warning label should read: Having Israel in your neighborhood can be hazardous to your survival.
Could the Israelis possibly be stupid enough to believe they have helped their situation?
Then we would stop giving them billions in taxpayer money to Israel and find it easier to seperate the moderate and secular folks from the militant and zionist troublemakers.
Terrance Mitchell
Redfield, South Dakota
That is something I can agree with you on Terrance, good luck getting your hero Obama, and the bought and sold U.S. Congress to sign onto that one.
Thanks hootowl,
I hope they pay attention but if they keep giving to Israel, well, I might not ever vote again because I'll feel that my vote for what I and the majority are looking for will never count anyway. I don't know but if they do betray, it could get very depressing.
Terrance Mitchell
Redfield, South Dakota
The MIC and AIPAC won't let Obama do it.
In case nobody has noticed, we already have a shadow Word Government and its name is "Z**n"
Of course, I could be wrong...
If Israel were in my neighborhood, my family and I would have been kicked out of our house, told that we could live in our garden shed without access to food and medical care, and when we tried to get back into our house we would be accused of being terrorists and would be shot.
Russel forgot about a few other things.
If Israel was in your neighborhood:
It would declare that your home and property is theirs now, and force you out to live in a tent in a unbuildable lot or steep hillside.
it would install checkpoints on your street and routinely stop it's neighbors from getting to their jobs or even medical care.
It would patrol and occasionally shoot to death any neighborhood children who didn't do what it said.
---USAn---
"What does it say about Obama's character that he sides with the Israeli slaughter machine against those that it slaughters?"
This seems to me to be a red herring. Far more important than Obama's lip-service support for the Israelis is the fact that the Gaza incursion ended just when Obama took office. What does this say about the change that has come to Washington?
"What does this say about the change that has come to Washington?"
Absolutely NOTHING.
This article really doesn't offer anything new...anyone remember "A Hundred Eyes For an Eye" about a month back?
Dafoe
To the opening question in the title if they were in my neighborhood they should not have any reason to feel threatened and so behave atrociously. As to Obama's character I'll take him warts and all. Instant answers and solutions are not forthcoming and not in the middle east. Pulling the President down won't bring peace to the middle east, it might make Russell feel better but it is counterproductive. Write the WH etc. To take to the airwaves with this is bound to build the walls higher.
I would FLEE the neighborhood ... I do not want to be near, associate with war criminals, genocidal warriors, ethnic cleansing monsters ..... they are bad for my health and my spiritual well being.
To the writer of: "but ask yourself, if you lived in a city where rockets were being launched on a daily basis, what would you want your government to do?" WTF? Israel - with U.S. money and backing - has committed genocide/ethnic cleansing - TERRORISM - against the Palestinians since the 1940's. Palestinians have the MORAL RIGHT to use white phospherous - or however you spell it - to get rid of the Israel occupiers. Hell, if I had a personal nuclear device and were a Palestinaian I would use it. Rockets? Rockets? oh my god. how dare they try to defend themselves. Israel does not have a right to exist and has never had the right to exist. Never. never did. never will.
If Israel is in your neighborhood, and you don't have an army, navy, or air force, you have to be pretty stupid to act as a proxy for a distant country and fire its rockets into Israel. You also have to be pretty stupid to encourage your children to throw stones at eighteen year-old soldiers armed with tanks and repeating rifles.
BTW, the principle of proportionality is clearly formulated in the third paragraph of Article 5 of the Treaty establishing the European Community as follows: "Any action by the Community shall not go beyond what is necessary to achieve the objectives of this Treaty."
Israel did what was proportionate to make Hamas stop firing rockets (and to think carefully before firing rockets the next time rather than declaring "victory").
Did hundreds of innocent women and children die? Yes. Was Israel's behavior barbaric? Yes. But, ask yourself what Israel's proportionate response might be to get Hamas to give up its aim of exterminating every Israeli? They haven't done that yet.
Your move.
Of course a Zionist Israeli would leave out the fact that the Palestinians are trying to defend themselves, in any way they can, against the heavily-fortified Israelis (courtesy of the American Empire). Their survival is at stake. People do whatever they can to survive - even if it appears irrational to you.
"Israeli and international corporations are directly involved in the occupation: in the construction of Israeli colonies and infrastructure in the occupied territories, in the settlements' economy, in building walls and checkpoints, in the supply of specific equipment used in the control and repression of the civilian population under occupation." See http://www.whoprofits.org/
Our move, eh? how would you react if Israel were riddled with "Palestinian only" roads, occupying troops, your terrirtory was carved up into buntastuns, and a blockade of basic food, fuel and medical supplies? If you weren't getting weapons from America I bet you would fight back by any means necessary.
The repetitive one sideded Hasbara talking points that blame Hamas for everything are wearing VERY thin in well informed communities like the CD readership. You may be able to fool people who get all their information from U.S. MSM tee vee "news" with such talk Joshaua but broadly read leftists who read articles here as well Chomsky,
http://www.chomsky.info/
Amy Goodman's Democracy Now!
http://www.democracynow.org/
and more balanced foreign press like the Guardian:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/
and even Israel's own Haaretz?
http://www.haaretz.com/
As well as reports from Amnesty International:
http://www.amnestyusa.org/all-countries/israel/occupied-palestinian-territories/page.do?id=1011175
The Red Cross:
http://www.icrc.org/web/eng/siteeng0.nsf/html/palestine-news-270109
and former President Jimmy Carter's Carter Center:
http://googlemini.cartercenter.org/search?q=Israel&btnG.x=13&btnG.y=8&sort=date%3AD%3AL%3Ad1&output=xml_no_dtd&oe=UTF-8&ie=UTF-8&client=default_frontend&proxystylesheet=default_frontend&site=default_collection
Not so much...
Cana you provide any documentation or evidence that Hamas has, as it's aim, exterminating every Isreali? I keep hearing hearing this, but not been presented with any evidence.
If you visited a Hamas members home, and wren't carrying a gun or wearing an IDF uniform, you would likely no only not be killed, you would probably be treated to tea and probably supper too. And they would do so in spite of it being Isreal, through it's actions, that appears to be engaged in a campaign of extermination or complete subjugation. Hospitality to all is a keystone of Arab culture, and by extension Muslim culture.
---USAn---
Those same Hamas members that have been executing Fatah members?
I recall seeing images of Hamas throwing Fatah members off the top of tall buildings when they seized control of Gaza.
Hamas has banned Fatah from meeting or holding rallies and has confiscated all weapons held by Fatah members.
Yes, they surely are the personification of hospitality....
When will you open your eyes?
President Obama obviously is not the one chosen to confront the Israeli government for their violent behavior towards the Palestinians. Hopefully, soon a capable individual or group will address the Israelis for all of the pain and suffering they cause and subject the rest of the civilized world to endure. Somehow the US government does not have the power to stop the Israelis. They take from us our war machines, and money as they please. What is this power they have over us? Answer that and perhaps we can begin to strike back.
"What is this power they have over us? "
One sentence, AIPAC campaign bribes errrr I mean "contributions," pretty simple really.
"..What is this power they have over us? Answer that and perhaps we can begin to strike back."
The power is money and the influence it buys. If they can't buy our politicians outright, they'll use their money to pay for blackmail or worse. Haven't you noticed how progressive, honest politicians tend to die in small aircraft? If one doesn't toe the line, they'll either crush him or kill him.
Of course, I could be wrong...
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ follow the money straight to Congress...
the U.S. chooses not to intervene ............ $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$