EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Corporate Win: Supreme Court Says Monsanto Has 'Control Over Product of Life'
- How the US Turned Three Pacifists into Violent Terrorists
- Cornel West: Obama 'Is a War Criminal'
- In 'March Toward Disaster,' World Hits 400 PPM Milestone
- Revealed: How US State Department 'Twists Arms' on Monsanto's Behalf
Popular content
Today's Top News
Amid Unemployment Crisis, Senate Gridlock Leaves Jobs Bill in Limbo
Republicans Appear United in Opposition
WASHINGTON - This week, Senate Democrats will attempt to push through a jobs bill that has stalled in the chamber for seven weeks. Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) filed for cloture on Monday afternoon, leaving just days before a vote on the American Jobs and Closing Tax Loopholes Act, or House Resolution 4213, a $23 billion bill to extend federal unemployment benefits and other emergency stimulus measures. The cloture motion signals that Reid believes he has the votes to pass the long-mired legislation. But there are still signs that the contentious, job-saving bill might not pass - leaving people on unemployment benefits, doctors and states in financial limbo.
If Congress does not pass the bill, hundreds of thousands will lose their federally extended unemployment insurance. Doctors will take a 21 percent cut in Medicare reimbursement rates, possibly causing them to drop needy patients. (Image: US Chron) Calling for an end to debate on the floor, Reid warned, "We'll
learn a lot this week about who wants to fix problems, and who wants to
make excuses." He castigated the opposition party's intransigence: "If
Republicans have their way, next week will be yet another without a
lifeline for the most needy, those willing and wanting to work. The
other side has slowed and stalled just about every piece of legislation
this year - just as they did last year and the year before that.
That's not a secret. The numbers don't lie, and Republicans make no
efforts to hide their strategy of delay."
What is at stake? If Congress does not pass the bill, hundreds of thousands will lose their federally extended unemployment insurance. Doctors will take a 21 percent cut in Medicare reimbursement rates, possibly causing them to drop needy patients. Starting in December, the federal government will provide less backing to the Federal Medical Assistance Percentages program, or FMAP, which provides states with money for Medicaid so that the "poorest of the poor," in Reid's words, can see doctors.
The bill has broad support, but not broad enough. Reid needs a Republican to cross the aisle to vote for the legislation, and needs to hold the Democratic coalition together. As of Monday, that was not happening. The floor debate was contentious - with Republicans bashing what they view as Democrats' free spending, and Democrats detailing the impact of job losses and the possible effect of Medicaid cuts in their states. No Republicans have yet come out in favor of the bill, with moderate Sens. Olympia Snowe (Maine), Scott Brown (Mass.) and Susan Collins (Maine) apparently remaining in opposition. Additionally, Sen. Ben Nelson (D-Neb.) has signaled that he might not vote for the bill as it ups deficit spending.
That means that Democrats might need to pare the bill down. And changing it comes with its own problems. The Senate has altered the House version enough that Congress will need to reconcile the versions or the House will need to re-approve the bill. Differences between the two might make that difficult: Moderate "Blue Dog" House Democrats, for instance, successfully fought for the removal of the $24 billion in Medicaid funding - which Reid hopes to keep in. And every week that Congress does not approve the bill is another week that thousands of the long-term unemployed go without unemployment insurance checks.
Against this backdrop of contentious fighting over deficit spending, President Obama has renewed calls for more stimulus to battle sky-high unemployment rates. Fifteen million Americans - about 9.7 percent of the work force - remain jobless. In a letter to Reid, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio), Obama called unemployment a "crisis" and asked the congressional leaders to pass Medicaid funding as well as a new provision to save local workers' jobs.
"I am concerned ... that the lingering economic damage left by the financial crisis we inherited has left a mounting employment crisis at the state and local level that could set back the pace of our economic recovery," Obama wrote. "The lost jobs and foreclosed homes caused by this financial crisis have led to a dramatic decline in revenues that has provoked major cutbacks in critical services at the very time our Nation's families need them most. ... [If] additional action is not taken hundreds of thousands of additional jobs could be lost."
McConnell responded, "[B]ecause Democrats can't seem to resist any opportunity to use a must-pass bill like this as a vehicle for more deficit spending, they've piled tens of billions of dollars in unrelated spending and debt on top of it, all at a moment when the national debt has now reached $13 trillion for the first time in history. This is fiscal recklessness, plain and simple."
Republicans last week released a counterproposal to the Democrats' jobs bill. But it funds the new jobs bill out of stimulus spending and forces across-the-board governmental budget cuts (exempting defense spending). Democrats oppose the measure.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

9 Comments so far
Show All'The bill has broad support, but not broad enough. Reid needs a Republican to cross the aisle to vote for the legislation, and needs to hold the Democratic coalition together.'
What about the Majority Rule, Reid? Or isn't this legislation important enough to invoke it? Or perhaps you just use the republicans as cover, since you essentially agree with them and are ultimately funded by the same sources.
Imagine, we're going to continue to have this feckless, self-serving corporate hack 'leading' the Senate because the corporations managed to engineer Navada's election and Reid's opponent is a raving Teapartier. (Look for more of the same in many races, including the one in '12.)
Actually...It is not really his fault that the 'Thugs are doing a virtual filibuster, like they do of everything. However, if there was ONE moment where his party could have rammed home to the public the true face of the GOP, this was it! Instead of the 'virtual,' filibuster (which is just implicitly understood now, since it is now unheard of to require less than 60 votes on ANYTHING), he needed to make them conduct an actual one.
And once again, the bourgeois class-interests of the Commondreams readership is reflected in the lack of comments here.
Maybe it's just outrage burnout.
Ah, the worst case scenario: if 10 million more become unemployed with no relief in sight.
First the jobs were outsourced; what's next the people?
Oh yes, there will be many people needed to clear the mines of Afghanistan of those valuable minerals. After the native population has been dronned to death..voila, a new place for Americans to go to get a job! America, we're outsourcing people now!
Join the newly named "PIECE" Core, and ask not what your country can do for you; please INVEST your body and soul in a PIECE of the action.
You're needed in another land. I mean Alaska isn't connected to the continental U.S., nor is Hawaii, so hey, let's annex Afghanistan for the 51st state!
We have a new MANIFEST DESTINY, AND HEY,IT'S ALREADY GOT PIZZA HUT AND KENTUCKY FRIED, AND WAL-MART COMING SOON. You'll feel like you never left home, and hey, it's a job!
Of course, that is the worst case scenario..I think....
Good God,
We're still loosing nearly a half a million jobs a month and talking heads on the biz channels are still lying about a delicate recovery, coming out of the recession, etc.
When you have over 100 banks fail, as we have this decade, you are not in a recession. You are in a bona-fide Depression. (If it weren't for derivative fakery and Tom Foolery, stats would show this economy shrinking wildly without the essential consumer.) If the government included everyone without a job with a living wage, the unemployment number would be around 50 percent. Since it only counts those receiving unemployment benefits they claim it's at Nine percent. But wait, they dummied up that number as well: now they don't count "discouraged workers" who can't find a job in a few weeks.... The real number they don't want you to know about is 22 percent US unemployment. A very sick domestic economy indeed.
This is a consumer-based economy. How's that gunna work with no consumers? Huh? When millions are living in tent cities at the edge of every town, you are in a Depression. When the only jobs being added are government paper-pushing jobs that create nothing (like the census) you are in deep long-term trouble.
Gold is rocking towards 1300 dollars an ounce for a reason. Nobody has faith in this Casino shell game any more.... I'm sitting in cash in my 401 because I don't want to get burned anymore. But cash has lost 40 percent of it's value since 2000 so no matter what I do I get screwed by the bankers who print as much as they need at my expense.
If these morons in D.C. don't create some real jobs pretty soon, this is going to boil over.
TJ
'This is a consumer-based economy. How's that gunna work with no consumers? Huh?'
This used to puzzle me a lot; why, I thought, would corporations want to cut their own throats by disempowering consumers? But I think the answer is that they are trying to break the workforce and they'll do whatever is necessary to achieve this goal--even if it means loss of revenue.
I've been unemployed for almost 18 months, surviving on only temporary jobs, most of which pay well below (like 1/2) of what I need to live on. the pay for temp work continues to decline and there are more unemployed than ever. There is no question of what you say about the number of unemployed; the numbers are a sham.
I'd also like to emphasize that it seems Congress is not even considering extending COBRA and the COBRA supplement, so, come August, when it will 18 months since I became unemployed, I will also lose my health insurance.
I used to wonder that about these corporations, too. But I think the reason that these entities do not give a flip is because they really might not generate the largest share of their income based on the actual stuff that people buy, but on casino games (ie., 'investment income'). I that is true, then they really only need the wealthy to buy their stuff, and will not feel the loss of all the rest of us. I have no idea if that is correct or not, but maybe worth thinking about.
Also, about the bogus unemployment stats...Don't forget to add 1 percentage point to whatever stats your're looking at (whether 9.9 or the more realistic 18%), because that's how much higher it would be if we did not have 1 out of every 99 adults incarcerated at the moment. So, even if you take the lower number, we have still been over 10% for a long time now...
I wish you the best in your job search.
I think you're right as well. After all, corporations no longer make their killings by selling profits; rather, they cook the books and get tax breaks and all sorts of goodies, all gifts from their good buds in government.
-------
Thanks for the good wishes. I'm realistic enough to realize that I may never have a permanent, living-wage job again; all I hope for is enough work to pay the bills and keep me out of debtor's prison (haul out your Dickens...it sure looks like we'll be revisiting time soon enough).