Elderly New Yorkers Angry as Crisis Hits Poorest
NEW YORK - From housebound grandmothers who relay on charity meal deliveries, to ailing retirees who cannot pay rising costs for medications, older Americans feeling the pinch of the financial crisis are getting angry and forming groups with names like "Senior Outrage."
In New York, with city and state tax revenues tumbling, benefits and services to the elderly are being cut, and many older residents are furiously drawing comparisons to the billions of dollars spent to bail out banks -- and pay Wall Street bonuses.
Dolores Green, 68, retired as a home help worker and lives on a government Social Security check of $740 a month. She pays $719 a month in rent, leaving just $21 for everything else.
To eat, she relies on the federal food stamp assistance program, and worries that her cost for some medication she needs for her diabetes has gone up to $8 from $3.
To get by, she said: "I run errands for seniors. They may hand me $2 or $3 or something."
Green says she sees more people seeking government assistance, such as her daughter, who lost her job after 25 years.
"She's just applied for food stamps, she's got two kids," Green told Reuters at a community center where some 25 elderly New Yorkers were eating a lunch of sandwiches, a gelatin dessert, milk and tomato juice. "That's why she can't help me, because she's got to help her children."
"Maybe I'll move in with you," she jokes to her friend Alice Jordan, 80, a retired teacher who suffers from osteoporosis and high blood pressure.
Jordan said her food stamp allocation had gradually eroded to $54 a month from $180.
When she reads about the well-heeled victims of financier Bernard Madoff's suspected $50 billion Ponzi scheme, she says she wishes they would spare a thought for those who never had such wealth.
"Just like this guy Madoff ripped them off, how did they feel when they lost their money and had to change their style of living? Think of us. ... How do you think we feel?" she asked.
BIG BUDGET GAPS
New York City's Department for the Aging, which runs more than 300 community centers for aging residents and provides services such as food delivery to the homebound, affordable housing and heating subsidies, has cut its 2009 budget by $4 million to $285 million and faces another proposed cut, of $9.5 million, in 2010.
The cuts are part of Mayor Michael Bloomberg's bid to close a $4 billion city budget gap caused by the collapse of corporate tax revenues, especially from Wall Street, which normally pumps a fortune into local coffers.
New York state, which typically gets 20 percent of its revenues from Wall Street taxes, also is proposing cuts in health care and services for the elderly as part of a drive to close a $13 billion 2009 budget gap.
Among the proposals is a cut in the state contribution to the Federal Supplemental Security Income, or SSI, for elderly, blind or disabled people with little or no other income.
Parvati Devi, 62, says that would cut her SSI check by $24. "I can't afford to have anything cut," she said. "We collect cans on the street, we do anything to survive."
A couple of hundred retirees attended a forum with New York city and state officials this month to express their anger at cuts they say are hitting the most vulnerable people hardest.
"We are outraged that the government, which has spent hundreds of billions of dollars to bail out financial institutions -- and they in turn have given $18 billion as bonuses to their top executives -- has no funds to support vital services for their senior citizens," said Muriel Beach, New York City head of the State Wide Senior Action Council.
State Wide and other groups formed the "Senior Outrage Coalition" this month to mobilize protest among the city's 1.3 million citizens aged 65 and over.
"We are of a generation that fought in the sixties," she said. "We're out there doing it again."
City figures show that in 2006, one-fifth of New Yorkers age 65 and older lived in poverty, twice the national average. Advocacy groups say by now it is closer to one-third, and New York is second only to Detroit among major U.S. cities in its rate of poverty among the elderly.
Moreover, the federal poverty guidelines for 2008, $10,400 for a single person and $14,000 for a couple, are so low that many who are in need do not qualify for most public benefits.
Minorities tend to fare worst, with 30 percent of Hispanic, 29 percent of Asian and 20 percent of elderly blacks in poverty compared with 13 percent of elderly whites in New York City.
A formidable crowd despite walkers, canes and wheelchairs, many at the forum vented rage at lavish bonuses being paid on Wall Street.
Richard Gottfried, a state assemblyman, said while they might have been pleased to hear that six top executives at investment bank Goldman Sachs gave up their bonuses last year, the tax on their bonuses alone put $12 million into the state budget in 2007.
"I, like many of you, could do a lot with $12 million," Gottfried said.
(Editing by Patricia Zengerle)

Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
14 Comments so far
Show AllAngry about Medicare Part D that does not help the middle class? You can do something about it.
I have a plan to fix the prescription drug benefit and more.
Get people to Send a free prewritten fax to Sen. Minority leader Mitch McConnell telling him to STOP EVERY REPUBLICAN FILIBUSTER, get the Employee Free Choice act enacted into law, along with single payer universal health care, a fix for the Medicare Prescription drug benefit, a 10 dollar an hour minimum wage, an end to the Iraq war and until that happens you will boycott some Republican campaign contributors.
You can go to http://write-congress.democratz.org and send Mitch McConnell a free prewritten fax. This web site appears completely noncommercial. I don't sell anything there.
We have to hit the friends of the GOP in their wallets. Oh and if you only send your fax, this will fail. You need to get friends to send the fax and have their friends send the free fax and so on.
Thank you!
PS the prewritten fax reads thusly:
Hello
I want the following actions taken
and legislation enacted into law.
Congress and the President must
enact HR 676 single payer universal
health care and set up a new
prescription drug benefit in
Medicare Part B covering 80% of the
cost of all drugs with no extra
monthly premiums, no extra yearly
deductible, no means tests, no
coverage gaps, and remove the means
test for Medicare Part B and until
that happens, I won't buy ANYTHING
from Republican contributor
Rite Aid Pharmacies.
The President must end the war in
Iraq and until that happens
I will not buy any products from
Republican contributor and War
contractor General Electric
Corporation.
Congress and the President must
enact a $10/HR MINIMUM WAGE
into law and until this happens
I will not go to any Republican
contributor Wendy's Restaurants.
In 2008 Brown-Forman of Kentucky,
the maker of Jack Daniels Whiskey
and Southern Comfort gave Mitch
McConnell money for his campaign.
SENATOR McCONNELL MUST NOT
EXECUTE ANY REPUBLICAN
FILIBUSTERS FOR 8 YEARS
DURING THE OBAMA PRESIDENCY
AND MUST GET THE EMPLOYEE
FREE CHOICE ACT ENACTED
INTO LAW AND UNTIL THAT
HAPPENS I WON'T BUY JACK
DANIELS WHISKEY OR SOUTHERN
COMFORT OR ANY OTHER OF THEIR
PRODUCTS.
Thank you.
Counterpunch web site has a great article proposing a tax EXCLUSIVELY on the rich. The money is there. The politicians need to fear us more than their rich friends and patrons (bribers) in order to accomplish this. Otherwise it's back castles, kings, serfs and highwaymen.
I am currently lucky. I am neither retired nor, at the present time, poor--but I will be if things go this way much longer.
For the first time in my 30-year worklife, I was fired last week. I immediately applied for unemployment benefits and today received a ton of paperwork, including 3 appeals I have to make to ensure I’m eligible!
I could hardly believe it! Unemployment has me jumping through hoops to prove I’m worthy enough to receive benefits that will allow me to pay the rent, and extras like food and clothing.
It’s bizarre, obscene, and surreal that anyone should have to go begging. I feel unclean having to prove that I ‘deserve’ benefits. It reminds me of Arlo Gunthrie’s ‘Alice's Restaurant,’ where, in one refrain, he questions having to prove that he’s not a criminal only so he can be drafted into an army where he’s expected to perform the ultimate criminal acts.
I am frightened and distraught. I simply can’t imagine how those less fortunate than me are feeling.
I read about the system in the United States and Compared to Canada it IS like you are some sort of criminal applying for parole.
From what I understand the Employer can "challenge" UI payments to ex employees in the USA. The more they successfully challenge the lower the rate they have to pay.
This has gotten so bad an INDUSTRY has been formed wherein companies have been set up to help these firms challenge ex employees claims for a fee.
Apparently what YOU have to do is pay a fee to some COMPANY to ensure you receive Unemployment Insurance you should be entitled to.
While I have not had to apply myself up here in Canada, I did look into it several months ago when it looked like Our jobs might be lost and it was relatively straightforward and could all be done online.
That said I must admit I have not gone through the entire process in Canada for some time and crossing my fingers that I do not have to.
Best of luck to you.
When I was a kid in school, I remember the teachers explaining why the rich were rich. They'd say that the rich would invest their money, and because they took this risk that they would make money on the money they put in, they deserved the profits. Later, I remember Ronnie Reagan talking on the boob tube, saying that the profits that the wealthiest Americans made would be reinvested, and so that would help the economy, and trickle down to the rest of us. Today, that thoughtful understanding of why a few are raking in the dough while the rest of us are slipping down, down, down, extends to those who work on Wall Street -- the money managers, too.
Somehow, no one ever mentions how the average Joe or Jane, also take risks which benefits the economy. Take for example the couple who risk getting married and having chilren, risking that GranMa, or the neighbor down the street will be in good enough health to babysit while they both put in 40 hours a week at work. Or the risk that many men take working in public works that their hearts won't give out before the kids grow up. Which brings us to another risk we folks at the bottom take: that we willingly pay Social Security taxes believing that the government will take care of our money so that when we retire we will have it to live on, or that our survivors will be helped with the survivor benefits. That's a lifetime of investing, not a get rich quick scheme.
The point that I would like to make here is that the old arguments about how the rich deserve to stay rich at our expense no longer impress me, and I bet they don't impress many others as well.
In New York another equally empty argument on behalf of the rich is that NY cannot tax the rich and non rich according to their wealth (or lack of it)because the rich would leave for other states where the tax rates would be more favorable to them. I don't believe it. And just in case I am wrong, I say good riddance, we will get along without you just fine!
I'd bet New York didn't see a penny of those 12 million in taxes, thanks to all the tax haven tricks available to the rich.
TAX THE RICH!!! Why should one person have more wealth than can be spent by that person and future generations of that family when others in our nation are in dreadful poverty without a home or enough food to eat? In California our state government is broke and is cutting all kinds of programs and today are sending out layoff notices to thousands of state employees---all because the legislature will not raise the taxes. Our government is more concerned with the wealthy being able to continue their standard of living. You've heard about trickle down, haven't you? The rich get all the money and don't get taxed on it because they can buy a yacht and hire someone to clean the bottom once in a while.
We need to tax the wealth. Anyone with over $5 million dollars should pay a wealth tax that is progressive. The more they have the more they pay. This money paid to the government can be used to fully fund all the needed programs that are being cut, as well as have funds to repair and maintain our infrastructure.
Why put more people out of work and have more poor elderly people suffering while the rich wallow in wealth with a personal trainer to rub their back? We also need a sales tax on all that stock market dealing.
TAX THE RICH!!
The destruction of America's society is progressing just as the ChristoFascists planned.
My Medicare D copay just increased 75%. Trust is shattered and hope is gone...
New York City once imposed a tax of one penny per share on all stock trades (repealed by Adolph Giuliani). It should be reinstated, but I doubt Mayor Bloomberg is the man for the job.
As a senior citizen myself, I tremble when I think about what has happened and what is Yet To Come. Certainly the Republicans are Not Concerned about the elderly poor. They WOULD like to see the end of Social Security and all programs to help the poor and ailing. I don't foresee any real assistance in helth care or costs. We crumble, we die, good riddance. Our loss will be mourned only by those who love us. In Peace may we rest.
Think Tanks, wealthy investors and the Republican party are trying to gut these entitlement programs.
Count on it. They in essence want to STEAL all those FICA taxes paid in order to Finance tax cuts to the wealthiest.
This "deficit" is one of the deficits the CIA and other Government agencies refuse to count when they are measuring debt as a portion of GDP. They claim they owe it to themselves so it does not count.
Which is rubbish. They have spent these monies to finance other programs and they will HAVE to make up for the shortfalls via more taxes and or GUT SS and medicare.
"Maybe I'll move in with you," she jokes to her friend Alice Jordan, 80, a retired teacher who suffers from osteoporosis and high blood pressure.
I think a part of the problems faced by the elderly today, problems of poverty as well the same lack of support and caring experienced by many people who live alone, is the dissolution of the extended family.
I agree with you Morticia .Families working together would go along way to adress alot of the problems in the way we live.One thing i can say about our system is it hones the worst qualities in a human being .PEOPLE Not shareing creates more markets for our corporate masters and industrial priest.
Exactly and not by chance either. I've noticed , well it's pretty blatent really, that advertisng over the past fifteen years has pushed a "don't share" and "spoil yourself" line.
Of course, the underclass continues to live in inadequate shared housing like it always has. But we don't talk about that.
The horror is that the working poor and middle classes might have to reconsider how they live. oh noes