Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Green Jobs Plans Could Solve 'Twin Crises'
NEW YORK - Worldwide efforts to overcome the current economic crisis will require more spending on green industry, which will also help slow and possibly reverse the impending climate crisis, say two new studies released this week.
Green jobs at the crossroads. Worldwide efforts to overcome the current economic crisis will require more spending on green industry, which will also help slow and possibly reverse the impending climate crisis, say two new studies released this week. (Image: treehugger.com)
"It's time for a bailout for the environment: one that creates jobs, is
global in scope, and can help rebuild communities amidst the ashes of
the current economic crisis," said Michael Renner, co-author of the
latest report, entitled "Green Jobs: Working for People and the Environment."
Statistical analysis in the report released Wednesday shows that currently nearly 200 million people in the world have no work to make their ends meet. These numbers are likely to increase further if governments fail to adopt innovative ways to tackle the current economic crisis.
"Green jobs are not only about renewable energy," said Sean Sweeney and Jill Kubit of Cornell University's Global Labor Institute, who co-authored the study commissioned by the nonprofit Worldwatch Institute, an environmental think tank.
The report's authors say that, in China alone, renewable energy technologies employ no less than 1 million people in the wind, solar, and biomass industries. But several other economic sectors, such as construction businesses, transportation systems, agriculture, and basic industry also have the potential to create many jobs that would help reduce carbon emissions to protect the environment.
Retrofitting Europe's residential buildings in order to cut carbon emissions by 75 percent, for example, could lead to more than 2 million new jobs in the next two decades, according to the report, which notes that the construction sector currently employs about 111 million people worldwide.
The report's authors also see "huge potential" for green jobs in efforts to grow public transportation systems. The report's findings show that in the United States and Europe, there are already about 1.2 million people employed in this sector.
According to the report, worldwide, more than 40 percent of steel output and one-quarter of aluminum production is based on recycled scrap, rendering the estimated quarter million jobs in these two sectors at least "a shade of green."
The researchers also note that recycling programs create as many as 15 million jobs worldwide, but they often entail "dirty, undesirable, poorly paid, and even dangerous work, particularly in developing countries." In Brazil, however, over 90 percent of recyclable material is collected by scrap collectors who have organized themselves into a national movement with 500 cooperatives and 60,000 collectors, the researchers said.
Researchers cite a study on more than 1,000 organic farms in Britain and Ireland showing that organic farms employed on average one-third more employees per farm than conventional counterparts.
The authors note that over 1 billion people depend on agro-forestry for subsistence and income, particularly in Africa, Asia, and Latin America. They hold that planting trees on agricultural land provides multiple environmental benefits and can raise farm incomes.
A study released by the environmental group Greenpeace International and the European Renewable Energy Council (EREC) early this week offered similar conclusions.
The report, entitled, "Energy [R]evolution: A Sustainable World Energy Outlook," shows that aggressive investment in renewable power and energy efficiency can create a $360-billion-a-year industry, provide half of the world's electricity, and slash $18 trillion in future fuel expenditures -- while protecting the climate.
"Unlike other energy scenarios that promote energy futures at the cost of the climate, our energy revolution scenario shows how to save money and maintain global economic development without fuelling catastrophic climate change," said Sven Teske, co-author of the report. "All we need to kick start this plan is bold energy policy from world leaders."
Energy efficiency will have to be a major component of those policies, he said, if carbon emissions are to decrease while global energy use inevitably increases. In Teske's view, strict energy efficiency standards make "sound economic sense" because they can help slow down rising global energy demand.
"The energy saved in industrialized countries will make space for increased energy use in developing economies," he said. "With renewable energy growing four-fold not only in the electricity sector, but also in the heating and transport sectors, we can still cut the average carbon emissions per person from today's four tons to around one ton by 2050."
The Greenpeace report suggests that the cost of continued reliance on coal will remain as high as $15.9 trillion until 2030, which is more than what would be required to pay for the renewable solutions proposed in the plan. The authors conclude that these clean energy sources will produce electricity without any additional fuel costs after 2030, while creating millions of jobs and stimulating the global economy.
"The global market for renewable energy can grow at double-digit rates until 2050, and overtake the size of today's fossil fuel industry. Currently, the renewable energy market is worth $70 billion and doubling in size every three years," said Oliver Schafer, EREC policy director. "Because of economies of scale, renewable energies, such as wind power at good sites, are already competitive with conventional power."
Schafer thinks that after 2015, renewable sources across all sectors will be the most cost effective. "The renewable industry is ready and able to deliver the needed capacity to make the energy revolution a reality," he added in a statement. "There is no technical impediment, but a political barrier to rebuild the global energy sector."
John Passacantando, executive director of the Greenpeace chapter in the United States, agrees.
"Countries like China and India are well placed to take the enormous investment opportunity presented by the energy revolution," he said. "It would be short-sighted for them to focus on fossil fuels to power their rapid economic growth. The energy revolution is key to them climate proofing their development."
While there is significant untapped economic potential in the green jobs sector, not all news is good.
According to the Worldwatch report, green jobs are "still an exception" in most developing countries, which account for some 80 percent of the world's workforce, and where nearly 500 million people still earn no more than $1 a day.
Other issues that concerned researchers include the rising level of informality in the global economy, a lack of rules and standards to help ensure decent jobs, and the fact that environmental costs are too often externalized, making it harder for green enterprises to compete.
"Given all of the uncertainties in today's world, it's time for a bold commitment and international cooperation to promote green economies that support conservation, low carbon technologies, recycling, and local communities," said Renner. "I can't see how we'll escape our twin economic and environmental crises if we don't."
- Posted in



10 Comments so far
Show AllInventors are your seed corn. A green movement that doesn't support its inventors is only consuming itself.
Please fund green inventors. They need minimum wage. To see what inventors go through, see "Flash of Genius" before it's gone.
thank god for green energy, because i can't watch tv or use my computer without electricity, and I'm too fat to do anything else...we'll all still have houses and jobs and refrigerators and washers and dryers and and ipods and movies and sports teams and cars and huge wardrobes and everything, and the world's lands and oceans will be filled with lush vegetation and diverse animal populations?...and all those poor developing nations will be able to grow up to be just like us?...
I don't think it will really play out that way...
the world is a crime syndicate, run via corrupt national governments, funded by individual consumptive behavior (legal and illegal) and taxes, and maintained by intellectual and financial dishonesty and large-and-small-scale violence...individual relenquishing (willing and non) of the inherent rights and responsibilities that accompany birth has led to unquestioning and throttling dependence upon corporations for survival and pseudo-experts for direction...keys to any sustainable change will be the reclaiming by individuals of their inherent rights and responsibilities for the well-being, not only of their own minds and bodies, but of all living things...humans have natural energy, mental and physical, that they must learn to understand and control, directing and releasing this energy in non-destructive ways...'inventing', 'developing', etc., are euphemisms for destructive industrial activity, which this planet, or, rather, the living things upon this planet, cannot afford...time to grow up and do without, rather than come up with new ways to continue to do 'with'...electricity must go...
In the wake of human industrial activity, even 'green' activity, swirls toxicity and death...
What would these inventors invent? A Class M planet? Water? A honeybee? Clover?
A tropical island with warm, clear lagoons filled with sealife? A DVD player made of corn?
Hard to do much with electricity, no matter how generated, without copper wire, and lots of it...copper mining results in a fair amount of toxic waste, doesn't it, Montana?
This is a good article about where we have to go if we are to survive as a species, not to speak of other animals and plants. So much of our national wealth has already disappeared down a rabbit hole of weaponry, war, greed and corruption. We have wasted our wealth by the hundreds of billions and have little to show for it.
Jump starting green energy, on the other hand, is the type of excellent investment that government should be making. In this country we must remove all funding restrictions to solar and wind and help them to start as non-profits, municipal companies or independent local profit-making enterprises. The closer the power source to the consumer, the less wiring and chance of failure. Right now, as I understand it, some subsidy laws are written to effectively exclude anyone but those who are already in the energy producing business, ie oil companies.
Green architects and inventors need encouragement and help, not the big-time "connected" real estate developers who put up environmentally thoughtless buildings that will suck air conditioning and heating out of the grid at enormous rates. Manufacturers such as GE and the auto companies have a history of buying up patents (and then not using them) or otherwise suppressing innovation. We cannot let the same thing happen with green ideas.
Green jobs will not solve everything all over the world - they are "still an exception in most developing countries, which account for some 80 percent of the world's workforce, and where nearly 500 million people still earn no more than $1 a day" In those places, green can be part of diversification of the economy and promoting nutritional agriculture (rather than cash crops like poppies, for instance). Poor farmers, villagers and artisans are being held hostage by many factors, including the cost of energy. Cheap clean energy can help solve fundamental problems like water transport and purification.
If we are not always fighting wars for oil, we could unleash such an onslaught of help to these countries. (Or at least leave them the hell alone). There are lots of creative and energetic people in this country and all countries who would be thrilled to direct their efforts toward a peaceful and clean world where people have work, shelter, food and water.
This is what I want.
Joe
The most bang for the buck: Free Public Transportation
.
http://freepublictransit.org
Right on!
Imagine a fleet of electric buses in every major city.
We need to keep writing and calling our representatives, especially when the new batch comes in in January.
David Lindorff argues against conspiracy theories in an article posted today. But the impediment for "green jobs" once again is the elite conspiracy of class war aggression against the people. The elite conspiracy is to secure wealth, power and control over the society. A shell of a democracy remains but the elites get around that by manipulating the public's tastes through the media. The public is caught between the manipulation and their own common sense. The 'twin crises' created by the elites have plenty more siblings. We deal with all the crises when we vote our own better interests in all of our exchange/association.
One of the elites' manipulations involves the idea that organic farming requires more labor than conventional farming. The elites manipulated the public into driving down costs by reducing labor in their businesses. The elites claimed that in order to compete in the global marketplace, American farmers had to replace labor with all the fossil-fueled capital-intensive material inputs. With the socialist element purged from the society, and a conspiracy to push fossil consumption growth in place, the human tendency to build machines and systems took off like mad. "Welcome to the machine."
We can't change direction by continuing to fight the elites' fires. They set too many, too fast, and they're too large and too destructive. Instead, the left has to get off the firetruck (a sort of gravy train in itself) and decide to limit the influence of elites on the society in a general way. Take a look at other societies. The successful ones put strict controls on the elites.
This article is pure malarkey. Greening industry now will actually speed climate change. This is because we have passed the tipping point. Use commondreams search feature to find "ice age". Read the top article.
Goto FlashEarth.com and view the north pole. There's nil sea ice there now. Which means the oceans have been diluted which means the situation with the Southern Ice cap having reached unprecedented proportions is going to become even stronger as the ocean current is slowed by the lesser salinity of the ocean water.
Once this industrial carbon sinks, we're heading hard into an ice age and quick.
These are the real solutions:
Veganism (Animal food producting is costly to the environment and hugely wasteful. It requires 5000 gallons of fresh water to produce just 1 pound of beef, 16 pounds of wheat to produce 1 pound of beef, causes dessertification, not to mention factory farming is torturous to the animals...)
Direct Democracy (like how the constituion was established only every day then forever).
Calorie Economics (which means human effort MUST be repaid in HUMAN EFFORT, eliminating the means to game people by cash or material.)
Thermal Depolymerization (The ability to recycle literally anything by feeding it through a pressure boiling process.)
Raised Field Agriculture (Lost Ancient Agricultural system that delivers crop yields on par with modern agriculture which though is sustainable, not environmentally damaging by chemical fertilizer and pesticide.)
Wind Power (Wind energy over America if well enough harnessed could offer 2X the energy that America consumes from all sources today. This does not account for Skyrise Wind Turbines which is my very own invention that I can not find the least help to bring to market.)
Geothermal Energy (Drill to the mantle, pipe some water to it, use the steam coming off it to spin the magnets past the wire coils of your alternator, voila, electricity.)
Wave, River and Tidal Hydro Power (More magnets spinning past wire coils...)
Conversion of solar energy by Heat Engine (aka Stirling Engine... Incidentally solar by photovoltaic and nuclear and biodiesel and oil from half empty wells ALL require more energy to deliver to market than they could possibly return, thus are energy drains and not in the least energy solutions.)
Brushless Motors for Transport (Electro Magnetic Propulsion can be applied to cars, not just bullet trains. The EM Brushless Motor can be housed in a vehicle, connected to the transmission. They require simply magnets, wire coil, a timer, and a battery. Alongside wind energy, or possibly with a wind turbine on the vehicle or heat engine on the vehicle, such vehicles are entirely practical for human transport needs.)
Maglev Trains (Magnetic Levitation Rail transport is already in use in several industrial nations.)
Regenerative medicine (The use of adult stem cells to grow limbs and damaged tissues and whatever's necessary to repair a person.)
Oxidative Medicine (The use of high levels of oxygen to dissolve ANY organism foreign to the human system.)
Chelation (The removal of heavy metal toxins from the body by EDTA.)
This is a list of every nutrient that people need, you can find vege sources of every of these on my blog www.lamegame.name :
Vitamins
Biotin
Folic Acid
Niacin
Pantothenic Acid
Riboflavin
Thiamin
Vitamin A
Vitamin B6
Vitamin B12
Vitamin C
Vitamin D
Vitamin E
Vitamin K
Minerals
Calcium
Chromium
Copper
Fluoride
Iodine
Iron
Magnesium
Manganese
Molybdenum
Phosphorus
Potassium
Selenium
Sodium (Chloride)
Zinc
Other Nutrients
L-Carnitine
Choline
Coenzyme Q10
Essential Fatty Acids
Lipoic Acid
Phytochemicals
Carotenoids
Chlorophyll & Chlorophyllin
Curcumin
Fiber
Flavonoids
Garlic
Indole-3-Carbinol
Isothiocyanates
Lignans (phytoestrogens)
Phytosterols
Resveratrol
Soy Isoflavones (phytoestrogens)
Amino acids
Alanine
Arginine
Asparagine
Aspartic Acid
Cysteine
Glutamic Acid
Glutamine
Glycine
Histidine
Isoleucine
Lysine
Methionine
Phenylalanine
Proline
Serine
Threonine
Tryptophan
Tyrosne
Valine
rocyahsoul@yahoo.com
www.lamegame.name
Daniel Vincent Kelley
Its actually 3 crises: greenhouse gases, energy independence, and jobs.
The government needs to organize and finance this. Its no different from airports, levees, dredging, interstate highways, dams, the military...
Let's get started, Mr. Obama.
Thank goodness there is another enthusiastic comment on this article. And I agree - a green jobs program, well implemented, could be a triple blessing. And while we are talking, all the other things you mentioned need some fixing up too.
As for the military, I would like to fire Blackwater, Haliburton and all the overpaid no-bid contractors. We need to use that money wisely to train young US soldiers and civilians to do heroic jobs that can serve them well all their lives, like building green, setting up energy systems, rescuing and rebuilding after disasters, creating water systems and helping to start responsible agricultural programs. I believe such programs will build on the international good will we are likely to get from electing Obama and keep us safer. We should not blow another opportunity like we did after 911. I know we don't deserve good will, but we could start trying to earn it.
Joe
Thanks. Its time for a completely new governmental focus.