Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Lawsuit to Ask That Cheney's Papers Be Made Public
Months before the Bush administration ends, historians and open-government advocates are concerned that Vice President Cheney, who has long bristled at requirements to disclose his records, will destroy or withhold key documents that illustrate his role in forming U.S. policy for the past 7 1/2 years.
Vice President Cheney has said he does not have to make his papers public after leaving office because he is not part of the executive branch. A lawsuit to be filed today says they are covered under the 1978 Presidential Records Act. (By Alberto Pellaschiar -- Associated Press) In a preemptive move, several of them have agreed to join the advocacy group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington in asking a federal judge to declare that Cheney's records are covered by the Presidential Records Act of 1978 and cannot be destroyed, taken or withheld without proper review.
The group expects to file the lawsuit today in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. It will name Cheney, the executive offices of the president and vice president, and the National Archives and chief archivist Allen Weinstein as defendants.
The goal, proponents say, is to protect a treasure trove of information about national security, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, domestic wiretapping, energy policy, and other major issues that could be hidden from the public if Cheney adheres to his view that he is not part of the executive branch. Extending the argument, scholars say, Cheney could assert that he is not required to make his papers public after leaving office. Access to the documents is crucial because he is widely considered to be the most influential vice president in U.S. history, they note.
"I'm concerned that they may not be preserved. Whether they've been zapped already, we don't know," said Stanley I. Kutler, an emeritus professor and constitutional scholar at the University of Wisconsin Law School.
Former vice president Walter F. Mondale, whose papers are being declassified and shipped to the Minnesota Historical Society, said the fate of Cheney's records bears watching.
"I think you'd have to be very worried about it," said Mondale, who is not a party to the lawsuit. "Under Bush and Cheney, they've used every opportunity to assert executive privilege."
Cheney has not disclosed his plans for his papers, nor has he argued publicly that any are exempt from the 1978 law. Congress passed the law after the Watergate scandal to ensure that the country's highest elected officials preserve their papers for public review.
"The Office of the Vice President currently follows the Presidential Records Act and will continue to follow the requirements of the law, which includes turning over vice presidential records to the National Archives at the end of the term," Cheney spokesman Jamie Hennigan said in an e-mail.
Kutler and others, including the American Historical Association and the Society of American Archivists, are not reassured. Their lawsuit contends that President Bush sought to improperly narrow the scope of the records law in a 2001 executive order that declares, in part, that the statute "applies to the executive records of the Vice President."
Scholars say "executive records" is a term that is not found in the original act, and that seemingly opens the door to withholding some documents on the grounds that they are "non-executive" records -- legislative records, for instance. It raised red flags because Cheney has frequently argued that his office is not part of the executive branch but rather is "attached" to the legislative branch by virtue of the vice president's role as president of the Senate.
"I think this has been in the works since then, but nobody really focused on it," said Anne Weismann, chief counsel for the ethics group.
The group wants the Archives to abandon its interpretation that legislative records of vice presidents are personal property and not covered by the presidential records law.
Gary M. Stern, general counsel for the Archives, said he has shared the group's concerns with the White House.
"We have no reason to think that anything will happen differently with this vice president than has happened with any other," Stern said, "which is, the records that they create in their White House office and with their White House staff will come to us as vice presidential records under PRA."
Former vice president Al Gore's papers, for instance, are maintained at an Archives facility in Washington, he said.
Martin J. Sherwin, a history professor at George Mason University and a plaintiff in the case, said it will be impossible to measure Cheney's influence without access to the records.
"It horrifies me as a citizen to think our government can operate in total secrecy during the administration and then, after the administration, remain in secrecy," he said.
For years, Cheney has resisted revealing any aspect of the inner workings of his office; he has shielded information such as the names of industry executives who advised his energy task force, his travel costs and details, and Secret Service logs of visitors to his office and residence. Since 2003, his office has refused to comply with an executive order requiring entities in the executive branch to file annual reports on their possession of classified data, at one point blocking an inspection by officials from the Archives.
The Presidential Records Act, inspired by Nixon's attempt to withhold from Congress and perhaps destroy some of his records and tapes after Watergate, first applied to the Reagan administration. For the first time, it provided for the preservation of vice presidential records.
The law established a process for providing public access to presidential and vice presidential records through the Freedom of Information Act, beginning five years after an administration ends. Presidents and vice presidents can restrict access to certain records, notably those involving national security, for up to 12 years.
Archives officials say they have met with White House staff members to discuss the records transfer. The agency has leased a 60,000-square-foot building near Dallas to archive records temporarily until Bush's presidential library is completed at Southern Methodist University.
"There have been no red flags that have gone up for us about records-management procedures and getting ready to turn records over to us," said Susan Cooper, an Archives spokeswoman.
Joel K. Goldstein, a constitutional scholar and expert on the vice presidency at the St. Louis University School of Law, said Cheney faces a tough sell if he argues that many of his documents are not "executive records."
"When a vice president is sitting there in the West Wing and participating at the highest levels in the work of the executive branch, and when the main reason somebody like Vice President Cheney wants to be vice president is to help drive the car, it's a little bit anomalous to say you're not part of the executive branch," said Goldstein, who is not part of the lawsuit.
Staff writer Lyndsey Layton contributed to this report.
- Posted in



28 Comments so far
Show All"Lawsuit to Ask That Cheney's Papers Be Made Public"
Good luck with that !! What are you guys smoking ? Cheney 'makes' the law. which universe do you guys live in ??
A waste of time for a nation that believes the Government's
lies about the false flag attacks of 11 Sept 2001.
This is essential if we are to go forward with our democracy. If we don't go back and correct the outrageous and illegal practices of this administration we simply cannot move ahead with any self-respect. Cheney breaks the law, he does'nt make it. He may have vamboozled the system for a time while in power but so does a common criminal, a con-man, a thief. Eventually they mess up and have to pay for it. There is an enormous task ahead just to right the wrongs of his work on the dark side and the sooner we start the sooner we are done. Also, if McBush gets in, these guys are not only free, they will be enshrined in some family values museum forever. If Obama gets in, maybe, just maybe he will reconstitute the justice department and they will awaken to their lawyerly duties and make this right.
Jeevee
Exactly right, Robert.
I second that. It takes work to prosecute enormous crimes like fraud, mass murder and violations of the Constitution on an unprecedented scale. Of course and so what. No excuses.
Moves to save the records will result in having those records for prosecution or in being able to prosecute Cheney for destroying the records contrary to a court order.
If Obama gets in the most important appointment will be Attorney General. How about someone with integrity, intelligence and a passion for justice. (Wow - that sounds so quaint!)
Joe
Fat. Chance. Ever heard of Executive Privilege?
SHRED, BURN, and FLUSH!!! Anyone interested in sub-leasing 60,000 square feet of warehouse near Dallas?
this is a righteous suit as we know what kind of chicanery cheney evokes from the sump pump where he lives, flanked by his heart attack team
this could be the basis of the war crimes charges he will eventually face and so richly deserves
one would like to think there are "crimes against humanity" charges in the offing but it is not entirely clear that cheney is even human
he looks a lot like a reptilian shape shifting alien if you ask me
cheers, b
bryanD sez: "he looks a lot like a reptilian shape shifting alien if you ask me"
***
Dude, that seems like a rather harsh take on reptilian shape shifting aliens.
If the American People really had the paperwork on Cheney's work it would be helpful in proving the murder, corruption and treason charges that can and should be leveled on him after he leaves office. The fact that this monster will walk the streets is a travesty of justice. Unfortunately, the paper shredder is probably already going at a steady pace. This is one shrewd guy. History will take care of him, though, even if we never gain access to his paper-trail of tears.
Cheney's papers made public? You must be joking.....:)
Cheney's papers should be made public the day after the Clinton's papers and Michelle and Barack Obama's dissertations papers are made public. I am more concerned with the future than I am the past
Future? What future? We ain't got no stinking future after Dick Cheney.
billiam1 has got it exactly right.
All of these comments are "right on target".
Mr. Cheney and Mr. Bush, nor any of the others could be required to furnish any information even if a suit could be made against them, under the present system here in place in the USA.
However, if they both---along with the rest of the administration are charged with war crimes, based on their own conduct and the information they have provided already, i.e. interviews and broadcasts etc.; they will start to sell each other down the tubes to save their own worthless lives------------and there will be no more secrets kept by these criminals.
The recognized authority already exists. The court is in place, out of jurisdiction of the US sphere of influence. The people of the USA could make history and at the same time live up to their own "mantra" of being a "Nation of Laws" with "law abiding citizens". They could seize the "suspects", lock them up until the World court could take custody---or take them to the Hague in Air Force One, which would be sweet justice for the world to witness---and the USA would immediately move into a true leadership position; and lead the world with integrity. The world would start immediately to emulate that example----how wonderful a planet would that be? To be dominated by justice and integrity, by a true world power-----the United States of America.
Or, they could continue to play these games and make a mockery of themselves---show themselves to be a true "rogue nation"---unworthy of trust or respect---and become what history will some day no doubt use as a "Negative Example".
"If your heart is pure and your intentions are honorable you will have the strength of ten--- if not----you will melt like a snowflake on a stone warmed by the sun."
They're long gone. Jail him pre-emptively.
Screw his paper, it's obvious to anyone with brain cell that he's one of the greatest criminal masterminds in history. What more needs to be said?
The only thing about Cheney I'd like to see publicized at this point is him swinging from a gallows.
No, don't hang Cheney. Drawn and quartered on live TV would be better. I'd watch
So ?
What a farce.
Cheney being asked to hand over his paperwork! Does nobody understand executive privilege? Executive privilege (for eight years now) has given the vice president the power to do whatever he wants - including declaring himself not part of the executive - when it suits him.
Anyone considering "demanding" anything of Cheney should remember Harry Whittington - a friend of Mr. Cheneys.
Having been shot in the face and chest by the vice-president, (the 78 year old) Whittington decided his best course of action would be to go to CNN and publicly apologise to the VP - for getting shot in the face.
doesn't that tell you anything?
Dick, one of the most aptly named persons in politics.....I'm just waiting for his battery to fail.
Short of either throwing him in the can or strapping him to a chair, nothing will bother this thick-skinned motherf~!@#er.
Cheney flack Hennigan sez: "The Office of the Vice President currently follows the Presidential Records Act and will continue to follow the requirements of the law, which includes turning over vice presidential records to the National Archives at the end of the term."
***
Here's the money shot in the article, kids. Narrow your focus (as the Dick will) to the words "vice presidential records".
Since he has never performed a single function as "vice president," he will be required to turn over nothing. The records of his actions as K Street Don and international agent provocateur will never see the light of day.
The perfect term to describe Dick Cheney is "eminance grise." Cursory research will reveal that it is not english: it was a term invented by the French to describe Cardinal Richelieu (the villain of Alexandre Dumas' "Three Musketeers," who was an actual historical figure). Like the notorious french cardinal, Cheney is the despised power behind the throne that was occupied by an patrician idiot. Like Richelieu, Cheney has done much to centralize power within the executive branch, and has done so with Machiavellian rigor. The reason as to why Cheney wants his papers to disappear is vanity, as he would make a great villain in any bit of future literature. There is also the remote possibility that his papers could be used against him in any prosecution should any future administration decide to do the right thing and prosecute him. Unfortunately, that appears most likely to be confined to works of fiction.
Robert Wales and NativeSon - I second your proposals.
Democrats - It takes WORK to prosecute enormous crimes like fraud, institutionalized kleptocracy, mass murder and violations of the Constitution on an unprecedented scale. Of course, and so what!!! No excuses. No collaboration and abetting masquerading as nicey nice cooperation.
NOTHING COULD BE MORE IMPORTANT THAN RESTORING DEMOCRACY TO ITS (ADMITTEDLY IMPERFECT) PREVIOUS STATE.
Moves to save the records will result in having those records available for prosecution or in being able to prosecute Cheney for destroying the records contrary to a court order. The whole world knows he is a criminal, but paper goes much further than opinion in court.
If Obama gets in, the most important appointment will be Attorney General. How about someone with integrity, intelligence, a work ethic and a passion for justice. (Wow - that sounds so Frank Capra quaint!)
Joe
Cheney is a traitor. He's going to waste alot of money on security to avoid getting tarred and feathered for a long time to come. No wonder they pushed so hard for the FISA crap.... they want to get the heads up before the citizens mob marches on his castle.
Has there ever been a bigger traitor to The Constitution?
The truly disgusting part is that Cheney will live out his days as a very wealthy man, protected by our Secret Service and adored by the oligarchs. Instead of his deserving fate of a fair trial, prison, then a firing squad.
On the context of Cheney destroying documents...
An OPEN Government must have the information to be self correcting. Cheney is the antithesis of open government.
In the hopes of promoting a reaction by the People of this Nation that would reflect an effective answer to the collective shame that many are experiencing.
I would suggest that Native Son is correct.
There are many avenues that the defendants in this case (just a few "leaders") could use to prevent the subpoena of these documents. They would indeed produce them and anything else demanded of them in a DEFENSE at their trial (s) for War Crimes under the established world authority. That these people are members of this society, and ostensibly under the protection of the Secret Service even after they leave office is of little concern. If for example the Secret Service were to refuse to render into custody these defendants for transport to the Hague for trial they could be ordered to by the next president in office.
If on the other hand, the established order decided to make this a partisan political matter and not surrender these defendants; the people could act on their own authority and deliver them.
This would indeed inform the world that the United States of America and "most" its citizens are law abiding members of the world community. If the American people do not take the appropriate action, that is action they would and have demanded from other nations under the same conditions in the past; they will loose all credibility most likely for all time.
They have already lost much of that as it is. How much longer will the world tolerate such behavior. Who will not fear the United States when they remember that at one time, the people that they are waging war upon now were once their allies?
Suppose just for a moment that the other world powers gathered in conference and taking into consideration the behavior of the United States in the past sixty years decide that they themselves may be at risk of incurring the wrath of the Americans? Would it not be foolish of them to act upon those very realistic fears? Could the United States stand against the world? Most likely alone?
I do not believe so.