Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Time For Climate Activists to Get Tough
Have we failed to slow global warming pollution in part because climate and environmental activists have been too polite and well behaved? Is it time to take to the streets, express some outrage, maybe engage in a little guerilla warfare against Big Oil and Big Coal?
An activist in arrested during a protest on Copenhagen during the COP15 climate summit.
(Courtesy of JustDoitFilm.com) That’s the message you get in a new documentary film called Just Do It: A Tale of Modern Day Outlaws, which will be released in the U.K. this summer. The film follows the adventures of several British climate activists as they cut through fences and get smacked around by cops in riot gear. The film is selling a kind of moral outrage: Big Oil and Big Coal are wrecking the planet just to turn a profit, and nobody – certainly not mild-mannered treehuggers – is doing anything to stop it. As one activist in the film says: "I want to feel like doing something, rather than nothing, and not just watching the world go to shit."
This question of how far to take the fight to stop global warming has haunted activists for years. But now that more conventional solutions, such as a global treaty to cut greenhouse-gas pollution, are dead, the issue is more pressing than ever. As the crisis grows, the temptation to turn up the volume with more dramatic and attention-grabbing protests will only increase. Climate activists often speculate about who will emerge as the Martin Luther King of the climate movement. But it may be equally relevant to ask who will emerge as the Malcolm X.
Here in the U.S., recent demonstrations have been tame and peaceable. A five-day protest march earlier this month to protest mountaintop-removal coal mining at Blair Mountain in West Virginia, the site of a bloody labor battle in 1921, went off without confrontation. There have been sit-ins in various governors’ offices and rallies at the National Mall in Washington DC and banners hung on smokestacks at coal plants in a number of states and untold numbers of conferences and campus rallies. All these events may or may not be helping to build a broad social movement. But they certainly have not done much to stop the amount of greenhouse gases being dumped into the atmosphere.
This summer looks like more of the same. Earlier this week, organizers sent out a letter to activists to enlist support for an August rally to stop the Keystone XL pipeline from Canada into the U.S. If you care about the fate of the earth’s climate, it’s certainly a worthy target. The pipeline, which will carry 900,000 barrels of carbon-intensive crude from the tar sands into the U.S. each day. In the letter by Bill McKibben, founder of advocacy organization 350.org, who is collaborating with author and farmer Wendell Berry, actor Danny Glover, and NASA climate scientist James Hansen to organize the event, McKibben makes clear that he is asking protestors "to do something hard," which is to come to Washington "in the hottest and stickiest weeks of the summer and engaging in civil disobedience that will quite possibly get you arrested."
Interestingly, organizers are asking demonstrators to ditch Birkenstocks, torn jeans and tie-dyed T-shirts for button-down, business attire. "We need to be able to get across to people who the conservatives are and who the radicals are," McKibben said. "People need to understand how radical it is to change the composition of the atmosphere." By marching in button-downs, rally organizers are clearly borrowing a page from the Mississippi Freedom Riders of the 1960s, who, by arriving in the South as well-dressed, respectable students and citizens, helped expose the moral savagery of the white power establishment.
It may be a shrewd and effective strategy, but inviting a comparison between climate activists and the Freedom Riders only underscores how tame the fight against global warming has been so far. The Freedom Riders proved the power of peaceful action, but they also showed astonishing courage and a willingness to risk their lives to change the world. Buses were firebombed. Some of them were attacked by police dogs. Others were beaten bloody, had bones broken, skulls cracked. But their suffering inspired people. “If those kids are wiling to lay all that on the line, I should be able to screw up at least a little courage in order to support the movement,” one person says in Breach of Peace, Eric Etheridge’s excellent book of portraits of Freedom Riders.
So far, the fight against global warming has been conspicuously lacking in inspiration, perhaps in part because it has been conspicuously lacking in people who are willing to lay it on the line. Maybe the movement is still young or maybe the enemy is too diffuse. Or maybe we just like the idea of living on a hotter planet.

42 Comments so far
Show AllIn the article you cited, Jeffrey St. Clair writes about "Greenpeace executives in Britain", but then mentions "Stephen Tisdale, then director of Greenpeace UK". It is actually Stephen Tindale, former Executive Director of Greenpeace, UK. I wrote about Tindale and other former Greenpeace members who sold out, such as Patrick Moore, former Friends of the Earth UK executive director, Charles Secrett, etc. in a comment recently:
http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2011/06/14-4
Alcyon - Jun 14 2011 - 11:08am
(For some reason, the paragraphs are gone now from this comment).
There will be sell-outs in any movement. Pointing to such former member sell-outs and trying to paint the whole organization as sold-out is cheap, to say the least. What do they propose as an alternative? Become closet deniers, while claiming to be a skeptic, like Alexander Cockburn? It is also very strange that this article supposedly is an excerpt from a forthcoming book called "GreenScare: the New War on Environmentalism". If the book is going to have more such mudslinging on the environmental movement, then I think the title is deceptive and dishonest.
Still, great improvements have been made by using the system of law against itself. But the greatest improvements to human society have been made by full-range, all-scale attacks on bad conditions maintained by the Powers in Place.
Read Paul Craig Roberts yesterday "In America, Lawlessness is Now Complete - A World Overwhelmed by Western Hypocrisy": http://www.counterpunch.org/roberts06292011
Yeah, and get declared a terrorist organization. Just ask ALF and ELF.
When enough disobedience overloads the information-gathering and warrant serving capacity of the local police/FBI/DHS, then we may have a "war" on our hands.
President John F. Kennedy
I agree blueskykate.
I don't think that the sabotage of systems that are inherently harmful to Life can fairly be called violence, as long as those actions don't directly cause preventable injury or death.Actually, I think it qualifies as self defense.
We need to fight to get poorer, on average.
We need less extremes of affluence, less consumption, fewer people, have less economic growth (optimum 1.3 % annually as target, as extension of the human natural organic growth/decay), less stress, more harmony, more peace, more happiness and more sense of being one human tribe together on this planet of - as we've fairly recently discovered - limited resources.
We need to demand less bustle and more non-consumptive forms of enjoyment.
We must establish sustainable shared happiness at our core - as individuals, societies and species - and continously reflected in our public discourse.
Materially we must use without using up.
No more distractions, only good actions.
We really need to fight hard now, every which way we can. - That includes clever, brute force against violence.
Or forced to commit suicide.
The enemy is indeed too diffuse. This is a point that SO MANY people skip right past. All those who enable the system and those who would actively defend the system, all those who are pursuing various selfish ends that are clearly against the common welfare and sustainability, all those who are addicted to various wasteful, mindless activities and forms of consumption - ALL of these constitute the enemy that is diffuse, because they can be living right in your neighborhood, working alongside, or be even family or relatives. For them, climate change is just another news story, and if the story happens to take more than a few minutes on the idiot box, there's always the remote control.
"Time For Climate Activists to Get Tough"? Absolutely. But it's also time for EVERYONE to become a climate activist. At the very least, it is time for everyone to stop acting at cross purpose and to stop supporting the system. That is, at the very least.
The very fact that conservative parties get elected in many countries shows that there are LOTS of people who do not give a damn about climate change, and these people constitute half the population in some countries, if not more.
>>"... the fight against global warming has been conspicuously lacking in inspiration, perhaps in part because it has been conspicuously lacking in people who are willing to lay it on the line."<<
If I were an activist and if I see more than half the population that does not give a damn and constitutes the enemy that is diffuse, a part of me would think "why should I risk my life when these people are not willing to make even the tiniest sacrifice?". But then, I would have to think about the other people in other parts of the world who would suffer the most, even though their particular contribution to this crisis is disproportionately small.