EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Deepwater Horizon: Conservationists Warn of 'True Catastrophe' for Wildlife
Oil drifting ashore along the Gulf of Mexico coastline will affect key breeding grounds for seabirds as well as fisheries, wildlife bodies say
Oil that drifts ashore will impact on important breeding grounds for seabirds and many other species, according wildlife experts. Oyster and lobster fisheries could also be badly hit.
Pelicans on their nests, and other shore birds, with an orange containment boom behind them, are seen Friday, April 30, 2010 on Breton Island, La.
(AP Photo/Alex Brandon) "It seems to me yet another man-made environmental tragedy on our hands," said Martin Spray, chief executive of the UK Wildfowl and Wetlands Trust. "The coast of Louisiana has about 40% of the US coastal wetlands so it's a seriously important area. These are incredibly important for their fisheries as well, so there are human livelihoods involved as well."
"The terrible loss of 11 workers may be just the beginning of this tragedy as the oil slick spreads toward sensitive coastal areas vital to birds and marine life and to all the communities that depend on them," said Melanie Driscoll, a conservation director based in Louisiana for the US National Audubon Society (NAS). "For birds, the timing could not be worse - they are breeding, nesting and especially vulnerable in many of the places where the oil could come ashore."
Efforts to stop the oil before it reached shore may not be enough, she said. "We have to hope for the best, but prepare for the worst, including a true catastrophe for birds."
Chris Mann of the Pew Environment Group said: "The Exxon Valdez oil spill provided a mass of scientific data on how oil affects marine life, ecosystems, coastal communities, fisheries and subsistence economies – the effects extend far beyond the inevitable photographs of seabirds, marine mammals and fish covered in oil."
Important bird habitats at risk in the Gulf of Mexico include Chandeleur Islands, Gulf Islands National Seashore in Louisiana and Mississippi and the Active Delta in Louisiana.
The brown pelican, the state bird of Louisiana, nests on islands in the Gulf of Mexico and its breeding season has already started this year. The NAS said many pairs are already incubating eggs. Other species at risk include terns and gulls that nest on the beach, including the Caspian tern, royal tern, laughing gull and the black skimmer. These birds roost on the beaches and also plunge into the water to feed on fish and other marine life. They are therefore at risk from oil on the surface of the water or if it washes ashore.
Similarly, the American oystercatcher, Wilson's plover and snowy plover feed on invertebrates on the beach and could find their sources of food at risk if oil ends up on their sands.
Ocean-dwelling birds such as the magnificent frigatebird could also be affected by oil on the surface of the water that could damage their feathers.
Migratory birds such as plovers and sandpipers are currently on their way from wintering grounds in South America to their breeding grounds near the Arctic. They usually rest and refuel in the Gulf of Mexico on their long journey across the world.
If the oil flows east, it will encounter the seagrass beds that form a key habitat for manatees, among other species.
Carl-Gustaf Lundin, head of the marine programme at the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) told the BBC: "If you've got seagrass beds badly contaminated, clearly the manatees could be seriously affected." Less than 2,500 adult manatees remain in the area and are already at risk from climate change and disturbance by boat traffic.
Mann said that the effects of the Exxon Valdez oil spill in Alaska in 1989 can still be found along the beaches in Prince William Sound more than 20 years after the accident. "And research has shown that polyaromatic hydrocarbons - components of crude oil that are highly resistant to weathering - are also highly toxic to marine life."
The accident could also been seen as a warning for those wanting to drill for oil in the Arctic circle, around Alaska. "With decades of experience in drilling in the gulf, and response equipment nearby, the gulf is one of the 'safest' places to drill," said Mann. "If Deepwater Horizon can happen there, it can certainly happen in the Arctic Ocean, where bitter cold, ice, and extreme wind and wave conditions are everyday facts of life and response equipment would be days or even weeks away."
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

38 Comments so far
Show AllI recall as a kid one of the things that would get us all running outside to take a look, and that when a Pelican was flying over. They are very rare in Alberta and were even then. Goofy looking yet so beautiful.
The sheer diversity of life plummets. One day I suppose there will be naught left but Mosanto corn and Mosanto cattle and Mosanto fish and people will only "see pelicans" in picture books.
Monsanto corn, cattle and fish eaten by Monsanto people.
GwNorth...You forgot...Monsanto "fish strawberries." .... hard as a rock with only a vague memory of strawberry taste! God help us!
Reading about this tragic environmental disaster, my heart is beating too fast, I am nauseous and feel totally helpless. Damn these big corporations!!!!! How dare they ruin the life of all people and creatures on this planet for their obscene endless increasing profits!!!!!
Doomsday is coming for all the U.S. Coastal wildlife and we cannot do a thing?!!!!!! Come on!!!!! All the technology and supposed "State of the Art" equippment and we cannot save this wildlife? Then....nothing is worth anything on this planet! Who cares about stupid crap like profits and buisiness and jobs (which are artificial anyway)....if we can't save Mother Earth and her diversity....we are less then useless!!!!!
Happy May Day by the way....Beltane....sad, that today should bring to memory the fertile life of the Earth....when today the fertile life of the Coasts is being ravaged!!!! Like always....Patriarchal, capitalist, corporatist backlash destroys the true beauty of life!
And to top it off, considering the state of the planet and what we have to do to stop the destruction, THEY tell us that their stupid wars and all the waste and destruction that goes with them must continue! Such waste and stupidity - our planet is ruled by the lowest among us, greedy egomaniacs who are traitors to this planet.
Pelicans are just the coolest bird. I have spent a lot of time watching them glide by on the wind or diving for fish off the coast of Florida.
My heart would actually race when we ran out to see these things fly. They look so cool flying...we would all shout out "I can see the pouch I can see the pouch'.
They were fascinating...do children still feel this excitement when seeing creatures of the wild be they Pelicans or moose or bear or coyotes? I found them a heck of a lot more interesting then TV was...
what if everyone upstream of New Orleans all flushed their toilets at precisely the same time . . .
It would draw half of Congress into the Gulf?
Pardon - a moment's freak optimism.
Just a suggestion. Conservation coalitions are putting together lists of cleanup volunteers. Maybe we should be washing cormorants while we're lamenting the stupidity of offshore drilling. This debacle will have Obama's greasy fingerprints all over it, but the birds don't know anything about all of that. I hope those of you within driving distance of the gulf are on your way.
I think volunteering is wrongheaded.
I mentioned a few reasons why I think such action is wrongheaded in a previous CD post of yours under the opensource.or article addressing BP lobbying influence.
In a nutshell: Make them pay for you services. It's going to happen anyway. But going down with the notion to save the wildlife firsthand is idealistic. In reality more people will be sopping up oil and shoveling sand, and scrubbing rocks, and being covered up to your elbows in shit rather than any romantic notion of saving the animals....
So, you might as well get paid to be there. And focus on getting the best pay (1989, we got $16.69/hr 7wk/12hr day); don't settle for less. The risk to the labor crews are great, undermining it with free labor doesn't do anyone any good (The work crews are already being assembled....) And if you come down with some illness from being exposed to toxic debris, you can sue the employer contracted by BP to clean up the mess, rather than look to your conservation coalition for compensation.
Didn't think of that chuk-it. Good point.
Thanks for sharing your experience about this. I think there are many reasons why people volunteer for things like this, ranging from idealism (not a dirty word, by the way) to profit. I'm sure the situation on the beaches is far from ideal, and that miles of dewy eyed animal lovers are not sending flocks of grateful egrets back into the skies. In my case it's purely selfish. I'm sitting here on my ass watching a tide of death kill the gulf wetlands, and all I can do is bitch about the government and BP and hope they burn in hell. As I said in my reply to your other post, all I want is to exorcize this feeling of helplessness. I need a seagull and a bar of soap. I don't care about the rest of it.
As you said, BP is calling for volunteers. As far as I'm concerned they can shut down the rest of their operations and put their own employees to work sopping sludge off the beaches. There are other venues. ( http://pascagoulariver.audubon.org/issues-action/oil-spill-efforts ) I think we all contributed to this crime. I'm not feeling real good about my species right now. If I had my way every damn one of us would be down there cleaning that toilet.
(I'm addressing both comments you've made to me in this one thread)...
I'm not challenging your idealism or your individual need to overcome helplessness, but I am challenging the notion volunteerism, which is glamorized with the image of washing oily wildlife, may be unrealistic in this specific example.
A realistic scenario is, if the oil spill is on any scale like Valdez, the coastal areas will be covered in oily debris. Your sense of helplessness will be challenged when standing on a mile long stretch of coast up to mid-calf in oil. The heroic image of singling out the living bird is dependent on you specifically looking for it in a sea of oil when so much of the rest of us would simply be trying to contain the messy goo from sucking the life out of the shorelines and estuaries....(and honestly, many are simply there for money...)
I too wanted to save the animals when Exxon spilled its goo all over coastal areas were I grew up. But all the "important" jobs were taken by "important" people. I wouldn't come to understand until years later, that very few animals were saved. The oily bird clean up crews spent more time "tagging and bagging". Even such morbid data collection, in reflection, might have held more meaning than what I was tasked. At least these animals were being recorded.
I was there and saw a massive oil disaster first hand. I was overwhelmed and experienced helplessness. I saw the pristine beaches that symbolize so much of what I hold dear, covered in oil. I saw far too many dead animals, and remember becoming angry with myself for becoming upset over a couple of dead puffins when I had seen so many gulls over the course and their deaths didn't register. I remember tidal pools of oil deeper than three feet. (My first memories of the beaches in AK are playing in tidal pools, jumping from rock to rock, a great explorer, each rock representing an island, and the tidal pools were great oceans....) In 1989, I remember logs too big to move saturated in oil...we'd scrub them down like the big rocks, and move on... No life except for the basic reminder from the breaking surf. I hated it. I ended up scoring a job as a prep cook on a big boat and didn't have to be covered in the stuff anymore. I couldn't see how any of clean up mattered.
Years later, I found competing reports arguing much of the clean up effort had little impact on the overall picture. We were, it appears, but 11k workers fruitlessly swabbing at 11,000,000 gallons of crude.
All these past feelings make me ill, but I also feel it is important to stick it to the oil company as best as we can. And going around on chat forums reminding people the pay rate was $16.69/hr for low-life contractor hand beach crews in 1989 is paramount. Because right now, the same jobs we did are being offered for $10-12/hr. But if people don't put things into context they have no idea the cost. I realize my conclusions may fly in the face of your idealism. I just think the crews and displaced fishers should get every nickle they can for the hazardous work they are about to take as they witness their beautiful coast suffocate and experience a version of helplessness too.
anyway, I don't think you're being selfish, or are guilty of "sitting on your butt"....I think you're an idealist and this world needs more of us.
anyway, I've rambled enough...peace, voxclamantis.
To second Vox, Thank You Chuk for sharing your experience.
Thank you chuk-it......my heart goes out to you. I understand what you are saying. Idealism is great until you're in the trenches! Then, reality hits like a ton of bricks and you find yourself praying to get out of the sink hole you find yourself in. It must be an endless nightmare to try to help....and then realize....no help is possible! Too late!!! It's already too late for the wildlife unless somehow the oil is prevented from hitting the shore. That is not likely. And anyway, the birds will try to dive for fish.....can you imagine the fish?! Someone however has to clean up this mess....and I agree, let the oil companies take on the task! Those obscene thugs! I would like to see the CEO's calf deep in their oil sludge!
11 workers were blown to smithereens out there too! Some of that may be coming ashore as well.
My comment is based on my own life situation. I realized as I was reading chuk-it's comment, that i felt deeply just like chuk-it said. My work has been in the psychiatric field for the past 23 years. I am semi-retired now and am totally burned out! I went in to the field with high idealistic hopes of "helping." I come out with the realization that very few are actually helped by the "psychiatric system." Like most "systems" we are self perpetuating....we grinde and grinde but rarely put out a cured product. Bless you chuk-it for your attempt and for your reality check. Bless you also voxclamantis...for your idealism and might I suggest you go to an animal shelter of some kind and pet the critters for awhile? My heart is breaking for the wildlife on the coast right now....I cannot even think about it anymore. The eggs, the birds, their wings, their feathers, the fish, the plants, the air, I cannot bear this!
Bless you too, Inanna. And let me assure you that my life is made out of and overflowing with critters. Today all broken hearted people are my friends.
Very glad I went back tonight to read your reply voxclamantis. I am so glad you have critters. All hearts and critters are one heart...really. Peace.
And a splendid ramble it was, chuk. A moving testimonial. If idealism is the diametric opposite of moral numbness I would say that your own idealism has been tempered but not killed by experience. Nice chatting with you.
Alas, there's little point to trying a cleanup until after the well head is shut off. I think history shows that most of the oiled birds don't survive. This Eco-Catastrophy will slosh around the Gulf of Mexico and then go up the East Coast and on to England. BP and Halliburton aren't big enough to pay for the damages.
voxclamantis.....Excellent idea!!!! I hope you are right.....is everyone on the way? I live in Illinois....can't afford to travel there.....wish I could tho. I would do it in a heartbeat if someone paid for my travel expenses.
During the Exxon Valdez oil clean up of 1989, I worked with people from Florida, Louisiana, Texas, Virginia, Washington, Oregon, and foreign countries like Mexico, and even Japan were on the ground working to clean up the oil spill. There were more out of state workers than state workers cleaning up the spill. The crew I worked on had only three people from AK out of 40+ workers, and I was one of them.
So, in a nutshell, someone will pay for the clean up --and that someone shouldn't be you.
My Message to British Petroleum and any other 'Drill Baby Drill' Sacks of Sh*t is you should be WATERBOARDED for what you've done.
I really get sick of people who say "Well, the disaster will pass and everything will get back to normal" -Bull Sh*t, this will cause damage to wildlife and the health of our environment for years to come.
British Petroleum, GO STRAIT TO F*CKING HELL you Scumbags disguised as Human Excrement!!!
I second that emotion.
I find it very odd that no one in the media even cites the date of the rig explosion. It happened April 20! I am writing this on May 2! Doesn't anyone find the U.S. government response time of yet another disaster criminal ... deplorable ... ridiculous ... stupid ... unacceptable ... typical?
Why does our government wait so long to respond to disasters? That's the question everyone should be demanding an answer to.
I was listening to the radio yesterday. I was trying to find a news station. Just so happened to dial onto an NPR station. Scott Simon was asking Dan Schorr about the recent oil rig explosion ... er ... oil spill(?) in the Gulf of Mexico. Blah, blah, blah ... only then to get to (something to the effect) that President Obama is responding quickly ... that he and his administration do not want to make the same mistake Bush and his administration made during Hurricane Katrina.
WTF!
Well ... deja vu all over again!
It just seems to me that we have had such incredible incompetence in our government for so many years that we sit back and accept the incompetence as acceptable.
Where was the Coast Guard on April 20? On the 21st? On the 22nd? On the 23rd? On the 24th? ... you get my drift ...
Do we have an emergency disaster team? Do we have anyone ... anywhere who can immediately assess a situation and call the right shots? Or do we only expect clutch play from athletes? Or the quick, no questions asked or answered, 3 page ransom note Henry Paulson delivered to inform Congress of the impending doom ... when it comes to spending billions and billions and billions of tax payer dollars to bail out the wealthy, the elite, the powerful ... the big bank gangster fraudsters ... the balls to the wall Wall Street gang of theives ...
Response of government to Paulson's ransom note was faster than a speeding bullet ... yeah ... right to the heart of America(U.S.) and Americans(U.S., of the ordinary ... common folk type)! Imagine that! They sure were ready, willing and able to save their own. But when it comes to saving the environment or saving ordinary people's lives ... f??? y?? a?? t?? h???? y?? r??? i? o? ...
In my opinion, the media, the government(including SCOTUS) and corporations should all be replaced with actual human beings ... who have hearts and brains, who can think standing up and can do the right thing.
Demand ... ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE! ECONOMIC JUSTICE! SOCIAL JUSTICE!
YES!!!
Yes! And in Iraq and Afghanistan too.
The point being that this is how cancer spreads. Cancer seems to be human cells but it is alien and destructive. It has to be excised in total along with good tissue. The longer the time it is given to settle in the greater the associated loss of function of the infected body.
The time is at hand. Shakespeare recognised that throughout history peoples have recognised that natural disasters foretell political and social collapse. So Birnam Wood comes to Dunsinane 'because' Macbeth and Lady Macbeth murdered their King Many think this is because God is punishing the miscreants. Well, such is a very naive way of expressing the profound validity, which is that those who live by crooked means simply become incapable of living by honest means and only honest means can deal with natural disasters. Mother Nature accepts no lies.
are the senior management of BP, that is those earning more than 250 K, going to forgo their bonuses for the next 10 years? and contribute this amount to the recovery of the gulf coast?(likely the minimum time for those thousands affected / tourism, fisheries,coastal construction/ to get their livelihoods back, and for nature to recover)
if things go as bizarrely as they have lately, we can expect that BP upper execs will get even bigger bonuses than in the past.
If things go as bizarrely as they have in the USA for some time, we can expect this to be used as an argument to continue the War on Terror; to reinforce the lobby who proclaim War is Peace; to torture more Islamic prisoners; to increase funding to the buccaneer banks, and of course much, much more.
This sound a bit nuts but only a little thought shows it is not difficult to understand. The US citizen mourns birds and ecosystems that die on their shores and US armed forces do as they wish in Afghanistan.
Come to think of it it is not so far fetched to believe that this is precisely why the 'BP upper execs' will get a bonus.
The point of this is that open absurdity necessarily destroys all validity: Twin Towers, Kennedy assassinations, wars in Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan, even Pearl Harbour. Now Now! Don't shoot the messenger. The USA has no validity anywhere. It utterances are crass black humour. Although not alone, US citizens and their admirers everywhere are to blame. Period!
American English and, by association (I am not sure which started it), English has become a language with no meaning. The vast bulk of its media rapes the world to make meaning like Mc Donalds makes burgers.
And people buy and swallow the shit!
Almost all oil wells have an acoustic blowout preventer. If the rig up above explodes, the sound of the lifeboats motoring away from the rig will cause the oil well to shut down at the wellhead.
One oil drilling rig didn't use an acoustic blowout preventer. Guess which one! BP successfully argued that with its new technology, the acoustic blowout preventer wasn't needed. BP had wires running from the wellhead up to the control room on the rig at the surface. This new technology saved BP half a million dollars.
Unfortunately for BP, the blowout took out its control room on the rig at the surface. Then the rig sank.
By not using the relatively simple safety device, BP may have caused the world's worst oil spill. If oil gets on a beach it can be cleaned up, but once oil gets into a delta marsh, it's polluting the area forever.
The evidence, according to Bob Cavnar of TheDailyHurricane.com, points to a backside blowout and that the blame falls on the operators, the owner of the rig: Transocean.(1)
But it also appears that operators attempted to activate the BOP before evacuating, but nothing happened. BOP are also known not to function 100%(2)
Since then, more data on the amount of cement used by Halliburton in its role of cementing over the well is being forwarded via WSJ articles.(3) If you follow the comments at dailyhurricane.com, you find a comment by elowe:
"...47 bbl nitrified cement job on a 7 X 9 5/8" production csg string to +/- 15,500 ft. Pretty light cement job for that much annular volume. It likely was a backside blowout, but the csg was already hung off in the well-head. ...
The DeepH2O Horizon completed the Tiber well to over 35,000 ft just a few months ago. I am not sure I would lay all the blame on RIG for this one...."
And, Paul, could you forward a reference to reinforce your statement that the acoustic BOP would have worked in such a scenario, if indeed, 1) the casing was hung in the casing head above the ocean floor, 2)it's a result of a backside blowout. As far as I understand, the BOP was originally functioning before Transocean operators were setting up the casing, and the implication is something jammed the BOP ability to shutdown the well before they evacuated the rig.
In regard for the worst oil spill disaster "in history", the current gusher *if* 25,000bbl really are gushing out daily (instead of John Amos' estimate of 20,000bbl), it would have to gush for 18 weeks to beat out the #2 Ixotc I spill(4) Currently at 25,000bbl and the expected 10 weeks to stop the leak (see Montara Oil Spill)(5), the Deepwater Horizon oil spill would be on par with the #5 worst spill, the 1978 Amoco Cadiz of the coast of Brittany which dumped some 1.6bbls(6)
These numbers are all dependent on if they can't contain the oil leaks with the containment boxes that should be in place 6-8 days from now (7)
----------------
1)http://dailyhurricane.com/2010/04/bob-on-fox-news-talking-about-the-bp-well-blowout.html
2)aolnews.com/nation/article/oil-spill-debacle-points-to-rig-blowout-preventer-as-utter-failure/19461009
3)http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703572504575214593564769072.html
4)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oil_spill#Largest_oil_spills
5)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montara_oil_spill
6)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amoco_Cadiz
7)http://www.nola.com/news/gulf-oil-spill/index.ssf/2010/05/bp_builds_containment_boxes_to.html
Consequently, if the containment boxes work and thwart this disaster and the gushing oil pumps onto surface level containment barrages, then the hypothetical numbers of the total spilled would look as follows:
At 20,000bbls a day with 12 days already past, plus 6 to 8 days for CBs to be placed
360,000bbls on day 18, and
400,000bbls on day 20.
or, 15 million gallons to 16.8 million gallons
At 25,000bbl
450,000bbl on day 18, and
500,000bbl on day 20
or, 18.9 million gallons to 21 million gallons
The best case scenario will be the CBs working 6 days from now, and that only (?!) 20,000bbls are gushing right now. EVEN THEN, this spill should be 1.37 times that of the Exxon Valdez, or 1.9 times at 21^6 gallons. If the CBs don't work, and it takes BP-Transocean 90 days to fill the well with mud and sand, we are looking at as much as 94.5 million gallons, which would surpass the Atlantic Empress spill of 1979 (267,000- 287,000 tonnes), making this the #3 largest spill in history.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlantic_Empress
ps. On my above post, I mentioned the Amoco Cadiz off the coast of Brittany, France. It should read 1,600,000 barrels, and not 1.6 barrels....
Louisianans voted for Jindal. Shows what happens when you vote Republican.
It is really a disaster for the biodiversity in the area.i think whole reason behind it that the global warming and no any country try give the solution for it.
Alpine White Teeth
http://www.articlesbase.com/dental-care-articles/alpine-white-teeth-whitening-review-amp-free-trial-2212431.html
"Because...
they killed their Mother"
Neytiri,
princess of the Na'vi people.
As mankind thinks, so it becomes.
Mankind's minefields began with the laying of mind fields.
We're just about finished here.
Perhaps it's time to challenge BP's right to exist. Take away BP's charter, kill its "personhood". Is there any activity moving in that direction?
Why only BP?