Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
New Ghost Towns: Industrial Communities Teeter on the Edge
That all changed after Kaiser, the industrialist who'd turned out ships and planes at a record pace in World War II, built the nation's largest consolidated aluminum works here on the banks of the Ohio River.
One-horse towns such as Ravenswood, whose downtown is seen here, are "one plant shutdown from oblivion," says Tom Juravich, who co-wrote a history of the 1990 lockout at the local aluminum plant. (photo By Jeff Gentner for USA TODAY) The plant paid Tim Shumaker his first living wage, and he won the right to keep it two decades ago after his union was locked out for 19 months.
Today, that victory seems hollow. Shumaker, 49, has been laid off. Part of the vast aluminum complex is closed, and the rest is for sale — its orders down, its workforce reduced, its future uncertain. Shumaker stands at the locked plant gate and, after a year without work, worries what's next for him and his community. "The way things are going," he says, "there's not going to be anything here."
Ravenswood, with 4,000 people and one big factory, is like many towns in the USA where things still are made: caught in a winter between recession and recovery, hoping the latter will arrive before the former kills the last decent blue-collar job.
If the rest of the aluminum works closed, "would this become a ghost town?" muses Jim Frazier, principal of the Henry J. Kaiser Elementary School.
Whether it's textiles in the Carolinas, paper in New England or steel in the Midwest, most industrial cities and mill towns "are on pins and needles," says Donald Schunk, an economist at Coastal Carolina University. "Day to day, week to week, any manufacturing facility seems vulnerable. People don't know if they'll be there."
That's true in:
• Georgetown, S.C. (pop. 9,000), where the closing of the local steel mill last year left International Paper as the last major private employer.
• Madawaska, Maine (pop. 4,000), where workers voted last month to take an 8.5% wage cut to keep the financially strapped paper mill going.
• Glenwood, Wash. (pop. 500), where flat lumber prices and rising land prices are crippling the forest products industry.
Anxiety over possible layoffs or closings can disturb workers as much as the real thing, experts say. Harvard psychologist Daniel Gilbert says it's uncertainty that really bothers people: They feel worse when they think something bad might happen than they do when they know it will happen.
Ravenswood knows the feeling. It's waiting for the other shoe to drop.
The aluminum works south of town has two parts: a reduction plant (or smelter), where ore is heated to 1,800 degrees to make aluminum; and a fabrication plant, where aluminum is rolled or stretched into sheets or plates. Since 1999, the plants have been separately owned.
A year ago last month, Century Aluminum closed the reduction plant, laying off Shumaker and about 650 other workers. The fabrication plant, owned by Rio Tinto Alcan, still employs more than 1,000.
What if the Alcan plant, which bought its raw aluminum from Century, also were to close?
That worries almost everyone, including Frazier at Kaiser Elementary. Of the school's 160 families, 37 have parents who worked at Century; many others have breadwinners at Alcan.
Kate Bronfenbrenner, a Cornell labor relations professor who studied the 1990 Ravenswood lockout, says that if the second plant closes "that town would die." Other communities sustained by manufacturing face a similar fate, she adds: "We had ghost towns in the past. We could have them again."
The difference is that people could leave a ghost town — miners to work new veins, farmers to till fresh land, merchants to move closer to road or rail.
Today, Tim Shumaker sees no such options. In past layoffs, he always found work somewhere; now there seems to be none anywhere.
So, like almost everyone else here, he's staying put, wondering whether Ravenswood could become a new kind of ghost town: a place where people stay, because they have nowhere else to go.
Rise and fall
Kaiser's Ravenswood plant created a middle class where there was none. When the United Steelworkers Union was voted in after the plant opened in 1957, the hourly wage jumped from $1.78 to $3.25.
Three decades later, the aluminum works was sold to a group that secretly included Marc Rich, an American commodities trader who was living in Switzerland to avoid charges of violating the U.S. trade ban with Iran.
According to a history by Bronfenbrenner and Tom Juravich, working conditions at the plant deteriorated. The company forced workers into double shifts — sometimes for several days in a row — in the 100-degree heat of the "pot rooms," where molten aluminum is made.
When the union contract expired, the company locked the workers out.
Organized labor had been losing such battles, but at Ravenswood the Steelworkers launched an innovative "corporate campaign" that went beyond the picket line.
The union mobilized pressure from foreign unions and governments, persuaded beer companies to stop buying Ravenswood aluminum and lobbied the state Legislature to investigate the company. In 1992, the company settled, agreeing to a new contract with higher pay and limits on mandatory overtime.
By the end of 2008, though, energy prices had risen, foreign competition had increased, and the price of aluminum had dropped 50% in a few months. On Feb. 4, 2009, the smelter closed.
Workers gathered in the high school gym. Gov. Joe Manchin, a pro-union Democrat, came up from Charleston. "The world's changing," he said.
In the America where things are made, the recession has been a depression. According to a new Northeastern University study, one in every six blue-collar industrial jobs have disappeared since 2007, matching the drop in overall employment in the Great Depression.
Last year, about 1.3 million factory jobs vanished, including Shumaker's. For the first time, the government announced in January, most union members are government employees, not private-sector workers.
One-horse towns such as Ravenswood risk losing their reason for being, says Juravich, who teaches about labor at the University of Massachusetts. Without a hospital or university campus or county seat, "they're one plant shutdown from oblivion."
Sometimes oblivion is a ghost town with tumbleweed blowing down Main Street and the doors of the Last Chance Saloon swinging in the desert wind. But most 21st-century ghost towns will not be deserted.
People, many unemployed or underemployed, will fill the bars, stoops, corners, clinics, jails and social welfare offices.
An industrial town makes products that bring wealth into a community; a post-industrial ghost town has a zero-sum economy — people in marginal jobs, "serving and paying each other," Bronfenbrenner says.
At best, the new industrial ghost towns become places for low-rent homes for long-distance commuters. At worst, they slowly empty out.
Uncertainty and anxiety
At first, some Century workers — who as a group averaged $51,000 in pay per year — regarded the layoff as a vacation. Besides unemployment compensation, 20-year veterans such as Shumaker got two years of layoff pay (about $400 a month) and continued health coverage (no premiums, no deductible and a $10 co-pay for office visits).
A year later, some benefits are expiring, savings are running low, and people are beginning to hurt. The local food bank's caseload has tripled. The pawn shop's business has doubled. "I'm warm and dry," Shumaker says, "but I don't have a dime to my name." He's behind in the payments on the three-bedroom house he shares with his wife and teenage son.
He has pawned some tools. Instead of stopping for a burger at lunchtime, he goes home and fixes a peanut butter-and-jelly sandwich. He drinks less milk, eats less meat, buys less gasoline. He drives a dented Ford pickup with 150,000 miles on it.
What's most striking about Ravenswood, however, is not the material deprivation but the psychological distress, an anxiety about the future that tests faith itself. "I try to explain that God has not abandoned us," says Scott Mapes, pastor of the Church of the Nazarene, where yearly giving has dropped from $180,000 to $150,000.
Shumaker does not lack daily sustenance; he lacks a future and a purpose. "I'm not depressed or anything, but I can't seem to get started in the morning," he says. "I didn't get out of bed today until 9 a.m."
He's wearing a black T-shirt with pictures of a U.S. flag and a buffalo and the words "Roam Free." Problem is, he can't. The old rule — go where the work is — no longer applies, unless maybe you're a nurse or a teacher.
There's constant speculation that Century might reopen. Shumaker's not optimistic.
Others aren't waiting for a call back to work. Hundreds are taking advantage of a federal program that pays $20,000 for education or training for workers who lose jobs because of foreign competition.
Dave Guthrie, 51, says he's glad he was laid off because now he has the time, money and motivation to go to college. He wants to be a traveling nurse, working short-term contracts around the country, far from what he calls the plant's "us-vs.-them" labor-management dynamic.
He sees Ravenswood as a nascent ghost town: "Industrial workers are dinosaurs. In the future, it's going to be service jobs and electronics. … Eventually, people will start leaving here. It's that or a minimum-wage job at Wal-Mart."
Tim Shumaker is not going anywhere. On another slow, jobless day, he sits in the union hall, which is a sort of shrine to the great lockout. There's a picture of a worker who died on the job in 1990; a union-issued Marc Rich "wanted" poster; a photo collage of members' children, under the words "Why We Fight" and "Labor's Future."
There's also an aerial photo of the sprawling colossus that sucked up more power than a city and pumped out 500 tons of metal a day. For a half-century, the hottest place in West Virginia; now, stone cold.
"It's disheartening," he says. "I enjoyed working there — even the pot rooms. I miss it."



23 Comments so far
Show AllI was suprised to find out that in some European countries, simply shutting down a plant because there is more profit to be made elsewhere is against the law. The corporation must go through a regulatory process where economic hardship and availability of other living-wage jobs to the workers is considered, show the only alternative to shutting down is impending bankruptcy, and if so, the government makes subsidies avaialble.
In other words, they never forget that the primary reason for the plant is the jobs and livlihoods of the many, rather than profit for the few.
And no, such regulations, oddly, don't destroy the economy. Such countries enjoy thebest living standards in the world.
I experienced that first hand. I used to work for a large US company with an office in London. It was decided to outsource the companies IT department. When someone asked how many people in London were going to be outsourced, we were told: "None, they have laws against that over there". Need I say more?
"Free Enterprise" is hollowing out industrial and much of service industry America, and we are being trained in the effects of Raw Capitalism on a very personal basis. The lack of an Industrial Policy that protects the core interests of the nation is now manifest, and many will suffer hardtimes simply because of greed--for greed is the stink arising from the rot. I wonder how many people who didn't vote for Perot in 1992 would like to change their vote now that they've witnessed the effects of that "giant, sucking sound"?
Perot could have been a flim-flam like Obama, but I guess his victory would have sent a message to the PTB. It could have made passage of NAFTA and GATT more difficult, at least slowed it down.
You think?
Perot campaigned in open opposition to NAFTA and GATT and had other worthwhile ideas, too. He spun no web of stories about Hope and Change, unlike Clinton, the presidential campaign Obama mostly copied. Rather, Perot was very frank about what voters could expect from either of the other two candidates, and his predictions have come to pass. The Dot.com boom enginered by Greenspan doomed Perot's 1996 chances. That boom created the mirage known as the Clinton Surplus, its upward redistribution would be spun in two opposite directions by BushCo as the boom became the Dot.com Bust.
Most solutions to the problem, including mine, call for rather radical change in the overall nature of the US economy, its governing institutions, its media, its social structure, and, most importantly, the stories it tells itself. Yet in the future, the problem of having too many people chasing too few jobs will recur unless population starts to decline and emphasis shifts to developing minds instead of things.
Thank you Mr. Clinton, Mr. Bush and Mr. Obama. This is your gift to the American people.
YES ... SOLELY SOLAR ... solar panels on every home! Put these people to work. They want JOBS! They have experience. They have skills. The government is aware of all the closings of industrial/manufacturing plants. Utilize these situations to keep people working. Give them a chance! They(the first tier) could first build and install the solar panels for their own homes and local businesses to save them money on utility bills. Then they could start building and selling the panels to surrounding communities. Teaching them(the second tier) how to install and maintain panels and troubleshoot ... and so on. This could apply to every locale. This could also be done with wind turbines. Make them here. Give people a chance. POWER TO AND FOR THE PEOPLE. Weatherization projects could help too. It would be a winning situation for all ... create productive jobs ... reduce use of fossil fuels ... save communities.
Your messianic promotion of solar power is just like the people in the old days who used to insist that if everyone would just smoke pot, war would soon be abolished.
Are these expensive solar panels and associated equipment going to be funded by the government?
Is the government going to fund solar panels even in cloudy climates where they are comepetely cost-ineffective. I live not too far from Ravenswood, WV, and only about 5 days out of the last month have not been overcast. And this is fairly typical weather. And in the summer, the roof is shaded by trees for much of the day, would I be expected to cut my and my neighbors trees down?
The Germans now produce solar panels that are almost as effective in cloudy as in non-cloudy conditions. They are light years ahead of us.
That simply isn't possible. Think! It would defy the laws of physics! The solar radiation reaching the ground under cloud cover is only a handful of watts per square meter. (Compared to about a kilowatt per square meter under ideal clear skies)
Best commercial cell effeciencies are 20%. The maximum theoretical efficiency for crystalline silicon cells (the most common commercial type) is 29%. The record laboratory efficiency for exotic cells is about 40% - but such cells are just curiosities as they are far too expensive for commercial applications in the forseeable future.
When ENRON Raped all Californians at the beginning of this decade, the state government was FORCED to pay Actual Extortion to ENRON by the Bush Administration.
If instead, the state had told Enron to go fuck itself, had seized Enron's property for its ACTUALLY CRIMINAL acts, and had applied that extortion money instead to EVEN JUST GIVING millions of California homeowners solar cells and solar water/space heaters/coolers, that state would be so far ahead that other states would envy it.
And if socialist principles like that could be seen to work against unbridled capitalist pigs like Enron, then this nation would be well on its way forward.
Instead, that state is a financial mess BECAUSE of Republicans, again, who are pulling the same shit in that state's government that they do in the US Senate- the minority stops the majority from positive action. Again. Also.
Wherever Republicans go, they spread grief and misery and destruction and hate and corruption. Their God is the almighty dollar. And that makes for Bad Government- another way of saying Republican government.
Also, the money is there, it's just a matter of who gets it. For instance, the banksters always make sure they get theirs, no matter who has to die.
For example, the chart is always held up about Medicare and/or Social Security, whereupon the line curves dramatically upward for payments and debt. However, you could also label THAT SAME CHART, "How Much WE WILL OWE THE RICH"- merely for the service of lending us their (our own) money! Get it now?
It is the government's duty to its citizens to make every one of them feel like a citizen-stakeholder. And if there is no commercial work, there is plenty to do to make this nation better. We need all hands to work for a better tomorrow. And if there is absolutely no work THAT DOES NO HARM, then there should be support for that citizen FOR DOING NO HARM! Yes, for doing nothing harmful, for lying fallow like farm fields do, until needed again. Every person is important, and should be made to feel like a citizen and important. That is the first job of a good society.
That is why I decry Republicans so, as well as Libertarians. lobbyists, Dimocrat Blue Dogs and DLC-corporatists, and others who 'go along to get along- or those who get into government 'to do well' instead of 'to do good'. Because they do not value people, so much as they value money. But money is only the labor of the people, symbolized. Which makes it really really easy to grab if you are a bankster and own the place.
So yes, government can easily do a lot for solar power and wind power, even in WV. And remenber, the ripples that are made when California and other states do not need natural gas or other fuels, will drive energy prices down for WV. So we ALL benefit. Except maybe Senator A-Hole from Oklahoma. And you know who I mean.
When they have succeeded in doing away with Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and the safety net is completely shredded, how many millions of elderly people will have become ghosts through starvation? I'll most certainly be one of them. (age 73) How many towns and cities won't have been completely emptied of people?
Looking in from the outside, I see a Congress and Senate that do the bidding of the corporate and Israeli lobbyists. I see a media similarly controlled by the same interests. I see military spending going up, even while there is a chronic debt crisis. In the midst of this I still see tax cuts. I see an economy which will collapse in the next 5 years. I see refusals to reduce the US military even after economic collapse as part of stubborn attempts to maintain the US empire PNAC style. I see Obama as an obstacle to change, and I see the next Republican president as even worse. I see a population that has been condition to accept corporatism as the ONLY answer and in the same breath, anything socialistic, which at least saved the USSR from barbarism as it collapsed, as evil.
In short, the not so rich population of the USA is in for some VERY hard times. I see no hope of improvement over the next decade. I see America's religions growing faster than ever. I see homelessness and riots ahead. But the riots wont be the worst of some ugly violence, some of it religiously inspired. The USA will eventually recover from its taste of Iraq, but with the current full on USA capitalist attitudes and prevalence of so many guns, it might take 20 years, but by then world resources will not be so freely available, and it will not return to the America you once knew.
A very plausible scenario, Scary but realistic. It could indeed come to all that. If something is not done soon to break the hold of the MIC, America is doomed to something very alike what braithwa842 wrote. Times will be very hard. Welfare will have to back to make sure we don't have to have death wagons to pick up the dead every morning. People will have abandoned the cities even more and are struggling to survive in rural areas where they still have food.
Militias will possibly roam freely thanks to the further loosing of gun laws. Anti-government sentiment will be boiling and ready to spill over into violence. Citizens who otherwise would never even own a gun will feel they HAVE to pack a pistol. Homicides will go up. So will property crimes. Drug dealers might even be hurting.
Gary
“We are what we think. All that we are arises with our thoughts. With our thoughts, we make the world.”
== Gautama Buddha
I'm not sure about the widespread violence and riots.
I see the US becoming a giant El-Salvador or Honduras. Grinding poverty and oligharchy combined with overall peasant-passivity, until a leftist uprising can be organized, then the violence will be a good thing.
I must say thank you only to Obama
He's president! He's livin the dream!
from the article:
"They feel worse when they think something bad might happen than they do when they know it will happen."
rest easy, then, because if we keep manufacturing metals, among other things, bad things will happen...continue to happen...
"He's wearing a black T-shirt with pictures of a U.S. flag and a buffalo and the words "Roam Free." Problem is, he can't. The old rule — go where the work is — no longer applies, unless maybe you're a nurse or a teacher."
perhaps if the buffalo and slogan were more than art...why can't one roam free, as the buffalo, and native man, once did?
oh, yeah...private property...good luck with that...
we need to live different in the future, and the dying of industry is necessary...as is the dying of private property...
what is the matter?? didn't Milton Friedman the famed Nobel prize conservative economist of laisse fairism say outsourcing jobs is the ticket because it will create middle classes abroad that will--in the long run--buy stuff from the US? dont tell me the Nobel Commitee got it wrong!
the fundamental misconception at play here is that a human being must prove his right to exist...
Exactly! The only rights are the rights of property! The right to exist would require (gasp) that something be occasionally required of the property owner so others can simply not starve or freeze.
http://www.infoshop.org/page/AnAnarchistFAQ
From the article:
He's wearing a black T-shirt with pictures of a U.S. flag and a buffalo and the words "Roam Free." Problem is, he can't. The old rule — go where the work is — no longer applies, unless maybe you're a nurse or a teacher.
Nurse or teacher - teachers are paid by tax dollars and most medical people now depend on Medicare and Medicaid to fund their profession. Our government will never change because so many in America depend on the government for a paycheck. And those are the same people who moan the word "socialism".