Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Copenhagen Climate Summit in Disarray after 'Danish Text' Leak
Developing countries react furiously to leaked draft agreement that would hand more power to rich nations, sideline the UN's negotiating role and abandon the Kyoto protocol
The UN Copenhagen climate talks are in disarray today after developing countries reacted furiously to leaked documents that show world leaders will next week be asked to sign an agreement that hands more power to rich countries and sidelines the UN's role in all future climate change negotiations.
The UN Copenhagen climate talks are in disarray today after developing countries reacted furiously to leaked documents. (Photograph: Attila Kisbenedek/AFP/Getty Images) The document also sets unequal limits on per capita carbon emissions
for developed and developing countries in 2050; meaning that people in
rich countries would be permitted to emit nearly twice as much under
the proposals.
The so-called Danish text, a secret draft agreement worked on by a group of individuals known as "the circle of commitment" - but understood to include the UK, US and Denmark - has only been shown to a handful of countries since it was finalised this week.
The agreement, leaked to the Guardian, is a departure from the Kyoto protocol's principle that rich nations, which have emitted the bulk of the CO2, should take on firm and binding commitments to reduce greenhouse gases, while poorer nations were not compelled to act. The draft hands effective control of climate change finance to the World Bank; would abandon the Kyoto protocol - the only legally binding treaty that the world has on emissions reductions; and would make any money to help poor countries adapt to climate change dependent on them taking a range of actions.
The document was described last night by one senior diplomat as "a very dangerous document for developing countries. It is a fundamental reworking of the UN balance of obligations. It is to be superimposed without discussion on the talks".
A confidential analysis of the text by developing countries also seen by the Guardian shows deep unease over details of the text. In particular, it is understood to:
- Force developing countries to agree to specific emission cuts and measures that were not part of the original UN agreement;
- Divide poor countries further by creating a new category of developing countries called "the most vulnerable";
- Weaken the UN's role in handling climate finance;
- Not allow poor countries to emit more than 1.44 tonnes of carbon per person by 2050, while allowing rich countries to emit 2.67 tonnes.
Developing countries that have seen the text are understood to be furious that it is being promoted by rich countries without their knowledge and without discussion in the negotiations.
"It is being done in secret. Clearly the intention is to get [Barack] Obama and the leaders of other rich countries to muscle it through when they arrive next week. It effectively is the end of the UN process," said one diplomat, who asked to remain nameless.
The text was intended by Denmark and rich countries to be a working framework, which would be adapted by countries over the next week. It is particularly inflammatory because it sidelines the UN negotiating process and suggests that rich countries are desperate for world leaders to have a text to work from when they arrive next week.
Few numbers or figures are included in the text because these would be filled in later by world leaders. However, it seeks to hold temperature rises to 2C and mentions the sum of $10bn a year to help poor countries adapt to climate change from 2012-15.
- Posted in



124 Comments so far
Show AllThe final nail in the coffin of the Copenhagen talks.
This round of climate talks, and according to some mankind's last hope of averting environmental disaster, was dead before it even got off the ground.
The US announced weeks ago it would not submit to any cuts that would amount to a cut back of it's wastrel lifestyle. And with the timely release of the hacked e-mails, this was assured.
The US, UK and other First World nations have agreed amongst themselves that their short term economic gain is more important than our children's survival.
Perhaps it is time for the protestors to do more than protest. It is becoming clear that only direct action against the worst consumers and polluters is needed.
So, it looks like Copenhagen was all along, and the real threat of climate catastrophe to future generations is just a proxy, a clever tool for siezing more power for the wealthy - through their usual institution of global financial subjugation, the World Bank.
How many here think asking them, hat-in-hand, to be nice, is still effective? Let the great Copenghagen riots begin. May Copenhagen be remembered like LA/Watts in 1965, Paris and Prague in 1968, Seattle in 1999, Athens a year ago.
This is a "leak" of far, far greater importance that those e-mails, which I learned from brother up in Canada (he never heard of them) is apprently only getting major media coverage in the US (while in Canada everyone knws about the Amy Goodman incident).
So, a prediction - you will not hear a pip of this story in the mainstream US media.
When King was assassinated many USA cities were burning.
You're prediction seems to be correct so far. I checked the front pages (online) of several mainstream news sites, and none of them seem to mention the "Danish text."
Better correct this. First sentence should be:
"So, it looks like Copenhagen, all along, along with the threat of climate catastrophe for future generations, which is very real, is being used as just a proxy, a clever tool, for siezing more power for the wealthy..."
The sentence sounded dangerously close to being misunderstood as left-AGW denialist-conspiracist.
I'm sure it'll be picked up by the right-wing media and used to further embarrass Obama.
Why? The right fully supports such elite scheming.
I don't think the right-wing media figures that are basically leading the conservative movement right now think that long-term. They'll just see a story that Copenhagen is a failure and use it to attack Obama for going to it.
$10 billion, is that one year of Bomber getting his surge off?
Naomi's disaster capitalism to the MAX!
Thank you Obomber for all your great presents this year:
Working Class money to Banksters in a jobless false "Recovery"
More Bombs in Afghanistan
Subsidies for Insurance Companies
And now some more Predatory Capiltialism under the GW banner.
More "state secrets" and domestic surveillance and fascist laws.
Whether you are weak or a phony is irrelevant and your supporters are only a hinderance to progress.
"If you are not part of the Solution then you are part of the Problem" as your non-soul brother Stokely said.
Please stop blaming the citizens for their lack of militant action against the ruling slime.
The bloated slime have chosen to rob and kill and oppress.
But the citizens must earn a living, overcome the greatest propaganda apparatus in history,and risk prison( in a time when demonstrating is considered "low level terrorism" and protestors put in "free speech cages" and pre-emptively arrested),and assassination if the citizen is heard widely or holds significant power.
Everyone should be commended for whatever they do to resist and gently admonished for any collaboration.
odoco
Duplicity beyond belief - actually - not really. Nothing surprises me anymore with respect to selfishness, greed, ego-manical behavior and a propagandized image that underlies self-righteousness and callousness for the world's people.
We will see a time when the 'other' nations will unite, just as they are now doing in South and Central America, against the interests of the US and UK. When even their rapacious dictators / militaries will be put aside, and when a growing proportion the flow of natural resources from other countries will be effectively curtailed. Then - we will most assuredly see the difference between "American values and ideals" and "American interests."
did anyone REALLY expect anything else?
I repeat myself......stop empowering them. Change your lifestyle. Stop consuming. Grow food. Hunt. Make due with old vehicles. Ride a bike. Don't invest. ETC!!!!!
We only empower the elite by buying the products that make profit for corporations that pay salaries to CEOs that control the poitical machine that controls us.
And turn off that mind numbing,body debilitating idiot box.
And do not rationalize any employment by, contributions to, or association with the fascist governments.
odoco
Glenn - I got rid of my noise box about a month ago - long, long overdue. The quality of my life - and my intellectual capacity - immediately improved.
Odoco... without noise box, no Link TV, no Free Speech TV.. No Amy Goodman, Laura Flanders, no Al Jazeera English, no Thom Hartman... ni los canales hispanicos... though, oddly, I do have to resort to the Communist Chinese cultural channel for broadcasts in French and Deutsche Welle over HNTV for programs subtitled in Spanish but with German sound tracks.
But I mostly agree...other than Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert, it's mighty sparce out there.
i'm of course depending only on the internet now for all news, correspondence and informing myself.
it really seems to have made a difference in that I focus better on getting information rather than have to divide it with watching TV "shows". i never miss them ...since unpluggment for 3 years now. anything interesting i would like i simply try to get it online on dvd a few times or just make do with less . or just put old dvd's or tapes to entertain myself with favorite old stuff. otherwise --
there are always the good old BOOKS to read!!!
Yeah, I'm all for the internet and books. Is anyone literate anymore, besides the elite few who go to the elite schools? This is a real question, since I was last in school some 50 years ago.
Don't forget Animal Planet, History Channel and the Discovery Channel. But even these are getting so bad and have so many commercials they are hard to watch.
i see these programs from time to time where other people watch the tv...and it seems to true that these things have become nothing more than a type of "reality tv" charade, usually more about what the humans do in their adventures than really learning about animals or nature - as if the "animal kingdom" has become a substitute "foreign enemy or threat" type of adventure. they are sold more like "adventures" not unlike other shows...it's just it's animals that are the "subject".
they are good in that anything that makes people aware of the natural world is important for all of us...but it is not as if we REALLY needed to have such things just to open our OWN eyes EVERY DAY to what the world is like...and realize WE are merely living IN IT and PART of it -- and our actions and decisions are subjecting the world to so much catastrophy , whether or not we are directly aware because of the proximity to our own lives or not.
simply that we OUGHT to know that if we throw our garbage around without thought, our OWN homes would start to stink and be dirty.
why is that so difficult to understand that - no matter that one lives in a prosperous society such as the USA or europe - that these are ONLY PART of a larger HOME - which we call the Earth
and that eventually what anyone does anywhere that is thoughtless towards our "home" will come around to dirty that same home?
one does not need to HAVE traveled the world to know instinctively :
there are consequences to what we do IN our own neighbhorhoods - ELSEWHERE.
the west, in particular , BUT ALSO developing countries like China , can not continue throwing garbage somewhere "ELSE" or causing the pollution elsewhere to extract resources just to stay or become prosperous at the expense of others...for sooner or later
we ALL will pay the price for disrespecting our Mother Earth and only Home that has been so generous to all of us.
even its impersonal harshness or challenges -= the earth has so much beauty as with its generous bounty - and yet
our civilization - especially the rapacious , profit-driven, commodifying structures - especially promoted and imposed by the west that others are forced to follow in order for THEM to survive - simply has become so disrespectful and so ungrateful towards our mother earth.
this can not continue. even the rich, succeed as they might in ridding the world of the poor or many others in order to "reserve" for themselves the world's treasures and bounty -- will one day meet with even WORSE results when the earth will simply swallow everything that has ever been built...long before our civilization and science can even built ships to reach ANY planet elsewhere to survive.
and even if THAT were to happen , to be achieved....what would it really say of US and the rich?
that the rich drive other human beings to such desperation for their greed and selfishness...and the human society drives the earth to such a condition ?
Ray 1:48 Between radio and web most of those are covered.
I still have pbs, have never had cable. Still, a lot of crap on pbs, mediocre entertainment. And now Moyers is going. In the late 60s through the 80s, pbs was often worth watching. Off broadway plays, art, music (where I first heard Cat Stevens), dance (where I first saw Twyla Tharp) Even arch conservative Wm F. Buckley invited fairly "radical"guests onto his show, Firing Line, guests such as Germaine Greer, Huey Newton, Noam Chomsky, Nader, many others. He loved to try and out smart 'em. Now pbs is a shadow of what it once was. Although it was never perfect and could have used improvement, today it is a vestige, a deteriorated artifact of a time when things seemed to be improving.
AT Thanksgiving I was in a motel while visiting relatives. Oh boy, cable, I thought. What a let down. This is something people pay for?
Yes, yes, yes! Let's make this the most profitless Christmas the corporations have ever seen and let's make the new year the same. Essential food (I've got six inches of snow on the ground and more coming) essential medicines and essential transportation only. Nothing else. Give everyone on your Christmas list a donation in their name to a food bank or a homeless shelter or some other charity, or buy something from a charity thrift store. We need to show them that they're about to lose that 70% of the economy they say we are. If they won't count our votes then they won't get to count our dollars...
How many of us are there to make any difference whatsoever?
Still, it's a good idea. Hold up a banner or large poster in the parking lots: STOP CORPORATE GREED! NO HOLIDAY SHOPPING, 2009!
There aren't many of us. True. But it would only take a minority to turn away from them to dramatically affect their bottom lines.
Maybe, over time, maybe.....I think there are millions out there who would be amazed at the gratification of eating your own homegrown veggies. Amazed at spending time with family and friends entertaining one another rather than being entertained by electronics. At walking in the woods rather than driving to the movies. At vacationing in the mountains with a backpack rather than flying to a beach in the Bahamas.
Life without all that artificial crap is so much more real and interesting. And you feel alive and thriving rather than like a zombie looking for an escape.
You might want to join Reverend Billy Talen's church [of stop shopping]. (btw, Rev Billy is a free-public-transit advocate)
Sorry, that will never happen.
As I understand just a nickel deposit for a returned bottle can drastically effect the soft drink industry. So any noticable percentage of non consumers might very well make a difference.
It will not hurt to try!
Good point. Don't buy anything, live frugally. This was the advice of Ben Franklin when the British East India Mafia was monopolizing everything imported to the early colonies. I don't even buy clothes much anymore. I wear them till they fall off me into rags. My maid sews them back together for me over and over again. Who cares what you look like, the name of the game is to get through this depression without your butt being owned by the banksters. Now is the time to downsize.
And grow a victory garden using non-GMO seeds. Go semi-vegan and turn off the boob tube for good.
Who knows? After all these planet burners and bankrobbers get us up to 200 degrees in the shade maybe something better than man will inherent the Earth. This might be a nice place to live in about ten million years. That's what you body does when you get a fever: it cooks the bad bugs off so as to return to a normal temperature free from parasites.
Of course, in my little example there, I'm typecasting US in the role of the bugs......
I just hope Greenland hangs in there for another ten or twenty years. But it's not looking to good these days, so I may have a beachfront property sooner rather than later.....
BLUB BLUB, BLUB BLUB BLUB.......
I heard James Hansen say on NPR this morning that dealing with climate change won't require anybody to change their lifestyle. We just have to switch to alternative energy sources and we can continue to live like we always have.
Apparently nobody thinks we can handle the truth.
Conservation is great but Hansen is correct also.
The only downside to renewables is their manufacture, but citizens do need employment.
Hey, glenn!
I don't believe Hansen is correct...energy is not the end of the argument...energy is nothing without products that run on it...
are we proposing that solar panels will sit atop houses connected to no wires? no batteries? running nothing? of course not...
the problem is the attitude that energy generates...now that I have this energy, I need to USE IT for something...that leads to the manufacturing of product, and the destruction of the living world...
so, alternate energy does not mean we all get to keep making and buying tvs and computers and cell phones and ipods and cars and refrigerators and microwaves and washers and dryers and glue guns and ceiling fans and nose trimmers, use them until they are no longer working or desired, then throw them in a pit...
the living planet, the source of all of that matter, cannot tolerate that...
sorry, I've had a long day...
Dubet no apoligies needed, I did not mean to imply that we should retain our feeding frenzy, I meant we can maintain a healthy,joyful, fulfilled life using only renewable energy.
Yes, we can live a healthy, joyful, fulfilled life using only renewable energy. It's just that this will require changing the way we live. Very little of what we consume today adds to our health, joy or fulfillment. In fact, most of it detracts from these things.
Local economies are it. You have to dismantle the big prize of big business. This eliminates the supply-side mega-rackets where elites ramp up production with an agenda of mass addiction. Ultimately we have to eliminate the supply-side mega-rackets, one way or another. Localism is the best way.
Jeevee
DON'T HUNT! WHY MUST YOU FILL YOUR BELLIES WITH DEFENSELESS ANIMALS? TRY TO DO SOME WEB RESEARCH ON WHY HUMANS ARE NOT ANATOMICALLY EQUIPPED TO BE KILLERS.
The Masters of Warming and the Masters of War will gladly sacrifice the rest of us to keep their blood-drenched power.
A Great General Strike is long overdue.
So diabolically typical. Once again, the ruling elite of the most powerful nations screw everyone else.
I agree with the sentiment of the Naomi Klein article. We need to become MORE disobedient.
"The so-called Danish text, a secret draft agreement worked on by a group of individuals known as "the circle of commitment"...
Do they call it the "Danish text" because like in Hamlet, in the end everyone dies?
"Do not, as some ungracious pastors do,
Show me the steep and thorny way to heaven,
Whiles, like a puff'd and reckless libertine,
Himself the primrose path of dalliance treads.
And recks not his own rede. "
"Something is rotten in the state of Denmark."
I'm going to steal this ... soon ...
Nice, Dude, nice.
Ahhh, literacy among the Plebs. Have to weed that out...451 degrees Fahrenheit. That is the new planetary temperature, isn't it?
There is certainly something very rotten.
So, just as expected, here is the dictatorship by the elite that was expected all along and for the most obvious interests of the status quo. The NWO in all it’s awesome tyranny.
Perhaps the delegates from the poor and small countries, those few who can not be bought or will not sell the lives of their people for a few shekels in Swiss accounts, their people, those who will suffer most from the climate change, perhaps they should go down the road and join a meeting where people's interests are represented and they can listen to Naomi at Klimaforum09 then at least they can figure how the World Bank and the IMF intend to benefit through the coming disasters and thereby even the 10 billion can be put down to an investment into “Disaster capitalism”.
I think people should “moon” Obama when he speaks at the UN Copenhagen climate talks and they should get up and walk out when he walks up to accept his Nobel prize, either that or throw their shoes…. US leadership only knows how to facilitate profits for gangsters to make money out of wars, social and economic disasters, and the other messes it creates.
It’s not as if the world depends on this. Oh, that’s right it does, doesn’t it?
It's like Seattle and the Green Rooms all over again.
It seems stupid (at least to me) to set any sort of targets towards reducing emissions. Just tax carbon--whether it is emitted by rich countries or poor. The taxes collected can go (in part) to poor nations to help them get up to speed as well as to rich nations that must modernize their antiquated systems. Let's face it: Goals aren't going to be reached anyway. Some international agency will have to monitor and inspect fuel consumption--if not the UN, then another agency. Enforcement needs to have teeth--a tariff on goods produced by a polluting nation if it fails to pay its tax, for example. Before any plan gets implemented, specialists will have to anticipate how the agreement can be gamed--because you know it will be gamed from all sides. All of this can be done--what is lacking is the will.
"just tax carbon."
Although that would be the fairest and therefore best solution, can't do it. Al Gore wouldn't make his expected profits.
I laughed when I read this. I laughed. Who in his right mind ever expected anything less? When television news and students in the street altered the course of the Vietnam war, the corporate operators looked around and took off their gloves. The game has been getting progressively more violent and harsh ever since. Those same operators now own 90% of the news media and 80% of all wealth. Who would ever think that they would do anything to decrease their power? They certainly own Amerika outright, including our oreo president. And they will let it be called the 'Denmark paper' as though to somehow shift the blame to that piss ant country. But it will not become newsworthy, because it is the Christian holiday season, and everybody will be mobbing WalMart to buy shit for people that need freedom instead, thereby feeding the monster. Kill your television, delete your newspaper subscription, and make any xmas present you give. Buy Nothing.
I'm delighted. The big porkers haven't even arrived and somebody already sold them out. I would have thought something like this would have taken several days if not a week to break cover. Very poor conspirators in the cause of World Conquest. Is this where the Global North starts shaking its nuclear missiles into the faces of the Global South and telling them to, "Just shut up and take it bitch. This time be like a good Democrat and swallow. I wonder if it was like this with Tommy Jefferson and Sally Hemmings"? But we're all Democrats here, aren't we?
Cicero: "Freedom is participation in power."
This is climate colonialism by the First World against the Third World--potentially a declaration of economic and environmental war that could kill billions of human beings and eliminate millions of plant and animal species.
It is the WTO-ization of accelerated eco-cide for the many and cushy unsustainable lifestyles for the affluent few. Secret agreements in secret rooms for secret adjudication by secret tribunals and secret World Bank/IMF "structural adjustments" criterion all to be harshly enforced, details to be released too late to do anything about them.
Achtung! The annual corporate coven-clave at Davos ist Das Neues Weltreich! Neo-lib rich folks uber alles, uuuu-ber alles in Der Welt...
This is the continuation of the wrong path deeper into resource wars spread by the U.S. and abetted by the NATO EU countries that exploit religious, tribal and racial differences and government corruption in the Third World. They will drag down and destroy the habitability of this entire planet for future generations whose existence will increasingly be the worst Malthusian nightmare in the Third World and a gleamy-eyed brutal Police State network in the First World.
It shows a complete and total lack of imagination, coherent vision, integrity and honesty at every level and in every aspect.
May God thoroughly damn these arrogant, conceited, selfish, blind and complete imbeciles who are trying to quietly stick this knife in the backs of their own children and children's children's generations to ruin all our futures. "God curse their ill favored faces: May they all die an ill death," as they say in Scotland. Parasites, Benedict Arnolds, and stand-off butchers for the paymasters of resource wars.
This explains why the Copenhagen "talks" got no coverage from the U.S. "mainstream" TV media: Their corporate puppeteers had already passed the word to their "editors" that the fix was in so they must downplay the entire summit practically to non-existence in the mediasphere to help cover-up the betrayal of an entire planet. There is no way around it: These people are all evil and self-delusion personified.
You are right.
And it gets worse:
This from a Counterpunch article shows that plans are being carried out on the economic front to further impoverish the common people in the USA. I'm sure the "leaders" of the other "developed" (in greed and piggery) countries are planning something similar:
"Obama is deliberately precipitating another crisis on the advise of his chief lieutenants. Summers and Geithner are steering the economy back into recession so they can implement the same austerity measures and "structural adjustment" programs which have been used throughout the developing world. It's "starve the beast" all over again. As the stimulus dries up, revenue-depleted states will be forced to auction off public lands, resources, parks and other assets to the highest bidder. The banksters and robber barons will feast on the country's treasures while the middle class is crushed by the freefalling dollar, lost home equity, and persistent high unemployment."
Mike Whitney lives in Washington state. He can be reached at fergiewhitney@msn.com