Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
FCC Commissioners Support Open Internet Rule
WASHINGTON/CHICAGO - U.S. communications regulators voted unanimously to support an open Internet rule that would prevent telecom network operators from barring or blocking content based on the revenue it generated.
The proposed rule now goes to the public for comment until Jan. 14, after which the Federal Communications Commissions will review the feedback and possibly seek more comment. A final rule is not expected until the spring of next year.
"I am pleased that there is broad agreement inside the commission that we should move forward with a healthy and transparent process on an open Internet," FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski said on Thursday.
The vote came despite a flurry of lobbying against the net neutrality rule by telecom service providers like AT&T Inc (T.N), Verizon Communications Inc (VZ.N) and Qwest Communications International Inc (Q.N), which say it would strip them of the ability to manage their networks effectively and that it would stifle innovation and competition.
The rule would prevent operators from discriminating against any legal content a third party wants to deliver to consumers on their networks, though it allows for "reasonable" network management to unclog congestion, clear viruses and spam, and block unlawful content like child pornography or the transfer of pirated content.
The full FCC slate of three Democrats, led by Genachowski, and two Republicans voted in favor of issuing a proposed network neutrality rule for public comment.
But the two Republicans, Robert McDowell and Meredith Attwell Baker, did express concern with the content of the rule, saying they do not share the majority's view that the Internet is showing breaks and cracks and that the government is the best tool to fix it. They also questioned whether the FCC has the legal authority to regulate the Internet network.
Nonetheless, the vote was 5-to-0 for proceeding with the rule-making, and 3-to-2 for approving the notice's language in its entirety, said Jen Howard, an FCC spokesman.
The FCC will accept public comments until Jan. 14, then it will review them and can ask for further comment with replies due by March 5.
NET NEUTRALITY
Advocates of net neutrality such as Google Inc (GOOG.O), Amazon.com Inc (AMZN.O) and public interest groups say Internet service providers must be barred from blocking or slowing traffic according to how much revenue the content generates.
But service providers say the increasing volume of bandwidth-hogging services, such as video sharing, requires active management of their networks.
AT&T President of Operations John Stankey said he was anticipating the rule with as much dread as if he was going to the funeral of a dear friend.
"Regulators should understand that there's plenty of competition in this market," Stankey said at the Supercomm trade show in Chicago.
Late on Wednesday, Verizon Wireless softened its opposition by issuing a joint policy blog statement with Google. They said they believe it is essential that the Internet remain an unrestricted and open platform.
Google and Verizon Wireless, a joint venture of Verizon Communications and Vodafone Group Plc (VOD.L), are partnering to develop an Android-based mobile phone.
"We have cleared the first hurdle in this process, and are on the road towards creating a framework that promotes innovation and consumer choice on the Internet," said the Washington-based Open Internet Coalition, which represents Google, Amazon and eBay Inc (EBAY.O).
With the threat of of a court fight looming, Democrats in
Congress are mulling legislative options to promote net
neutrality. But Senator John McCain, an Arizona Republican,
said he introduced legislation on Thursday aimed at prohibiting
the FCC from enacting rules to regulate the Internet.
(Additional reporting by Steve Holland; Editing by Tiffany Wu
and Lisa Von Ahn, Phil Berlowitz)



7 Comments so far
Show AllA good hint of something good, but I say that the msm really needs this also because it is this very same 'prejudicial' msm that keeps most of the people in america ignorant and veggitized so that they really don't know what they are missing.
No more Bush. What a relief.
AT&T President of Operations John Stankey said he was anticipating the rule with as much dread as if he was going to the funeral of a dear friend.
"Regulators should understand that there's plenty of competition in this market," Stankey said at the Supercomm trade show in Chicago.
------------------------------
What an awful liar. Around here, there's Verizon Where's the competition?
Let's give Stankey Corporate Personhood to mourn while we're at it.
Sounds good t'me!!
While this is a good step, by no means is the struggle for Net Neutrality over with. It it incumbent upon progressives to bombard the FCC with public comments in favor of an open Internet. Also, be advised that the nightmare that the telecoms want is one Republican &/or corporate Democratic administration away. The price of 'net freedom is eternal vigilance.
Great post NateW.
The only right we really have left is free speech. Once we loose that, all else is lost. We should all cut checks to the EFF (Electronic Frontiers Foundation), ALCU and other Net Neutrality vehicles. Nate is right, we should get other CDer's to look at this article and bombard the FCC with comments. You know the crooked telcoms are going to make up fake comments, because they want to steal your government paid for internet for their own revenue.
Thank God Insane McCain didn't get in there. He's a NeoCon Control Corporate Dildo.
AT&T = Nazis (whatever you do, don't contact one of their telephone poles. They will claim you disrupted their revenue and pursue you to the ends of the Earth. I know. It happened to me. They gouged me thousands of dollars for an old rotten pole.)
TJ
"All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." - Thomas Jefferson