EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Get Apocalyptic: Why Radical is the New Normal
- Think Fracking Is Bad? Wait Until You Hear about the Gas Industry's "Acid Jobs"
- We’re Being Watched: How Corporations and Law Enforcement Are Spying on Environmentalists
- Move Over, God, the Biotech Companies Are Here
- Burning Tulsa: The Legacy of Black Dispossession
Popular content
Today's Top News
Arctic Ice Melts to Third-Smallest Area
LOS ANGELES - The Arctic ice pack melted this summer to its third-smallest size on record, up slightly from the low points of the past two years but continuing an overall shrinking trend symptomatic of climate change, U.S. scientists said on Thursday.
In this undated photo provided by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, walrus congregate on a beach in Alaska. Thousands of walrus are congregating on Alaska's northwest coast because of receding sea ice in the Arctic. An environmental group is seeking to list walrus as an endangered or threatened because of disappearing summer sea ice. (AP Photo/ U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service) Northern sea ice retreated to its minimum extent for 2009 on September 12, when it covered 1.97 million square miles (5.1 million square km), and now appears to be growing again as the Arctic starts its annual cool-down, the National Snow and Ice Data Center reported.
That level falls 20 percent below the 30-year average minimum sea ice cover for the Arctic summer since satellites began measuring it in 1979, and 24 percent less than the 1979-2000 average, the Colorado-based government agency said.
The lowest point on record was reached in September 2007, and the 2009 minimum ranks as the third smallest behind last year's level. But scientists said they do not consider the slight upward fluctuation again this summer to be a recovery.
The difference was attributed to relatively cooler temperatures this summer compared with the two previous years, with Chukchi and Beaufort seas especially chilly by comparison with 2007. Winds also tended to disperse the ice pack over a larger region, scientists said.
"The long-term decline in summer extent is expected to continue in future years," the report said.
The U.S. government findings were in line with measurements reported separately by the Nansen Environmental and Remote Sensing Center in Norway, which reported this summer's minimum ice extent at just under 5 million square kilometers (1.93 million square miles).
Many scientists regard shrinking Arctic ice as among the most obvious signs of global warming. World leaders will meet at the United Nations in New York on September 22 to discuss a U.N. climate treaty due to be agreed in December.
MARITIME IMPLICATIONS
The shrinking polar cap poses a loss of crucial habitat for polar bears and has implications for maritime shipping, opening up new routes to navigation.
Once again this year, the Northern Sea Route through the Arctic Ocean along the coast of Siberia opened, enabling two German ships to navigate the passage with Russian icebreaker escorts.
Russian vessels have traversed the passage many times over the years, but the maritime fleets of other nations are showing more interest in the route as the summer thaw expands.
This year the Amundsen's Channel through the Northwest Passage also opened briefly, as it did in 2008, but the deeper Parry's Channel did not. Both opened in 2007.
Scientists have voiced concern for years about the alarming decline in the size of the Arctic ice cap, which functions as a giant air conditioner for the planet's climate system as it reflects sunlight back into space.
As a greater portion of the ice melts, larger expanses of darker sea water are exposed, absorbing more sunlight and adding to the global warming effect attributed to rising levels of heat-trapping greenhouse gases emitted into the atmosphere by human activity.
Scientists also have measured a thinning of the Arctic ice cover, as older, thicker ice more resilient to warming temperatures gives way to a younger, thinner layer that melts more easily in summer.
(Additional reporting by Alister Doyle in Oslo; Editing by Mary Milliken and Cynthia Osterman)
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

12 Comments so far
Show Allwww.ageofstupid.net
that's all i have to say................
Yep
The planet of the slow learners.
So much suffering.
very sad.
Hey, I hadn't heard of that before, thanks.
Just bought a ticket online.
should be a great movie............
only trouble is, it's a bit tooooooo late.............
_____W_____W______W____A_______RRRRRRR__________________
______W___W_W___W____A_A______R_______R__________________
_______W_W___W_W____A___A_____RRRRRRR__________________
________W______W_____AAAAAA____R______R_________________
________W______W____A_______A___R_______R________________
Yep the Pentagon with its destructive Wars and waste of $700 Billion plus per year
(as opposed to $900 Billion per DECADE estimated for Universal Health Care coverage)
is the biggest emitter of global warming emissions on the planet...
High on the list and only recently uncovered as such a huge contributor is all those ocean tankers shipping all our jobs overseas which turn out to contribute 40% of the CO2 of all the cars on the planet!!
Not only are the Corporate banksters offshoring our jobs they are destroying the planet in the process...
The environmental 'canary in the coal mine' that dropped dead the other day with the confirmation of a trans-polar shipping route has been utterly unheard in the cacophony of consumerist self interest.
Walk in peace.
So, do something. Join the movement for free public transit.
http://freepublictransit.org
I absolutely agree. Public transit represents a great opportunity to increase the efficiency of our exploitation efforts. There is no point in continuing the rampant wastage of the resources available to us.
"The Arctic ice pack melted this summer to its third-smallest size on record, up slightly from the low points of the past two years..."
Well that will buy the deniers a year or two. It'll be "Hey look everybody, the ice packs are getting bigger. That proves that Global Climate change is B/S."
The data shows the pack minimum area is 24% larger than two years ago. That doesn't prove anything... it is just simple mathematics applied to 3 data points out of the 31 points available to us.
I am having a difficult time understanding how growth in the minimum ice pack size is evidence of a "shrinking trend". Bigger simply does NOT mean smaller.
I'm now looking at data from NASA. The Arctic icepack min. has measured 4.1, 4.6 and 5.1 M sq Km in Sept 2007, 2008 and 2009 respectively. This in reality is an increase of over 24% in just 2 years. This is not showing a shrinking trend but rather the opposite at this point.
I do not deny global warming nor am I doing the Chicken Little thing. I think data should be collected and analyzed in an unbiased manner. I have no particular reason to believe that this obvious short term cooling trend will continue or that it will reverse itself but I don't see evidence of global warming, anthropogenic or otherwise, in this data.
Those with a serious concern of anthropogenic global warming are doing themselves and their credibilities a disfavor by beating the drum in the face of this data.