Cargill and the Priest: Priest Stands Up Against BigAg and Deforestation
In the Brazilian town of Santarem, one brave priest is the only thing standing between multi-national grain trader Cargill and the rest of the Amazon
Father Edilberto Sena arrives at Rural Radio station and takes up his position behind the microphone. He reaches into his pocket and pulls out his script for today's show. One question is scribbled on it for the daily debate: ‘Why is this happening?'
Edilberto is a Roman Catholic priest and a follower
of liberation theology - meaning not only does he believe in teaching
the word of God, but believes that he has an absolute obligation to
fight poverty and bring justice to the poor. So he takes up the
microphone each week not to recite afternoon prayers to his 200,000
listeners, but to tell the people of Santarem, Northern Brazil, exactly
why they are finding it so hard to grow crops and why the rainforest
that once surrounded their city resembles a burnt desert.
Edilberto isn't just referring to climate change. The Amazon rainforest is being torn down by agribusinesses which use the land to farm soya and export to European livestock farmers, feeding the growing demand for cheap meat. For ten years Father Edilberto has stood at the heart of Santarem's campaign against the world's leader in this trade, Cargill.
‘In Santarem people started to say, "why is it so much hotter?". I tell people this is not God's doing; this is happening because of the destruction of the rainforest.'
Cargill has US revenues of over $63 billion each year and is thought to be the largest privately owned firm in the world. It arrived in Santarem in 1999 with plans to expand the town's port to make it big enough to take advantage of the fast, cheap route from Northern Brazil to Europe. The company claimed it wanted to bring development and prosperity to the state of Para, but Edilberto and his fellow campaigners remained unconvinced.
A 2006 report by Greenpeace shows that deforestation in those parts of the Amazon surrounding Santarem leaped from 15,000 hectares in 2002 to 28,000 hectares in 2004. The arrival of Cargill also seems to have encouraged increasing numbers of locals to make a living by grabbing land illegally and growing soya.
Edilberto paints a particularly bleak picture of what Santarem looks like now. ‘If you fly over Santarem you can see what a desert it has become, you can see the damage of the pesticides and the lonely Brazil nut trees. Cargill has brought devastation to us; this is why we are fighting them.'
However, Edilberto's case against Cargill is based on more than just a moral or religious aversion to agribusiness - he is adamant that what Cargill is doing is, in fact, illegal.
In Brazil as elsewhere, large construction projects must complete an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) before ground is broken. Greenpeace discovered in 1999 that Cargill had filed no such assessment, even though the site was thought to be of indigenous archaeological interest. A high profile, multi-NGO campaign ensued, ultimately landing Cargill in court.
In June 1999 the Ministry of Public Prosecution won a civil action to stop Cargill constructing the terminal unless the report was completed. While Santarem rejoiced, Cargill and the Port Authority appealed the court's decision. In 2003, Cargill again lost its appeal, but by this point the terminal was near completion - so big it had already destroyed the beach and the twenty-five family-run businesseses that depended on it. 630 Amazonians were made redundant leaving just 70 in work.
Cargill was eventually forced to carry out the EIA, but insisted it had followed correct procedures. This doesn't wash with Edilberto. ‘When I saw the completed report, I realised it was pure propaganda for Cargill!' he scoffs.
He describes the report as ‘vague and untrustworthy' - saying it takes into account none of the evident damage to the environment, the use of pesticides poisoning drinking water or the fact it was built on a site of archaeological interest.
After years of tireless campaigning, there appeared to be a silver lining: Cargill agreed to stop buying soya from freshly deforested parts of the Amazon - but only on a short-term rolling agreement, which has recently been renewed. ‘Cargill wanted to show Europe they were concerned about the environment to improve business, so we asked them to agree to ten years. Of course, they didn't,' says Edilberto.
The Greenpeace report suggests that Cargill's intentions haven't changed despite Edilberto's efforts. In fact, that authors argue that Cargill is counting on increased deforestation in the Amazon to meet the huge export capacity of its port facility.
Soya can only make a profit when farmed on a large scale, so in order for Cargill to optimise production, deforestation and expansion are essential. This leads to displacement of rural farmers, particuarly locals who sell their land but lack the skills and education needed to work in Santarem. ‘Farmers used to grow mango, fruits, rice. Then they sold their land to Cargill and moved to the city but had no work, no skills and soon ran out of money,' Edilberto explains.
Controversy surrounding this allegedly illegal use of the land in Santarem is still ongoing. Edilberto and the Community Action Group are convinced that the EIA gives an inaccurate assessment of the environmental impact of the terminal.
Despite death threats, political pressure to leave the church and almost being forced to leave his radio station, Father Edilberto came to the UK to gather further support. ‘Your people have to join us and put pressure on these big projects that are coming to Amazonia. Help us save the world!' He says it with a smile on his face and lets out a little giggle, but it is said with conviction nonetheless. ‘We need you, we have to be more aware and confront them - because more destruction is coming.' What Cargill told us:
Cargill has complied with all the legal and environmental requirements at our grain terminal in Santarém since we were granted permission by the state government of Pará to construct it following a public tender process in 2000. This includes the completion of an environmental impact study (called a PCA) as part of the construction process and the completion of another environmental impact study (an EIA RIMA) in September 2008, which has been made available for consultation in advance of a public hearing to be scheduled by the Pará government.
Alongside other Brazilian soy processors and exporters, we have also committed not to purchase soybeans produced on land in the Amazon Biome deforested after July 2006. Since this agreement (The Soy Moratorium) we have been working with NGOs - including Greenpeace, The Nature Conservancy, Conservation International and WWF- to independently monitor soy production and sanction farmers deforesting in the Amazon Biome.
To help, you can start by getting involved in the Friends of the Earth campaign ‘Fix the food chain' by emailing your MP and adding your voice to Edilberto's.
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
28 Comments so far
Show AllI could not help but notice the protesters signs. All In Portugese.
Contrast that to Iran.
VIVA FATHER EDILBERTO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
STOP ALL COMPANIES FROM EXPLOITING AND DESTROYING EARTH!!!
NO TIME LEFT!!
ATTACK THESE COMPANIES WITH ALL YOU WANT!!!
FOKM ALL!!
NO WAY BACK!!
LIKE IN PERU...WE HAVE TO GIVE IT FIGHT YALL!!!!
DONT STOP!!
DONT GVE UP!!
FIGHT THIS GREY SYSTEM OF MONEY POLITICS!!!
ONELOVE!!
Thanks to Moondoggy for the Homegrown Revolution Youtube information.
The strangeness of the vicious cycle is that there wasn't poverty as poverty is known now in this hemisphere until Columbus sailed, & the European's began arriving to set up their Mammon system upon the earth.
This hemisphere might still be one big natural national park, but that would be a divergent time line so how things would be is Columbus hadn't sailed, and the Europeans hadn't arrived is an unknown.
The cash register world is here now & of course going to eat up the people's of the rainforest slowly but surely for all the natural resources to continually feed the consumption of the cash register world so everyone on the planet is locked into the cash register world one way or the other.
Everything has to play out according to the prophetic word until Jesus returns in Rev 19. The globalist system of the Beast is being built, has been being built all through time, & will be built until it's conclusion.
There will be those who Spiritually Reject this world of themselves as it is God, The God of Israel & of All Creation who has already cast his judgment upon any who worship the Beast & the Image of the Beast.
The God of Israel casts his judgment upon the world while Jesus, The Son, executes the judgements of the Father when that day comes.
If Jesus were living in the rainforest the cash register world would come for him, too, as they don't care who they kill to get what they want in this world.
Life is good. What an experience! It's always best to forgive.
It was Columbus who first brought Gideon's Bible to the New World, Shadow Dancer. And since then life ain't been so good for indigenous people here, in case you haven't yet made the connection.
The devil is in the details...
To all those people above who posted very thoughtful responses to this article and to anyone who happens to read my little post here, I want to share a 10 minute video that demonstrates how we all, no matter where we live, can fight corporate abuse and rainforest destruction without even leaving home:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mCPEBM5ol0Q
It's called, HOMEGROWN REVOLUTION - Radical Change Taking Root
We can do something about it, eat good food and have fun at the same time.
Hmmm, some very thought-provoking Comments here. Think about it: the one common denominator despite people being from different nations is that we are all being exploited in one way or another by the same greedy big corporations. The laborers and the consumers are one in the same. As consumers we have become addicted to a way of life that is killing us, making us and our planet sick from stress and toxins. Then, we give back our hard-earned money to the same people that would deregulate safety controls on the food we eat and the cars we drive. They've got us coming and going. It's a win-win for them. We must become smarter consumers.
I am very suspicious of the news coverage of Iran. Why weren't the News Papers and Stations so intersted in Rwanda when all that carnage was occuring? It seems... like the US of A is really interested in another country when it is important to U.S. of A. It's disgusting. I am, in no way, denigrating any person's right to speak out in Iran, I am just saying we choose our people to support when it serves out interest. So like US.
There should be more Father Edibertos. Where are they?
I agree with the comments of theinitiate. Where do we begin? People are just so endoctrinated to believe they have to buy all this crap out there...even, and especially if it says it is good for nature...whatever that means. I wish I could just take a container and get a replenishment of shampoo or whatever...instead we have to schlep to the store ande buy more crap in plastic containers. There are just not enough hours in a day to deal with all the stuff we are confronted with. But, I feel all this stuff is related. I guess we all have to take our stand in our own small way. But, to tell you the truth, sometimes I feel like I'm pissing in the wind being a vegetarian, earth centered, spiritual person.
I heard yesterday of a doctor in Argentina who has pointed out birth defects caused by the use of Round-up in Argentina.I think it was Monsanto who was being mentioned. The soy crops there, apparently, "needed" their Round-up. This stuff affects everyone. How can we come together and speak against this? I just don't know how this, thank God it exists, discussion will bring about change??? Frankly, I think most people in the USA are dolts...and happy with their lives.
I guess I'm not done. I see on MSNBC, right now, a discussion on the protest in Iran. Chris Matthews is making the comment that what we are seeing is "modernity",those protesting are young modern and want change and modern thinking. A guest, is stating that he came to the US as an immigrant and he chose to come here because he could see that he could live a better life.
Well, my opinion is that the better life is could be debated. On one hand, yes, through Democracy, we do live a better life( or did before Corporations took it over). But on the other hand, the same topic I mentioned above, comes into play. That is the consumerism aspect. Does bing able to buy and have all the comforts of an American lifestyle, really mean that someone has a better life/ And if it does-AT WHO'S EXPENSE?
Rome's red hatted Fascists will soon take care of this compassionate human being like they 'removed' Oscar Romero.
The Amazonian people have got to feel the causal connection between the forest destruction and the deteoration in their lives. In Peru this connection has been dramatically made: first by the indigenous peoples and then by the rest of the Amazonian population. Cargill and the rest have little chance of getting in now. Santarem must take action: viva Padre Edilberto.
To "theinitiate" - You have GOT to read Barbara Ehrenreich and Deirdre English's FOR HER OWN GOOD. Some of your comments about women out the kitchen and into the industrialized world are developed in this book. I think it will put the puzzle pieces together for you.
Fr. Ediberto exemplifies "honorable" at its truest and best. He needs our prayers. What we have for elected leadership in this world is disgraceful; they are all complicit in their self-serving destruction of the earth and its people. True leadership is not elected, but shows itself in the compassion and bravery of people like Fr. Ediberto.
We in the US will not make such a move... to rise up and say,"NO!" to corporate abuse... of our lives and the earth. Only a few of us will take up this battle. When those few do so, there are those that belittle them and label these people as "trouble makers" or "outlaws"
We are so spoiled with our life styles, that many of us veiw certain aspects of our lives as necessities. But most of what we think we NEED-are luxuries. Every time we buy a bottle of shampoo, conditioner, even a green cleaning product, we are doing so much harm. Yeah, we now recycle, but besides the fact that this (I am only guessing here) is probably a small portion that gets recycled, CO2 is produced even in this process. But we are still making and using more and more plastic every day.
What about being able to go to the store with the same container every time, and filling it from a large vat, that gets filled with naturally made shampoo and conditioner by small local businesses. Bulk food stoes should come back instead of large supermarkets selling plastic containers. The same goes for any product that we buy continually, which come in small plastic containers. There is a large "oceanfill" that is between California and Hawaii, that CD posted an article on a few weeks ago. It is twice the size of Texas. This is so disturbing. My point is that we depend too much on our needs or even luxuries to come from large corporations. These get shipped by oil etc, far distances.
Why can't we go back to providing much of what we want and need on a small scale? David Korten promotes this in his book "The Great Turning".
One reason many people won't do this is because the people around them aren't doing it. Plus, many people can't or won't give up their jobs in order to make and create their own needs, as in centuries past. So, we depend on the corporation to supply us with money, so we can buy corporate made products, to save us time, so we can work more and make more money to buy more products. We belived all the time that we are "living the good life." But instead we are getting sick from lack of exercise, lack of fresh living food and the pollutants we breath and drink. We are over stressed and under loved with all our time spent going off to work to create profit-for who and for what?
Woman worked hard to gain the right to make money of their own, giving them, hopefully, equal power in relationships with their spouses. In the past, men could use their financial power to rule over their wives, etc. (IN many situations, this is still the case of course.) So, now, woman need to buy products already made in order to save time, because we couldn't be in the kitchen as much or not at all.
I won't leave out the fact that PERSONALITY definitely factors in a woman's choice to make a career or go out to work. I was not, and still am not, the domestic type. I am an outdoor type, who also likes to study and read. So the point is that personality is another reason for woman to go out to work to be able to express WHO they are... not to fall into the stereotype of house wife and mother.
Where am I going with this? I'm not blaming woman, but possibly the shift of woman out of the kitchen was seen by business as a new kind of maket. What may have begun as slight innovation,to help, became an exaggeration to exploit the market. These are just my theories and only part of the picture, of course.
Again, what I'm trying to do here, is get to the bottom of what it is in our culture, our life style, that keeps us on the merry-go-round that is grinding us down in the ground. How can we break the cycle of exploiting our resources, just to make our lives easy, exciting and what ever else. Nature has her own special excitement, her own marvels and wonders. The earth can give us what we need if we would only take the time to learn, not be HELL BENT ON PROFIT.
Ok I'm done for now.
It was Father Couglin, in the 1930's who warned us that the
Banks and others were taking over the government in the USA.
The extreme lefties put the pressure on the pope and had him
removed from his Radio Program that was broadcast on Sunday afternoons. It was in 1975 that Congressman Wright Patman,
warned us about the Banking System out of control, unlike
our politicians of today, he spoke up, and he could not be bought off.
...you mean the anti-semite,
pro-nazi, anti-New Deal
megalamaniac couglin?
The article says, "A 2006 report by Greenpeace shows that deforestation in those parts of the Amazon surrounding Santarem leaped from 15,000 hectares in 2002 to 28,000 hectares in 2004", and I wonder if this is accurate. I took a look at the initial set of facts provided in the 64-page (plenty for large pictures) report and didn't notice a mention of hectares, but km; tens of thousands of square kilometers deforested on a yearly basis and there are many hectares in a sq. km.
28,000 hectares is a lot, but I think the deforestion of the Amazon is much worse than this. Or maybe this is 28,000 in one relatively small part of the Amazon, not representing all of the deforestion of it in Brazil. Over the past few years or so Greenpeace and/or FoE reported that around half of the Amazon had been deforested for soya cultivation and ranching for meat animals, beef I guess.
In any case, the Greenpeace report seems certainly recommendable. Among other things, it tells of [slavery]; real slavery. Some of the pictures showing soya fields are also impressive in terms of the scope or size of these fields, where there was once awesome jungle and a healthy environment. The report says that because of the monoculture cropping of soya, herbicides (and maybe, if not surely, pesticides) have to be used and this is poisoning the environment.
It's all wickedly insane, psychopathic, and the indigenous get not only forced, one way or another forced into slavery, some are also murdered for their land. Even without the human injustices, all of this would still be psychopathic, because it takes psychopathic people to destroy such crucial environment, the destruction of which is seriously contributing to climate change, too.
Re. Christian ministers and nuns who have been and are activists in So. American countries, working for the rights and dignity of the indigenous and poor, and for environmental sanity, there evidently have been a good number down there. I believe it's some nun from the U.S. who also was brutally murdered by ranch workers over the past several years down there too.
The only activist Roman Catholics I'm aware of in the U.S. and Canada are in the U.S., the Catholic Worker movement or organisation. Although I've have read little about them, it was still enough to learn that they're socially active.
This is not about the environment, but a documentary by John Pilger about U.S. actions in So. American countries includes some of the history, with live footage, on the activism of former Archbishop Oscar Romero and some nuns. It's entitled "War on Democracy" and there are (were just a few months ago, anyway) free copies online; I believe at Google and Youtube, both. Based on that documentary and having read that Pope John Paul II, with the influence of the present pope while he was cardinal, had ordered Oscar Romero to cease his activism, it seems he didn't obey them and continued his important activism, until assassinated. I think to recall that John Pilger explains precisely who the assassin was, too. And I assume that person has never been indicted, tried, ....
One lousy thing JP II said and which cies like Cargill would likely welcome is that the enviornment is supposedly not important, that only humans are important, which is a clear sign that he either didn't understand our dependance on Nature, or that he was really root'in for Cargill, Monsanto, open pit mining, etcetera. He said this during (I believe) fall 2002, when I first heard or read of him saying this, that is; and repeated it again not long before he died. He had come to correct himself later in 2002, or in 2003, but still repeated this absurdity further on.
Thankfully, So. Americans have good Christian representatives. And I can't see why the Vatican is opposed to Lib. Theology as So. American priests and nuns live it. Jesus said to be active, so he clearly supported Lib. Theology; without use of violence. And plenty of Roman Catholic Canadian priests have considerable respect for Karl Marx; just that they prefer to not preach use of guns, although without really blaming him for this point.
To MikeCorbeil -- Thanks for the long post. Don't deceive yourself though, Mike. To use your idea, there are as many "bad" Christian representatives in South America as there are good ones. The church in Latin America, as elsewhere, can be a force for liberation and justice or it can (and often is) a conservative, reactionary, and collaborationist force working against the interests of the people and in favor of the oligarchs and upper classes with which many of these clergy associate and with whom they identify.
Yet another of the 3,500 or so reasons I don't eat meat.
"Edilberto is a Roman Catholic priest and a follower of liberation theology - meaning not only does he believe in teaching the word of God, but believes that he has an absolute obligation to fight poverty and bring justice to the poor."
That's always great to read and I wonder when priests in the U.S. and Canada will become such true disciples of Jesus of Nazareth. Here, they are [silent]; very. They like collecting the tithes and complaining when the government threatens to raise hydro-electric costs for churches, but are otherwise ... dead silent. "No wonder" the churches have [emptied] here.
I agree. The Roman Catholic church in the US used to be more progressive with social issues. During the Great Depression priests used to organize the unemployed and march on DC. Those priests are few and far between now. The church sold out. When is the last time that you heard Catholic Social teachng being preached at a sermon. Catholic SOcial Teaching is amazingly progressive. At least the priests of SOuth America take it to heart. Who knows there could be a change back to more social teaching.
Anyways. My prayers are for this courageous priest.
of course the eia gives an inaccurate assessment.... cargill's lawyers' high paid jobs depend on their navigating their way through every conceivable loophole to do what they do best... facilitate cargill's gobbling up of ever more resources with as little renumeration or accountability as possible to keep their stockholders happy with the trickle up effects. free market capitalism. ya gotta love it.
"we have to be more aware and confront them"
speaking truth to power. bravery. decency. liberation theology. whatever you call it, this world needs more of that interconnectedness-spark that motivates father sena...percy schmeiser...raj patel...stan cox...frances moore lappe..... so many others waking up and working to be heard rather than just herded.
If history shows us anything we can count on one or all of the following:
1. the local bishop will be pressured by Rome to "reassign" the priest to take care of a convent in the middle of nowhere.
2. the local bishop will order the priest to be silent in return for a large donation from Cargill,
3. the priest will receive some middle of the night visitors who will threaten him or simple execute him.
Rome does not tolerate anyone who challenges the establishment.
ppeters, 11:30am,
If any of this happens (excluding his being executed), the courageous priest should send an emissary to Rome to nail a list of protest theses on the door of the Vatican, and form the new Church of Liberation Theology. He might be immediately joined by most Jesuits and many others chafing under the Roman regime. It could be based in Brazil or some other Latin American nation.
Ray Berthiaume
Peters: At first I thought "How cynical. But on reflection I believe I know of instances where each of the three possibilities has happened. I pray his bishop supports him. I know the people are behind him. We need more priests like him!
Keep in mind that the current Pope, while head of the Holy Office, was the person instrumental in condemning "Liberation Theology". I have a cousin (then a nun) who was convicted in this country of a felony for giving sanctuary to Guatemalan refugees--not a word of complaint from our hierarchy. A man (a priest) who was in the seminary with me received a severe beating at the hands of Teamster thugs because of his involvement with the UFW. The sister (a nun) of a another friend was executed in the middle of the night in the Amazon valley. She also was trying to protect native rights. Deafening silence from the authorities follows each event. The Vatican is more interested in "rendering to Ceasar" than in "come to me all you who labor and are buredened." The only rest they will know is the rest of death.
There is always someone willing to rid the King of a meddlesome priest.
I think Father Ediberto is a true man of God.
The last pope shock his finger at Latin America priests and bishops who practiced liberation theology (the clergy surviving the death squads anyway). Liberation theology reminded his, silk slippered, holiness of "peoples movements" at the advent of communist Poland.
He did embrace the ultra conservative opus deigh christo-fascists though.
The roman catholic church is still all about maintaining top-down feudal order. "You peasants will get your reward in heaven." Just keepin the ol franchise alive.