World Bank Loan Withdrawn From Brazilian Cattle Corporation
THE INTERNATIONAL Finance Corporation (IFC), private lending arm of the World Bank, has withdrawn a $90 million (€57 million) loan to Brazilian cattle industry giant Bertin, following complaints that it was using the money to expand further into the Amazon region.
"It is good news that the World Bank is withdrawing these funds, yet scandalous that it was feeding a company that causes Amazon deforestation and climate change in the first place," said Paulo Adario, Greenpeace Brazil's Amazon campaign director.
The move came two weeks after a Greenpeace report, Slaughtering the Amazon, revealed that financial backing for the Brazilian cattle industry had turned it into the largest single source of deforestation in the world.
The report, based on a three-year undercover investigation, showed how Bertin and two other Brazilian companies supplying the global market with cattle products for top brands and supermarkets buy cattle from Amazon farms involved in illegal deforestation.
By helping Bertin to expand into the Amazon, Greenpeace said the IFC had been driving further destruction of the rainforest, a haven for biodiversity and one of the world's key defences against climate change because of its crucial role as a "carbon sink".
"For a bank that portrays itself as the ‘knowledge bank', this was a very ill-conceived and thoroughly destructive use of its resources", Mr Adario said at the weekend. "It must now guarantee that it will not invest in such damaging projects in the future."
The last $30 million (€21.4 million) loan from the IFC will no longer be given to Bertin and it is anticipated that the World Bank subsidiary will ask that the $60 million (€35.6 million) it had already invested in the company be returned early.
Tropical deforestation is responsible for approximately 20 per cent of global greenhouse gas emissions, and Brazil has been ranked by Greenpeace as the world's fourth biggest "climate polluter".
Following the slow progress of climate talks in Bonn over the past two weeks, Greenpeace is calling on world leaders to "take personal responsibility for securing an effective climate-saving deal" by attending the UN Climate Summit in Copenhagen next December.
"This would include providing $110 million a year for developing countries to tackle the climate crisis, $40 million a year of which should go towards forest protection in return for commitments to end deforestation in the Amazon by 2015 and globally by 2020."
Last week, Brazilian president Lula da Silva announced that he would veto clauses in an Amazon land reform Bill that would legalise the landholdings of millions of people who have settled in the region - a move that could spur more deforestation.
"We want to be an example to the world in taking care of our own things," he said, adding that Brazil was now open to adopting targets to cut its own greenhouse gas emissions if rich countries agreed to do more.
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
9 Comments so far
Show Alldebit calculator can be calculated his kind of information can usually be found on billing statements or by checking your account online. The more data you have on hand, the quicker and easier using the debt calculator will be.
commercial finance
http://www.whygroup.com.au
Thank God for small victories.
If people will do this to nature what will they do to us for a few dollars more? I'll skip anything that walks, swims or flies.
"this was a very ill-conceived and thoroughly destructive use of its resources"
Liberalism as promoted in the USA seeks individual fulfillment via release of responsibility. Ill-conceived ideas and policies are the result. Chances are the bureaucrats at the World Bank who pushed loans to the cattle giant see their job as primarily a means to this personal fulfillment end, to make one's mark on something, anything, damn the consequences. This is taught in US ivy-league schools. This is liberalism of the Ayn Rand Fountainhead kind.
>>>rtdrury wrote: Chances are the bureaucrats at the World Bank who pushed loans to the cattle giant see their job as primarily a means to this personal fulfillment end, to make one's mark on something, anything, damn the consequences.
I have seen and interacted with such bureaucrats. Some of them have Ph.D.'s. In addition to the full-time bureaucrats, there are tons of 'consultants'. The whole thing works through connections, lots of easy money to be made, résumés padded, reports produced, PowerPoint presentations made, international trips...and so on....life is good - for these folks.
The storefront is pretty and the merchandise looks appealing. Out back in the alley they are butchering nature. Go ahead and buy, just say a little penance at church. This is the status quo.
Numbers 3 through 17 or the 3,500 or so reasons I refuse to eat anything with a face.
Activity in the Amazon is getting ample attention. The concerns are throughout the country. Recommendations from a major report on biofuels which addresses land use to which the cattle industry in Brazil is also subject:
http://www.reporterbrasil.org.br/biofuel/exibe.php?id=80
old goat, thanks for the link. I had always suspected that Brazil's claims about their sugarcane-based alcohol cannot be true, and that it's simply another opportunity for them to cash in on global demand for 'stuff', even if it means clearing out vast areas of the Amazon. When I see news articles on the Amazon deforestation, I often wonder - who does the Amazon really belong to? What's so sacred about some stupid line drawn on a map? The reason other countries cannot do anything to stop this destruction is because no one has the moral authority.