Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Michael Pollan Dishes out Advice on Healthful Eating
Michael Pollan's advice on healthful eating is refreshingly straightforward: Eat food, not too much, mostly plants.
Pollan, who has written tomes on food including the best-seller The Omnivore's Dilemma, said he deliberately kept his latest book, In Defense of Food, An Eater's Manifesto, short and simple.
"The deeper I delved into the whole field of nutrition science and the whole issue of what you should eat, the simpler it got," Pollan said in a phone interview from Berkeley, Calif.
"I was able to cut through the underbrush and discover that those seven words say it all. That was a little alarming to my publisher because she was expecting 50- or 60,000 words.
"But it really did come down to eating real food," he said, the kind of unadulterated whole foods, not snacks, that our great grandparents ate. He also found "that there is no good reason to worry excessively about specific nutrients, that you could safely tune out 99 percent of the nutritional advice that was out there, whether it was corporate, governmental or medical. There has been so much noise, so much static about nutrition," he said. "When you look at the science behind some of these nutrient claims, it did not hold up."
That is a part of the speech Pollan is planning to deliver Saturday evening at the Enoch Pratt Free Library. Witty and erudite, Pollan is to able to discuss the big issues of food and the environment in an approachable, lively style.
Take Meatless Mondays, for instance. It has been known in academic circles for some time that a meat-based diet requires twice as much energy to produce as a vegetarian diet, said Robert Lawrence, director of the Center for a Livable Future at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. The Hopkins center promoted the idea of going meatless one day a week to reduce the burden that food-production practices place on the environment.
But the concept took off after Pollan endorsed it during an appearance on Oprah.
"We were particularly pleased when Michael Pollan recommended to Oprah Winfrey's viewers that to help the environment, they should refrain from eating meat once a week," Lawrence said in an e-mail.
While Pollan's family has adopted the Meatless Monday regime, he acknowledged it has not come without cost. "I have a son who is 16 years old and who craves meat. For him, it is not a meal if an animal has not died to produce it. We struggle to have that meatless day with him."
On days other than Monday, Pollan eats meat, but only from animals that have been raised in pastures, not in feed lots. "Once you have seen those places," he said, referring to the industrial cattle operations he visited while researching a magazine story on how a calf comes to market, "you lose your appetite."
Pollan said he wrote this eater's manifesto because even though people were concerned about the origins of food - a topic he covered in The Omnivore's Dilemma - they were more interested in personal health, in what to eat. He answers this question by setting out a number of cleverly phrased rules.
He said, for instance, that one way to distinguish real food that you should be eating from edible substances that you should avoid is that real stuff has no more than five ingredients. The food industry has also taken notice of these rules, he said, and figured out ways to capitalize on them. There is now a brand of ice cream, hardly health food, that touts itself as a five-ingredient mix.
"So I have to come up with some new rules to counter these industry ploys," Pollan said. He promised to disclose a few of his new rules at the Baltimore gathering.
Pollan said part of the reason we are confused about what to eat is that we recently got a lot of bad advice from so-called experts. For instance, the public-health campaign that urged eaters to abandon butter, which has saturated fat, and replace it with margarine, which is loaded with trans-fats, was based on bad science, he said.
"We traded in a fat that had been part of the human diet for eons for one that looked novel, but turned out to be much more dangerous. Getting people off lard and chicken fat and butter and putting them on hydrogenated oils has been a public-health disaster, and we are owed an apology," he said.
Pollan, who teaches journalism to graduate students at the University of California, Berkeley, was also critical of the way the media has covered food and nutrition.
"The authors of the new nutritional studies get hyped. The editors of the newspapers want front-page stories, and the net effect, since journalism thrives on change, is that journalists tend to exaggerate every change in the science. Science is an iterative process. Scientists make mistakes they refine, but as you watch the twists and turns in a newspaper, you would think every news study is blowing up the one before."
He added that "journalism thrives on novelty, not on tradition. And the fact is that most of the wisdom about food is old, traditional and not surprising."
Pollan, 54, grew up in Woodbury, N.Y., He got his undergraduate degree in English from Bennington College and his master's in American literature from Columbia University. He was an editor of Harper's magazine. For a time, he and his wife, Judith Belier, a painter, lived in a rural section of Connecticut. There, he planted a garden and did battle with a hungry woodchuck, trying to fire-bomb the critter before eventually building a fence to keep the animal at bay.
His career as a writer is, he said, a confluence of his passion for gardening and his study of American nature writing.
"One of the lessons you learn when you start gardening is that you have a legitimate quarrel with other species, weeds and pests. How you navigate that quarrel is going to define you as a gardener," he said.
"From the Puritans to Thoreau to John Muir, I love that whole question of our relationship to the natural world."
As fond as he was of the American literary tradition of nature writing, Pollan said its approach of "worshiping nature as a spectator" was a fine way to preserve wilderness but is not an approach that is useful today. "We talk about nature too much in terms of virgin land or raped land. We need to think about married land, about how we get what we need and the land is actually improved. I have seen that in farms and in my own garden."
Growing your own vegetables, as Pollan does in his Berkeley front yard, gives you an opportunity to negotiate a relationship with nature, he said.
"When you are cooking with food from the garden," Pollan writes in In Defense of Food, the food is "alive." "You are not in danger," he wrote, "of mistaking it for a commodity, or fuel, or a collection of nutrients."
Pollan, the proud gardener, puts it another way: A Sun Gold cherry tomato pulled from his front yard is, he said, "a tomato so sweet even a kid will eat it."
Pollan's rules
Here is a sampling of Michael Pollan's rules of how to eat well:- Avoid food products that contain ingredients that are unfamiliar, unpronounceable, more than five in number or include high-fructose corn syrup.
- Avoid products that make health claims.
- Shop in the peripheries of the supermarket, where the fresh food is; avoid the middle, where processed food resides.
- Eat meals, not snacks.
- Eat plants, especially leaves.
- Don't get your fuel from the same place as your car gets its gas.
- Eat slowly, at a table, and try not to eat alone.

31 Comments so far
Show AllThe shift to hydrogenated fats was not the result of "bad science".
Here is what happened:
Corporate welfare for the petrochemical industry created cheap fertilizer and pesticides followed by corporate welfare for agribusiness that created a surplus of corn and soybeans that were converted into hydrogenated fats that were heavily marketed on the premise that saturated fats were bad and hydrogenated fats were good.
From a marketing standpoint, one of the best things about hydrogenation is the increased shelf life of the products.
Uh, I read this book about a year ago. This isn't new.
Not to you, nor to me, but there are other people out there. Plus, it's good to be reminded of what's real.
But according to the FDA , if these foods are "good for you" they are drugs and the FDA must regulate them.
Only if they make health claims on their boxes. Real food doesn't come in a box or a package.
Of course it does. When we sold our vegetables to the town folk, we not only put them into a box so they could transport them, but we "advertised" that it was very good for them. ;)
Have Meatless Monday Every Day!
Eat Your Veggies - Become Vegan - Eat Living raw Fruits and Vegetables
Why eat Something Dead, ie Meat is Murder - Meat is DEAD
Can we eat meat while it's still alive instead?
Hard to stick a fork in it, though.
Veganism makes people militant. Must be all the fiber.
lol. I probably get as much fiber as a vegan from all the whole grains I eat. And I am eating more veggies than ever before too...but still eat meat and dairy.
Trying to avoid eating anything with more than 5 ingredients means that you'll have to make your own meals. That's work intensive, time-consuming, not particularly glamorous, and doesn't involve a magic pill.
Unfortunately, I don't see it becoming very popular any time soon.
"Eat plants, especially leaves."
This is very good advice; the vitamin and mineral content of dark green leafy vegetables is amazing. It is important, however, not to overlook the nutritional contributions of root vegetables.
q
VEGAN - the only way to be an evironmentalist
VEGAN - the only way to be a liberal
VEGAN - the only way to be fully human
Sigh...
You people are so tiresome.
I'm not vegan, but I am a ovo-queso-pesco-pollo-vegetarian. I don't eat anything in my taxonomic class (mammilia).
Michael Pollan is a bit of a hypocrite. He advises eating mostly plants and yet he eats meat six days a week!
Also, I dare say most people would lose their appetite if they saw any animal slaughtered, whether raised in a feedlot or a pasture.
Most people are pansies as well thats why they have lost the ability to realize the importance animals in their first circle of family. Before the industrial revolution animals where the most important because they helped you raise the food you 'and' they ate, as well as being food. Every animal needs to have a job working with other animals, just like you. 200000000000 yrs of being an omnivore doesn't go away over night.
Don't let the words get in the way of your understanding. Animals have always been on the menu. Life and Death are what create new life and a future for the world. Vegans die and animals eat them, thats why vegans taste better, 200000000000yrs of knowledge cant be wrong.
All our meat sources are mostly vegetarian(vegan) and have been a major part of creating our known history of agriculture. You city folk(vegans) cant realize what a toll on the environment not eating locally does. You would not be able to survive the fast paced farmers life of having a cow under your legs, wheat in one arm, a chicken in the other, a load of vegetables on your back and a skid or a wagon filled with tools and poop to spread as fertilizer. You would want a steak as you pound out nails for your house you are constantly building in front of the fire after dark, as farmers work is never done. Watch out for the frost as it might come unexpectedly and kill your fresh plantings! Quick! You vegans run to the fields and start a series fires to keep the frost off! Tend them till dawn when the last cold snap comes! Good luck!
City folk............
Why do you assume all vegans are "city folk?" Or that we don't realize the importance of eating locally? Your stereotyping negates whatever point you were trying to make.
Pollan is a talented writer and all...
But fire-bombing a chipmunk...?
What kind of "marriage with nature" is that...?
Why do people resort to violence out of expediency or efficiency...?
I guess preventive measures for pest control was only considered after reactionary revenge didn't work out... Kind of like US foreign policy...
I guess that defines different folks in their approach to reality...
Another strategy is to grow abundance, so even the lowly woodchuck can have enough to eat...
After all... It was the local chipmunk population that was displaced by Pollan's Connecticut country home and garden...
GoldenMean;
You have never had a garden, have you?
While I don't advocate fire-bombing a chipmunk, I can tell you from experience that it is very frustrating to have your newly planted tomatoes uprooted by squirrels. I'd be happy to share, but . . . you have to be able to grow it first in order to be able to share it.
How likely do you think it is, that there were once wild animals roaming freely wherever you live? And if that's no longer the case, does it mean that they were displaced by . . . you?
Hey Bea...
Why yes... Thanks for asking...
I have been growing a kitchen garden in an urban area for ten years...
Including teaching free classes in my community about permaculture...
And I can say that the biggest pests are humans and their domesticated animals..
I have volunteered on organic farms, and wild crafted food from the wilderness...
And while the elk may lay down in the corn feild and trample a bushel or two,
I won't fire bomb one to just to save ten bucks...
I have done extensive reading about gardening to learn from the mistakes & successes of others...
There are many natural non-violent forms of defense... Deer fencing, chicken wire, mesh, and glitter strips...
Yes, uprooted plants by rodents are indeed a problem, and there are multiple solutions...
I have a composting worm bin where I put my kitchen scraps and autumn leaves...
It is also habitat for rodents... Who have an abundance of easy food in one place...
so they don't bother doing extra work digging up other plants for food...
As far as my own footprint goes... When I built my art studio in my garden...
(as inspired by Pollan's "A Place of My Own" where he describes building his art studio)...
I chose to add a living roof and an elevated floor, as to not displace bird & rodent habitat...
GoldenMean;
OK - you win - a fence is a better option than fire-bombing. I thought you were being a little judgmental, but . . . it looks like at least you practice what you preach.
However, I do wonder if you feel equally sympathetic towards aphids, hornworms, mites, earwigs, mosquitoes . . .
:-)
BTW I don't use chemicals either. But after trying everything else (OK - maybe not "everything"), including feeding them, I trap my squirrels and give them a nice ride to the country three or four miles away from my garden where I hope they will be happy. Undoubtedly, this forced relocation wouldn't meet your approval. Maybe some day I'll try the fence. Frankly, it never occurred to me that it could be a solution.
I wish you happy gardening!
Bea
Hey Bea...
I live by the philosophy of "Do Least Harm"... And occasionally I will accidentally kill a slug or worm while gardening... It makes me sigh and I try to avoid it... But I don't lose sleep over it like the Jainists...
There are several strategies for insect control that work in different climates and soils and garden styles... And a multiple pronged approach works best... Variety and companion planting is better than monocrops for keeping pest populations down...
Beneficial herbs like basil, onion, and calendula are natural insect repellents... Beneficial insects like lady bugs, crane flies, and bees also keep pests at bay and help pollinate... Beneficial animals like bats and birds eat Mosquitos and other pests, and batboxes are easy to make... Bugs and molds tend to be attracted to the more stressed out plants, so sufficient watering, organic fertilizer, spacing, and sunlight helps to keep plants vigorous enough to fend off bacteria & mold, and recover from damage from foragers... Crop rotation and letting it be fallow from time to time keeps pest populations in check, and allows the soil system to equalibrialize... "No till" methods like mulching and layering keep the soil from being compacted, allowing the roots to grow deeper and water to percolate... There are some natural chemicals (like beer) that are useful for slugs and snails... But it is messy to clean the beer traps, and I'd rather drink the beer myself... So I use Sluggo sprinkles instead...
Peace Light & Love
GoldenMean;
Thanks for your reply. It looks like we have more in common than I originally thought. I guess it's better to talk, rather than make assumptions . . .
However, how is your "accidentally" killing the slugs with Sluggo so much better than fire-bombing a chipmunk? I know that chipmunks are much cuter than slugs and a little higher on the food chain (still - a pest is a pest is a pest), and . . . I am only half kidding. So? For all we know, slug's internal life could be more complex than ours. :-)
Butter and a substitute for it that's [healthy] is to simply take real extra virgin olive oil of first and cold pressed kind and dip your bread in it while dining; or, alternatively, put the olive oil in a glass jar with a cover and then refrigerate it. The latter will produce a thickened or solidified olive oil that'll be easy to spread on bread as you would do with butter or non-hydrogenated vegetable oil margarines.
Using a plastic container, I found the olive oil did not solidify at all, or hardly enough anyway, when refrigerating it, and putting the container of oil in the freezer solidified the oil, but much too hard for spreading easily on bread. The oil solidified well in glass containers simply placed in the refrigerator; not the freezer.
As for the number of ingredients mentioned in the article, when purchasing prepared foods, I pretty have been using the same guideline for years without having read of this being suggested anyway; BUT even if the number is four ingredients, then I still make sure that they're all really okay for my personal health concerns, due to needing to self-monitor for triglycerides, high level of bad cholesterol, and soy, the latter of which causes gout for my father and myself. But five ingredients seems to be generally good guideline when purchasing prepared foods.
When I prepare my foods entirely from scratch, then there can be several more than only five, for I use several or more spices, always looking to buy only non-irradiated; and spices, while giving us very, very small amounts of vitamins and minerals still provide a good source of these elements. I just started making my own curry this month and this alone has ginger, cumin, tumeric, and three or four other spices; but not hot pepper spices like cayenne and paprika, f.e., for I read at whfoods.com that these have a low smoke or burn point, that they should only be added to dishes when we're ready to eat them, like once the dish is on the table and you're going to "chown (it) down". Apparently many people make curries with a hot pepper spice mixed in and then this mix is to be used for cooking; and that's apparently, according to whfoods.com's guide on these pepper spices, something we should not do.
So when I mix my spice mixes with other things for cooking, then it ends up being several more ingredients than only five; like adding onions and garlic, celeri, parsley, and meat, fish or eggs. NO problem! We then know what all of the ingredients truly are and that they're all safe.
Several years ago I read that people in India cook meats with over 20 different spices and have been doing this for a very long time; in good part because many spices, which include onion and garlic, contain anti-bacterial qualities.
It's all from readings; nothing I scientifically researched. But I think this above approach is wholly safe.
Oh, what about when buying quiches containing over five ingredients, but they're listed as being all spices and vegetables, possibly also cheese? I treat these as okay, but am careful about which company I'll buy quiches from.
Best, I guess, is to simply prepare our foods ourselves; except when knowing of good prepared-food producers. I don't buy from the large corporations; wouldn't trust them with what I eat! Their prepared foods would only be used as a [last] resort; for myself anyway.
I also don't buy cleaning products from large corporations, unless I'm low on money and then buy environmentally safe dish soap containing no colorants. Otherwise, bleach and white vinegar, white vinegar and baking soda mix (for cleansing drains, like for sinks, f.e.) suffice for cleaning around my residence, as far as I'm concerned. For bathing or showering, one bar of good quality soap suffices for the whole job; using no shampoos or hair conditioners, for no such junk is getting my ... little amounts of money to live with and I think the stuff is garbage marketing anyway.
In computer science there's the principle of KISS, "Keep it simple, stupid!". It's applicable for much more than computer science, being generally good "rule of thumb", imo anyway.
Cooking foods like with many spices does not fit with KISS? Sure it does; it only takes a little time to learn what each spice is good for, and which ones can be used either as a spice or herb, if a person also like herbal teas. Cinnamon, f.e., makes a great spice as well as herb, making great herbal cinnamon tea, f.e. Fennel seeds, f.e., can be added to the cinnamon tea for the extra health benefit and if you chew on the seeds once they're moist enuogh, but haven't soak for too long, then you get a great licorice sort of flavour from them.
Been unlucky with cinnamon in the area where I reside since last fall; it's nearly always tasteless, which tells me that it's too aged. I've told the store about this a number of times, but it appears to still be getting cinnamon, powdered and stick form, that's too aged. Spices don't keep forever! Whfoods.com provides information on storage of all foods covered at the website and says spices don't last more than around a year, for those with the longest duration, and powdered form loses its qualities more quickly than seed and stick forms.
Can I stop by for dinner? :-)
Butter substitutes, a little more on this, and for baking cookies, f.e., are listed at www.foodsubs.com, where many other food subs are listed or described. I don't know if what the website provides for information is thoroughly correct, but have had success with its recommendations, so far.
Bananas and apple sauce can be used to substitute for butter for making or baking cookies. I usually make whole oats cookies, mixing in buckwheat and whole wheat flours, wheat germ and bran, sunflower and (if I have them) hemp seeds, diced dried figs (the non-sulfur... kind), some blackstrap molasses, cinnamon (and we can add from a few or more other spices), an egg or two or else a substitute, possibly a few more ingredients not presently coming to mind (not having made any of these for months now); and use 1/3 or 1/4 the amount of butter other people say to use, and only to make the cookies a little richer than they'd be without any butter, substituting in pureed bananas and a little apple sauce for the rest of the butter that's not used. This is the general idea of the recipe anyway; I'd have to pull out the written recipe to check and won't do that now.
(All organic ingredients, but only for the extra this provides for health and environmental ethics, as well as to refrain from giving my money to the large corporations.)
Egg substitutes? One is to use flax seed and instructions for how to use these seeds to prepare egg substitute are easy to find online. I'm not sure, but think it really only substitutes for the white, not the yolk, but maybe both (?).
I developed an allergic reaction to eggs for a little while last year, seriously swelling feet (no pain at all and didn't even know they were swollen, until trying to put on shoes or boots, which I could no longer put on at all, a little inconvenient during winter!); but am eating eggs again without any problems, for several months now.
But flax seeds are rich in Omega-3 and possibly other healthy plant fats, and preparing them for egg substitute is easy, very simple, and has turned out well for me, so I might throw some of this into the cookie mix anyway, with or without the egg whites. I think I'd want to include the yolks though, having read that these are highly nutritious in content. Whites are also nutritious, but if I developed the swelling reaction again, then the whites would have to be omitted. This allergenic information might be available at whfoods.com, but if they don't cover eggs, then it's easy to find the information online at other websites.
For the cookies, the wheat germ and bran for the cookies are only in relatively small amounts; f.e., 3 cups whole rolled oats, 1 cup each of buckwheat and whole wheat or kamut wheat flours, and then around 1/2 to 1 cup of wheat germ and about half that for bran. The germ for its highly nutritional value and the bran for extra fibre.
If anyone wonders why I didn't mention raisins for the cookies, it's because the damn little things are too soft, while chopped or diced figues or figs provide a great chewiness and I like this for the pleasure of working the jaws. With the figues I have found the need to remove the really dry parts of the skin, where it's discoloured and no longer dark, but rather a light brown; usually using black figues. These lighter areas are tougher than leather to chew; no, they're just plain unchewable. The good part of the figue gives a cookie some real "body", say; otherwise, the cookies would "disappear down the hatch" ... fast enough, besides needing to chew the sunflower seeds a little. The figue pieces keep you chewing quite a while longer; good for the jaw muscles, I figure.
I believe to recall reading that figues are also more nutritional than raisins; maybe much more nutritional.
Dates? No, for they're just a sugar substitute, so I don't bother; instead using a good, pure, real cane sugar, along with the molasses. Occasionally using real, pure maple syrup, but this stuff is expensive these days.
This is possibly not the best recipe guideline in the world for these cookies, but works fine for me and we certainly won't or shouldn't have bowel movement "hang-ups" with such high-fibre foods! My diet is definitely high in fibre, particularly grain kinds, not being able to afford many fruits, and it's evidently important for the intestines; keeps them "good and clean", instead of building up crud on the walls, which (I read and believe) can come to develop into serious health problems; not meaning for bowel movements, but truly serious problems.
"Make food your medicine and medicine your food", a farming-loving RCC (Jesuit, maybe) priest once wrote. It's an article somewhere on the Internet and I believe he actually practiced agriculture.
And bon apetit!
Thanks for the tempting tips. BTW--one tablespoon of flax seed, mixed with three tablespoons of water substitutes for one egg in baking recipes.
good work…unique site and interesting too… keep it up…i am looking forward for more updates.
acne treatment
http://www.skinb5.com/
This guy is just trying to market a book. There's a lot more to food and nutrition than his seven word summary. For one thing, Europeans and especialy Euro-USans fell into a weird tendency toward white foods and seasoned not with spices but with meat, dairy, sugar and salt. White foods are low on nutrients, particularly phytochemicals. And spices are the most potent foods by weight, by vitamin/mineral content, phytochemicals, and especially in aiding the immune system. He's right in that simple is good, but tend toward wild food, and away from the "supermarket". I can't believe he actually used that word! When you tend toward wild food, you find yourself attracted to the dark colors and the spicy stuff. It's no surprise that our instincts direct us toward the most nutritious food. Nature doesn't need intervention.