Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
As Crisis Spreads, Europe Points Finger at America
LONDON - Financial firms are reeling in the United Kingdom, Ireland, and the Netherlands. Iceland is on the brink of national bankruptcy. A continent that has enjoyed steady growth for years is watching it all melt away.
Financial firms are reeling in the United Kingdom, Ireland, and the Netherlands. Iceland is on the brink of national bankruptcy. A continent that has enjoyed steady growth for years is watching it all melt away. And everyone is pointing the finger of blame across the Atlantic Ocean.(Kim Haughton/WPN for The Boston Globe) And everyone is pointing the finger of blame across the Atlantic Ocean.
In the financial district of London, the pubs of Dublin, and on the campuses of Holland, people are citing reckless lending in the US mortgage market, unbridled American consumption, and a lack of government oversight for the financial meltdown that has engulfed Europe. Many dismiss the US bailout as an unwise and hypocritical move that rewards the greedy bankers who caused the crisis and breaches the ideals of the country that pioneered market-driven capitalism.
"It seems to me that the US government supports the people that least deserve it," said Sanne Castro, 28, a student at the Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands. "But it does prove that even the most hard-core free-market capitalists would rather turn in their fundamental beliefs than their money."
Europeans are watching the value of their investments plummet, their banks collapse, their ability to borrow or get a mort gage diminish, their currency slide, and their job security become more fragile than ever. In short, they look just as shell-shocked as Americans.
The financial free fall in Europe is, in part, due to a shift in economic philosophy by the major European nations, said William Keylor, director of the International History Institute at Boston University. European nations, seeking to emulate the formula for growth and financial innovation that has propelled the American economy, gave up tight control over financial markets and privatized formerly state-run major industries, such as gas and transportation. When stock markets were advancing and economies were growing, Europeans embraced the changes, Keylor said. But the current crisis has caused many to have second thoughts. Now, some are insisting that the Europeans had it right all along, and government ownership would have limited the risks and curbed the catastrophes now enveloping the region.
"It is hard for them to play the 'blame game' when they chose this path freely and continued to follow it when times were good," Keylor said.
It is clear that times have changed.
The Euro Stoxx 50 Index, which measures 50 European blue-chip stocks, plunged 22 percent just in the past week, mirroring precipitous drops in exchanges in London, Germany, and Paris. As the panic spreads across oceans and national borders, many Europeans are criticizing US leaders for not doing enough to stabilize the global market.
Even British Prime Minister Gordon Brown took a swipe at Americans as he proposed his government's own roughly $800 billion bailout of its banks earlier this week.
"This problem started in America with irresponsible actions and lending by some institutions," Brown told a press conference on Wednesday. "The global financial market has ceased to function."
The anger marks a drastic change among Europeans, who gleefully looked on as the early stages of the US crisis seemed to show the weaknesses of America's unfettered capitalism, according to Nigel Gault, an economist at Global Insight in Lexington, Mass. But as the economic storm has ripped through Europe, schadenfreude is being replaced by anger.
The most severe excesses came from America, Gault said, but the greed and reckless behavior weren't confined to the United States, Gault said. Although European banks were much more conservative, their lending policies fueled housing booms in parts of the United Kingdom, Spain, and Ireland that are now going bust. And some European banks, including a state-owned firm in Germany, held billions of dollars in risky mortgage-backed securities.
"Is that America's fault for selling them toxic assets?" Gault said. "Or Europe's fault for not more thoroughly investigating just what they were buying?"
Some Europeans, noting the response of the Bush administration to Wall Street's woes, have chided US leaders who have railed against the European model of managed capitalism for suddenly embracing government intervention in the financial sector.
"These people were the first to state that government regulation in the market is in the long run bad for the economy, for example when it comes to environmental laws, social welfare, and of course Wall Street," Castro said. "And what are they doing now?"
In London, the wreckage of the US crisis looms over Canary Wharf, the city's new financial district. A skyscraper here until recently was the main office of Lehman Brothers. At a nearby Starbucks, next to what used to be the headquarters of First Boston Bank, Alastair Green, 50, an investment banker, expressed concern about the relentless market mayhem.
"Everybody assumes there is a solution out there," Green said. "But what if there's not?"
Emily Springford, a lawyer who specializes in bankruptcy and insolvency litigation in London, said it's obvious the United States is the main driver behind the current upheaval here, but Europe cannot escape blame entirely. She supports the US bailout because it was "necessary to take action," but says British leaders are doing a better job at protecting the people's interests.
"There is still a sense of disbelief here about how fast the crisis is spreading," Springford said.
The question for European leaders, Keylor said, is whether the crisis will cause them to reconsider American-style capitalism.
But for Phillip Massey, an information-technology worker in Dublin, the question is not what Europe can do for itself, but whether the American bailout of its financial institutions will mean a worldwide recovery.
"When America sneezes, the whole world catches a cold," Massey said. "But chicken soup and home remedies aren't going to fix this one. The world as a whole needs treatment."
Globe correspondent Michael Goldfarb contributed to this report.



121 Comments so far
Show AllI'm not one to shy away from looking in the mirror, but c'mon, greed and stupidity know no boundaries. While we in the U.S. may be greedy and dumb and hypocritical, we haven't exactly cornered the market.
"It is not true that it's one damn thing after another - it's one damn thing over and over." Edna St. Vincent Millay
I think that , what is commonly questioned, around the world, especialy in more wealthy countries, is why the hell do the US people put up with this shit?
They see our greed in our refusal to provide health care, decent housing, FEMA< FDA< etc.ZThey see it in the uS "tax phobia". They have trouble understanding why, with al the wealth at the top, why it is that uS accepts tax cut over and over, when what we really need is revenue.
They see a country of people , more or less, out for themselves. And they are correct. The rest of the world (at least our more wealthy allies) just do not live that way. And they do not want to.
"I think that , what is commonly questioned, around the world, especialy in more wealthy countries, is why the hell do the US people put up with this shit?"
Are you a US person? If so, why do _you_ put up with this shit? Beyond writing on Common Dreams and voting, what do you do to _not_ put up with this shit?
I "put up with this shit", because I cannot sell my fricking house now, thanks to greed and Bush. ( I wouldve ben out of here in 2004, if I couldve afforded it) I DONT put up with it, in that I dont just go along with the duopoly. I worked for almost 25 yrs as a social worker. I will not go into what i did. I spent a year overseas in W, Europe, in a workcamp, so I know what it is like there.
I spent days with moveon.org in 2004. I sat at the polls til 3:00 am (and the bar). I went for a hearing last week to protest the rise in "housing values " in my poor neighborhood (they need revenue , of course--let then go get it in the suburbs!)
I am going Tuesday to attend a hearing on the cuts on Rx Drugs for Medicaid .
What the f*ck have you done?
Hey, no need to take that tone - I was just asking what you did in the same vein that you made your statement.
Me? I've been a delegate for Jerry Brown. I've worked to get the Green Party off the ground in my state (it isn't). I've contacted and threatened my reps ad nauseum. I write op ed pieces and letters ad nauseum. I've worked on campaigns to unseat useless pols.
I'm glad that you've done stuff and that you continue to do more. Too many here and there don't do shit then wonder why they have to put up with shit. So, my hat's off to you. Keep doing good stuff and I'll keep doing good stuff and maybe we won't have to put up with so much shit.
Good for you. Do you use credo long distance? (probably). You know, you get those "free speech" calls to DC every moht? They also have cell phone (I dont have one).Also, good books and Ben & Jerrrys for everyone who signs up!
Well, we could have a real pissing contest on all the reasons that things won't work. In the end, tho, it's all just pissing. S'okay, you're in good company - there are plenty of others who justify all their pissing and moaning because "nothing works."
So good on ya for your hard earned cynicism - it will take you so very far.
"It is not true that it's one damn thing after another - it's one damn thing over and over." Edna St. Vincent Millay
What the hell is with you?? Did you think that I was being sarcastic?? Why?? I use credo, dumbass! It was kindve a "oh, good for you, and have you heard of this" thing...jeez---Obama delegates and supporters certainly are touchy. I can see why.
First, I am trying to explain what I THINK that EUians are thinking, ie: US greed. And, not we do not have a "corner on it", but, if you ask me--pretty close!
So you say, "what have you done to not put up with thsi shit"--which I saw as a "you dont do anything" type question, acting as if I only post on cd.
So, I tell you what I've done//beendoing, and you say "hats' off" and you tell me what YOUVE done/doing. I say "good for you" and you assume that I am being an asshole. After telling you what my line of work was, etc?? Talk about cynical!!
To be honest, I think taht backing Obama is about the least progressive thing you can do right now. But, at leaast you are doing somethign. I was trying to start a discussion on good, progressive action to take.
You got me ALL wrong, bud. I dont think taht "nothing works" at all!! I just dont think that acceptng the system works. But, I wasnt going to say that, as I did not want to appear too cynical. So you respond with cyniccism.
Peace, buddy?
I think that we have fallen down the undemocratic rabbit holes in our Constitution and we cannot climb out. Lack of direct elections, lack of proportional representation, and domination by money and two similar parties all hamper our political expression. The majority are against the war and are repelled by the bailout, but there are insufficient means to turn outrage into power.
Joe
Tony Blair, Gordon Brown, Sarkozy, Burlusconi and other European leaders have no right to act self-righteous. They were pathetic lap dogs, suck ups and enablers while the deregulation, looting and militarism was going on.
They have their own agendas to privatize everything and to tear down social benefits and working conditions. They cannot get as far because there are laws and regulations in Europe and a more active and organized population.
Joe
Thanks you two. Nothing left I need to say.
I'll give the regular folks in Europe credit. When their nitwits in government go too far, they take to the streets and raise hell (unlike us, who cower at home). Probably a big reason they haven't wrecked things there as badly as Washington and Wall Street have here.
I wonder if the citizens in these countries will lose their national healthcare? (Now THAT could be ugly.)
Some interviewee last week said "the American people would panic, but they don't know how."
That's because of the Prozac in our water and the Dumbdown in our TeeVees.
Hey, did y'all hear that they're reprising the Partridge Family nitcom? C'mon be happy...
To be fair, the Prozac is taken voluntarily and the TV is happily watched and obssesed over.
That's sort of like saying "I wonder if the US will lose its military?" No chance in hell. Even the most conservative elements of Europe would not support giving up national health care.
You are exactly right! Why USns take it so long--I have no fucking idea.
They would never give up basic human rights. But, the cry you hear, is anger at possibly losng their highest standard of living in the world. I hope that it does not happen. It probaly never wil, because the people there have a lower tolerance for total bull shit!
I do not subscribe to "misery loves company".
They also have regulations and laws that allow them to get rid of these people alot faster than we do--unless Congress had the balls to impeach, here.
Let us not forget Margaret Thatcher who helped introduce unfettered capitalism in the UK, at the same time Ronald Reagan did the same in the US - Blair and his cronies continued it and where followed by all right-wing neo-cons on mainland Europe, Berlisconi, Sarkozy, Balkenende et al allowing the corporations to do as they please and the banks to play Russian Roulette with money in the name of greed.
Many of us on this side of the water knew that once the US started getting in the shit Europe would follow behind it.
As usual though the ruling elite get away with losing nothing (or even adding to their wealth) and we the people get screwed rotten by corrupt politicians protecting their paymasters, the ruling elite.
Revolution Now!
peace and love
all is illusion...there is no government
I don’t understand why people put their money in the stock market, or in investment packages that are nothing more than disguised wrappers around the stock market. I don’t have an IRA. I don’t want one. People criticized me years ago for feeling that way. Who is criticizing now? I thought people would have learned their lesson from reading history about the collapse in 1929. Evidently not. My personal belief is that everyone who is losing the value of their stock market based investments and retirement plans is getting what they deserve. Our economy would be a lot more solid if people would just keep their money in more solid and guaranteed bonds and savings accounts. But most people are too short sighted and greedy to restrain themselves. They fall for the trap of sleazy investment analysists. They did in 1929, 1985, and now 2008. When will everyone learn from history? Keep your money in guaranteed bonds and savings accounts and forget the false promises of all those investment analysts who obviously know nothing about what they are doing. By keeping your money in guaranteed bonds and savings accounts you may be curtailing rate of growth of the economy a little bit, but that’s not a bad thing. Indeed, as a result of the economy growing too fast you are now losing all your investments, as indeed you should.
For me, the economy is doing fine. I have not lost a single cent from any of my savings accounts, and the price of gas is going down. Times are good!
Instability, even cyclical instability, i.e. the "business cycle", only tempts people to gamble for zero-sum advantage, the greater problem. The lesser problem is the idea of investing with strangers. The best investment is in your own personal enlightenment. The second best investment is in the enlightenment of your local community. With enlightenment, prosperity with stability happens rather automatically, beautifully. As a more comprehensive policy for individuals, ask yourself if the investment supports the idea of localism, limits on power concentration to something like ten man-powers.
Beautiful.
Well put.
I'm in the process of forming a local permaculture group that will share both knowledge and resources which will allow us to start to uncouple from the system. It's not going to happen overnight (unless it's forced to), but it's a necessary step down the road.
As the wise tiger said in Calvin and Hobbes: Look down the road.
Depends on the stock doesn't it. Some of them are like buying lottery tickets, you'll never get what you paid for. Others, I think, will pay you each year in something called dividends; but they're not guaranteed, only if the company profits do you ever get those.
What I take note of is the idea from an old stockbroker who didn't go broke in the crash of '29. He argued that when the shoeshine boy started trading it was time for him to get out...
Halliburton , KRB, etc, are not doing to bad, are they?
At this moment, I would NEVER keep any money in a bank account. Your financial smugness could soon change if there are extended bank holidays, the dollar is devalued, the United States goes bankrupt, or if there is severe hyper-inflation which seems to be a given. Do you really think with over $10 trillion in debt your paper money has any worth? This not only has to do with the stock market, but the financial abuse this government has perpetrated for decades. If you were truly financially astute, you would put your 'money' into hard assets, particularly food and water and equipment / land to to feed yourself, your family, and your community.
http://www.youtube.com/user/GreenProgress
That’s really good advice, and if I was only interested in earning the most possible money in my lifetime regardless of whether or not I really need it, I might take your advice. For example some people are suggesting to buy gold. But I am happy enough knowing that whatever I do lose by keeping my money in a savings account, other people lose more by keeping their money in stock market based investments. So in the end I am better off. And even gold can become unstable. I remember many years ago when it went up to $750 and ounce, then fell quickly to less than $300 and remained there about for almost three decades. I personally knew people who lost half their life savings in that disaster. At the time I was young, but not rich enough to buy a single ounce of gold. Lucky for me.
The only other place I would keep my money other than FDIC protected savings accounts and government bonds is in my mattress. But I know that would eat an anxiety hole in the hearts of most greedy Americans, so I don’t expect you will do the same. Enjoy your losses, but don’t blame me for the downturn.
Yes, I am smug, and I expect to remain smug until I die, which will be sooner than you think. You see, I am a senior at the end of his life. I don’t have a lot of money, but I have enough in the bank to survive my remaining few years. I don’t need to take dumb investment advice from financial crooks, thank you very much.
It is my personal belief that if more of the population had been like me, we would not have allowed our government to deregulate financial institutions to this extent and the current financial depression would have been completely avoided.
I repeat. Enjoy our losses, but don’t blame me for the downturn.
.All investments are subject to ups and downs. Had you purchased gold in 1970 you would be rather overjoyed with its price today:
30 years of gold highs and lows
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7284184.stm
People for the most part use the market , not as speculators, but to gain a steady profit over their working lives so that their retirement is made easier. Every appraisal of that market shows that any thirty year investment ,not speculation I reiterate, would have been a successful one.
The problem we see today stems from speculation combined with deregulation. McCain's financial adviser, Phil Gramm, actually forced through Congress the deregulation of the very sort of bundled security causing the collapse we are witnessing.
If you sat down and figured out how much money you have deprived yourself by not investing in Class A bonds or Stable Funds over that same thirty year period you might actually burst into tears. I simply cannot follow your premise that by putting our money into mattresses we would have avoided a financial crisis, we would have had a crisis of another type is all....Where do you think all the money comes from to invest in start ups and short term loans to businesses that are the heartbeat of our economy?
I think you seek to throw the baby out with the bath water. The crooks should be punished and Wall Street cleansed of dishonesty, not abandoned with little thought to the consequences.
.
We see things, not as they are, but as we are.
Anais Nin
The real question now is, will these criminals be punished? Will the dishonest elements of Wall Street be cleand out and disinfectant used to clear away their stench?
I haven't seen much movement in that direction so far.
.It is doubtful in the extreme that the culprits will be punished, Mr. More. They will ride off into the sunset with their ill gotten millions, the antithesis of the Hollywood happy ending.
What I would hope for, when this thing bottoms out eventually, is that it will serve as a learning experience and a loud call for Mr. and Mrs. Average American to understand that we all have a duty to pay attention and to participate in the process...
This crisis was made possible because those charged ( by election or appointment) with overseeing the business practices of our financial community were, in reality, servants of that community.
.
We see things, not as they are, but as we are.
Anais Nin
Where's John Wayne when you really need him to get the bad guy's?
I forgot to say, I believe Mr. and Mrs. America are wide awake.
Your graph shows the price of gold at $700 in 1979/80. Knowing my bad luck in life, that's when I would have bought, and I would have earned nothing.
No, I don't burst into tears thinking about what I could have earned over fifty years of employment and ten years of retirement (I told you I'm old). However, I have seen a lot of people throughout that entire period shed a lot of tears after losing their investments before they had a chance to collect them, investments that they would not have lost if they had put them in a savings account.
.Hee, "A cynic is a man who, when he smells flowers, looks around for a coffin." H.L. Mencken
.
We see things, not as they are, but as we are.
Anais Nin
..deleted...not worth it.
I try to respect everybody, particularly those older than myself. My comments may have seemed a little glib, but my advice was honest. What is wrong with taking some of the money you have and buying some canned food or beans and rice or other foods that will store for maybe six months to a year? You will have it to eat in the future anyway. If we go through an incredible hyper-inflationary period such as what Germany went through in the 1920's, why not invest in what you might absolutely need for the next few years?
I do not want you or my mother ( just turned seventy-five ) to have to suffer like many did during the Great Depression. I and many others have called this recent stock market / credit / financial crisis many years ago. This whole financial trick ( including the banking system - Federal Reserve ) has been a well orchestrated magic show that is finally coming to an end. We will see near-term deflation as we are seeing in much of the commodities markets, some going to fifty year lows.
But, as soon as the present hoarding of money ( increase of LIBOR rate ) by banks ends and $350 billion reenters the economy the dollar will plummet. This is what people should really be watching; the dollar - http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/quote?ticker=DXY%3AIND . Once the dollar collapses, we will see hyper-inflation.
There is a further reason why you should have some cash on hand as well. Bank disruptions could become a reality. One hundred banks are estimated to go under in 2009 - fifteen have already gone insolvent this year. 'Bank holidays' are a threat to your savings. Who cares how much money you officially have if you can not access it.
Emergency Banking Act ( Bank Holidays ) - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergency_Banking_Act
LIBOR - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libor
CDS ( Credit Default Swaps ) - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Credit_default_swap
Executive Order 6102 - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_6102
I didn’t realize you were dead serious about stocking up on food. Well, despite the bad news I hear on TV, I’m actually willing to risk it for the next few months. But in the event of further economic collapse, you are correct. We may all young and old need to purchase a supply of survival commodities. I’ll stock up on rice and beans.
GreenProgress, I see nary a thing wrong in the way you choose to save and prepare, not a thing. I do so wish you'd ease up with references from Wiki and expect to be seen as serious @ the current Global economic collapse.
BillofRights
BillofRights,
It just seems that most people have no idea as to what led up to this collapse including most of our politicians. I used Wikipedia to give a basic overview of a couple of important economic items as well as history into the Great Depression. In this instance, Wikipedia is very accurate and undisputed as these are basic facts. But, your advice is noted, and other than pertinent articles and reference material, I'll exclude links to everything else.
I think it is important that people know that the U.S. CDS market is around $15.5 trillion ( $45-$62 trillion worldwide ), a little under a third of that is subprime. A bond could have X amount of debt yet there could be 10X of CDS contracts outstanding. Warren Buffett has accurately defined derivatives bought speculatively as "financial weapons of mass destruction."
.I use Wiki myself, however I am fully cognizent of the many complaints that "facts" are slanted and opinions formed through distortions of those "facts". The folks at Wikipedia are constantly weaning out the lies and the half truths there, but it is a difficult job at best.
.
We see things, not as they are, but as we are.
Anais Nin
ardee,
Thank you, and I agree. I think it is a great service and has the potential to be even better.
Same here, once I had a small 401K with a couple of hundred dollars, and I ultimately had to quit my job due to a back injury. First, I learned what a rip-off Cobra was, then decided to use the money I had in my 401K. With all the penalties I paid, I don't think I even got my principle back. It then occurred to me that while the markets could hold my money hostage, others could sell and get out at will. Seemed more like playing a game with loaded dice in Vegas. Hint: those dice are not loaded in small investors' favor. So I opted for CD's and Bonds. But hey, you're probably better off holding real gold now if you can get it because the dollar is likely to shrink to practically nothing, or buy goods that you can store for hard times.
The limits of corporate media frames are glaring. On the extremely rare occasions that one of these outlets compares different societies, the corporate frame obscures the elites' class war against the people. The most relevant frame to the plight of the people is that societies are plagued to a variable degree by the presence of elites and their zero-sum rackets. European societies are plagued more, Asian, African and South American societies are plagued less, and North American societies are plagued most. To the extent that the economies are run by the people they have stability. To the extent that they are run by elites, they have instability, chaos and destruction. Will Common Dreams please post some frames that resonate with reality?
Dittos.
Mega-Dittoes!
Or have we crossed a "permissible irony level" here?
Basically, it is time for people to learn the real value of money. It is gonna be a hard lesson for some. Sadly, the bottom 30% of the financial spectrum will suffer the most, but I sincerely hope that this forces them to take up pitchforks and molotov cocktails and sends them into the streets to take back what was stolen from them.
It started with Reagan and Thatcher and must stop now or we are doomed to live in a destroyed world.
And yes, my estranged family deserves to be taken into the streets and hung from the trees for supporting Reagan.
"to take back what was stolen from them."
Addresses, anyone?
We can start with a particular long time businessman living here in the Pittsburgh south hills suburbs. In spite of 100% opposition of his own community, this "pillar of the community" wants to strip-mine the coal from under a large portion of the communities only major public park. Needless to say, the county nixed the idea, so he is suing the county for over $200 million for an "illegal taking" of his private property - the coal seam under the park.
It is a perfect analogy of what the global corporations are doing on global scale - only in this case - the guilty party is much more accessible.
Careful. Getting very close to being classifiable as a "terrorist". Class anger must always be either unfocused and random, or misdirected somehow.
Appropriately targeted actions are called a "revolution".
20 million Dittoheads are already being frothed up to "defend the nation" against this. They're convinced electing a Corporate Stooge like Obama is a "socialist takeover" -or at least a socialist/muslim/liberal/thing I don't like takeover. So conviced they boo their OWN Corporate Stooge when he tries to say "our" Stooge is a "decent, Christian man". What will happen when the "economy" tanks and their masters can direct them at REAL "commie" stuff like what many of us may wish to struggle for.
I'm getting a very "Weimar Republic" sorta vibe about our situation nowadays.
No, not Wiemar Republic. Rather Spain; and it 1935... only there will be no Nazi Germany to help the reactionary fascists this time.
I hate to say it, but, what was "taken away" never really existed in the first place. I know people believed it, worked for it, and they were all pawns in a Ponzi scheme.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081011/ap_on_bi_ge/where_s_the_money_4
Still I see no "movement" to take what these thieves DO have, in the service of the people who were harmed.
We act like a bunch of cowards.
"I hate to say it, but, what was "taken away" never really existed in the first place. I know people believed it, worked for it, and they were all pawns in a Ponzi scheme."
I completely agree and have said as much in a recent op-ed piece. I'm hearing this from more sides and this is good.
But, you see, this is why I asked about your comment before about US people not doing shit. You see no "movement", but in reality, you and I seem to be doing things. They may be small things, but we are doing things. In that we, we are a movement. The problem is, not nearly enough of us are doing things.
I'm not sure it's a matter of cowardice, but of not knowing how to react and what to do. So, most people wait for someone else to start a movement, when in reality, we each have to start a movement. We each have to start a revolution inside ourselves that states, "That's it! I'm not playing this fucking game one more second!" And that's it, really. It's that simple! That's where the real revolution really starts.
We need to stop waiting for someone else and just change ourselves because I can guarantee that there is no one else who will make the changes we want. We're it! Always have been.
"It is not true that it's one damn thing after another - it's one damn thing over and over." Edna St. Vincent Millay