The face of the environmental movement is changing. No longer strictly the domain of nature enthusiasts, a new socially conscious environmentalism is becoming mainstream. In Oakland, teenagers from poor neighborhoods are learning to install solar panels. In the Bronx, gardens are sprouting up on rooftops. Indigenous Americans in Hawaii, New Mexico and Minnesota are collaborating to keep their traditional food supplies free from genetically modified inbreeding. Social justice and environmental movements are creating alliances that broaden the possibility of who will benefit from the greening of America.
Building bridges between social justice activists and nature freaks isn't as hard as it sounds, as demonstrated by the eighteenth annual Bioneers Conference October 19-21 in San Rafael, California. Since 1990, pathbreaking Bioneers--biological pioneers--have provided a forum for activists from around the globe to share visions of combined social and environmental sustainability. Farmers, scientists, educators and others gather to connect their issues and create solutions.
"When you take care of nature, you take care of people. And when you take care of people, you take care of nature," Bioneers founder Kenny Ausubel said. From this vantage point, it makes sense to think about sustainability not only in terms of depleted natural resources like timber or fossil fuel, but also in terms of depleted human resources--such as the disproportionately high number of young black men who are imprisoned in America. It's possible to talk about preserving the oil-rich wilderness of Alaska in the same breath as we talk about preserving the heart and soul of New Orleans.
Van Jones, founder of the Ella Baker Center for Human Rights in Oakland, calls this "social uplift environmentalism." To counteract what he perceives as twenty years of racial segregation in the environmental movement, Jones said he envisions a world in which "a green wave lifts all boats." His organization's Green for All campaign aims to secure $1 billion in funding for "green-collar" job training across the country. Weatherizing buildings, harvesting solar power and constructing wind farms are jobs that can't be outsourced overseas. Training a green-collar workforce can help lift people out of poverty while improving the ecology of our cities.
Majora Carter is the founder of Sustainable South Bronx (SSBx), an organization working for environmental justice in that low-income neighborhood. She believes no community should have to bear the brunt of environmental toxicity. Carter lives and works in a place where nearly one in four children has asthma as a result of diesel trucks idling for hours on their way to Manhattan. SSBx is developing the South Bronx Greenway to provide safe public outdoors space and to create better transportation policy. Another project, to remove a 1.25-mile stretch of unused highway running through residential neighborhoods, will make space for the things residents really need, like parks, housing and businesses. "You shouldn't have to have a lot of green to be green," she says.
The new environmentalism also means recognizing the direct link between cultural diversity and biodiversity, a connection that indigenous activist Winona LaDuke is trying to bring into the public discourse. "Wherever Indigenous peoples still remain, there is also a corresponding enclave of biodiversity," she writes, and that variation of life-forms is vital to the health of any ecosystem. For twenty years she has fought to protect Manoomin, a wild rice that grows on the lakes in Northern Minnesota and is a sacred food to the Anishinaabeg people, from genetic engineering. Changing the DNA of traditional foods upsets the ecological systems in which they grow and impacts the people whose cultures depend on their cultivation. At the Bioneers conference LaDuke said: "I didn't know what seed slavery was until I met up with Monsanto." Keeping agri-giants like Monsanto away from traditional seed supplies and keeping Manoomin wild are two ways indigenous Americans are working to preserve native lands and cultures.
That the environmental movement has gone mainstream is a good thing because it creates the possibility of solving multiple interrelated problems at once. But this opportunity will be missed if the emerging eco-consciousness is co-opted by corporate sellers of hybrid cars and organic cotton Levi's. Integrating more diverse voices into the environmental justice movement helps ensure that it is truly a people's movement instead of a consumer movement. Bioneers are leading the way with their vision and willingness to forge alliances. After all, if green is the new black, everyone should be invited to the party.
Joliange Wright is a writer based in Brooklyn. She spends her time making herbal medicine and writing about the relationship between sustainability and social justice.
Copyright © 2007 The Nation
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Newsvine
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
6 Comments so far
Show All"You can't be co-opted, bought-off, silenced or group-thinked if you're a one-man shop. It has its limitations also, however. There's something to be said for organizing, one way or the other."
Oh, by all means, Paul - organize. It's necessary. Yet, change begins in the heart - yours, mine, and anyone with a conscience. We need each other, but we must be true to ourselves.
Be, do, organize!
--"The environmental movement has been hijacked. There is very little authenticity or integrity left. I have seen so much enviro-hypocrtical bull that I am beyond cynical."
Maybe so ... however cutting your nose to spite your face is not the best reaction. In this 'bushworld' we live in just about any single gesture needs to be cheered , whether mainstream or not. There is ofcourse the gigantic risk (reality!) of the movement being co-opted, which in all likelihood it has but if some benefit comes out of it we should be happy. I guess its called lowering your standards !!
Sure, there are parasitic people who are just trying to make a buck. We all need to pay our bills. But why the 101% jaded response? Fact of the matter is that environmentalism has indeed gone mainstream, especially for the under-40 crowd.
You can't be co-opted, bought-off, silenced or group-thinked if you're a one-man shop. It has its limitations also, however. There's something to be said for organizing, one way or the other.
The environmental movement has been hijacked. There is very little authenticity or integrity left. I have seen so much enviro-hypocrtical bull that I am beyond cynical.
I don't trust any organization, I look for hidden agendas, and where's their profit.
And I have realized that only individual effort is going to produce results.
I'm doing my part - you do yours. If everyone does what's right - then we'll all be all right.
Ramsay
If nothing else happens, at least individuals will improve their own lives by taking direct responsibility and action.
Teenagers in Oakland and (former) indigenous people and permaculturists and back-to-the-landers and organic farmers and anyone else striving to live more sustainably all have one thing in common: direct, personal action aimed at taking control and living their values. It's what I've been calling for all along here on CD. Waiting for any organization is like waiting for Godot.
Don't wait - do it now!
There was a good article in the New Yorker recently on Paul Watson:
In the seventies, Watson became interested in the writings of Henry Beston, an early-twentieth-century naturalist, who wrote, "The animal shall not be measured by man. In a world older and more complete than ours they move finished and complete, gifted with extensions of the senses we have lost or never attained." Watson found similar ideas in the work of Henry Fairfield Osborn and William T. Hornaday, and in the Deep Ecology movement, associated with Arne Naess, a Norwegian philosopher and mountaineer, who, in the early seventies, noticed that some environmentalists had begun arguing that no species was of greater worth than another, and that ecosystems should be protected for their own sake, not simply to benefit mankind. A "deep" ecologist would clean up a pond because plants and animals deserve to be free of pollution; a "shallow" ecologist would preserve the pond so that his grandchildren could have a nice place to swim.
Naess believed that the two outlooks could coexist, but Watson argues that they are in profound conflict. He contends that there are only two social currents that really matter, anthropocentrism and biocentrism, and they function in his thinking much like a Marxist dialectic: the former being a dominant and amoral world view that, fixated on the interests of one species, is inherently unstable, violent, and destined to collapse; the latter being a view that is held by a vanguard, egalitarian and just, and that, representing every species' interests, is destined to triumph."
***although i think putting such thinking into practice is difficult, I do feel it is more honest than what has been voiced recently. The CITES meeting that was held recently argued that we need to think more about people's rights(!) even though the meeting was supposed to be about other species. The good news is that a recent UN official talked at length about human arrogance and anthropocentrism , so it is good that this disease is being exposed.