US Paid Nearly $31 Million in Condolence Payments to Iraqis, Afghanis
WASHINGTON - The Department of Defense spent nearly $31 million in three years in condolence payments to civilians in Iraq and Afghanistan, but it didn't track how it doled out the money, a Government Accountability Office report found.
The report, released Thursday, is the most detailed public study of compensation payments in the two wars. It found, for example, that the Defense Department paid $26 million to settle 21,450 claims, or an average of $1,212 per claim.
The military makes condolence payments for killing or injuring a civilian or for damaging property. Generally, Iraqis and Afghanis received up to $2,500 for property damage or death. In April 2006, military officials in Iraq raised the maximum payment to $10,000. In addition, U.S. officials began paying the relatives of Iraqi soldiers and police who were killed because of U.S. operations, the report states.
But the department doesn't indicate how many of those payments went for killed civilians, injured civilians or for property damage. U.S. officials have never released statistics on how many civilians have been killed by U.S. troops.
According to the report, the U.S. began compensating Iraqi civilians or their relatives in June 2003 for inadvertent killings or property damage, usually at the discretion of the forces on the ground. But the military didn't establish guidelines for paying civilians until October 2004. U.S. forces began compensating Afghanis in October 2005.
But those compensation reports aren't very detailed, a Washington advocacy group found. In a separate report released Thursday, the Campaign for Innocent Victims in Conflict found that many reports contained only a sheet of paper with a synopsis of what happened.
Sarah Holewinski, CIVIC executive director, said that none of the reports the military has made public details the incidents the way the GAO report recommended. "All we have seen are bulk-line items. And that kind of generality does not lead to accountability," Holewinski said.
The amount of condolence payments in Iraq dropped by two-thirds between 2005 and 2006. During that time, U.S. officials said that Iraqi civilians were being killed because they couldn't identify U.S. checkpoints. The U.S. subsequently made checkpoints more easily identifiable, and the military said the number of civilian casualties declined.
U.S. officials also paid for scores of homes that were damaged during the November 2004 offensive in Fallujah.
From October 2004 to September 2005, the Defense Department gave Iraqis $21,528,664 in condolence payments, compared with $7,311,911 the following year. In Afghanistan, the military paid $210,758 from October 2005 to September 2006.
In its recommendations, the authors of the report said the Defense Department should better differentiate payments for civilians injured or killed and those whose properties were damaged.
But Holewinski said that even if the military met those recommendations, that wouldn't explain how civilians were killed and why
© 2007 McClatchy Washington Bureau and wire service sources.
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
8 Comments so far
Show AllDick Cheney takes craps that are worth more than $31 million.
I heard something about this on Public Radio several years ago. US soldier's going door to door doling out the taxpayers money to Iraqi's for damages to property and lives. Like someone pointed out before, when has the US ever done this in previous justified wars???? Isn't it like admitting we invaded the country illegal and we are paying for these people's silence in fear they will sue us for damages. It looks to be like there are a lot of people at the top who know how wrong this war was to begin with. They just don't have the ethic's, morals or backbone to put a stop to it. At the rate this administration is throwing around taxpayers money, we are going to be bankrupt in another few years if we aren't already!
Thirtyone million is absurd.
We should give the Iraqi people the 100 billion (thats 100,000 million for anyone who doesn't know!) that congress just gave Bush, get the troops the hell out of there, and give Iraq as many more billions as the international court in the Hague says we should give them.
The international community should help them with real elections too. The so called winners of the US supported (and rigged) elections in Iraq were all approved by the US "authorities" before they were allowed to play candidate. The American government has brought horror to the world with this Iraq fiasco. They are a major threat to the safety & well being of everyone on earth.
Shakker:
Stop comparing Afghans and Iraqis to Nazis. First of all the Taliban are Pakistanis. Afghan are not Arabs. The Afghan people were the victims of a Taliban regime backed and funded by Pakistan and Saudi Arabia just like the Iraqis suffered living under the authoritarian regime of Sadaam. Last time I checked the 911 hijackers were Saudis and Egytpians and not Afghans or Iraqis.
$31 million for 3 years! Congress just approved $95 billion for 4 months to keep the troops in Iraq and Afghanistan killing and maiming more civilians. I'm sure we all know that the only scientific studies of the death toll in Iraq concluded that by June 2006 hundreds of thousands of Iraqis had died as a result of the U.S. invasion and occupation. Yet Bush and Congress fund a "surge" of troops in Iraq (and Afghanistan) to "improve security." Sounds to me just like the "pacification" our government carried out in Vietnam...
The amounts are pathetic especially when broken down per person. Its something like $5000 for an Iraqi and even less for an Afghan. How dare these people put a price on human life!
Does anyone really believe those victims got the bulk of these funds? Hardy har har... whattabunchashit. And what pathetic amounts for "condolence".
Why are we paying? - are we admitting that we are killing innocents?
I don't recall payments to the families of the Nazis when we bombed Germany in WW2.
If this war were right, true, and just we would pay no one.