To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.

×
  • Home
  • jeff merkley
  • lead
  • troy jackson
  • michael brown
  • senate
  • center for biological diversity
  • arizona
  • election 2022
  • self-immolation
  • ukraine
  • russia
  • gaza
  • critical race theory
  • palestine
  • jan 6 insurrection
  • covid-19
  • george floyd
  • black lives matter
  • stacey abrams
  • trumpism
  • kyle rittenhouse
  • georgia
  • selma
  • john lewis
  • marjorie taylor greene
  • jared kushner
  • bernie sanders
  • sarah huckabee sanders
  • joe biden
  • kamala harris
  • jon ossoff
  • raphael warnock
  • election
  • midterm elections
  • big oil
  • fossil fuels
  • workers
  • inequality
  • minimum wage
  • poverty
  • environment
  • africa
  • food
  • hunger
  • animal rights
  • julian assange
  • amnesty international
  • united kingdom
  • wikileaks
  • biodiversity
  • new mexico
  • democracy
  • taxation
  • campaign finance
  • us supreme court
  • public health
  • oxfam
  • afghanistan
  • congressional progressive caucus
  • fight for the future
  • net neutrality
  • open internet
  • free press
  • anti-semitism
  • bend the arc
  • texas
  • cop26
  • 350.org
  • fcc
  • corporate power
  • jamie dimon
  • jpmorgan chase
  • stop the money pipeline
  • coronavirus
  • imf
  • jubilee usa
  • vaccines
  • florida
  • sustainability
  • center for responsive politics
  • amazon.com
  • drug policy alliance
  • marijuana
  • public citizen
  • environment america
  • renewable energy
  • aclu
  • war crimes
  • war on terror
  • immigration
  • refugees
  • arctic national wildlife refuge (anwr)
  • fossil fuel divestment
  • veterans
  • veterans for peace
  • oklahoma
  • racism
  • democratic party
  • people's action
  • republican party
  • us congress
  • budget
  • hyde amendment
  • reproductive rights
  • women
  • food & water watch
  • codepink
  • militarism
  • pentagon
  • us military
  • sunrise movement
  • filibuster
  • us house
  • war on drugs
  • common cause
  • indivisible
  • mitch mcconnell
  • stand up america
  • arctic
  • muslim ban
  • g7
  • patriotic millionaires
  • oregon
  • chris murphy
  • education
  • jamaal bowman
  • civil rights
  • ed markey
  • technology
  • infrastructure
  • moveon.org
  • egypt
  • journalism
  • barack obama
  • epa
  • pollution
  • war on science
  • voting rights
  • environmental working group
  • friends of the earth
  • icc
  • shell
  • methane
  • indigenous
  • line 3
  • healthcare
  • privatization
  • unemployment
  • labor
  • green new deal
  • data for progress
  • islamophobia
  • virginia
  • us department of justice
  • us senate
  • genocide
  • coal
  • iea
  • new york
  • facebook
  • police
  • big pharma
  • justice democrats
  • social security works
  • extreme weather
  • pesticides
  • bds
  • israel
  • plastics
  • fda
  • greenpeace
  • afge
  • alexandria ocasio-cortez
  • arms trade
  • benjamin netanyahu
  • cair
  • minnesota
  • super pacs
  • janet yellen
  • oil change international
  • wall street
  • factory farms
  • extremism
  • endangered species act
  • civil liberties
  • colombia
  • tony blinken
  • paris agreement
  • campaign legal center
  • fec
  • wto
  • criminal justice system
  • philadelphia
  • 9/11
  • center for food safety
  • monsanto
  • central america
  • mexico
  • children
  • mark pocan
  • rashida tlaib
  • chuck grassley
  • aipac
  • chuck schumer
  • jewish voice for peace
  • china
  • guantanamo
  • roe v. wade
  • jay inslee
  • at&t
  • corporate personhood
  • media
  • baltimore
  • naral
  • nina turner
  • center for reproductive rights
  • elon musk
  • jeff bezos
  • earthjustice
  • moveon
  • privacy
  • japan
  • rahm emanuel
  • apartheid
  • progressive international
  • coronavirus relief
  • agriculture
  • federal reserve
  • g20
  • people power
  • pennsylvania
  • wolves
  • demand progress
  • massachusetts
  • union of concerned scientists
  • human rights
  • nafta
  • asia
  • boris johnson
  • idaho
  • debt
  • sudan
  • world bank
  • keystone xl
  • syria
  • ilhan omar
  • kirsten gillibrand
  • usda
  • people for the american way
  • ron desantis
  • conservation
  • chevron
  • ecuador
  • steven donziger
  • deb haaland
  • us department of interior
    Israeli army demolished a Palestinian house and farm in West Bank

    A War Without Headlines: Israel’s Shock-and-Awe Campaign in the West Bank

    The most violent period of Israeli aggression in the West Bank since the Second Intifada has been largely overlooked, in part because of the sheer scale and horror of Israel’s genocide in Gaza, but it's consequences could prove just as devastating.

    Shock and awe. The phrase is apt in describing what Israel has done in the occupied West Bank almost immediately following the events of October 7, 2023, and the start of the Israeli genocide in Gaza.

    In her book The Shock Doctrine, Naomi Klein defines “shock and awe” not merely as a military tactic, but as a political and economic strategy that exploits moments of collective trauma—whether caused by war, natural disaster, or economic collapse—to impose radical policies that would otherwise be resisted. According to Klein, societies in a state of shock are rendered disoriented and vulnerable, allowing those in power to push through sweeping transformations while opposition is fragmented or overwhelmed.

    Though the policy is often discussed in the context of US foreign policy—from Iraq to Haiti—Israel has employed shock-and-awe tactics with greater frequency, consistency, and refinement. Unlike the US, which has applied the doctrine episodically across distant theaters, Israel has used it continuously against a captive population living under its direct military control.

    Indeed, the Israeli version of shock and awe has long been a default policy for suppressing Palestinians. It has been applied across decades in the occupied Palestinian territory and extended to neighboring Arab countries whenever it suited Israeli strategic objectives.

    What is underway, therefore, is a race against time. Israel is working to consolidate what it hopes will become an irreversible new reality on the ground.

    In Lebanon, this approach became known as the Dahiya Doctrine, named after the Dahiya neighborhood in Beirut that was systematically destroyed by Israel during its 2006 war on Lebanon. The doctrine advocates the use of disproportionate force against civilian areas, the deliberate targeting of infrastructure, and the transformation of entire neighborhoods into rubble in order to deter resistance through collective punishment.

    Gaza has been the epicenter of Israel’s application of this tactic. In the years preceding the genocide, Israeli officials increasingly framed their assaults on Gaza as limited, “managed” wars designed to periodically weaken Palestinian resistance.

    These operations were rationalized through the concept of “mowing the lawn,” a phrase used by Israeli military strategists to describe the periodic use of overwhelming violence to “reestablish deterrence.” The logic was that Gaza could not be politically resolved, only indefinitely managed through recurrent destruction.

    What unfolded in the West Bank shortly after the start of the Gaza genocide followed a strikingly similar pattern.

    Beginning in October 2023, Israel launched an unprecedented campaign of violence across the West Bank. This included large-scale military raids in cities and refugee camps, the routine use of airstrikes—previously rare in the West Bank—the widespread deployment of armored vehicles, and a surge in settler violence carried out with the backing or direct participation of the Israeli army.

    The death toll rose sharply, with hundreds of Palestinians killed in a matter of months, including children. Entire refugee camps, such as Jenin, Nur Shams, and Tulkarm, were subjected to systematic destruction: Roads were torn up, homes demolished, water and electricity networks destroyed, and medical access severely restricted. Israeli forces repeatedly laid siege to communities, preventing the movement of ambulances, journalists, and humanitarian workers.

    At the same time, Israel accelerated the ethnic cleansing of Palestinian communities, particularly in Area C. Dozens of Bedouin and rural villages were forcibly emptied through a combination of military orders, settler attacks, home demolitions, and the denial of access to land and water. Families were driven out through sustained terror designed to make daily life impossible.

    Yet the most violent period of Israeli aggression in the West Bank since the Second Intifada (2000-2005) has been largely overlooked, in part because of the sheer scale and horror of Israel’s genocide in Gaza. The annihilation of Gaza has rendered the violence in the West Bank seemingly secondary in the global imagination, despite the fact that its long-term consequences may prove just as devastating.

    At the same time, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his extremist coalition succeeded in presenting themselves to the world as reckless, unrestrained, and ideologically driven—willing and able to expand the cycle of destruction far beyond Gaza, into the West Bank and across Israel’s borders into neighboring Arab countries. This performance of extremism functioned as a political strategy.

    The consequences are now unmistakable. Large areas of the West Bank lie in ruins. Entire communities have been shattered, their social and physical fabric deliberately dismantled. According to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestinian Refugees in the Near East, more than 12,000 Palestinian children remain displaced, increasingly suggesting a displacement that may become permanent rather than temporary.

    History, however, offers a critical lesson. The Palestinian struggle against Israeli settler colonialism has repeatedly demonstrated that Palestinians do not remain passive indefinitely. Despite the paralysis and fragmentation of their political leadership, Palestinian society has consistently regenerated its capacity for resistance.

    Israel understands this reality as well. It knows that shock is not infinite, that fear eventually gives way to defiance, and that once the immediate trauma begins to fade, Palestinians will reorganize and push back against imposed conditions of domination.

    What is underway, therefore, is a race against time. Israel is working to consolidate what it hopes will become an irreversible new reality on the ground—one that enables formal annexation, normalizes permanent military rule, and completes the ethnic cleansing of large segments of the Palestinian population.

    For this reason, a deeper and more sustained understanding of current events in the West Bank is essential. Without confronting this reality directly, Israeli plans will proceed largely unchallenged. To expose, resist, and ultimately defeat these designs is not only a matter of political analysis but a moral imperative inseparable from supporting the Palestinian people in restoring their dignity and achieving their long-denied freedom.

    A War Without Headlines: Israel’s Shock-and-Awe Campaign in the West Bank

    Shock and awe. The phrase is apt in describing what Israel has done in the occupied West Bank almost immediately following the events of October 7, 2023, and the start of the Israeli genocide in Gaza.

    In her book The Shock Doctrine, Naomi Klein defines “shock and awe” not merely as a military tactic, but as a political and economic strategy that exploits moments of collective trauma—whether caused by war, natural disaster, or economic collapse—to impose radical policies that would otherwise be resisted. According to Klein, societies in a state of shock are rendered disoriented and vulnerable, allowing those in power to push through sweeping transformations while opposition is fragmented or overwhelmed.

    Though the policy is often discussed in the context of US foreign policy—from Iraq to Haiti—Israel has employed shock-and-awe tactics with greater frequency, consistency, and refinement. Unlike the US, which has applied the doctrine episodically across distant theaters, Israel has used it continuously against a captive population living under its direct military control.

    Indeed, the Israeli version of shock and awe has long been a default policy for suppressing Palestinians. It has been applied across decades in the occupied Palestinian territory and extended to neighboring Arab countries whenever it suited Israeli strategic objectives.

    What is underway, therefore, is a race against time. Israel is working to consolidate what it hopes will become an irreversible new reality on the ground.

    In Lebanon, this approach became known as the Dahiya Doctrine, named after the Dahiya neighborhood in Beirut that was systematically destroyed by Israel during its 2006 war on Lebanon. The doctrine advocates the use of disproportionate force against civilian areas, the deliberate targeting of infrastructure, and the transformation of entire neighborhoods into rubble in order to deter resistance through collective punishment.

    Gaza has been the epicenter of Israel’s application of this tactic. In the years preceding the genocide, Israeli officials increasingly framed their assaults on Gaza as limited, “managed” wars designed to periodically weaken Palestinian resistance.

    These operations were rationalized through the concept of “mowing the lawn,” a phrase used by Israeli military strategists to describe the periodic use of overwhelming violence to “reestablish deterrence.” The logic was that Gaza could not be politically resolved, only indefinitely managed through recurrent destruction.

    What unfolded in the West Bank shortly after the start of the Gaza genocide followed a strikingly similar pattern.

    Beginning in October 2023, Israel launched an unprecedented campaign of violence across the West Bank. This included large-scale military raids in cities and refugee camps, the routine use of airstrikes—previously rare in the West Bank—the widespread deployment of armored vehicles, and a surge in settler violence carried out with the backing or direct participation of the Israeli army.

    The death toll rose sharply, with hundreds of Palestinians killed in a matter of months, including children. Entire refugee camps, such as Jenin, Nur Shams, and Tulkarm, were subjected to systematic destruction: Roads were torn up, homes demolished, water and electricity networks destroyed, and medical access severely restricted. Israeli forces repeatedly laid siege to communities, preventing the movement of ambulances, journalists, and humanitarian workers.

    At the same time, Israel accelerated the ethnic cleansing of Palestinian communities, particularly in Area C. Dozens of Bedouin and rural villages were forcibly emptied through a combination of military orders, settler attacks, home demolitions, and the denial of access to land and water. Families were driven out through sustained terror designed to make daily life impossible.

    Yet the most violent period of Israeli aggression in the West Bank since the Second Intifada (2000-2005) has been largely overlooked, in part because of the sheer scale and horror of Israel’s genocide in Gaza. The annihilation of Gaza has rendered the violence in the West Bank seemingly secondary in the global imagination, despite the fact that its long-term consequences may prove just as devastating.

    At the same time, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his extremist coalition succeeded in presenting themselves to the world as reckless, unrestrained, and ideologically driven—willing and able to expand the cycle of destruction far beyond Gaza, into the West Bank and across Israel’s borders into neighboring Arab countries. This performance of extremism functioned as a political strategy.

    The consequences are now unmistakable. Large areas of the West Bank lie in ruins. Entire communities have been shattered, their social and physical fabric deliberately dismantled. According to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestinian Refugees in the Near East, more than 12,000 Palestinian children remain displaced, increasingly suggesting a displacement that may become permanent rather than temporary.

    History, however, offers a critical lesson. The Palestinian struggle against Israeli settler colonialism has repeatedly demonstrated that Palestinians do not remain passive indefinitely. Despite the paralysis and fragmentation of their political leadership, Palestinian society has consistently regenerated its capacity for resistance.

    Israel understands this reality as well. It knows that shock is not infinite, that fear eventually gives way to defiance, and that once the immediate trauma begins to fade, Palestinians will reorganize and push back against imposed conditions of domination.

    What is underway, therefore, is a race against time. Israel is working to consolidate what it hopes will become an irreversible new reality on the ground—one that enables formal annexation, normalizes permanent military rule, and completes the ethnic cleansing of large segments of the Palestinian population.

    For this reason, a deeper and more sustained understanding of current events in the West Bank is essential. Without confronting this reality directly, Israeli plans will proceed largely unchallenged. To expose, resist, and ultimately defeat these designs is not only a matter of political analysis but a moral imperative inseparable from supporting the Palestinian people in restoring their dignity and achieving their long-denied freedom.

    Common Dreams. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.
    Common Dreams Globe
    LATEST NEWSOPINIONCLIMATEECONOMY POLITICS RIGHTS & JUSTICEWAR & PEACE
    LATEST NEWS
    OPINION
    Common DreamsTo inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.

    Abolish ICE

    ICE agents in Minneapolis

    Mussolini Had His Blackshirts, Hitler Has the SS, and Trump Has ICE

    The existence of this profoundly unaccountable, overtly fascist military apparatus poses a structural danger to our democracy. This is why "Abolish ICE" is an extremely moderate position.

    Aaron Regunberg
    Jan 16, 2026

    On Tuesday ofthis week, The Economist and YouGov released a poll finding, for the first time, that more Americans want to abolish Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) than don’t.

    According to the poll, 46 percent of people support getting rid of ICE, compared to 43 percent who oppose its abolition. This represents a major shift in public opinion—this same polling outfit found only 27 percent support for abolishing ICE as recently as July. Today’s survey also found that most Americans believe ICE is making them less, not more safe, by a margin of 47 percent to 34 percent.

    Keep ReadingShow Less
    Abolish ICE
    fascism

    SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER

    Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

    subscribe
    below
    * indicates required
    True
    True
    Follow Us
    Most Popular

    Top DOJ Officials Resign After Being Cut Off From Renee Good Killing Probe

    Kristi Noem Goes on TV and Lies Through Her Teeth (Again) About ICE Killing of Renee Nicole Good

    Ex-Presidents, What More Do You Need to See Before Calling for Trump's Impeachment?

    Schumer, Jeffries Refuse to Join Democrats' Growing Calls to Slash ICE Spending

    'You Are Murderers!' 'Get the F*ck Out!': Fury at ICE Agents Boils in Minneapolis

    Hours After US Citizen Shot Dead by ICE, JD Vance Says ‘Door-to-Door’ Operations Are Coming

    'Goebbels Could Not Have Improved On This': DHS Spreads 'Propaganda' on ICE Killing as Violence Mounts

    'Where Were You Born?' ICE Conducting Show-Me-Your-Papers Stops in Minnesota Neighborhoods

    3 Children Hospitalized in Minneapolis After Family Van Hit With ICE Flash-Bangs

    ‘This Is Just a Lie’: Kristi Noem Denies ICE Is Using Show-Me-Your-Papers Tactics in Minnesota

    We cover the issues the corporate media never will.
    Please support our journalism.

    A War Without Headlines: Israel’s Shock-and-Awe Campaign in the West Bank

    The most violent period of Israeli aggression in the West Bank since the Second Intifada has been largely overlooked, in part because of the sheer scale and horror of Israel’s genocide in Gaza, but it's consequences could prove just as devastating.