Court: Negligence by US Army Corps Caused Katrina Flooding
NEW ORLEANS, Louisiana - The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' failure to maintain a navigation channel led to massive flooding in New Orleans following Hurricane Katrina, a federal judge ruled late [Wednesday].
The decision could make the federal government the target of billions of dollars worth of legal claims by more than 100,000 other individuals, businesses and government entities that also sustained damages from the water that inundated 80 percent of the city when the levees protecting the low-lying city were breached in several places.
Katrina made landfall August 29, 2005 in southeast Louisiana as a Category 3 storm. At least 1,836 people lost their lives in the hurricane and in the subsequent floods. Damage estimates were well in excess of $100 billion.
U.S. District Judge Stanwood Duval ruled in favor of six residents and one business who claimed that the Corps' inadequate oversight of the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet led to the flooding of New Orleans' Lower 9th Ward and neighboring St. Bernard Parish.
Judge Duval called the Corps' approach to maintaining the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet "monumental negligence."
"Clearly, the Corps failed to maintain and operate the MRGO in a manner so as not to be a substantial factor in the destruction of the Reach 2 Levee," wrote the judge in his 189-page ruling.
"In addition, it failed to take action that it could have taken to place foreshore protection using the very operation and maintenance funds which proved to be sufficient to fund these actions in the 1990s," he wrote. "Instead, it ignored the safety issues for the inhabitants of the region and focused solely on the maritime clients it serviced so well."
"Futhermore," wrote the judge, "the Corps failed to notify Congress of the dangers which it perceived or should have perceived in the context of environmental damage to the wetlands caused by the operation and maintenance of the MRGO..."
However, Judge Duval held that the Corps was not responsible for the flooding of eastern New Orleans, where two of the plaintiffs lived. But St. Bernard Parish, one of the more devastated areas, lies just south of the MRGO.
During the trial in May, the plaintiffs' experts told the court that the MRGO outlet became a "hurricane highway" that funneled storm surge into New Orleans. They said that without the channel, the flooding would have been minimal.
Government experts argued that Hurricane Katrina would have overwhelmed the levees and floodwalls with or without the contributing effect of the MRGO.
Judge Duval rejected the Corps' argument and awarded the plaintiffs a total of $720,000.
Tanya Smith, a nurse anesthetist who lived in Chalmette close to the MRGO, was awarded $317,000 in property damages, the largest amount of any of the plaintiffs.
"Total devastation could possibly have been avoided if something had been done," said Smith after the ruling.
Pierce O'Donnell, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, said the ruling was the "first time ever the Army Corps has been held liable for damages for a major catastrophe that it caused."
Joe Bruno, another of the lawyers for the plaintiffs, said he expects the government to appeal.
Justice Department spokesman Charles Miller said the government would review the judge's ruling before deciding how to respond. The lawsuit was the first case against the federal government over Katrina flooding to go to trial. A single judge alone made the decision because a jury cannot try a case against the federal government.
Since Hurricane Katrina, the Corps has admitted that the MRGO is a flood risk and has de-authorized the channel for deep-draft navigation and closed the opening with rocks. The Corps completed construction of the MRGO rock closure structure on July 20, 2009.
Congress has passed two laws providing $75 million for operation and maintenance activities targeting the protection, restoration or increase of wetlands; and the prevention of saltwater intrusion or storm surge.
The Corps is using some of this appropriation for shoreline protection along the MRGO and Lake Borgne. In addition, the Corps is developing a comprehensive MRGO Ecosystem Restoration Plan that is planned for completion in 2011.
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
11 Comments so far
Show AllFor years the climate around the Army Corp of Engineers rewarded conventional laid back behavior and thinking. The passions were directed to playing golf, buying things at a discount. Awarding contracts might have gotten their blood up a little. They lived without protest abiding by the financial constrictions and priorities imposed by the Presidents' budgets and sometimes Congressional pet projects that involved local contractors. Analysis, critical thinking, and speaking out were squelched.
As Barabara Ehrenreich pointed out in her book, people who disturbed the tranquility by raising questions about the safety of the infrastructure or suggesting extra work would have been seen as "Debbie Downers". And besides, who cares about "those people" in New Orleans.
Joe
How much was stolen from law enforcement, regulation, and disaster preparedness in order to pay for a new paradigm thanks to restructuring in the name of the Global War on Terror?
We lose more people to tobacco, alcohol, and natural disasters domestically, and annually, than to all the terrorist acts (globally) in combined history (unless you call the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan acts of terror - another argument and I'd side with 'yes' on that one). Yet we've devoted billions of dollars to prepare against terrorism, and not just that robbed from FEMA (now under DHS), but also that which has been taken from the FBI, as well as your local police and fire depts. I'll wager that there hasn't been a single increase in preparedness of our health care industry against the event of a natural OR deliberate biological disaster. At least not unless it was a hand-off to some drug company (immunized against liability) to create experimental drugs (with our kids as the test subjects) to fight a severely weird type of flu virus - a subject suspicious enough to be worth considering its origins.
Consistency is not indicative of SNAFU.
The US Army Corps of Engineers are side-by-side with the Pentagon as being the WORST of the WORST of tax dollars being spent to destroy the United States. We know how the Pentagon does it.....GENERATING CONFLICTS/WARS AND ENCOURAGING THE WEAPONS-BUILDING INDUSTRY IN THIS COUNTRY (instead of hospitals and schools which are DIRELY needed). What most people do NOT know is how the US Army Corp works.....they actually alter the environment to aid building houses & development of towns/cities ...examples.....the straightening of the Kissimmee River from '61 to '71 to create a 56 ft. mile long and 30 ft. deep DITCH for flood control!
The result: 34,000 acres of marshland has dried up, six species of fish are extinct, and the unhealthy condition of the Lake Okeechobee has harmed people and the environment. At the taxpayers expense we are now nearing the end of a process to fix the Kissimmee River....costs to destory and costs to repair....no wonder why WE THE PEOPLE are diving into economic and environmental disrepair.
answertothepeople@gmail.com. This is a start up and not fully formed group YET but their entire approach is summed up in the name.
Thanks for your time.
The Bush administration was informed about the Levee's inability to withstand a Force 4 Hurricane, yet still they cut funding on the Army Corps of Engineers budget on that very project.
They Should be stripped of all their wealth and sentenced to hard labor rebuilding homes in New Orleans.
But it's the Army slogan, "Create a hole, fill it in, again ... ".
The u.s. financial pools were drained,
the levies breached by politicians,
the corporate hydrologists.
Wouldn't the negligent underfunding of the US Army Corps by the Bush administration mean that Bush can also be held accountable? They really should strip that family of every single dime to their name.
I don't think it was just the Bush administration doing the underfunding. All of our infrastructure for decades has been underfunded and ignored, which is why the levies, the bridges, and everything else is going to hell. The foundation of the country is crumbling under us, and the rotting core of the dominate race is breaching the surface. It's going to take a lot more than holding those responsible accountable. In all truth, each and every one of us is accountable in some way or another for the decline that we're now beginning to pay for.
Yes. They've stolen from infrastructure to pay for wars. By the mid-80's it was clear, at least to me, that we were living off our capital and not building wealth (read as "real investment") at all.
Yes, and not only wars. Everything is privatized and deregulated. The "private" owners are irresponsible. They take all the money out as profit and put nothing back into maintaining the infrastructure of what they own. In clear terms, they are raping the country!