EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- How the US Turned Three Pacifists into Violent Terrorists
- Corporate Win: Supreme Court Says Monsanto Has 'Control Over Product of Life'
- Cornel West: Obama 'Is a War Criminal'
- Revealed: How US State Department 'Twists Arms' on Monsanto's Behalf
- Victory in Seattle as Teachers Win Battle in Standardized Test Boycott
Today's Top News
World's Wealthiest People Now Richer than Before the Credit Crunch
We are not all in this together. The UK economy is flat, the US is weak and the Greek debt crisis, according to some commentators, is threatening another Lehman Brothers-style meltdown. But a new report shows the world's wealthiest people are getting more prosperous – and more numerous – by the day.
The globe's richest have now recouped the losses they suffered after the 2008 banking crisis. They are richer than ever, and there are more of them – nearly 11 million – than before the recession struck. (Image Credit: AP))
The globe's richest have now recouped the losses they suffered after the 2008 banking crisis. They are richer than ever, and there are more of them – nearly 11 million – than before the recession struck.
In the world of the well-heeled, the rich are referred to as "high net worth individuals" (HNWIs) and defined as people who have more than $1m (£620,000) of free cash.
According to the annual world wealth report by Merrill Lynch and Capgemini, the wealth of HNWIs around the world reached $42.7tn (£26.5tn) in 2010, rising nearly 10% in a year and surpassing the peak of $40.7tn reached in 2007, even as austerity budgets were implemented by many governments in the developed world.
The report also measures a category of "ultra-high net worth individuals" – those with at least $30m rattling around, looking for a home. The number of individuals in this super-rich bracket climbed 10% to a total of 103,000, and the total value of their investments jumped by 11.5% to $15tn, demonstrating that even among the rich, the richest get richer quicker. Altogether they represent less than 1% of the world's HNWIs – but they speak for 36% of HNWI's total wealth.
Age also helps: more than eight out of 10 of the world's wealthiest people are aged over 45. So does being male: women account for just over a quarter of the total – though this is slightly higher than in 2008. The highest proportion of wealthy women is in North America – 37% of HNWIs – while the lowest is in the Middle East, which has 14%.
Generally, HNWIs are most concentrated in the US, Japan and Germany: 53% of the world's most wealthy live in one of those three countries, but it is Asian-Pacific countries where the ranks of the rich are swelling fastest. For the first time last year the region surpassed Europe in terms of HNWI individuals.
This scale of wealth of the richest people in Asia Pacific – fueled by the fast-growing economies in China and India – is now threatening to overtake North America, where the value of the wealth rose more slowly – 9% – to reach $11.6tn.
The richest people in the Asia-Pacific region have also fared better since the crisis. Their wealth is now up 14.1% since 2007 while individuals in North America and Europe are yet to recoup the losses they suffered during the banking crisis.
Britain is lagging behind in the league of affluence – it has not yet enjoyed a return to pre-crisis levels of wealth as sluggish economic growth holds back prospects. The growth in the number of rich individuals in the UK was among the slowest in the top 10 nations, showing a 1.4% rise to 454,000 and remaining below the 495,000 recorded in 2007.
The report said that while the UK stock market rose almost 30% and GDP grew 1.3% – after contracting by 4.9% in 2009 – the fortunes of the rich were held back by falling house prices and the rise in unemployment. Their prospects might improve next year, however. "Construction spending for the 2012 London Olympics is expected to help propel the economy and the housing market recovery," the report said.
The 1.4% rise in the number of rich people in Britain compares with a 7.2% rise in Germany and 8.3% in the US – where there are 3.1m HNWIs – and the 3.4% rise in France.
India moved into the top 12, with a 20.8% rise to 153,000, for the first time, while Italy, 10th in the table, endured a contraction in the number of wealthy people from 190,000 to 170,000.
The performance of investments made by wealthy individuals in shares and commodities, and their willingness to take more risks, helps drive their wealth, which in turn fuels "passion" purchases of multimillionaire must-haves, ranging from Ferraris to diamonds, art and fine wines. Demand for such luxuries is especially high among the growing number of wealthy individuals in the emerging markets.
The report warns of problems for this year, saying "the path to global recovery will likely be uneven and various risks remain".
It added: "The global effects of the financial crisis receded in 2010 but aftershocks still materialized in many forms, including the sovereign debt crisis in Europe and the growing burden of a gaping fiscal deficit in the US. These types of shocks showed the fragility of the economic recovery and could still pose an obstacle to growth in 2011".
Read highlights from the report here
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

31 Comments so far
Show Allof course they're richer.
the thieves stole our money.
The thieves wrote the laws to get blood from stones.
I think they get stoned from blood.
I think you're both bloody right.
It's truly miraculous! The Fed injects $3.7 Trillion of taxpayer money into the system and saves the asses of the filthy rich; the very same who destroyed the global economy for the rest of us.
Uncle Sam has been a true patriot to its campaign gifters.
Richer is richer, poorer is poorer, and never the twain shall meet.
More countries are protesting by the day.
"Credit crunch," LOL, that's what the Brits call economic collapse, makes me want to have an afternoon tea and crackers.
Great post - will be featured tomorrow morning on the Daily Agenda.
Class warfare from the rich doesn't count?
Direct democracy
remember - it's not a war if the other side can't fight back.
They can get as rich as they like, I don't give a fuck.
Just so they leave the rest of us enough to live well---a standard which they would consider disgraceful.
"They ... get as rich as they like" and "they leave the rest of us enough to live well" is in fact mutually exclusive. If "they" leave the rest enough to live well, they'll be exposed as unfairly gaining, and have their excessive gains taken away.
People who "live well" enough get time to reflect on fairness and reason. They tend to try to stop excesses and champion equality. That's why the rich need a class of poor, relatively desperate people - to
1) not think as clearly as the middle-class have time for, and
2) to not have formal insight and powers to demand reasonable equality, and
3) to scare the middle class to strive for more so as not to become poor.
These people will NEVER have what they consider to be enough. They are sick beyond measure, and should be arrested and locked up for the good of humanity.
Just remember the old saying: We have enough for every man's need, but nowhere near enough for even one man's greed.
All hail capitalism.
Here is a fun fact: If you added up all the money traded on Wall Street, they actually trade on over $600 trillion. Which means that there is, according to them, over $550 trillion that has been miraculously added to the economy. That is the REAL pisser about the Bank bailout. The money they claimed they lost didn't even exist. So they not only didn't LOSE any money, they got money that there is nothing backing up other than our stupidity.
QE2, thanks... thanks a LOT :-(
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/who-really-benefited-from-qe2-anyway-2011-06-22
http://www.economist.com/blogs/dailychart/2011/06/rich
who fucking cares ...except these jackasses are the ones calling the shots in most governments...so they can just go fuck themselves. I hope they all choke on their puke when they discover they too have been screwed by the poobah from hell...hahahahahahah
It's the way the wealthy play the cards. During the 1920's certain elite like Prescott Bush, Morgan, Chase, Rockefellow, duPont, Frederick Koch to name a few, came out just fine after the 1929 crash,-- and the same again from 2001 to 2009, even some with the same names walked away with the money.
"David Rockefeller, Sr. (born June 12, 1915) is the current patriarch of the Rockefeller family." He was a teenager during the early 1930'ies and has played that game of "shaking the money-tree" to drop out the smaller investors all his life. - Pretty good at it, too.
If humans survive, the Rockefeller story is a friggin epic that will be told in a thousand years the way the story of Attila the Hun is told now - with the way the simply living people were raided out of the blue later being transparent to history-describers.
"The report warns of problems for this year, saying "the path to global recovery will likely be uneven and various risks remain"."
That's so mildly put as to be ridiculous. The US economy is hanging together by sexy bombing, outragous lies and scotch tape. "Various risks" are held off from storming the stage only by heavy artillery and frenetic distractions.
Anybody noticing the strange weather lately? If that's taken seriously and CO2-emissions phased out so rapidly that humanity as a whole can remain as materially well cared for as now, what will that do the global eternal growth economy? Might it change wealth-distribution maybe? Might those 11 million "high net worth individuals" resist that maybe? Might there be high resistance as well as high pressure for change simultanously maybe? How's that for "risks remain[ing]"?
Not to be alarmist or anything, but that means HUGE "risks remain".
Why are we not surprised?
Read Kevin Philipps "Wealth and Democracy" and see why fter depressions the RICH come out richer!
The Economist just wrote an article on this (as Puck notes).
This turn of events has been evident for some time. We should have seen it. That was the whole point of the crisis. That's why they want austerity (which always causes income stratification). Those guys OWN the economy - would they hurt themselves? No.
Buffet nailed it years ago. Following the 2008 crash he said that there is a class war and his class is winning, because the other class isn't even awake to the hostilities.
Point of Note: We vastly out number the HNWI's and can take EVERYTHING from them whenever we want. Wealth accumulation, contrary to popular opinion, is a priviledge. Just ask Louis the XVI, his wife, and their fellow aristocrats.
The wealthy would do well to stop viewing taxes as a penalty and start looking at it as "Don't chop my fucking head off" insurance.
Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it.
Now youre talking. Shall you be the modern day Robin Hood? I think some of them should be careful not to walk alone at night.
grinding my axe...
"Point of Note: We vastly out number the HNWI's and can take EVERYTHING from them whenever we want."
What we want is determined by their media. That's their "Don't chop my fucking head off" insurance.
"World's Wealthiest People Now Richer than Before the Credit Crunch"
No shit. The plan worked like a finely oiled Swiss watch.
The wealthy are plutarchists. Buying governments with our money is their primary business. If we got lazy (omg) we would have the true freedom we deserve instead of making the wealthy even wealthier. The wealthy are destructive extremists that will someday be determined to be criminally mentally ill for their destructive behaviors against humanity.