As historians ponder George W. Bush's disastrous presidency, they may wonder how Republicans perfected a propaganda system that could fool tens of millions of Americans, intimidate Democrats, and transform the vaunted Washington press corps from watchdogs to lapdogs.
To understand this extraordinary development, historians might want to look back at the 1980s and examine the Iran-Contra scandal's "lost chapter," a narrative describing how Ronald Reagan's administration brought CIA tactics to bear domestically to reshape the way Americans perceived the world.
That chapter -- which we are publishing here for the first time -- was "lost" because Republicans on the congressional Iran-Contra investigation waged a rear-guard fight that traded elimination of the chapter's key findings for the votes of three moderate GOP senators, giving the final report a patina of bipartisanship.
Under that compromise, a few segments of the draft chapter were inserted in the final report's Executive Summary and in another section on White House private fundraising, but the chapter's conclusions and its detailed account of how the "perception management" operation worked ended up on the editing room floor.
The American people thus were spared the chapter's troubling finding: that the Reagan administration had built a domestic covert propaganda apparatus managed by a CIA propaganda and disinformation specialist working out of the National Security Council.
"One of the CIA's most senior covert action operators was sent to the NSC in 1983 by CIA Director [William] Casey where he participated in the creation of an inter-agency public diplomacy mechanism that included the use of seasoned intelligence specialists," the chapter's conclusion stated.
"This public/private network set out to accomplish what a covert CIA operation in a foreign country might attempt - to sway the media, the Congress, and American public opinion in the direction of the Reagan administration's policies."
However, with the chapter's key findings deleted, the right-wing domestic propaganda operation not only survived the Iran-Contra fallout but thrived.
So did some of the administration's collaborators, such as South Korean theocrat Sun Myung Moon and Australian press mogul Rupert Murdoch, two far-right media barons who poured billions of dollars into pro-Republican news outlets that continue to influence Washington's political debates to this day.
Before every presidential election, Moon's Washington Times plants derogatory -- and often false -- stories about Democratic contenders, discrediting them and damaging their chances of winning the White House.
For instance, in 1988, the Times published a bogus account suggesting that the Democratic nominee Michael Dukakis had undergone psychiatric treatment. In 2000, Moon's newspaper pushed the theme that Al Gore suffered from clinical delusions. [For details, see Robert Parry's Secrecy & Privilege.]
As for Murdoch, his giant News Corp. expanded into American cable TV with the founding of Fox News in 1996. Since then, the right-wing network has proved highly effective in promoting attack lines against Democrats or anyone else who challenges the Republican power structure.
As President George W. Bush herded the nation toward war with Iraq in 2002-03, Fox News acted like his sheep dogs making sure public opinion didn't stray too far off. The "Fox effect" was so powerful that it convinced other networks to load up with pro-war military analysts and to silence voices that questioned the invasion. [See Neck Deep.]
Seeds of Propaganda
The seeds of this private/public collaboration can be found in the 84-page draft Iran-Contra chapter, entitled "Launching the Private Network." [There appear to have been several versions of this "lost chapter." This one I found in congressional files.]
The chapter traces the origins of the propaganda network to President Reagan's "National Security Decision Directive 77" in January 1983 as his administration sought to promote its foreign policy, especially its desire to oust Nicaragua's leftist Sandinista government.
In a Jan. 13, 1983, memo, then-National Security Advisor William Clark foresaw the need for non-governmental money to advance this cause. "We will develop a scenario for obtaining private funding," Clark wrote.
As administration officials began reaching out to wealthy supporters, lines against domestic propaganda soon were crossed as the operation took aim at not only at foreign audiences but at U.S. public opinion, the press and congressional Democrats who opposed funding Nicaraguan rebels, known as contras.
At the time, the contras were earning a gruesome reputation as human rights violators and terrorists. To change this negative perception of the contras, the Reagan administration created a full-blown, clandestine propaganda operation.
"An elaborate system of inter-agency committees was eventually formed and charged with the task of working closely with private groups and individuals involved in fundraising, lobbying campaigns and propagandistic activities aimed at influencing public opinion and governmental action," the draft chapter said.
Heading this operation was a veteran CIA officer named Walter Raymond Jr., who was recruited by another CIA officer, Donald Gregg, before Gregg shifted from his job as chief of the NSC's Intelligence Directorate to become national security adviser to then-Vice President George H.W. Bush.
[The draft chapter doesn't use Raymond's name in its opening pages, apparently because some of the information came from classified depositions. However, Raymond's name is used later in the chapter and the earlier citations match Raymond's role.]
According to the draft report, the CIA officer recruited for the NSC job had served as Director of the Covert Action Staff at the CIA from 1978 to 1982 and was a "specialist in propaganda and disinformation."
"The CIA official [Raymond] discussed the transfer with [CIA Director William] Casey and NSC Advisor William Clark that he be assigned to the NSC as Gregg's successor [in June 1982] and received approval for his involvement in setting up the public diplomacy program along with his intelligence responsibilities," the chapter said.
"In the early part of 1983, documents obtained by the Select [Iran-Contra] Committees indicate that the Director of the Intelligence Staff of the NSC [Raymond] successfully recommended the establishment of an inter-governmental network to promote and manage a public diplomacy plan designed to create support for Reagan Administration policies at home and abroad."
Raymond "helped to set up an elaborate system of inter-agency committees," the draft chapter said, adding:
"In the Spring of 1983, the network began to turn its attention toward beefing up the Administration's capacity to promote American support for the Democratic Resistance in Nicaragua [the contras] and the fledgling democracy in El Salvador.
"This effort resulted in the creation of the Office of Public Diplomacy for Latin America and the Caribbean in the Department of State (S/LPD), headed by Otto Reich," a right-wing Cuban exile from Miami.
Though Secretary of State George Shultz wanted the office under his control, President Reagan insisted that Reich "report directly to the NSC," where Raymond oversaw the operations as a special assistant to the President and the NSC's director of international communications, the chapter said.
"At least for several months after he assumed this position, Raymond also worked on intelligence matters at the NSC, including drafting a Presidential Finding for Covert Action in Nicaragua in mid-September" 1983, the chapter said.
In other words, although Raymond was shifted to the NSC staff in part to evade prohibitions on the CIA influencing U.S. public opinion, his intelligence and propaganda duties overlapped for a time as he was retiring from the spy agency.
Key Player
Despite Raymond's formal separation from the CIA, he acted toward the U.S. public much like a CIA officer would in directing a propaganda operation in a hostile foreign country. He was the go-to guy to keep the operation on track.
"Reich relied heavily on Raymond to secure personnel transfers from other government agencies to beef up the limited resources made available to S/LPD by the Department of State," the chapter said.
"Personnel made available to the new office included intelligence specialists from the U.S. Air Force and the U.S. Army. On one occasion, five intelligence experts from the Army's 4th Psychological Operations Group at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, were assigned to work with Reich's fast-growing operation. ...
"White House documents also indicate that CIA Director Casey had more than a passing interest in the Central American public diplomacy campaign."
The chapter cited an Aug. 9, 1983, memo written by Raymond describing Casey's participation in a meeting with public relations specialists to brainstorm how "to sell a 'new product' -- Central America -- by generating interest across-the-spectrum."
In an Aug. 29, 1983, memo, Raymond recounted a call from Casey pushing his P.R. ideas. Alarmed at a CIA director participating so brazenly in domestic propaganda, Raymond wrote that "I philosophized a bit with Bill Casey (in an effort to get him out of the loop)" but with little success.
The chapter added: "Casey's involvement in the public diplomacy effort apparently continued throughout the period under investigation by the Committees," including a 1985 role in pressuring Congress to renew contra aid and a 1986 hand in further shielding S/LPD from the oversight of Secretary Shultz.
A Raymond-authored memo to Casey in August 1986 described the shift of S/LPD -- then run by neoconservative theorist Bob Kagan who had replaced Reich -- to the control of the Bureau of Inter-American Affairs, which was headed by Assistant Secretary of State Elliott Abrams, another prominent neoconservative.
Another important figure in the pro-contra propaganda was NSC staffer Oliver North, who spent a great deal of his time on the Nicaraguan public diplomacy operation even though he is better known for arranging secret arms shipments to the contras and to Iran's radical Islamic government, leading to the Iran-Contra scandal.
The draft chapter cited a March 10, 1985, memo from North describing his assistance to CIA Director Casey in timing disclosures of pro-contra news "aimed at securing Congressional approval for renewed support to the Nicaraguan Resistance Forces."
North's Operatives
The Iran-Contra "lost" chapter depicts a sometimes Byzantine network of contract and private operatives who handled details of the domestic propaganda while concealing the hand of the White House and the CIA.
"Richard R. Miller, former head of public affairs at AID, and Francis D. Gomez, former public affairs specialist at the State Department and USIA, were hired by S/LPD through sole-source, no-bid contracts to carry out a variety of activities on behalf of the Reagan administration policies in Central America," the chapter said.
"Supported by the State Department and White House, Miller and Gomez became the outside managers of [North operative] Spitz Channel's fundraising and lobbying activities.
"They also served as the managers of Central American political figures, defectors, Nicaraguan opposition leaders and Sandinista atrocity victims who were made available to the press, the Congress and private groups, to tell the story of the Contra cause."
Miller and Gomez facilitated transfers of money to Swiss and offshore banks at North's direction, as they "became the key link between the State Department and the Reagan White House with the private groups and individuals engaged in a myriad of endeavors aimed at influencing the Congress, the media and public opinion," the chapter said.
In its conclusion, the draft chapter read:
"The State Department was used to run a prohibited, domestic, covert propaganda operation. Established despite resistance from the Secretary of State, and reporting directly to the NSC, the [S/LPD] attempted to mask many of its activities from the Congress and the American people."
However, the American people never got to read a detailed explanation of this finding nor see the evidence. In October 1987, as the congressional Iran-Contra committees wrote their final report, Republicans protested the inclusion of this explosive information.
Though the Democrats held the majority, the GOP had leverage because Rep. Lee Hamilton, D-Indiana, the House chairman, wanted some bipartisanship in the final report, especially since senior Republicans, including Rep. Dick Cheney, R-Wyoming, were preparing a strongly worded minority report.
Hamilton and the Democrats hoped that three moderate Republicans -- William Cohen of Maine, Warren Rudman of New Hampshire and Paul Trible of Virginia -- would break ranks and sign the majority report. However, the Republicans objected to the draft chapter about Ronald Reagan's covert propaganda campaign.
As part of a compromise, some elements of the draft chapter were included in the Executive Summary but without much detail and shorn of the tough conclusions. Nevertheless, Cohen protested even that.
"I question the inordinate attention devoted in the Executive Summary to the Office of Public Diplomacy and its activities in support of the Administration's polices," Cohen wrote in his additional views. "The prominence given to it in the Executive Summary is far more generous than just."
Long-Term Consequences
However, the failure of the Iran-Contra report to fully explain the danger of CIA-style propaganda intruding into the U.S. political process would have profound future consequences. Indeed, the evidence suggests that today's powerful right-wing media gained momentum as part of the Casey-Raymond operations of the early 1980s.
According to one Raymond-authored memo dated Aug. 9, 1983, then-U.S. Information Agency director Charles Wick "via Murdock [sic] may be able to draw down added funds" to support pro-Reagan initiatives.
Raymond's reference to Rupert Murdoch possibly drawing down "added funds" suggests that the right-wing media mogul was already part of the covert propaganda operation.
In line with its clandestine nature, Raymond also suggested routing the "funding via Freedom House or some other structure that has credibility in the political center."
Unification Church founder Sun Myung Moon, publisher of the Washington Times, also showed up in the Iran-Contra operations, using his newspaper to raise contra funds and assigning his CAUSA political group to organize support for the contras.
In the two decades since the Iran-Contra scandal, both Murdoch and Moon have continued to pour billions of dollars into media outlets that have influenced the course of U.S. history, often through the planting of propaganda and disinformation much like a CIA covert action might do in a hostile foreign country.
Further, to soften up the Washington press corps, Reich's S/LPD targeted U.S. journalists who reported information that undermined the pro-contra propaganda. Reich sent his teams out to lobby news executives to remove or punish out-of-step reporters -- with a disturbing degree of success. [For more, see Parry's Lost History.]
Some U.S. officials implicated in the Iran-Contra propaganda operations are still around, bringing the lessons of the 1980s into the new century.
For instance, Elliott Abrams. Though convicted of misleading Congress in the Iran-Contra Affair and later pardoned by President George H.W. Bush -- Abrams is now deputy adviser to George W. Bush's NSC, where he directs U.S.-Middle East policy.
Bob Kagan remains another prominent neocon theorist in Washington, writing op-eds for the Washington Post. Oliver North was given a news show on Fox.
Otto Reich now is advising Republican presidential candidate John McCain on Latin American affairs. Lee Hamilton is a senior national security adviser to Democratic candidate Barack Obama.
Enduring Skills
Beyond these individuals, the manipulative techniques that were refined in the 1980s -- especially the skill of exaggerating foreign threats -- have proved durable, bringing large segments of the American population into line behind the Iraq War in 2002-03.
Only now -- with more than 4,100 U.S. soldiers and hundreds of thousands of Iraqis dead -- are many of these Americans realizing that were manipulated by clever propaganda, that their perceptions had been managed.
For instance, the New York Times recently pried loose some 8,000 pages of Pentagon documents revealing how the Bush administration had manipulated the public debate on the Iraq War by planting friendly retired military officers on TV news shows.
Retired Green Beret Robert S. Bevelacqua, a former analyst on Murdoch's Fox News, said the Pentagon treated the retired military officers as puppets: "It was them saying, 'we need to stick our hands up your back and move your mouth for you.'" [NYT, April 20, 2008, or see Consortiumnews.com's "US News Media's Latest Disgrace."]
Bush's former White House press secretary Scott McClellan described similar use of propaganda tactics to justify the Iraq War in his book, What Happened: Inside the Bush White House and Washington's Culture of Deception.
From his insider vantage point, McClellan cited the White House's "carefully orchestrated campaign to shape and manipulate sources of public approval" -- and he called the Washington press corps "complicit enablers."
None of this would have been so surprising -- indeed Americans might have been forewarned and forearmed -- if Lee Hamilton and other Democrats on the Iran-Contra committees had held firm and published the scandal's "lost chapter" two decades ago.
Robert Parry broke many of the Iran-Contra stories in the 1980s for the Associated Press and Newsweek. His latest book, Neck Deep: The Disastrous Presidency of George W. Bush, was written with two of his sons, Sam and Nat, and can be ordered at neckdeepbook.com. His two previous books, Secrecy & Privilege: The Rise of the Bush Dynasty from Watergate to Iraq and Lost History: Contras, Cocaine, the Press & 'Project Truth' are also available there. Or go to Amazon.com.
Distributed by Consortiumnews.com
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Newsvine
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
57 Comments so far
Show AllIts nice to be able to blame this scheme for our abysmal stupidity. It was very obvious that Bush intended to go to war with Iraq no matter what. How could we believe the WMD story when there was no proof produced by any of the inspectors? He thought that his daddy had made a big mistake in not taking out Saddam during the first war. It is as simple as the idiot son wanting to show-up his pretty smart daddy. It turns out daddy was 100% correct in getting out of Iraq and leaving Saddam in power. I did vote for W the first time but realized my mistake and would have voted for almost anyone the second time.
The democrats got control of congress in the last election and did NOT cut appropriations for the war. Do we really think that they will do so next year? Too many of them depend on the same contributors, who enjoy the war's big spending, to kill the goose.
RichM - That is an interesting website, and I look forward to exploring it. The rub amongst socialist groups is the role of the party, the orgainized working class, and response to capitalist atrocities. After a tortuous journey through the left, I finally arrived at Trotsky as the one who pulled it all together. His credentials and positions are rock-solid. Unfortunately, the 4th International that he spawned was all but stillborn, due to the reactionaty circumstances of the time. Anyway, I really hope we can work together to raise the rest of CDville out of the reformist swamp, and into revolutionary Marxism.
Greencastle - You might be missing a key point, namely the petit bourgeois nature of the Orange Revolution. Its leaders were/are on the other side of the class line, and despite their optimism and sacrifice, you did not hear them call for anything like worldwide socialist socialist unity. Am I wrong?
Thanks for the article Mr. Parry.
I've always known that the corporate media was treating the American people like mushrooms, keeping them in the dark and feeding them loads of shit, but your article shows the mechanics of how they actually achieved the vision in Orwell's "1984", and "Network", the movie.
Now, if we had a news media outlet that actually leaned to the left as far as Fox leans to the right, the people would be able to put all of them in the proper perspective.
Like this __\ | /__
Unfortunately, lefties with the means to do this like Bill Gates, Ted Turner and others, must not think it is too important or it would have already been done. Why do you think that is?
So, all that remains for us is hundreds of liberal/progressive islands, Like CD, quarantined on the Internet, not just from the mainstream, but from each other.
If we ever want our views and thoughts to make a difference in the World and in Democracy here in America, we must do a much better job of organizing and getting our message out. Until then, a Cynthia McKinney or Ralph Nader candidacy perform no other function than that of "Equalizer" for the Republicans.
Several studies have shown that people who rely on Fox for their news, and many do, are the most uninformed and misinformed among us, and I have many inlaws in this category.
Any thinking person knows that Fox News is merely a stenographer and message amplifier for the right-wing Neo-Fascists. The problem is, their viewers are the inoculated, indoctrinated, "Sieg Heil" followers, and are unlikely to change their views by any means short of an addict intervention program.
Another function of Fox, other than maintaining Bush's base of about 20%, is to make the other corporate media appear to lean left, or have a bias toward the left, as compared to Fox. Since Fox lays hard(100%) on its right side, and the other corporate media leans (50%) to the right, and so, from many other corporate media viewers perspective it appears that the others lean left.
Fox=(__) Other corporate media=(/) Together=(/__)
Some viewers see=(\ /) Get It?
When talking about why Americans swallow the government propaganda and support militarism abroad, as in the case of Vietnam, Iran-Contra and Iraq, Daniel (Pentagon Papers) Ellsberg said -
"What's good about the American people is that you have to lie to them. What's bad about Americans is that it's so easy to do." -- Daniel Ellsberg
"The myth of a free press died with the assassination of
Pres. John Kennedy" --- and they weren't about to leave
anything to chance: the vote counting computers began
to come on line in the mid-1960's. 2000 was NOISY but
it wasn't the first steal.
Let's remember that the coup on JFK was actually a coup
on our US government. One of the first moves by LBJ was
to take us to perpetual war in Vietnam.
What followed was the great propaganda of the Nixon years --"peace is at hand." Officials studying Nazi propaganda in the White House, watching old Nazi films.
It also seems from documents which floated out after
Bill Buckley's death that the CIA was actually funding
right-wing legislators thru the Howard Hughes Company which
ran a number of front companies for them. Two of the Senators mentioned were Strom Thurmond and Gerald Ford.
Iran Contra, of course, is preceded by "The October Surprise" which is preceded by Carter's attempts to
rescue the hostages and the multi-failures of those
planned operations with helicopters going down everywhere;
some because they didn't have equipment intended to keep
sand out of the engines despite the fact it was a desert
operation.
Also note that . . .
RICHARD SECORD AND OLLIE NORTH WERE PART OF THE PLANNING
AND LED THE RESCUE ATTEMPTS FOR CARTER .....
*****************************
I can tell you many many stories of Iran Contra North and Mena AK
I knew Barry Seal and some of the CIA and Heritage foundation's lackeys
after being in Centroamerica for the past 25 years and the dope from Ilopongo and Palmerola and being in Nicaragua [Viva Los Sandinastas!] and in Guatemala, many many Indigenopus people dead with USA and Israeli WEAPONS, MINES AND DOLL BOMBS
horrible......
they all need to be hung in public as traitors
as far as the previous comments it is because USA 'sheeples' are fat lazy arrogant,greedy and IGNORANT
not to mention unhappy #16 in the world as in yahoo news today
I have always assumed that Fox "News" was simply a comedic parody of a fascist right wing news show... the way the Simpsons is a parody of everyday american life.
I mean, really, who could take the likes of Shawn Hannity, Bill O'Rielly or Rush Limbaugh as serious news commentators? They are just to far gone to be taken seriously, so it MUST be meant as comedy.
It would be like taking Homer Simpson as a serious family role model.
"why the U.S. public is so easily manipulated by standard propoganda tactics"
as Forest Gump said "Stupid is as Stupid does"
annabelle June 30th, 2008 1:05 pm
No one was really held accountable in the Iran-Contra scandal, thus, accountability is no longer a matter of importance to our government. The only priority is accomplishing the goal which in most cases means a profitable bottom line, which in turn funnels into many deep pockets.
_________________________________
I never get tired of talking up Bill Clinton's stated rationalization for pulling the plug on active DOJ investigations into important "loose ends" from the Iran-Contra and Savings & Loan debacles. In the true spirit of the moderate Democrats whose imps still haunt these very threads, Clinton claimed that We the People had given him a mandate to (re)establish a productive and civil working relationship between Republics and Democrats.
In his view, it would have been divisive and counterproductive to "settle old scores" by pursuing painful issues that would certainly have offended and inflamed Republican leadership. In Bill's pragmatic, stragetic analysis, there was no compelling reason to rock the bipartisan boat while one is trying to keep it on course.
Social justice isn't a "compelling reason" to the vaunted pragmatists; it's inherently inefficient and politically risky to pursue such questions. Our para-corporate political elite has become principle-free, and pursuing government investigations into Iran-Contra simply isn't good for the bottom line. Which fits in exactly with annabelle's comment.
BTW, you may be assured that Obama will follow the same approach, although he may wrap it in august, Lincolnesque terms. His qualified statements about instituting a review of the Bush Crime Syndicate's doings, and his tepid willingness to follow the evidence and authorize appropriate legal proceedings don't change my conclusion.
Oh, they may go through the motions in hopes of appeasing a few malcontents, but nothing will come of it. Just sayin'.
tj June 30th, 2008 1:39 pm writes:
"While this report gives an excellent, detailed and exhaustive look at the "Lost Chapter," it does nothing to answer the question why the U.S. public is so easily manipulated by standard propoganda tactics that have been used since … forever."
I doubt that Mr. Parry is a clinically-trained behaviorist or cognitive scientist. You might give George Lakoff a read, though.
Thank you Mr. Parry, as an activist during the period mentioned I have waited a long time for this report which I knew must exist. your book Trick or Treason introduced me to you as a terrific investigative journalist. Can't wait to follow the links mentioned here. I watched the Iran/Contra hearings and waited impatiently for Sen.John Kerry to ask the right questions. He never did and for the media to report the truth about how crack cocaine ended up on the streets of Los Angeles.They never did. Supposedly reported on a Sat. issue of New York Times but I never found it. Lee Hamilton, Brezenski both on Obama's team forebodes business as usual more than "change". Indeed keep up the good work.
Pissantnobody The Ukraine Orange Revolution (see NYTimes 2005/01/17 internation/europe/17ukraine) was a more recent showing of the way.
PissantNobody (12:52 am) writes, "...There is no such thing as peaceful and honest capitalism. Poverty, inequality, and war are built into it. Those who present or imply that capitalism can be reformed are liars or extraordinary fools....The singular goal of true humanitarians is international socialism...."
- You are exactly right. Most people who grew up under intense capitalist indoctrination will naturally be unprepared to hear what you are saying. But you are right. As things get worse, people may become more receptive to hearing the stark truth of the matter.
A valuable resource for understanding the way the world works is www.wsws.org.
The FBI had been used by the Oval Office, under both Johnson and Nixon, to spy on anti Viet-Nam war protest organizations. The files collected often went deep into hundreds of individual's lives; including junior high and high school records, information on family members and videos on visiting friends and associates coming in and out of the person's home.
The CIA has long had an operation of recruiting and currying favor with respected journalists to influence and shape public opinion; the writer will quote 'sources' and slant the story. This was done during the Garrison trials where the New Orleans DA tried to bring to public light the link between the CIA and the anti Castro nationals who were being recruited, including one Lee Oswald, to drum up support for an invasion of Cuba. The CIA used organized Cubans as a smoke screen to plant Oswald in various locations so his real motions could not be traced as he was pulled around like a puppet. Garrison, who had solid information about Oswald's whereabouts from people inside the CIA puppet organizations, was discredited and had abuse thrown at him by the NEw York Times, a respected paper that has long been in the pay of the CIA.
There's a lot of really good comments in this thread. Thanks to all who wrote.
It seems to me that all this propaganda activity by the government is what makes the warrantless surveillance pragmatically necessary (from the standpoint of the psyops controllers). They have to figure out how effective their strategies and tactics are, and people are like quantum physics: if you know you're being observed, you change your behavior accordingly. I also suspect that the reason they haven't closed down the internet yet is because they are actively monitoring sites like this, doing some fancy statistical analyses, and deducing the probability that people are buying what they're selling.
Given that the model for selling war is more or less the same model to sell toothpaste, the same techniques must be applied. But I think one thing is changing - at least in some circles: people are wising up and realizing that they are being fed a hurricane of white lies, black lies, and lies of omission. They are also becoming saavy to false framing of issues.
I think very soon the government/media/military/financial complex will be in the situation where they are considered a laughing stock, and not to be believed. And the masses are going to be pissed when they realize they've been duped.
OMG! The imperialist murderers tell lies, delete truth, and spread disinformation, TOO! If only those good-hearted Dems had held their ground, and forced publication of the whole report, we would never have gone to war again! If only... But when Obama gets in, we'll show those rascally Republicans how to wage peace. Oh, yeah...
CDers, awake! There is no such thing as peaceful and honest capitalism. Poverty, inequality, and war are built into it. Those who present or imply that capitalism can be reformed are liars or extraordinary fools.
The singular goal of true humanitarians is international socialism. Nothing else even makes logical sense! The singular task required to make that happen is to build the political party that can lead the organized working class to victory in that struggle. Get with it, or prepare to watch your wheezing childrens' burnt skin peel off after the a-bombs fly. It is not 'if', it is 'when' this will happen.
Another expose won't do it. We need a program, not another directionless crazy-maker! The choice is global socialism or imperialist tyranny and war. What will it take to show that there is no middle ground? I routinely challenge CD-land to propose something else, and the call is never answered. The reason is because there is no other solution. The leaders of the 1917 Russian revolution showed the way, but were overwhelmed. Study them carefully, shed your Civics class deceptions, and don't fall for the Stalin=Communism lie!
bamabanjo:
Wow, well said.
Advocating for the plight of the Palestinians is a worthy cause. But spouting off conspiracy theories about Zionism is remeniscent of the kind of anti-semitism that engulfed Europe in the decades leading up to WWII.
The Left is so much better than that. We are smarter, more noble, and should know better than to use scape-goats.
The fact that Israel even pops up in a discussion of the Iran-Contra scandal is indicative on some people's irrational obsession with the issue.
annabelle:
hearts they shrink as the pocket swells. Go to myspace.com/michaelplantman...hear Little Wheels.
This was an excellent article, but as I read it, I thought, he's leaving some stuff out. Thanks to willieb37, and heavy runner, and dfairley for pointing out some of it.
Plus, the contras were vicious terrorists, torturing and murdering and causing misery to the Nicaraguan people. They tortured children in front of their parents, and targeted teachers and health care workers. They were trained by Americans and Cuban exiles, some of them in Arkansas, where an ambitious Democratic governor collaborated with the fascists in the Reagan administration.
As for the October Surprise, I don't think that it has been proven that Bush 1 was involved, but many people have testified to the fact that the Reagan team committed treason by conspiring with the Iranians in order to influence the 1980 election. And the neocon North, the original sneering fascist testifier to Congress, sold weapons to Iran. You know, the Iran that the US is currently provoking. And they sold them through Israel. You know, the one that many people on this site insist is behind the US hostility toward Iran.
Yes, we must not forget that Lee Hamilton covered up Iran Contra, and then covered up 9-11. Those on this site who close their eyes and "hope" that the Democrats will make it all alright should meditate on that for a while.
Robert Parry, Pluck you and your Treasonous Musings!!
Oliver North is a War Hero and Eliot Abrams martyred his reputation for the Cause of Freedom. Both descend from the glorious American Heartland of Chickenpluckistan!
The Lord GOD appointed Fawn Hall to be a hot babe so as to deceive the treacherous Liberals.
This is the result of allowing power out of control without check and balance. I vaguely remember Iran / Contra other than I new the first Bush was entrenched in this and yet managed to win the White House. To this day Reagan is a hero when he was really out of control and should be treated as a war criminal.
Bamabanjo,
What about someone like myself, who doesn't give a damn what Jews, or Baptists, or Muslims believe in, but really detest the arrogance, violence, belligerence, land stealing, war crime committing, nose thumbing at UN resolutions, Apartheid, militant crimes of both the U.S. and Israel? I'm all in favor of protecting every individuals right to their religious beliefs. I'm also in favor of an international peacekeeping force going in to Israel and throttling their aggression, disarming them, and protecting them.
RichM-
Regarding your clarification of the article having nothing to do with Zionists, couldn't but agree. I would disagree however with your characterization of it as a trendy left item; in particular on this site it is parlayed by extreme rightist, white nationalists clearly identifiable by the ragged, hate filled language ("filthy, scum"- in which case you actually unfortunately fall into) and conspiracy theories lifted straight from their websites-which they often link to.
Chief among these is a willingness to "blame the Jews" through the convenient (and apparently antiseptic) cover of Zionism for America's current ills, rather than reflectively examining as you describe America's own excessive consumption patterns (>25% of all resources for <5% of population), history of imperialism and racism, and self-made lack of political involvement- not to mention totally ignoring the complex history of the Middle East and anti-Jewish oppression, including in America. This is done strategically in such a way to buttress pre-existing right wing, white nationalist propaganda invoking classic anti-Semitic stereotypes, arguments and other BS.
I think some involved in left causes may at times be drawn into these types of discourses either because of ignorance or their own racist predilections. There are certainly those that can be involved out of a reasonable concern for the plight of the Palestinians, but by ignoring the Palestinians', Arab, and Islamic world's own responsibilities for the current situation IMO they simply perpetuate it for the furtherance of their own ideological reasons, i.e. anti-American Imperialism, join any revolution (including the Islamic one), support working people, immigrant (except Jewish) struggles...
The right wing further benefits from attacking Jews under the cover of "the left" by encouraging Jews, who are turned off by this type of language, not to vote for progressive Democrats. This is further driven by the non-stop language on this site to vote none of the above, or Green, chatter- which further alienates other people from and drives down vote totals for Democrats. A spinoff example of this strategy is Republican funding for Ralph Nader's past campaigns, or gathering signatures to place him on the ballot to siphon off votes.
Theoretically a leftist could do the same thing by posing in this election as a super conservative, right winger on blogs and saying they would never vote for "middle of the road John McCain." I don't think the right would so easily influenced however, and I would be willing to bet they are more pragmatic as a movement in any case.
We must vote a third party. How many kicks in the head does it take?
This relates back to at least Nixon. Minor and medium functionaries in the Nixon administration were not punished after WATERGATE due to the treason of Gerald Ford an unelected lapdog of corporate America who pardoned Nixon and effectively killed any public examination of conspirators down the line. The names of these people have been cropping up in every illegal or immoral act of Reagan, Bush the spy, and Bu$h the inferior.
The inaction of the Congress and the Democratic party to impeach Bu$h the inferior and root out the multiplying hoards of fascists in the government absolutely ensures additional outrages in the next Republican administrations. The Republicans will be back in power quickly because they will have their ruthless criminals free to destroy any democratic impulse in the people. In a way the Democratic party's lack of moral action will do more damage in the long run than Bu$h the inferior.
The failure to provide minimally honest, effective government will result in violence and/or catastrophe in an attempt to align the government with the people.
Still going on, same people in charge, same people in the media, same lies, same policies, same self-aggrandizement, same wars, same possession of awful means of same destruction. Same system gives the same results. Who in power really wants to change, when the system makes the rules. Only a fracture of current conditions, a change in reality such as the results of a coming war with Iran, which they will bring about, will force a change in the power parasites. Vote anything but democrat or republican.
Everyone should be aware that the US is now engaged in similar dirty work in Iran, with Congress as deeply involved as the Bush administration. The latest New Yorker has a Semour Hersh article (http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2008/07/07/080707fa_fact_hersh) that begins:
"Late last year, Congress agreed to a request from President Bush to fund a major escalation of covert operations against Iran."
"'The Finding (for the convert activities) was focussed on ... trying to undermine the government through regime change,' a person familiar with its contents said..."
Imagine if we caught the Iranians trying to undermine our government. It would certainly be considered an act of war.
Not to be outdone, Congress is considering a resolution (H. Res 362) that includes the language:
"... Congress...demands that the President initiate an international effort to immediately and dramatically increase the economic, political, and diplomatic pressure on Iran to verifiably suspend its nuclear enrichment activities by, inter alia, prohibiting the export to Iran of all refined petroleum products; IMPOSING STRINGENT INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS ON ALL PERSONS, VEHICLES, SHIPS, PLANES, TRAINS, AND CARGO ENTERING OR DEPARTING IRAN; and PROHIBITING INTERNATIONAL MOVEMENT OF ALL IRANIAN OFFICIALS not involved in negotiating the suspension of Iran's nuclear program. (Emphisis added)
Incredibly, this resolution has 220 cosponsors. They're going to intercept all Iranian officials outside Iran? They're going to inspect planes, trains and ships entering or leaving Iran? A large percentage of the people running our government are clearly criminally insane!
RichM
As you probably guessed, the reason I included those quotes is that there is often a big difference in opinions on JFK between todays widely published "left" and older "left" who have had more time to read around (and especially about the CIA ties to the Non -Communist Left during the Cold War) On this last note See the fascinating book by Bruce Cummings on Allard Lwenstein. In it he discusses a very interesting tag-team relationshp between left-liberal CIA Congressman Allard Lowenstein and future Reagan administration Defense secretary Frank Carlucci.
Don't know if I will ever write the word left without quotation marks again! So much we don't know.
As in HOW MANY OTHER CASES?-- left-liberal ....like a fox!
stanwix June 30th, 2008 3:42 pm If you speak of income tax...all it pays is the interest on our debt based currency...the figures are out there. Other taxes? Who knows! Do not be too fast to believe that they are being used judiciously. The accounting system in the US is totally corrupted. As an example, check out cafr1.com...think that's it...you'll find it ..Where much of your tax money really goes.
The SISSIES of America are too concerned about their pampered asses to stand up to those in power. Even though they out-number them. Till people lose their vehicles, their houses, a few loved ones to lack of insurance. Then maybe they will change their wet panties and do something.
By then America will be in ruins, and the sissies will wimper their way into concentration camps and worse. Shakespeare would be in awe of this comic tragedy.
Nathaniel Heidenheimer (3:52 pm) -- Thanks for describing that book, & for including the Ellsberg quote & the phrase "I am a former Chomsky mainliner." // On the strength of those things, I will definitely look into it.
Iran-Contra is old news for those of us who've known where and how to look during the past generation.
What's most telling is the rarity with which this history has been conjured up during the recent several years of the current Iran issue. Many young people I know seem to have little knowledge of the 1980's.
Are there any Contemporary History teachers out there? If so, please let us know if Iran-Contra is presented in high school textbooks or somewhere else in the public school curriculum. Thanx in advance.
RichM, "It's not clear to what extent Reagan himself was involved." Try, "...mentally competent." From the Palmer Raids, to COINTELPRO, to Iran-Contra, to the Bush Crime Family, and false flag Pearl Harbors (PNAC) from the sinking of the Maine to the Twin Towers (including the one that was never hit).
We've come a long way baby.
It's the doom of men that they forget. Master doesn't share.
Any wonder the Media has been used to cover up the most imporatant aspects of Iran-Contra when its use had already been perfected to cover up the Coup D'etat Of 11-22-63?
See the book that Chomsky and Cockburn cannot answer!
New book JFK AND THE UNSPEAKABLE WHY HE DIED AND WHY IT MATTERS
BY JAMES W. DOUGLASS. I am telling people about this book, because I think it is the MOST CURRENT of possible events!
I am a former Chomsky mainliner. Then after a while I began reading a book that WAS NOT a JFK "ASSASSINATION" BOOK as that genre has been so laboriously constructed (moated?) The book mixed structural developments of the Cold War and National Security State with some elements of the Kennedy Assassination. From there on I read more about the assassination, and concluded that CHOMSKY'S DECPICTION OF JFK WAS DEAD ON: ABOUT 50% OF JFK.
What makes it all the more distorted is that it compleetly ignores the other 50%, the part of JFK that was in permanent struggle with the permanent military industrial bureacracy.
This incredible book is the answer to Chomsky and I especially recommend it to those on the "left" --whatever that means these days-- who have accepted the Chomsky Cockburn view that seems to be the only one publishable on the left these days. It offers the other side of the story, better than any other book I have read
And no it is not naive-liberal. It acknowledges JFKs strong Cold War uttereances and actions rather than trying to pretend they don't exist. That is exactly what makes this book so provocative!
Checkout these comments:
"Douglass writes with moral force, clarity, and the careful attention to detail that will make JFK and the Unspeakable a sourcebook for many years to come, for it provides us with the stubborn facts needed to rebuild a constitutional democracy within the United States."--Marcus Raskin, co-founder, Institute for Policy Studies
"Douglass presents, brilliantly, an unfamiliar yet thoroughly convincing account of a series of creditable decisions of John F. Kennedy—at odds with his initial Cold War stance—that earned him the secret distrust and hatred of hard-liners among the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the CIA. Did this suspicion and rage lead directly to his murder by agents of these institutions, as Douglass concludes? Many readers who are not yet convinced of this 'beyond reasonable doubt' by Douglass's prosecutorial indictment will find themselves, perhaps—like myself—for the first time, compelled to call for an authoritative criminal investigation. Recent events give all the more urgency to learning what such an inquiry can teach us about how, by whom, and in whose interests this country is run."—Daniel Ellsberg, author, Secrets: A Memoir of Vietnam and the Pentagon Papers
"A remarkable book: devastating in its documented indictment of the dark forces that have long deformed the public life of this country, while also illuminating JFK's final vision of world peace and documenting beyond reasonable doubt the unspeakable assassination of our last partially admirable president. This book should be required reading for every American citizen."—Richard Falk, Milbank Professor of International Law Emeritus, Princeton University
Just a word to jcrumb, who in addition to all-caps remarks above, also said this a few days ago in another thread: IMAGINE IF EVERY MEMBER OF THE ANTIWAR MOVEMENT….STOPPED PAYING FOR THE WAR..WAHT..50 MILLION PEOPLE WHO SUDDENLY ECIDE TO PUT THEIR MONEY WHERE THEIR MOUTHS ARE? CAN YOU IMAGINE?
A GENERAL TAX STRIKE..BY MILLIONS OF AMERICANS..WILL CAUSE A COLLECTIVE BARGAINING SCENARIO THAT WILL MAKE SUCH SWEEPING CHANGES, AND SO QUICKLY....IT IS ALL WE HAVE LEFT..IT IS NON-VIOLENT AT IT'S CORE..AND IT IS ALL THE BOY'S THAT CALL THE SHOTS CARE ABOUT..MONEY..MONEY..MONEY…NOTHING ELSE.
First off, writing all in caps comes off as yelling, and I for one would appreciate a wee bit of toning down, in the interest of give and take. Secondly, would that it were so simple. Not paying taxes means one of two things: an income below the taxable limit, which is unrealistic as a broad-based strategy; or breaking the law, which you're simply not going to get large numbers of people to do. And besides: our taxes pay for all sorts of worthwhile things we do want and need. And as a strategy, it's far from all that we have left (thankfully).
So if we could please begin thinking a bit more strategically, and a little less pie in the sky? And apologies to all who thought (correctly) that this thread was about Iran-contra and the government propaganda machine.
Democracy died years ago. Do you think we will ever, ever know the truth? Not a chance. No truth = no democracy. Also, it would be foolish to underestimate the Zionists. Especially today. The Zionists have access to a lot more of U.S. taxpayers money than we would like to believe.
I think I'll vote Green and hope when I awake from this nightmare I'll find that the world has no enemies.
Do not forget the incestuous relationship between the military and the CIA with regard to this period and the evolution of an illegal domestic surveillance regime.
Case in point: The Pentagon's Joint Special Operations University's (JSOU) June 2006 report entitled Blogs and Military Information Strategy, authored by Major James Kinniburgh and Dr. Dorothy Denning.
https://jsou.socom.mil
https://jsou.socom.mil/gateway/
This report focuses intently on the successes of domestic right-wing propaganda media and includes suggestions that the military hack into domestic U.S. bloggers' blogs to actually alter the contents of their blogs to embarrass or discredit prominent domestic U.S. bloggers. This is pure Orwell and should be investigated if we had a real representative Congress. I recommend that this report be read by anyone interested in this topic.
The Pentagon has run amok along with the rest of the military-industrial complex, including the CIA and NSA and are operating in the same outlaw status as the Bush-Cheney maladministration. When or if they can be reined in, the Constitution and democratic Republic restored is anybody's guess at this point. But the Pentagon is violating the Constitution to increasingly intrude into domestic surveillance and propaganda efforts of various dubious kinds, and is also increasingly usurping the State Department's previously existing authority with respect to various diplomatic activities. All of this requires much more attention on the part of Americans and investigation.
I have read theories about American support for the founding of Israel in Palestine being in part because it amounted to a forward military base for U.S. Imperialism so that military force could be used to dominate the oil resources there.
So Zionist - sure - but was there really concern for the Jewish people involved with resettling them in the midst of the Arab world? Or are they just mere pawns in the game of Big Capital to dominate the world's resources?
There has to be a call for Lee Hamilton to resign from the Obama campaign in light of these revelations.
This is much worse than Samantha Power calling Hillary Clinton a "monster."
"Lee Hamilton is a senior national security adviser to Democratic candidate Barack Obama."
That's pretty disturbing in light of the above mentioned criminal activities of Mr. Hamilton.
Also please note that Elliot Abrams now holds the same post Gary Sick did under Carter.
How interesting - DICK CHENEY WAS ON THE COMMITTEE AND INSISTED ON THE COVERUP!!!!
Please note that Rep. Lee Hamilton, D-Indiana, the House chairman who insisted that these illegal activities by the C.I.A. which resulted in tens of thousands of deaths and the perversion of the American press, was, in later years MADE THE CHAIRMAN OF THE 9/11 COMMISSION!!!!
THIS IS THE SAME LEE HAMILTON WHO CHAIRED THE COVER UP OF 9/11 AT THE 9/11 COMMISSION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
"In the Spring of 1983, the network began to turn its attention toward beefing up the Administration's capacity to promote American support for the Democratic Resistance in Nicaragua [the contras] and the fledgling democracy in El Salvador."
Democracy, in this case, meaning a puppet government that would be sure to restore the private, United Fruit ownership that was there under the dictatorships. United Fruit, at that time, according to Kevin Phillips, in his book "An American Dynasty," on the Bush family, was owned by "Zapata Offshore," a privately held corporation owned by George H. W. Bush.
So the "Contras" who slaughtered tens of thousands of people, were carrying the water to return lands to George H. W. Bush. The propaganda operation described in this article was part of that effort.
Donald Gregg, mentioned in Mr. Parry's article, was a principal figure in the treasonous "October Surprise" operation where Casey and other figures from the Reagan campaign, including George H. W. Bush, conspired with the Ayatollah Kumeni to hold the U.S. diplomatic personnel who had been captured in Iran and were being held hostage, until Reagan was inaugurated. The hostages were released on January 20, 1981, the day Reagan was inaugurated.
See "October Surprise" by President Carter's National Security Adviser for Middle Eastern Affairs, Gary Sick.
While "October Surprise" is out of print you can still get a copy here:
http://www.amazon.com/October-Surprise-Gary-Sick/dp/0812920872/ref=pd_bb...
"The 'Fox effect' was so powerful that it convinced other networks to load up with pro-war military analysts and to silence voices that questioned the invasion."
Are you sure that the C.I.A. outfit did not also work to influence the other networks?
I don't really think democrats are sellouts- it's them against us, always has been, always will be. One interesting footnote to the whole Iran-contra saga, and i must confess i didn't read the entire piece so he may have mentioned it: during the hearings the reaganites repeated the mantra again and again that this whole adventure began in 1983 or 1984 but in reality it began earlier. During the 1980 campaign there was some serious consternation on the part of the repugs that if Carter freed the hostages he would retain the presidency. So bush flew to Paris and pulled off what came to be known as the Oct. Surprise. He promised that after he and reagan were in the white house they would send the Iranians all the weapons they wanted, in return for holding the hostages an extra 76 days. And, if everyone will recall, the hostages were released the same day that asshole took the oath of office. An excellent documentary, Cover-up, the Iran-contra scandal (narrated by Elizabeth Montgomery) details the whole sorry episode.
While this report gives an excellent, detailed and exhaustive look at the "Lost Chapter," it does nothing to answer the question why the U.S. public is so easily manipulated by standard propoganda tactics that have been used since ... forever.
Lies are just lies.
Eliot Abrams is a treasonous, dual-national criminal. Why scum like that allows to slink the halls of leadership in this country is testament to the power Zionists hold in this country. We are truly lost.
AND YOU PAID FOR ALL OF IT..AND..I AM ASHAMED TO SAY..AT THAT TIME...SO DID I..BUT I DON'T ANYMORE...AND NEITHER SHOULD YOU!
JOIN IN TAX REVOLT..THIS IS A ROGUE STAE...A MILITARY COUP HAS SUPPLANTED OUR "RIGHTS" AND OUR FORM OF "REPRESNTATIONAL/CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT"..SO..STOP PAYING FOR MILITARY CONTROL OF YOUR GOVERNMENT..STOP OR LOSE! IT IS THAT SIMPLE,..IT REALLY IS..
LIVE FREE OR DIE..
No one was really held accountable in the Iran-Contra scandal, thus, accountability is no longer a matter of importance to our government. The only priority is accomplishing the goal which in most cases means a profitable bottom line, which in turn funnels into many deep pockets.
No one was really held accountable in the Iran-Contra scandal, thus, accountability is no longer a matter of importance to our government. The only priority is accomplishing the goal which in most cases means a profitable bottom line, which in turn funnels into many deep pockets.
from the article:
"In the two decades since the Iran-Contra scandal, both Murdoch and Moon have continued to pour billions of dollars into media outlets that have influenced the course of U.S. history, often through the planting of propaganda and disinformation much like a CIA covert action might do in a hostile foreign country."
these people consider us to be citizens of that hypothetical "hostile foreign country."
to them, we are "the enemy."
"public diplomacy" = domestic propaganda, yet another illegality with "bi"partisan support. keep up the good work, mr. parry.
(my above post was in response to gus, at 1:32)
Eliot Abrams is a scumbag & criminal, but the article has nothing to do with Zionists. The principal actors mentioned in this article are people like Otto Reich, Oliver North, William Casey, Walter Raymond, Rev Moon, Rupert Murdoch, and the king of the sellout Democrats, Lee Hamilton. It's not clear to what extent Reagan himself was involved.
Zionism (which I in no way defend) had absolutely nothing to do with it. That's a red herring. This is a story about the Reaganites, the CIA, & the American corporate media.
That's not to deny that there is a very strong convergence of interests between Zionists & American elites. However, it's become way too fashionable among American left-liberals to try to blame everything on "Zionists." The truth is that even if there were no such thing as Israel or Zionism, the political trajectory of the US wouldn't be any different. The main driving force are the needs of US imperialism. The problem is the structure of American society itself, not some "external evil." For instance, the US embraced slavery, committed genocide against the Indians, & stole half of Mexico, long before there was any such thing as Zionism or Israel.
The American public is so easily manipulated because we have a monopoly media that will not focus on issues like this. The internet is changing things as we gain more outlets and the ability to share information with each other.
We still have a majority of the population staring at their cable television lineups, but many of us are starting to spend more time on sites like this one.
Capital Crimes All.