

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Seven hundred people participating in the The Occupy Wall Street protests were arrested this weekend. Protests are taking place in several cities, see and with live streaming at.
NATHAN SCHNEIDER, nathan at wagingnonviolence.org
Schneider is an editor of the website Waging Non-Violence; one of his recent pieces is "Mass arrests on the Brooklyn Bridge: is this what civil disobedience looks like?" He is able to do interviews as well as coordinate media with protesters, including those who have been arrested.
MARGARET RATNER KUNSTLER, margaret at kunstlerlaw.net
Margaret Ratner Kunstler is an attorney and co-author of the just-released "Hell No: Your Right to Dissent in 21st Century America." She said today: "The mass arrests of 700 marchers coming from Occupation Wall Street was utterly illegal and part of a larger program by the state to shut down the most effective means people have of making fundamental changes. It was illegal because almost none of those arrested were warned that arrest might ensue unless they left the bridge. Those arrests should be seen for what they were: a shot over the bow to all who would take to the streets -- the protests can only go so far.
"The powers that be -- Wall Street and friends -- fear that because of the dire economic circumstances in this country people will take to the street s as they did in the Arab Spring. We saw similar police activity in 2004 in New York where 400 people were netted and illegally held in custody for days; we saw how the protests in Pittsburgh at the G20 protests resulted in arrest after arrest and we saw the Seattle World Trade Organization protests, where police violence was the order of the day. The biggest, greatest fear of the establishment is that people will take to the streets. The message we must send them is: Yes, we will."Seven hundred people participating in the The Occupy Wall Street protests were arrested this weekend. Protests are taking place in several cities, see and with live streaming at.
NATHAN SCHNEIDER, nathan at wagingnonviolence.org
Schneider is an editor of the website Waging Non-Violence; one of his recent pieces is "Mass arrests on the Brooklyn Bridge: is this what civil disobedience looks like?" He is able to do interviews as well as coordinate media with protesters, including those who have been arrested.
MARGARET RATNER KUNSTLER, margaret at kunstlerlaw.net
Margaret Ratner Kunstler is an attorney and co-author of the just-released "Hell No: Your Right to Dissent in 21st Century America." She said today: "The mass arrests of 700 marchers coming from Occupation Wall Street was utterly illegal and part of a larger program by the state to shut down the most effective means people have of making fundamental changes. It was illegal because almost none of those arrested were warned that arrest might ensue unless they left the bridge. Those arrests should be seen for what they were: a shot over the bow to all who would take to the streets -- the protests can only go so far.
"The powers that be -- Wall Street and friends -- fear that because of the dire economic circumstances in this country people will take to the street s as they did in the Arab Spring. We saw similar police activity in 2004 in New York where 400 people were netted and illegally held in custody for days; we saw how the protests in Pittsburgh at the G20 protests resulted in arrest after arrest and we saw the Seattle World Trade Organization protests, where police violence was the order of the day. The biggest, greatest fear of the establishment is that people will take to the streets. The message we must send them is: Yes, we will."
A nationwide consortium, the Institute for Public Accuracy (IPA) represents an unprecedented effort to bring other voices to the mass-media table often dominated by a few major think tanks. IPA works to broaden public discourse in mainstream media, while building communication with alternative media outlets and grassroots activists.
"This is not a 'satire,' it's debasement," argued one critic.
US House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) on Monday drew swift criticism after he excused President Donald Trump's decision to post an artificial intelligence-generated video featuring him dropping sewage on "No Kings" protesters.
During a Monday press conference, Johnson was asked by a reporter what he made of Trump posting a video that depicted him "pooping on the American people."
Johnson responded by praising Trump for his purported social media savvy.
"The president uses social media to make a point," he said. "You can argue he's probably the most effective person who's ever used social media for that. He is using satire to make a point."
Reporter: Speaker Johnson, you say that Democrats had a hate America rally, but what does it say that the president of released video of him pooping on the American people?
Johnson: The president uses social media to make a point. You can argue he's probably the most effective… pic.twitter.com/3BuyfEGIiZ
— Acyn (@Acyn) October 20, 2025
Many critics, however, didn't see anything satirical about the Trump video and questioned what point it was trying to make other than a desire to defecate on his political opponents.
"His point was that he’s an unaccountable, imperious would-be monarch who would like to dump poop on American cities," wrote Leah Greenberg, co-executive director of Indivisible, one of the main organizers of the "No Kings" demonstrations.
Investment banker Evaristus Odinikaeze disputed that there was anything satirical about Trump's post.
"This is not a 'satire,' it's debasement," he argued. "When the speaker of the House defends a video of the president literally defecating on Americans as 'making a point,' it tells you everything about the moral rot in this cult movement. Leaders with integrity elevate discourse, they don’t normalize humiliation as humor."
Democratic strategist Mike Nellis also questioned whether Johnson had a firm grasp of the meaning of satire.
"So Mike Johnson defended Trump’s weird AI videos this morning as 'satire' meant to 'make a point,'" he wrote on Bluesky. "Can someone ask Johnson what point Trump was making when he posted a video of himself dumping shit all over America? Or when he dropped napalm on Chicago? I’d like an answer."
Just before he deployed hundreds of armed and masked federal immigration agents in Chicago last month, the president posted another AI-generated image that showed the city under attack with a reference to the famous line, "I love the smell of napalm in the morning" from the film Apocalypse Now.
Rep. Sean Casten (D-Ill.) marveled that Johnson appears willing to defend anything the president does, no matter how juvenile.
"Mike Johnson is too much of a coward to condemn pooping on people," he wrote.
A majority of voters agree "Democrats in Congress should only vote for a government funding bill that reverses Republican healthcare cuts, even if that means the government shutdown continues."
Twenty days into the federal government shutdown, polling released Monday by Data for Progress and Groundwork Collaborative shows that US voters are concerned about rising healthcare premiums and want Democrats in Congress to keep fighting for a fix.
The GOP has majorities in both chambers of Congress, but some Democratic support is required to get most bills through the Senate. The government shut down at the beginning of the month after Republicans tried to continue with their spending plans, but Democrats pushed for undoing some of the healthcare cuts in President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA).
The OBBBA is expected to cause at least 10 million Americans to lose Medicaid coverage, and over 20 million more to soon face soaring health insurance premiums because Republicans refused to extend expiring Affordable Care Act (ACA) tax credits. Data for Progress, which polled 1,264 likely voters nationally from October 14-15, found that 72% of respondents were somewhat or very concerned about premiums rising.
A majority—52%—agreed that "Republicans' healthcare cuts will kick millions off their plans and double healthcare premiums on average for millions more. Democrats in Congress should only vote for a government funding bill that reverses Republican healthcare cuts, even if that means the government shutdown continues."
The think tank also found that 43% of respondents blame Trump and congressional Republicans "the most" for the shutdown, while 33% mostly blame Democrats, 21% blame both parties equally, and 2% were not sure.
While voters were split (48% each) on whether congressional Democrats "are fighting on behalf of people like me," a majority (54%) said they do not believe that "President Trump and Republicans in Congress are fighting on behalf of people like me."
The polling comes as Politico reports that "the confidence and cohesion from Republicans on both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue—and a similar confidence among Democrats—augurs no quick end to what is approaching one of the longest shutdowns in history."
Appearing on The Checkup podcast with Dr. Mikhail "Mike" Varshavski on Sunday, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) highlighted that with the OBBBA, the GOP "slashed Medicaid by a trillion dollars. What does that mean? First, it means rural hospitals all across the country, mainly in Republican states and districts, are gonna close. Some have closed already because so many of these hospitals depend on Medicaid. For many counties, like including in some of my counties in upstate New York, they're the only hospital. And they're the largest employer."
"Second, this applies to lots of your audience who I know tend to be young folks," he said. "The parents who were in nursing homes are gonna get kicked out. I was at Silver Lake nursing home on Staten Island where I know your dad lives. The owner told me if these cuts go through, all 300 patients, many of whom are Staten Islanders, are gonna have to leave because I have to close."
"Even more devastating is how the premiums will rise. In other words, we wanna just renew the tax credits that have existed for a while on your ACA," Schumer continued. "If they are not renewed, we asked the Republicans three times, we put votes on the floor, and three times they voted no, unfortunately. Here's what will happen. The average American who's on ACA will pay $500-1,000 more a month, not a year, a month. That's, you know, $6,000-10,000 a year."
The top Democrat stressed that "we hate the shutdown. That's why we want the Republicans to simply sit down and meet with us."
"Essential services, the military, law enforcement, air traffic control, they continue to work without pay. Some other people are furloughed, and they come back when the shutdown is over," Schumer noted. Trump is also pursuing a policy "no president has tried during the shutdown," he added, pointing to the administration's attempt to illegally fire some federal workers.
Data for Progress and Groundwork Collaborative found that 58% of people polled disagreed with Trump's shutdown firings.
"ICE was always going to be Trump’s private military to deploy domestically against Americans," said one critic.
The $170 billion in new funding for immigration enforcement operations that the Republican Party included in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act earlier this year led some to warn that the Trump administration was ramping up spending at anti-immigration agencies not just to fund its attacks on migrants, but to deploy federal forces against anyone it wanted to across US communities.
New reporting on Monday detailed just how much US Immigration and Customs Enforcement has spent on weaponry since President Donald Trump took office—weapons that have been purchased as the administration has turned federal agents on US cities such as Chicago and Portland, illustrating how the president is treating increasingly armed ICE officers as his "private military," as one progressive critic said.
As images spread online of immigration agents deploying pepper spray and tear gas at nonviolent protesters, Judd Legum at Popular Information recently delved into government contracting records from the Federal Procurement Data System and found that ICE has increased its spending on "small arms, ordnance, and ordnance accessories manufacturing" by 700% this year compared to 2024 numbers.
The agency spent $71,515,762 on small arms from January 20—the day Trump began his second term—through October 18.
The number dwarfs ICE's spending during the first Trump term, during which the agency spent about $8.4 billion annually on small arms, and during President Joe Biden's administration.
The type of weaponry purchased by ICE also raised alarm Monday, with Legum reporting that while most of the agency's spending was on guns and armor, "there have also been significant purchases of chemical weapons and 'guided missile warheads and explosive components.'"
"If the immigration enforcement apparatus of the United States were its own national military, it would be the 13th most heavily funded in the world. This puts it higher than the national militaries of Poland, Italy, Australia, Canada, Turkey, and Spain—and just below Israel."
The reporting comes as ICE and other immigration agencies continue to deploy armed, masked agents in major Democratic-leaning US cities, where officers have been filmed and photographed pointing a weapon at a protester; firing a pepper ball at a pastor, and pointing a firearm at bystanders who saw one agent arresting a man.
A CBS reporter in Chicago also accused an ICE officer of firing a pepper ball at her vehicle, causing the chemical to "engulf the inside of her truck."
Sally Duval, a Texas state House candidate in last year's election, said she was "curious to know why ICE needs 'guided missile warheads.'"
The report came days after the Trump administration used the US military for what Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom called "a profoundly absurd show of force that could put Californians directly in harm’s way," when the Marines fired 155-millimeter artillery shells over a section of the busy Interstate 5 freeway to celebrate the military branch's 250th anniversary.
Newsom accused Trump of "using our military to intimidate people [he disagrees] with" and called the exercise "reckless."
Melanie D'Arrigo, executive director of the Campaign for New York Health, said Legum's reporting on Monday showed that "ICE was always going to be Trump’s private military to deploy domestically against Americans."
Legum's analysis—which likely understated total spending on weapons by Trump's deportation forces, as it did not include spending by other anti-immigration agencies—followed a report on ICE's recent funding increase by In These Times.
With the $170 billion included in the OBBBA, reported the outlet, "if the immigration enforcement apparatus of the United States were its own national military, it would be the 13th most heavily funded in the world. This puts it higher than the national militaries of Poland, Italy, Australia, Canada, Turkey, and Spain—and just below Israel."
The budget, Brandon Lee of the Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights told In These Times, "shows the misplaced priorities of this administration, where they are cutting healthcare and cutting vital programs for people across the country, and putting all of this money into a domestic terrible force."
"And it shows the cruelty," said Lee, "that the Trump administration intends to enact on all people in the United States.”