Fired US Attorney Says Colleague Told Him Politics Was Behind His Ouster
WASHINGTON - A longtime protege of President Bush told former U.S. Attorney David Iglesias that he was fired for political reasons and that he shouldn’t fight his ouster, Iglesias says in a new book.
“This is political,” Iglesias recalls Texas U.S. Attorney Johnny Sutton telling him shortly after he was ousted. “If I were you, I’d just go quietly.”
Iglesias, a former U.S. attorney in New Mexico, is one of nine federal prosecutors whose firings triggered a yearlong controversy at the Justice Department and led to the resignations of Attorney General Alberto Gonzales and 11 other Justice Department officials.
Iglesias cites the exchange with Sutton in his upcoming book, “In Justice,” as further evidence that he was forced out because Republicans were displeased with his refusal to prosecute Democrats.
“I couldn’t believe what I was hearing: a U.S. attorney all but admitting that a colleague was being hung out to dry for reasons that had nothing to do with performance or professionalism,” he wrote in a draft of the book, which McClatchy obtained.
Sutton, who’s the top U.S. attorney in San Antonio, didn’t return phone calls Thursday seeking comment.
As a result of Iglesias’ and several other prosecutors’ accusations that they were fired in December 2006 for improper political reasons, the Justice Department turned over thousands of documents, and Congress forced top officials, including Gonzales, to testify.
No one has determined who decided which prosecutors should be fired and why. Democrats say that must mean the White House was calling the shots, while the administration has said it demonstrates that the firings were blown out of proportion.
Iglesias said he asked Sutton how he knew about his firing.
“I saw your name,” he quoted Sutton as saying.
Iglesias said in an interview that Sutton refused to elaborate, “but to have one of the most powerful U.S. attorneys tell me my firing was political was confirmation, in my view, that I was fired for the wrong reasons.”
During a congressional investigation of the firings, department e-mails revealed that Sutton was given a heads-up about the firings because he was the chairman of the Attorney General’s Advisory Committee of U.S. Attorneys.
Justice Department officials said they couldn’t comment on Iglesias’ account because of an ongoing probe of the firings by the department’s inspector general and the Office of Professional Responsibility.
“The department is cooperating with that investigation and has no further comment,” said spokesman Peter Carr.
Sutton, whose ties to Bush date back to the president’s Texas gubernatorial campaign, has been singled out himself by Republican critics who have called for his resignation. So far, he’s weathered the political storm.
The critics have accused Sutton of leading an overzealous prosecution of Border Patrol agents Ignacio Ramos and Jose Alonso Compean, each sentenced to more than 10 years in prison for shooting a Mexican drug courier as he was trying to flee back to Mexico.
“The type of protection from political pressure that Johnny has gotten was the kind of protection that I thought we would get,” said Iglesias, who said he bears Sutton no ill will. “And we didn’t get it, I think largely because we didn’t have a personal relationship with the president.”
Iglesias’ book, co-authored by Davin Seay, is due out in early June.
© McClatchy Newspapers 2008
Are we supposed to believe that this political appointee is such a naive fool that he’s shocked, shocked I tell you to learn that politics was involved?
If I remember right, all US Attorneys are to submit their resignations when a new President takes office. Certainly when the Presidency changes parties. So, I’m guessing this guy got his job in 2001 when a Democrat appointee resigned and he was appointed in their place. That’s sounds purely like politics being involved in deciding who’s the US attorney.
So, he didn’t bitch when he got his job because of politics, but he’s completely shocked, shocked I tell you, when politics forces him out of his job.
This guy got his job “politically” That is the game. You want to play with the big boys, you got to learn to take it on the chin. No sympathy for this one from me.
The 2 commenters before me got it all wrong-these positions are supposed to be above the fray-you can’t have all dumb-ass cronies running eveything in the admin.
What early commenters here do not know or acknowledge is that it is standard for a new administration to accept resignations and appoint new attorneys general as they choose. THAT is the political part. Once appointed it is presumed that they will be left alone to do their judicial best to be be, um, fair. They can be removed, fired, for blatant acts of misconduct. They take an oath to serve US independently. Responses here illustrate that crap repeated early and often is reported as truth. No intelligent discussion. The media drove this ‘of course it is political’ meme over and over again. Our department of justice, like every federal department, has been bled to death by these sly POLITICAL tricks. When your case goes to court, or when you are arrested and wind up in court, you may rethink the ok-ness of what has been done.
Johnny Sutton
United States Attorney
Western District of Texas
601 N.W. Loop 410, Suite 600
San Antonio, Texas 78216
Telephone (210) 384-7400
I sympathize. True, the appointments are made along political lines. That’s the rule. The rule sucks, but it is a rule, and it is applied fairly for all parties. But these guys were fired in defiance of even the sucky rules. I imagine it is because they would not toe the Chaney line, which is radically farther to the right than the regular Repub line. It’s a shame. No doubt they would have opposed Chaney’s dismantling of the constitution, so they were canned. Or their jobs were offered as payment to someone else for a favor, or a fortune. Either way, it was wrong, even by sucky rule standards, and they should protest, and help the rest of us dig up the scumbag deal that is behind it.
“you can’t have all dumb-ass cronies running eveything in the admin.”
actually….
Only the president has the power to fire US Attorneys. A reasonable presumption is that the president decided which ones would have to go.
The claim that the appointees are supposed to be, or assumed to be, free of political biases is more than a bit naive. If you do not remember the sixities, look up the very apt description of the so-called “Justice Department”. Which was: “There is a town in Mississippi called liberty, and a Department in Washington called Justice.” The entire judiciary, from the Supreme Court to the lowere courts and the U.S. Attorny offices are a morass of political corruption that exceeds that of many third world countries. It is unseemely for their to be protests by someone so corrupt to accept a hachet job from the Bush administration, and then complain about admittely shoody behavior. It is the same as the soldiers who enlist to kill Arab civilians complain when they do not get adequate treatment if they are shot or when they the psychopaths can no longer take the strain and ask to be compensated for a mental problem they surely had before they enlisted in Bush’s army. Fools such as soldiers and U.S. attorney political hacks get what they deserve.
We need to get Ramos and Compean out of prison. They have been locked up for over a year for simply doing the job they were hired to do. My understanding is that each of them have been in solitary confinement for almost the entire time. This is total injustice!!!!! Let’s all contact our Congressmen/ladies and urge them to continue pursuing the release of both of these noble border agents. Let’s be sure everyone in Congress is made aware of this new information. I know that many of us believed it was true before now, but now that new evidence is surfacing new opportunities to pursue their release may be available.
The categories of legal and illegal are poor substitutes for right and wrong. It’s perfectly legal for Iglesias’ master to fire him. In his capacity as U.S. attorney, he served at the pleasure of the chief executive.
However, the chief complaint as I understand it, is not that the firing was illegal, but rather that it represents an abuse of power. Bush’s administration is rife with examples of such abuses.
I used to work as a claims adjuster for an insurance company. “We will pay what we owe,” was code for “pay whatever we can get away with.” Remember ‘fair’ is a four-letter word that begins with the letter F. This ‘..whatever we can get away with,’ ethic seems to pervade the Bush administration’s actions.
Bush’s administration tends to push the bounds of law. Bush is legally able to fire Iglesias, however, that doesn’t make his action morally questionable nor just, but it does further the case; that he is an asshole.
I seem to recall that the white house initially claimed that the firings had to do with poor performance and nothing else. Regardless of past practice and standard operating procedures relative to these matters, the white house lied to the people again. That to me is the issue.
I agree. Damned liars.
Aha…Sutton..a protege of BuZh? Gee, what a surprise! Imagine the moral character of someone who has seen the Dark and aspires to make it darker. May this SOB be forever haunted by the family and friends of Ramos and Compean and may he never sleep another day of his life.
Sadly, no mention of New Mexico’s, Sen. Pete Domenici and his protege, Rep. Heather Wilson and their complicency in this case. The insiders report Pete is retiring rather than face investigation. Heather is poised to take his seat, but recently was accused of vote buying at the delegate nominating convention in Bernalillo County, New Mexico. Bushies to the criminal end!
What is really disturbing is that Bush has a protege.
Protege - a person who is guided and supported by an older and more experienced or influential person : he was an aide and protégé of the former Tennessee senator.
In an even partly just world this scandal would be enough to bring the Bush administration down.
The Bush/Cheney bench packing is costing Americans three cents a stamp for eternity.
The Senate Judiciary Committee spent months and months trying to sort this out, and they were making progress in revealing the sordid links between Karl Rove’s office and Monica Goodling’s office (the White House liaison at the justice department), all of this suggesting that Rove was behind the firings of US Attorneys who were, in some cases, refusing to prosecute cases that had no credibility in order to affect elections (Rove’s piecemeal approach to carving up election districts and using micro-tactics to win each little chunk). Ultimately Harriet Myers and another White House aide were called and didn’t show up at all. They spat in the faces of Congress, claiming White House privilege. Chuck Schumer, with the help of Dianne Feinstein, had been leading the charge, but once he got Mukasey in (who isn’t sure if waterboarding is torture), he seems to have figured that everything is now “OK.” This is all BS. There has been no accountability whatsoever for what is a major scandal at the heart of the government. I blame Congress for their laissez faire attitude towards everything. All smoke and bluster and then sitting back and playing nice with this monstrous, criminal White House. The government thinks we don’t remember: we the people have a memory, damnit, and we will hold you accountable at election time!!!
The point is that you can change the prosecutors when you come into office, that’s ok. BUT, thereafter you cannot because it affects their independance. It’s simple and clear,really.
impeach. duh
“David Claudio Iglesias (born 1958) is an American attorney from Albuquerque, New Mexico.[1][2]He was appointed by President George W. Bush as the United States Attorney for the District of New Mexico in August 2001 and confirmed by the U.S. Senate in October 2001.[2″
“In October 2006 (prior to the 2006 midterm election) Senator Pete Domenici called to ask about the progress of an investigation, New Mexico U.S. Attorney Iglesias said he felt this inquiry was trying to “pressure” him to speed up indictments in a federal corruption investigation that involved at least one former Democratic state senator. When Iglesias said an indictment wouldn’t be handed down until at least December, “the line went dead.” Iglesias was fired one month after the election by the Bush Administration as part of the Dismissal of U.S. attorneys controversy. Also in October, Representative Heather Wilson called about the indictments in a federal corruption investigation that involved at least one former Democratic state Senator.”[12]
Contrary to some of the above posts, he was NOT appointed by
a Democrat. He was one of George’s own but was following the
law instead of instructions from Cheney. Now that must make
it a bit more questionable. Seems like the whole thing was
because he wouldn’t speed up investigations of some Democrats so they would be indicted before the 2006 elections.
New oxymoron: “Republican Justice”
I know of at least one Civil Rights Attorney from Dallas who kept his job because he did the bidding of Karl Rove, Harriet Miers and the Bush Administration. He wrote to me in 2004 saying he was dismissing our civil rights complaint based on scientific misconduct and racial discrimination by NASA-NSF funded frauds. We thought it was strange when they kept losing the 30 page complaint which coincidentally and finally turned up only after Bush was in place for the second (fraudulent) term. It was at that time that Bush trotted out and announced a trip to the Moon and “Mars” which was all for the sole purpose of bolstering the military defense establishement. It was their reward for helping put him back in office. It was beautifully executed like clock work.
What was so funny was NASA issued filed CFR-1275, “Investigation of Research Misconduct” in October of 2003 months before Bush got re-elected just in case he didn’t make it back into office.
SRD
http://www.bccmeteorites.com/misconduct-planetary.html
When fireing a U.S. attorney interferes in a case, it is illegal. Bush committed an inpeachable offense when some of the attorneys were fired, even if it was only by not stepping in to stop what was happening.
CO-MARK —
“If I remember right, all US Attorneys are to submit their resignations when a new President takes office. Certainly when the Presidency”
You’ve confused two different situations . . .
Yes, when a new administration comes in, every one is fired. Clinton did that–every president does.
Bush W did that when he succeeded Clinton.
Each new president does that–
THIS is about firing the staff that the administration, itself, had put in place — it’s about firing your own guys!
And re this . . .
“Are we supposed to believe that this political appointee is such a naive fool that he’s shocked, shocked I tell you to learn that politics was involved?”
Actually, I think he is rather “naive” in his beliefs about qualifications, performance and the DOJ — and the oath he took. He is evidently an honest Republican caught up with thieves.
THINK ABOUT It . . . our problems aren’t with the 8 honest AGs fired — our problem is with the 92 AGs they didn’t fire who were willing to do their dirty work — !!!
And this is wrong . . .
See above info . . .
“co marchanges parties. So, I’m guessing this guy got his job in 2001 when a Democrat appointee resigned and he was appointed in their place. That’s sounds purely like politics being involved in deciding who’s the US attorney.
So, he didn’t bitch when he got his job because of politics, but he’s completely shocked, shocked I tell you, when politics forces him out of his job.”
Again — YES — the new president FIRES everyone and puts in their own guys –
Nothing unusual in that . ..
HOWEVER, after that, firing them — especially a batch of 8 is considered highly UNUSUAL!!!
Ginger -
FYI
The border guys shot the guy in the back as he was running back to Mexico
It is as important to look at the US attorneys who kept their jobs, as to look at those who were fired. Make note of their prosecutions. Alabama might be a good place to start.
To know who this Iglesias guy is we need to hear from New Mexico insiders. My limited understanding is that the White House (Karl Rove, maybe) wanted Iglesias to investigate the Dem that was running against Heather Wilson the Republican congresswoman from Albuquerque. It was a tight race and some dirt on the Dem would be good. But for some reason Iglesias didn’t move fast enough on it so they shit-canned him.
As “sansf” says above, former Governor of Alabama Don Siegelman knows that the danger to democracy was those allowed to continue as US Attorney for doing the bidding of Karl Rove. Recall that investigation by the Bush inJustice Dept targeted local politicians as follows: 262 Democrats, 37 Republicans, and 10 Independents. That is a 7:1 ratio. I call it political genocide in Rove’s quest of a permanent Republican majority.
The world is not perfect. Democracies around the world are not perfect. The current US democracy is rotten to the bone. I wish the US citizen that they are capable to restore democracy on all levels across the country. The Patriotic Act is used against opponents and also to consolidate the Republicans. No wonder that the legislation is pushed through to destroy even more privacy & civil rights. The doors are wide open to lobbying which in fact is organised corruption as long as this happends out of the public eye.
If the US goverment is lecturing the rest of the world about democracy, it time to start in their own country.
I work for an American company and was always teached to LEAD BY EXAMPLE.
I certainly don’t want to follow the examples of today’s US administration.
Gee, imagine that, a politically motivated firing of attorneys, why that is so absurd. Almost like expecting me to believe that the US Attorney General himself would be partisan and run Justice as a tool of political decision. Getoutahere!
Imagine a confirmation hearing that was anything at all like an actual investigation into competence and fitness to hold the office rather than a rubber stamp of the Presidents choice…Imagine a Supreme Court without radicalised judges like Alito,Roberts or that ever silent guy, you know Anita Hill’s buddy…….fugetaboutit!
To make things even more absurd let’s imagine a political scenario wherein there actually was a genuine two party system…naaaaah thats simply too far out for me.
I realize this is probably a ridiculous idea! But, shouldn’t all of these US Attorney’s be more concerned about laws being broken than they are politics????? Shouldn’t their functions be more to protect the interests of this country and the people in it than political haggling. Aren’t they supposed to be put in the position to serve the people not the current political party? That seems to me to be what’s one of the major problems in our country today. Everything has become political from religion to keeping your job. You learn to be a ‘brown noser’ or you lose your job. What ever happened to being the most qualified to do a job????? It seems to me until we start leaving the endless stream of politics out of it we are always going to have a mess!
The methodology in which US Attorneys are selected is an archaic holdover from the “spoils system” era. This had largely become moot in the meantime until the reign of Dubya, Cheney, & Co. What had applied was an informal compact of a semblance of a Civil Service type of competence guide would apply to give the appearance of that US Attorneys were to be professionals first, political appointees second. The White House idiot brigade has blown up that idea and regressed this nation back to the “bad olde days” of the spoils system where political loyalty is the ultimate determiner. The reason why that is truly disturbing because it is a facet of Third World governance (which prior to the occupation of the White House by the Bush crime family, had not been as ubiquitous as in the rest of the Americas) used by the ruling elite to persecute opponents (ask former Gov. Seligman of Alabama about that one). That it was Sutton (a political hack if there ever was one) who told Iglasias “the facts of life” and “urged him to go quietly” is not surprising.
What does this story have to do with Clinton Versus Obama Versus Nader?
So,… you carry out justice, as long as it does not come down on the wrong side of party lines?
wdmax3 March 7th, 2008 3:55 pm:
“What is really disturbing is that Bush has a protege.”
Scratch “disturbing” and insert “inconceivable” and you have my view. But perhaps “protege” isn’t quite the right word. Maybe it’s toady. Bootlicker?
melmac78 is correct about the two fact challenged posters who began the posts
They are totally way off base in their assessment of this massive scandal of Republican ethical-judicial malfeasance
same old