SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Visitors queue to see the "Christmas Spectacular" at Radio City Music Hall in New York City on December 20, 2021. (Photo: Anthony Quintano/flickr/cc)
Calls for US Facial Recognition Ban Grow After Mom Booted From Theater Over Her Job
"This is exactly why we need an outright ban on all use of facial recognition surveillance in places of public accommodation like bars, restaurants, retail stores, and music and sports venues," said one digital rights campaigner.
Dec 20, 2022
Digital rights advocates on Tuesday called for a ban on private use of biometric surveillance technology after a mom taking her daughter to see a Christmas show in New York City was kicked out of the theater after its facial recognition system identified her as an employee of a law firm involved in legal proceedings against the venue's operator.
"There are just so many ways that biometric surveillance technology can be abused to discriminate and put people in danger."
Kelly Conlon was accompanying her daughter and her New Jersey Girl Scout troop on a post-Thanksgiving outing to Midtown Manhattan to see the "Christmas Spectacular" at Radio City Music Hall starring the iconic Rockettes. However, as soon Conlon entered the venue's lobby, security informed her that she'd been flagged by facial recognition and that she would have to leave.
That's because she's an attorney for a law firm currently embroiled in litigation with Madison Square Garden (MSG) Entertainment, which operates Radio City--even though Conlon has nothing to do with the case.
"They knew my name before I told them. They knew the firm I was associated with before I told them. And they told me I was not allowed to be there," Conlon told WNBC.
"I was just a mom taking my daughter to see a Christmas show," she added. "I did wait outside... It was embarrassing. It was mortifying."
MSG Entertainment defended its actions, explaining that is has "instituted a straightforward policy that precludes attorneys pursuing active litigation against the company from attending events at our venues until that litigation has been resolved."
"While we understand this policy is disappointing to some, we cannot ignore the fact that litigation creates an inherently adverse environment," the company added.
Evan Greer, director of the digital rights group Fight for the Future, said in a statement that "this is exactly why we need an outright ban on all use of facial recognition surveillance in places of public accommodation like bars, restaurants, retail stores, and music and sports venues."
"There are just so many ways that biometric surveillance technology can be abused to discriminate and put people in danger," she added. "Madison Square Garden should immediately stop using this invasive, harmful technology, and lawmakers should act to ban this practice for good."
While campaigners have successfully fought for limits and bans on government use of facial recognition at the local level, only three states--Illinois, Texas, and Washington--have enacted comprehensive biometric privacy legislation, with Illinois offering the strongest protections of the three. There are no federal restrictions on the technology.
Greer tweeted that Conlon's case shows that "this is exactly why it is not enough to just ban government and law enforcement use of facial recognition and biometric surveillance."
"There are so many ways private corporations and even individuals can abuse this tech," she added. "It should be banned for all commercial use and public use."
Common Dreams reported last year that a coalition of more than 20 human rights groups called for a total ban on corporate use of facial recognition technology, arguing that "letting this tool of authoritarian control spread throughout the private sector has serious implications for worker organizing rights and heightens the risk of catastrophic biometric data breaches."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Digital rights advocates on Tuesday called for a ban on private use of biometric surveillance technology after a mom taking her daughter to see a Christmas show in New York City was kicked out of the theater after its facial recognition system identified her as an employee of a law firm involved in legal proceedings against the venue's operator.
"There are just so many ways that biometric surveillance technology can be abused to discriminate and put people in danger."
Kelly Conlon was accompanying her daughter and her New Jersey Girl Scout troop on a post-Thanksgiving outing to Midtown Manhattan to see the "Christmas Spectacular" at Radio City Music Hall starring the iconic Rockettes. However, as soon Conlon entered the venue's lobby, security informed her that she'd been flagged by facial recognition and that she would have to leave.
That's because she's an attorney for a law firm currently embroiled in litigation with Madison Square Garden (MSG) Entertainment, which operates Radio City--even though Conlon has nothing to do with the case.
"They knew my name before I told them. They knew the firm I was associated with before I told them. And they told me I was not allowed to be there," Conlon told WNBC.
"I was just a mom taking my daughter to see a Christmas show," she added. "I did wait outside... It was embarrassing. It was mortifying."
MSG Entertainment defended its actions, explaining that is has "instituted a straightforward policy that precludes attorneys pursuing active litigation against the company from attending events at our venues until that litigation has been resolved."
"While we understand this policy is disappointing to some, we cannot ignore the fact that litigation creates an inherently adverse environment," the company added.
Evan Greer, director of the digital rights group Fight for the Future, said in a statement that "this is exactly why we need an outright ban on all use of facial recognition surveillance in places of public accommodation like bars, restaurants, retail stores, and music and sports venues."
"There are just so many ways that biometric surveillance technology can be abused to discriminate and put people in danger," she added. "Madison Square Garden should immediately stop using this invasive, harmful technology, and lawmakers should act to ban this practice for good."
While campaigners have successfully fought for limits and bans on government use of facial recognition at the local level, only three states--Illinois, Texas, and Washington--have enacted comprehensive biometric privacy legislation, with Illinois offering the strongest protections of the three. There are no federal restrictions on the technology.
Greer tweeted that Conlon's case shows that "this is exactly why it is not enough to just ban government and law enforcement use of facial recognition and biometric surveillance."
"There are so many ways private corporations and even individuals can abuse this tech," she added. "It should be banned for all commercial use and public use."
Common Dreams reported last year that a coalition of more than 20 human rights groups called for a total ban on corporate use of facial recognition technology, arguing that "letting this tool of authoritarian control spread throughout the private sector has serious implications for worker organizing rights and heightens the risk of catastrophic biometric data breaches."
Digital rights advocates on Tuesday called for a ban on private use of biometric surveillance technology after a mom taking her daughter to see a Christmas show in New York City was kicked out of the theater after its facial recognition system identified her as an employee of a law firm involved in legal proceedings against the venue's operator.
"There are just so many ways that biometric surveillance technology can be abused to discriminate and put people in danger."
Kelly Conlon was accompanying her daughter and her New Jersey Girl Scout troop on a post-Thanksgiving outing to Midtown Manhattan to see the "Christmas Spectacular" at Radio City Music Hall starring the iconic Rockettes. However, as soon Conlon entered the venue's lobby, security informed her that she'd been flagged by facial recognition and that she would have to leave.
That's because she's an attorney for a law firm currently embroiled in litigation with Madison Square Garden (MSG) Entertainment, which operates Radio City--even though Conlon has nothing to do with the case.
"They knew my name before I told them. They knew the firm I was associated with before I told them. And they told me I was not allowed to be there," Conlon told WNBC.
"I was just a mom taking my daughter to see a Christmas show," she added. "I did wait outside... It was embarrassing. It was mortifying."
MSG Entertainment defended its actions, explaining that is has "instituted a straightforward policy that precludes attorneys pursuing active litigation against the company from attending events at our venues until that litigation has been resolved."
"While we understand this policy is disappointing to some, we cannot ignore the fact that litigation creates an inherently adverse environment," the company added.
Evan Greer, director of the digital rights group Fight for the Future, said in a statement that "this is exactly why we need an outright ban on all use of facial recognition surveillance in places of public accommodation like bars, restaurants, retail stores, and music and sports venues."
"There are just so many ways that biometric surveillance technology can be abused to discriminate and put people in danger," she added. "Madison Square Garden should immediately stop using this invasive, harmful technology, and lawmakers should act to ban this practice for good."
While campaigners have successfully fought for limits and bans on government use of facial recognition at the local level, only three states--Illinois, Texas, and Washington--have enacted comprehensive biometric privacy legislation, with Illinois offering the strongest protections of the three. There are no federal restrictions on the technology.
Greer tweeted that Conlon's case shows that "this is exactly why it is not enough to just ban government and law enforcement use of facial recognition and biometric surveillance."
"There are so many ways private corporations and even individuals can abuse this tech," she added. "It should be banned for all commercial use and public use."
Common Dreams reported last year that a coalition of more than 20 human rights groups called for a total ban on corporate use of facial recognition technology, arguing that "letting this tool of authoritarian control spread throughout the private sector has serious implications for worker organizing rights and heightens the risk of catastrophic biometric data breaches."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.