Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
- More Damning Evidence Points to Pesticide as Cause of Mass Bee Deaths
- Nobel Peace Prize Jury Under Investigation
- 'Gasland' Film Director Arrested at US Capitol Hearing
- The Cancerous Politics and Ideology of the Susan G. Komen Foundation
- A Journey To The End Of Empire: It Is Always Darkest Right Before It Goes Completely Black
Popular content
Today's Top News
If the Russians Did This to Us, We’d Kill ‘Em
What if the Russians invaded?
It's not so far-fetched an idea, you know. We spent half a century and trillions of dollars to make sure that it would never happen, so it's really not such a strange notion.
So what if the Russians invaded?
What if they came and stole all of our money?
What if the Russians invaded and enslaved our children as cheap worker bee drones locked in dismal dead-end jobs?
What if the Russians invaded and excavated all of our natural resources, leaving only mountains of toxic debris in their wake?
What if the Russians invaded and they ruined our infrastructure, thrashed our educational institutions, and stuck us with a grossly inadequate healthcare system?
What if the Russians invaded and incarcerated a huge percentage of our people in for-profit jails? What if they ruined our military by sending it off on big-money colonial expeditions? What if they cut the legs out from under the middle class?
What if the Russians invaded and turned us against each other, tricking this tribe of Americans into hating that tribe, in order to keep any of us from realizing that they were looting our country?
If the Russians did any of these things, we'd kill ‘em. Dead.
If the Russians invaded, we'd send our army to crush them in defense of our country (or, at least, we hire somebody to do it).
If the Russians invaded, we'd be furious and raging and hateful and destructive -- for good reason, too -- and we would bring to them the full measure of American organized violence in order to take back our country from their plundering rampages.
Of course, the Russians haven't invaded. But what's astonishing about the moment we live in is that America has in fact been subjected to all these travails. We have essentially been invaded by those who wish us ill, and our national and private resources are being stripped bare. This country is being looted, and everything in it that isn't nailed down is being carted away and sold off.
Our children are being saddled with enormous financial burdens. Our educational and healthcare systems, sucked dry as mere revenues sources, are falling to pieces. Our infrastructure is approaching ruin.
Our jobs, our industries and our community resources have been bundled up and exported to where the work can be done far cheaper, and the workers are compliant. Increasingly we are scrambling just to survive. Admittedly, our government remains absolutely dedicated to making sure that some of us do extremely well. It's just that that ‘some' doesn't include anyone you know.
What is absolutely astonishing about the moment that we live in is that we have been essentially invaded, we have been absolutely looted, and yet we don't seem to be the slightest bit angry about that.
If the Russians had done it, we would be absolutely furious. But in fact, it was our own overclass that did it, and not only are we not furious at them, we don't even notice the crime. Or, if we do notice, we're furious at some ridiculously inappropriate target, like a ‘liberal' president who isn't even remotely liberal.
America has always been a country with its full and fair share of flaws, but for quite some time during the middle part of the twentieth century, we got one thing reasonably right. There was a bargain then, between elites and the government and the public. According to the terms of the deal, the aristocracy would still be fantastically rich, but there would be limitations on their wealth, because some of that wealth, some substantial amount, needed to be shared with the working people and the middle class, and it was the role of government to make sure that that happened. Many among the well-to-do even shared that consensus.
Since Ronald Reagan rode into town, however, that deal is off the table, replaced by what is essentially a new New Deal -- or, more accurately, simply the Bad Old Deal. Under the terms of this new/old arrangement, the unregulated wealthy grab absolutely everything they can get their hands on, the middle class scrambles for whatever bare existence it can maintain, and the rest of America, the working class and the poor, fall deeper and deeper into third world-style poverty. Under the terms of this new system, the role of the government is no longer to provide for the welfare of the people, nor to ensure that there are limitations on what the plutocracy can liberate from them. Under the terms of this new arrangement, the function of the government is simply to serve as a tool, assisting that plutocracy in depriving America's own people of everything that can be taken from them.
That means that in the last thirty years we've entirely restructured the economy so that the super-wealthy have become obscenely-super-wealthy, and the middle class are lucky to have stood still, and haven't really even managed that. If one examines the destination of the considerable GDP growth that America has sustained over the last three decades, it's gone entirely to the richest of Americans. The middle class has actually lost ground. That's an astonishing fact, but think about it: Despite robust economic growth, workers today actually make less than they did back in the 1970s.
Even more amazing, it wasn't that hard to pull off. All you had to do was to fool the people and divert their attention to other circuses to go along with the remaining crumbs of bread. Meanwhile, unions were decimated by changes in government policy. Jobs were exported -- first to the south, then to Mexico, then to China, now to Thailand or Vietnam, and probably soon to Africa -- in a never-ending search for the cheapest possible way to wring value out of the working people of the world, leaving Americans without any sort of remaining industry or economic base. Tax policy was also deployed, channeling money from current working Americans, and especially from their children, and diverted it to the already wealthy. The upshot of all these policy changes was that the richest Americans became absolutely, astonishingly, fabulously rich, and the rest of us are barely holding on, if that.
If the Russians had come here and done this -- if they had come and stolen our resources, if they come and enslaved our children into inescapable soul-numbing jobs, if they had left us with environmental degradation and a wrecked economy and destroyed education system and a crumbling infrastructure and a sieve-like healthcare regime -- if the Russians had come and done any or all of this, we would've risen up in anger and hostility and patriotism and nationalism, and we'd have loaded up our weapons and killed every last one of them.
But it wasn't the Russians that did it, it was our own overclass. And worse still, it was our own government acting as though they were protecting us from the evil bogeyman du jour, while in fact they were assisting the wealthy in bleeding us dry, until our anemia left us fit only for our profit-seeking hospitals.
Think about how idiotic you have to be to allow yourself to be looted and not even realize the money's been taken out of your pocket. Think about how politically immature you have to be to allow a thief to walk right up to you, take your money, and not even recognize who that thief is. Think about how stupid you have to be to blame it on somebody else -- like gays, or Iraqis, or black helicopters -- and not pay attention to the real rip-off artist who's stealing your money.
I would tip my hat in admiration to these plutocrats for the cleverness of their scheme -- even if a scam this ugly requires the predators to have the moral sensibility of an empty parking lot -- but in fact what they've done isn't really all that clever. The successes of their crimes have lots more to do with the fatuousness of their victims than with the acumen of the criminals.
Worse yet, as if the American public hasn't already been stupid enough, here we are thirty years down the road from the advent of Reaganism, and we still don't get it. Here we are after three decades of being looted, still unable to figure out who's ripping us off. Here we are, even after the implausibly complete failures and disasters and depredations of the Bush administration, and most Americans are still unable to point to the criminals and their ideology, and identify the source of the crime.
Which makes the future looked even more shaky. Now we have a president who most Americans are coming to believe is some sort of far-left Stalinist, while in fact he is every bit the full-measured facilitator of corporate parasitism that either George W. Bush or Bill Clinton were.
And yet, because he is being made out to be some sort of outrageously decadent liberal, and because Americans are too dim to figure out the ruse, this president -- who is failing to address the concerns of ordinary Americans, most especially because he's not working for them in the least -- is bound to fail, and is looking increasingly like the proud owner of a one-term presidency. And what we can expect in reaction to that failure -- ironically and disastrously and jaw-droppingly idiotically -- is a sharp turn to the right. When Obama fails, it will be framed, as it already is being, as some sort of grand failure of liberalism. In fact, of course, just the opposite is true. It's a grand success of the overclass's looting of America.
In this respect, Obama offers precious little "change", even from the crimes of George W. Bush. Look at his healthcare initiative, for example. I don't know about you, but I'd say it's a pretty safe bet that anything that the big pharmacological and big health insurance industries are in favor of is pretty much guaranteed to be a disaster for the rest of us -- you know, we the people of the United States. This bill no more represents an initiative for the purpose of bringing healthcare to Americans than George Bush's prescription drug bill was an initiative to improve the life of seniors. In both cases, whatever vicarious and accidental improvements that exist are simply diversionary window-dressing on what is really another example of legalized corporate colonialism.
In the case of Obama's healthcare legislation, what's happening is that enormous quantities of new customers are being forced to buy expensive health coverage from insurance industry predators who will be vastly enriched by means of this new legislation, which is precisely why they would favor something that ordinarily we would expect them to oppose, and that we certainly would expect them to oppose if Obama was any kind of progressive whatsoever, even if only in his personal fantasies.
The bank bailouts were absolutely no different. What an amazing episode, what an amazing looting of the American public, what an amazing chapter in the destruction of an empire -- and all brought to us by a supposedly liberal president. In fact, Obama was simply extending the tradition of the Bush administration, and the Reagan ideology prior to that, which calls for pillaging the federal treasury in order to divert the maximal amount of money to economic elites, and then leaving the bill for the American taxpayer.
One could go on and on from here. Obama continues to deploy more mercenaries in Iraq and Afghanistan than there are uniformed American soldiers. He continues to support privatization of everything from American prisons to schools. He asks for the most tepid possible re-institution of regulations on the financial industry, and when the thieves on Wall Street growl back at him, he abandons even those most limited of obstacles to their worst impulses.
The upshot is that today American voters have two choices. They can have the party that represents the maximal plundering of America, at the maximal speed. Or they can have the party that represents nearly the same crime at almost the same velocity.
Either way, the United States has ceased in any meaningful way to be owned by citizens. Its voters vote, but their representatives in Congress and in the administration are beholden to economic elites, and act entirely accordingly. The country's institutions, infrastructure, and social relations are all being dismantled piece by piece and either relocated elsewhere or sold off in order to wring yet another drop of wealth out of the hides of working Americans, so that those who are already wealthy beyond belief can be even further enriched.
If some other country did this to us -- if the Russians invaded and took all our resources, and enslaved us and our children to work in dismal jobs when we could find any work at all sufficient to maintaining a rapidly sinking middle class livelihood -- if those things happened and the perpetrator was a foreign power, we'd rise up and go to war and we'd kill every last one of ‘em.
But we're not doing any of that, even though a very real enemy has invaded this country and stripped it bare.
In fact, this society is pretty busy making sure that we don't even notice who that enemy is.
- Posted in




103 Comments so far
Show All//What is absolutely astonishing about the moment that we live in is that we have been essentially invaded, we have been absolutely looted,//
What is absolutely astonishing about the moment that we live is that it's happened before, but elsewhere.
You know where?
yes -- in NAZI GERMANY.
it WAS corporatist/statist, it WAS Munitions/war industry, it WAS 'democratic' parliament 'electing' a "chancellor", it WAS a case of a collapsing economy that needed to be "saved" through Militarism (thus the "war is the health of the state") , it was , like the USA XENOPHOBIC, it was a culture that became "divide and conquer" towards its "unpatriotic" members, it USED the media just like the USA, it relied ALSO on "faith" and MYTHOLOGY of "superiority"...
It can be argued that this has happened before, in the former Soviet Union.
One could further suggest that the US is now on a glide path to replicate the economic and political collapse of the former USSR, for many similary reasons, an overextended empire, and an economic model that is fundamentally and fatally flawed.
Few Americans understand the characteristics of socialism and fascism.
The US experience is more comparable to a fascist third world model like we have seen in Latin America than it is to the socialist model such as the Soviet Union exemplified.
Rather than everybody having a token job like they did in the Soviet Union and its satellite nations, Americans will we walking through traffic pimping their female kin and selling chewing gum like you see in Mexico.
Well of course the US follows the fascist model. But that's hardly the point, both of these empires built spheres of influence that required huge military expenditures to maintain, and both were and are fatally oblivious to the repercussions of that dynamic. This is an unsustainable paradigm and in the case of the US, there's not even a core underlying legitimate economy.
As Wendell Berry notes in the September issue of 'The Progressive', "The US doesn't even have a real economy, it has a financial system." The eventual denouement promises to be ugly, and potentially explosive socially and possibly militarily as well. There's no readily apparent non-destructive exit from this construct.
Today's conservatives and their Trojan Horse, today's liberals, protect only the freedoms of monopolies, the end player of capitalism. In this they are like the founding fathers who were interested in protecting, as Samuel Johnson observed, "the freedom of slavedrivers."
None of this could have happened in an educated, thinking country. That 1% elite has systematically destroyed American education and reinforced it with total control over the greatest propaganda tool ever devised by mankind. That is the television set you have in several rooms in your houses. Getting rid of television in America is step one. Getting rid of the rich elites is step two. There was a time, a few years ago, when the approach could have been softer, but not any more. And the vast majority of Americans are too afraid of their own shadows, too afraid of not having two pounds of steak apiece for dinner, to do anything about it. Franklin said it two hundred odd years ago: those who are willing to give up freedom for security shall have neither. We've given it up, convinced by the delightful little devil's tube in the living room.
MichaelC
The trend is just the opposite...more TVs and bigger TVs.
good idea david - let's do the world a favor and kill ourselves
after all the damage we've done it would be nice to go out on an up note
Green writes:
"We have essentially been invaded by those who wish us ill..."
Or as GWB phrased it:
"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we."
Sorry, i couldn't resist...
You shouldn't have resisted!
Why on earth would your comment get flagged?
And I wish I had posted what you wrote...
Don't delete webwalks comment! It's the truth!
It's funny how when anybody criticizes their nemesis; their words usually describe themselves!
Whats going on here? Webwalks comment is flagged? For what? I agreed with him and mine isn't.
Webwalk has done nothing to get flagged for here and is a valuable contributor here on CD, please ignore this uncalled for flagging.
Webwalk typed a verbatim quote that is on the record, and he properly cited the source. The Ministry of Truth apparently objects.
hahaha! The W really did stand for wanker.
i wonder if there is any way to get the report on the "reason" given by the person who flagged it.
But all "flagged" means is that one reader clicked on "report this comment", it does not mean that the CD editors have decided anything.
it was probably george wanker bush who did it............(whatever happened to him?)
btw, how do you know when you've been flagged?
'reason'? forget it.................(there's no reasoning in this world any more)
keep 'em coming webwalk...............
I support this comment and cannot find any rationale for flagging it. Perhaps we could have 'recommend' and 'hide' buttons, like the KOS site, that way more people could weigh in. I would only flag a comment for existing beyond the boundaries of civilized discourse. Disagreement with a comment isn't a justifiable reason to flag it.
Sioux Rose
Like a virtual "Murder She Wrote" episode, there must be a Bush fan in the house! Quick, duck and cover!
You should be flagged for referencing Murder She Wrote :p
Whyever would this get flagged?
A tug of my forelock to Mr. Green whom I disagree with as often as not. He hit the bull's eye here.
"America has always been a country with its full and fair share of flaws, but for quite some time during the middle part of the twentieth century, we got one thing reasonably right. There was a bargain then, between elites and the government and the public. According to the terms of the deal, the aristocracy would still be fantastically rich, but there would be limitations on their wealth, because some of that wealth, some substantial amount, needed to be shared with the working people and the middle class, and it was the role of government to make sure that that happened. Many among the well-to-do even shared that consensus."
This is the America that worked and needs to be restored.
" in the last thirty years we've entirely restructured the economy so that the super-wealthy have become obscenely-super-wealthy, and the middle class are lucky to have stood still, and haven't really even managed that. If one examines the destination of the considerable GDP growth that America has sustained over the last three decades, it's gone entirely to the richest of Americans. The middle class has actually lost ground. That's an astonishing fact, but think about it: Despite robust economic growth, workers today actually make less than they did back in the 1970s."
People are waking up to the fact. Obama's election proved that, remember what he promised, not what he has done.
"he is being made out to be some sort of outrageously decadent liberal, and because Americans are too dim to figure out the ruse, this president -- who is failing to address the concerns of ordinary Americans, most especially because he's not working for them in the least -- is bound to fail, and is looking increasingly like the proud owner of a one-term presidency."
Here Greens usual academic elite attitudes show through. Americans are not to dim to see anything. Its a typical failing of an isolated class. They see Obama is not working for them, quite clearly for many it seems, check the poll's. He has already failed and is a one term President.
Obama is trying to establish a Statist Capitalism and that makes him look like a Socialist to most people. He is simply a wannabe European Statist apparently.
American's are far smarter and far better than Mr. Green's opinion. And they are far, far better than their leaders.
I too , Henry8 would really like to believe americans are BETTER than that.
however the REALITY is that - as Green puts it - THIS IS THE SITUATION and has been all along.
it is NOT the russians, not the chinese, not anyone else outside, since the USA became a nation -- that has done ALL these things that Americans BELIEVE "others will come to get us" -
it IS AMERICANS. regardless of how and why and who of the question.
THIS IS AN AMERICAN MADE - SELF-INFLICTION.
this is in fact the BED AMERICANS MADE FOR THEMSELVES and they are lying in it.
this is THE america AMERICANS made.
PATRICK BUCHANAN - the conservative whom i detest in many of his "nativist" nonsense (that is: WHITE, ANGLO-SAXON)
says a few things correctly:
"WE AMERICANS HAVE MANY FINE QUALITIES.....seeing ourselves as OTHERS see us ....is NOT one of them".
I agree with you we are responsible because we allowed it to happern, just as Green says....I'd liken it to the old frog in the cold pot of water analogy. Thats how they got us. And of course by buying Congress...most of it anyway.
Americans are better as a whole than portrayed.....see it all the time, but Pat is most definately right. "WE AMERICANS HAVE MANY FINE QUALITIES.....seeing ourselves as OTHERS see us ....is NOT one of them". But I sincerely believe we are seeing things more clearly now. We'll see though.
Americans didn't make this criminal syndicate. The syndicate did what all similar enterprises do. It promised protection and payoffs to those who cooperated. It threatened, it cajoled. It paid off politicians. It drugged the populace through sophisticated mental manipulation (especially through the almost perfect medium of manipulation - television). It also studied archetypes and the fundamental psychological and biological orientation and expectations of humans and put them to use for its benefit.
U.S. citizens can be excruciatingly dense and benighted (and systematically shell-shocked), but they are not the villains in this melodrama. To consider them so is to dim and disperse what should be a bright light shining on the true villains which comprise a distinct class always and compulsively working toward its own consolidation and enrichment.
yes, thanks...I was going to go down this road, too...with all the evidence available, it is difficult to understand how anyone could be confused about the fact that the society in which we find ourselves was very intentionally created by specific individuals with vicious agendas, using a number of distasteful methods, up to and including killing on various scales, from individual murders to wars...
the average joe, concerned primarily with personal affairs, never had a physical, mental or emotional chance against the systemic assaults launched by the wealthy and cruel...never even knew, in most cases, as the manipulations were, and are, often highest-level and covert...
also, most people don't tend to casually consider, as they go about their daily lives, that those they have trusted may be actively working against them...that would make one paranoid...wouldn't it?
This is one of Green's best in a long time. Not as much clever sarcasm as usual, just heavy layers of exactly how low we've fallen, thanks to American gullibility, the easy triumph of Reaganite propaganda carried forward to the present, and the popular need to see Obama as some kind of liberal savior when he's in fact the opposite.
Yes, we'd kill the Russians if they had done to us what our own elites have done, and we'd kill them if they'd lied to us systematically and relentlessly the way our media has for 40 years. Instead we're mesmerized by this same lying media and most of us have a grudging affection for the thieving, criminal class that comprises our economic elites. Or, enough of us do so that we're unable to create a large enough movement to squash the bastards.
There are untold thousands who ought to be in the same prison as Bernie Madoff, but instead they've made off like the bandits they are with billions in stolen loot, while dumbed down Americans are busy with moron TV, lottery tickets and liberal- hating. The brilliant Obama may begin to figure some of this out after his one term comes to a farcical halt and the Palinites take over in 2012.
We urgently need a new political party that embodies the ideals of "a government of the people, by the people and for the people." It certainly isn't going to happen with the Democrats and Republicans we have today, both of whom feed from the same troughs of corruption. They are different in name only, but are beholden to the same masters of greed.
For our part, we need to get off our complacent butts, become informed and become active participants in our fragile democracy.
Oh sure DMG, it's the fault of our local boogeymen again.
Why are you people always ragging our fatass MIC capitalist?
He bathes fairly frequently, wears nice suits, drives a nice car and hardly ever sodomizes lower life forms or does adultery in broad daylight with an audience. And unlike many of you, he goes to church every Sunday.
Sure he has bases all over the world and is always robbing and pilling people by accident all over the place, and screws the local population whenever he can, but he keeps Wall St humming, and as we all know from our tvs, that's all that really counts.
How can we ever expect to spread democracy throughout the world if not with a little local sacrifice and his humanitarian bombs and missiles? Even third graders know there's no other way.
Sure he gives and takes bribes and shit and that's not good. So write to your congress critter and ask it to plead with him nicely to stop doing that. That's all it takes. That will surely reform him.
Lighten up a little, DMG - he's only trying to make a buck to feed his family and buy a few harmless toys, just like you.
George Babbitt lives!
· Yr Obd't Servant
... and wishes you will remind all your friends that the correct term is 'realtor' and not 'real estate salesman'.
How about we take to the streets as in Seattle or Miami or Pittsburgh. Show them we will no longer be victims. And good luck with that. We have been running the world since the end of WW2 accumulating all the necessary expertise to do that and with the recent accumulations of the Patriot Act, the Military Commissions Act and the like, it is now rather easy, isn’t it, to apply our external expertise internally. We might resist but coherence is problematical inasmuch as we largely don’t cohere and if we attempted we couldn’t hide it from those who would now thwart it to the degree necessary. Ninja troops advancing in formation on American streets, thumping their truncheons against their shields in unison is the future unfolding.
Fantastic article! The power elite has managed to infect the general populous with a mental aids virus. most are completely unaware that they are infected, while rotting away from within. In all fairness, some of the public have voluntarily infected themselves.
If the Russians invaded and occupied America we would all get our guns and defend the country we love, but instead of being called freedom fighters we would be called terrorists by the Russians or maybe insurgents!
SUPERB way of making america "LOOK IN THE MIRROR".
a great way of expanding on the cartoon:
TOTO (or POGO?) tells his friend: "I have met the enemy and he is US".
or better "HE's AMERICAN".
not russian, not chinese, not afghan, not iranian, not iraqi, not venezuelan, not brazilian, not french, not british, not german, not turkmenistani, ....nooooooooo--they're not the ones that ENSLAVED americans....
the ones that ENSLAVED americans have been
AMERICANS ALL ALONG!
With The level of representation in the House At 770,000 Per representitive this kind of junk politics will only get worse. more elite in office and the wealthy controling all the strings. What we need now more than ever is a representation level of 100,000 per representitive or better. I cant explain it all here But you can get the Idea of what I say at http://www.thirty-thousand.org find out why the House is out of order.
I know the theory, that's the level of representation that is extant in the commonwealth parliaments (for the most part). You do realise that if you do have a rep for every thirty thousand or so, you'll end up with a house of reps that has over 11,000 politicians in it. (given that the population of the usa is over 350 million...) At one hundred k/ rep you'd still have 3,500 politicians, and you'd still not be well represented in the house.
Great Article!
Non-Partisan
Excellent article.
The sheep have been fleeced - and for the most part don't even realise they have been taken to the cleaners. One of the sweetest scams ever, even to the point of getting the victims to cheer it on. How sweet is that?
Green: "this society is pretty busy making sure that we don't even notice who that enemy is." Of course, its been a 30 year 'invasion' which doesn't help when your typical American has a 3 min attention span. Also, our democracy results in one voter in Wyoming having 80 times the value of a voter in California (in the Senate, the ratio is 1 to 3 for the presidency), so corporate America knows exactly where to put its money to effect policy: rural, red-state America. Hence, red-state America is kept carefully ignorant as to the real issues. They think the real issues are God, Country, and morality. They look around and note that things aren't so bad in THEIR america, and their morality must be the reason. They can't be expected to understand that red-states typically get 1.5 to 2 times as much money FROM the federal gov't as they give back in taxes, and that this tax shortfall is made up by the blue states whose voters don't count. Hence, they continue voting for 'morality' which helps the same corporate forces destroying the country, but are carefully kept ignorant as to the connection. When a democrat-majority finance committee can reject TWO public options for healthcare but overwhelmingly vote to APPROVE abstinence funding, it's obvious how powerful the red-states have become.
As long as our democracy is written so that urban blue-staters are fleeced by the federal government to send welfare to rural red-staters, who are then kept ignorant as to the real consequences of their votes, (they vote for 'morality' which coincidentally is a vote for corporate plundering), this country is not going to recover soon.
Okay, everyone agrees that we're chin-deep in that well-known creek, with neither paddle nor boat in sight, and the creek is *rising*.
What are people willing to *DO* ABOUT IT? Anything?
That's the problem: everyone says 'Ain't It Awful?' And everyone answers 'No It's Worse Than Awful'. And that's. where. it. stops.
Does anyone really think that's a sufficient response? If not, then what are people willing to DO? How much of *your* -yes, YOU- personal life are you willing to give up to create change? Are you willing to drop out of school? Cut back to part-time work? Give up evenings and weekends? Anything?
Someone -maybe Sam Smith at prorev- just recently wrote that in the US today, waaaaay too many lib-leftists seem to think "activism" means being on mailing lists and sending checks. Was he talking about *you*? If so, are you happy with the results you're getting? If not, are you willing to do anything to change that situation?
"Desiring something strongly enough to fight for it doesn't guarantee success. But it changes the odds."
"Desiring something strongly enough to fight for it doesn't guarantee success. But it changes the odds."
"What are people willing to *DO* ABOUT IT? Anything?"
Exactly what we need to hear Mairead. and often. Our activism is sporadic,uncoordinated and not very effective. We are not even minimally organized. What we need is a central site for discussing, planning, organizing and action. But where is it? Google says there are over a trillion sites on the internet. Is there not even one that treats this important subject?
Hi Mairead, you put your finger on it, and that was my reaction, too. What can we do? What can be done? Green's article isn't eye-opening. It's affirming, but my reply to Mr. Green is "So what?" Is he hinting at an armed revolution? Come on, we're all locked into our own insular lives, working two jobs, trying to support our families, escaping into the entertainment culture: television, the internet, video games, best-sellers, beer, drugs & food. Look at how the corporate media and government contemptuously manipulate and misdirect the people's discontent: wedge issues and tea parties. The truth is the establishment is more powerful than its detractors, and I can see nothing on the horizon that will change that. And that's why my answer to your question is: despair. I wish someone could give me a more satisfying answer, but there it is, and that's all that I suspect Professor Green has to offer, too. He's right, the Russians have invaded. So what?
Sioux Rose
ED: For all the reasons you cite, immediate change is unlikely, particularly with respect to a remedy for the disease that ails U.S.
However, these thoughts help mitigate the sense of powerlessness that sentient, aware persons should feel:
"This, too, shall pass."
"There is a Divinity that shapes our ends."
(And related to disaster-capitalist via rabid resources depletion)
"Consumed by that which it was nourished by."
"In the fullness of time..."
And so forth. There are cycles that go way beyond what individuals alone can summon. It's easy for us to note them when we look back over the arc of history; harder to recognize we are ensconced in such a cycle shift NOW. After all, it's tough to sense one's ultimate course when their canoe is negotiating life-threatening rapids.
Here's the difference:
If the Russians invaded, the Assimilated Press would rise up en masse to stoke the outrage of the populace and fan the violent resistance.
Currently, however, the "invaders" own the press, whose job is to cheerlead imperial expansion and stoke outrage against truth.
You nailed it Goebbels. A Russian invasion also wouldn't be an ostensibly altruistic and gradual 30+ year process, but we get the author's point despite the weak analogy.
Teddy, "superiority" has been a very American trait for a very long time. Check the US last century's history and there are quit some 'bad' wars, that were more like colonial conquests.
Har Davids:
to be FAIR. there is probably no country , or few cultures, immune to notions of "superiority"...
but NONE seems to have elevated that mentality - which in other countries seem to at least be "controlled" BY the knowledge that there are OTHER countries ....and the realities of such ....
to the point of being in COMPLETE DENIAL that there ARE other countries and peoples involved.
there seems to be NO nation that has elevated it to such a national hysteria and paranoia and obsessiveness throughout its SHORT history (showing how LITTLE america REALLY knows or has learned lessons) -
PRECISELY because there ARE other peoples, cultures and countries against whom it CAN measure itself and SAY "we are SUPERIOR".
other countries' mentalities of "superiority" are inherently CONTROLLED by their knowledge that they , somehow, because of realities, REGARDLESS of how much they do things for their self-interest, are only PART of many other entities collection.,
the USA maintains this "superiority" complex DESPITE that reality.
other countries , one way or another ACCEPT compromises..and trad-offs...
the USA BROOKS NO SUCH COMPROMISES.