EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Rise Up or Die
- Rallying Cry: Citizens Worldwide to Unite in 'March Against Monsanto'
- A 'Nonviolent Army of Love' Rises in North Carolina to Face Down Rightwing's Assault on Progress
- The Latest Lie: IRS Targeted Conservatives
- Genetically Modified Democracy: Monsanto and Congress Move to Stomp on Your Rights
Popular content
Today's Top News
Prolonged Attack on Public Education and Unions Leaves Teaching Profession Woeful
Teachers are more dissatisfied with their jobs than they have been in decades, according to MetLife's latest Survey of the American Teacher report. Based on a survey of public school teachers, parents and students, the report is the first large-scale national attempt to fully account for the impact that a recessionary economy and a vicious public campaign against public school teachers and their unions has had on the profession.
Teachers are less satisfied with their jobs than they have been in decades, according to the 2012 MetLife Survey of the American Teacher. Given the content contained in much of the current rhetoric about public education and the solution being offered by corporate reformers, is it any wonder? (File) In the report, teachers describe a situation where "cuts to school budgets have lead to diminished programs and services" at at a time when "students and their families are demonstrating increased needs."
Nearly three in ten (28 percent) teachers indicate that there have been reductions or eliminations of health or social service programs in their schools in the past year. In addition, 64 percent of teachers report an increase in the number of students and families requiring health and social support services and 35 percent say the number of students coming to school hungry has increased.
The New York Times reports:
Sandi Jacobs, vice president of the National Council on Teacher Quality, a nonpartisan advocacy group in Washington, said the push for evaluations, punctuated by a national movement to curb the power of unions, had fostered an unsettling cultural shift.
“It’s easy to see why teachers feel put upon, when you consider the rhetoric around the need to measure their effectiveness — just as it’s easy to see why they would internalize it as a perception that teachers are generally ineffective, even if it’s not what the debate is about at all,” Ms. Jacobs said.
More than 75 percent of the teachers surveyed said the schools where they teach had undergone budget cuts last year, and about as many of them said the cuts included layoffs — of teachers and others, like school aides and counselors. Roughly one in three teachers said their schools lost arts, music and foreign language programs. A similar proportion noted that technology and materials used in the schools had not been kept up to date to meet students’ needs.
“Often, we hear how important teachers are. But this survey tells us what teachers themselves are thinking, and it’s very sobering,” said American Federation of Teachers President Randi Weingarten in a statement. “Teachers are telling us they have the lowest level of job satisfaction in more than two decades and that a growing number are planning to leave the profession.”
"For the most part, the only organized entity that pushes back against right-wing ideas about education are teacher’s unions. So if you take them down a notch in the eyes of the public, you have more opportunity to get policies through like vouchers and charter schools and all the rest." - David Dayen, FDL
“U.S. teachers are frustrated with unrelenting cuts in budgets, elimination of arts and after-school programs, larger class sizes, and accountability systems that over-rely on student test scores,” she said. “This should call into question the obsession with cutting funding for public education and health and family services children and parents rely on.
National Education Association President Dennis Van Roekel called the results “shocking,” and attributed the results “in part, to the unconscionable cuts" to school budgets in recent years, including cuts to early childhood education, books and technology, and elimination of of key programs and classes, such as history, art, physical education and music.
“Policy makers’ actions have real consequences, and those are being felt in classrooms across the country," Van Roekel said in a press statement. "We encourage parents and community leaders to join us and speak up against the devastating impact of budget cuts and instead demand that students have the resources they need to succeed.”
David Dayen, writing at FireDogLake, asks "How public education in America is enhanced by making teachers feel like shit?" He answers his own question by acknowledging that hurting teachers' feelings or damaging their sense of worth is hardly the reason behind the corporate education reform movement -- exemplified by people like former DC school chancellor Michelle Rhee, New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg and Secretary of Education Arne Duncan.
...the real goal of this right-wing education policy isn’t solely to humiliate teachers as much as it is to humiliate unions. They want to build a narrative of union bosses protecting “bad” teachers and engaging in corruption at the expense of kids. For the most part, the only organized entity that pushes back against right-wing ideas about education are teacher’s unions. So if you take them down a notch in the eyes of the public, you have more opportunity to get policies through like vouchers and charter schools and all the rest.
###
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

33 Comments so far
Show Allso many, having been successfully brainwashed, find themselves on paths that do not lead where they thought they did, saying and doing things they never imagined...
the brainwashing, and those responsible, must be rejected, rather than obeyed...
both the school and the service must be seen as battle fronts established by the enemy, and abandoned, along with the technologies we equate with 'modern life'...
if not, 'modern life' will become an oxymoron...
I want oxen - not men.
Here's the real reason behind ed reform (read privatization):
~~~~~
In a stock market prospectus uncovered by education author Jonathan Kozol, the Montgomery Securities group explains to Corporate America the lure of privatizing education. Kozol writes:
“The education industry,” according to these analysts, “represents, in our opinion, the final frontier of a number of sectors once under public control” that have either voluntarily opened or, they note in pointed terms, have “been forced” to open up to private enterprise. Indeed, they write, “the education industry represents the largest market opportunity” since health-care services were privatized during the 1970’s.... From the point of view of private profit, one of these analysts enthusiastically observes, “The K–12 market is the Big Enchilada.”
"According to U.S. Census data, well over $800 billion is spent on education, public and private, at all levels in the United States each year.20 This makes it roughly the same size as the U.S. trade deficit with China. The private sector wants to get its hands on this money. Along with politicians, it is determined to break the power of the teachers’ unions and to attack one of the last bastions of decently paid American workers. The budget problems resulting from the current recession will provide them cover in doing this."
this is entirely consistent with what I would suggest is the high quality and perceptive perspective regularly displayed by your clear, concise postings...
my concerns are with corrupt systems, and I am eternally grateful that even within such systems, one can still hope to find blessed, courageous exceptions...
I have no doubt you were an outstanding one...
in my opinion, for what that's worth, you continue to be, and I look forward to your future postings...
"If a school continues to fail year after year after year and doesn’t show sign of improvements then there has got to be a sense of accountability [ie, teachers should be fired]. That happened in Rhode Island last week," [when all the teachers were fired] "When a school board wasn’t able to deliver change by other means, they voted to layoff the faculty and the staff. And as my education secretary Arne Duncan says, our kids get only one chance at an education, and we need to get it right,"
-- Barack "I'm the Decider now and all you liberal retards who are criticizing me should just shut the F up" Obama
consider that Obama's claims are based on a myth: that at the end of the day, the problem comes down to bad teachers AND that you can reliably determine who those "bad apples" are based on the performance of their students on standardized tests (and fire their asses!)
Data don't support his (and Bill Gates') lal la land "theory" that firing teachers (ever the consumate politician, Obama, calls it "accountability") based on student test performance is justified.
GF Brandenburg (retired math teacher who has more knowledge and good sense in his little pinky than Obama does in his Harvard "trained" brain) analyzed the data (as did Bill Gates who funded the studies and obviously did not want the null result made public because it did not support his theory)
"there is essentially no such thing as a teacher who is consistently wonderful (or awful) on this extremely complicated measurement scheme. How teacher X does one year in “value-added” in no way allows anybody to predict how teacher X will do the next year. They could do much worse, they could do much better, they could do about the same." -- GF Brandenburg,
from "Now I understand Why Bill gates didn't want the value added data made public"
http://gfbrandenburg.wordpress.com/2012/03/03/now-i-understand-why-bill-...
Obama's entire "Race to the Crap" program is based on the myth that student testing and teacher evaluation based on that testing will fix US public education and it's simply a sham. Just like Obama, coincidentally. But I suspect that all his supporters here at Common Dreams will vote for him anyway because "he's not as bad as the Republicans". My a**, he's not as bad.
And this ain't just a {un}Right-Wing [= Repugs] assault on Public Schools & their teachers. The Dims under Obama & Arne {Hit-Man- 'Katrina is the Best Thing to happen to New Orleans Schools'} Duncan's RTTT is the so-called 'liberal' Dims version of Bush Jr's NCLB [which apparently was cheerfully endorsed by the so-called 'liberal lion' the late Ted Kennedy]. Thus the Dims are just as guilty as the Repugs in this assault on Public School teachers!
only because you insisted, I force-fed myself Krugman...
the planet cannot afford any more upwardly mobile, educated consumers utterly committed to a life based on the labor of others, while simultaneously utterly ignorant of the physics or crimes involved with the removed manufacturing of anything and everything they purchase, possess or digest, from their clothing to their food to their cell phones to their medications...
education must begin with personal, physical relation to the living world, and the inherent personal and social responsibilities revealed by this awareness...
no more pundits in cushy jobs tweeting about the need for 'education', which clearly implies justified competition for eventual, perpetual superiority of income and station, and all in the complete absence of concern for the planet, as such concern directly contradicts product, and profit...
education would require the destruction of the very device used for tweeting... of the factory manufacturing... of the infrastructure supporting the delivered energies...
this would be education... not how to lie to oneself, and the world, about one's role... this is denial...
validating, again, why I no longer regularly read the NYT, or Krugman... Opinion is the right place for his column, all right... it is his, apparently, but not mine...
perhaps, one day, he would address the industrial and chemical devastation wrought by industry forced by violent resource control, or how his cherished education results in 'educated columnists' unable to see poppies blatantly being guarded by US soldiers, and farmed and processed into heroin right in front of them in Afghanistan ...
I am not holding my breath...
Where results aren't any better - especially since the hardest to teach are LEFT Behind in a public school system drained of dollars by crony capitalists and their kleptocrats in higher office.
From Chicago to California and from state governments to the federal government.
Were a realistic "merit" rating system to be developed, it would more reasonably involve the judgement of students than of their parents; you would just have to have someone other than the classroom teacher or teachers grade papers and issue grades to students to avoid the obvious tit-for-tat.
Still, I find it strange to imagine that government, administrations, (in general), parents, or the business community would be allowed to judge teaching. Administrations have conflicting interest and a majority of parents are so clueless as to insist on increased rote and conformity. Either the teachers themselves or the students could do it better, even when the students are quite young.
The current movement towards privatization has nothing to do with a concern to *increase* quality in education.