EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Corporate Win: Supreme Court Says Monsanto Has 'Control Over Product of Life'
- Cornel West: Obama 'Is a War Criminal'
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Disaster Capitalism Strikes as Hedge Funds Circle Near-Bankrupt Municipalities Like Vultures
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
Popular content
Today's Top News
G20 Summit Fails to Allay World Recession Fears
Summit ends in disarray as world leaders fail to agree increase to IMF and concerns mount over prospects for Italian economy
The G20 summit in Cannes has ended in ominous disarray, drawing nearer the threat of a world recession.
The Italian prime minister, Silvio Berlusconi, right, at a G20 news conference with his finance minister, Giulio Tremonti. (Photo: Dylan Martinez/Reuters) Leaders were unable to agree upon a boost to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to help distressed countries, while debt-ridden Italy, now seen as the epicentre of the euro crisis, was forced to put its austerity programme under the fund's control.
UK hopes that the Germans would relent and allow the European Central Bank to become the lender of last resort for the euro were also dashed.
In a day of unremitting gloom, and yet more market turbulence, the Greek government also stood on the precipice of collapse, risking an uncontrolled default, as the government of George Papandreou faced a late-night confidence vote in parliament. Prime Minister Papandreou was forced to cancel plans for a referendum on the euro.
The sense of stasis led the British prime minister, David Cameron, to issue a stark warning about the impact of the crisis on the world economy: "Every day that the eurozone crisis continues and every day it is not resolved is a day that it has a chilling effect on the rest of the world economy, including the British economy. I am not going to pretend all the problems in the eurozone have been fixed. They have not. The task for the eurozone is the same as going into this summit. The world can't wait for the eurozone to through endless questions and changes about this.
"We like the rest of the world need the eurozone to sort out its problems. We need more to happen in terms of detail on the European firewall." He also hinted at worse to come, describing this as only "a stage of the global crisis".
There had been hopes that the G20 would agree to increase IMF resources by as much as $250bn (£156bn) to more than $1tn, but disagreements about the wisdom, structure and size of the boost to the fund and over who would contribute meant the decision was left to a meeting of G20 finance ministers next February. The French president, Nicolas Sarkozy, had been eager to flourish a figure both to assure the markets and to top off his chairmanship of the G20.
Cameron revealed the friction, saying: "The very worst thing would have been to try and cook up a number without being very specific about who is contributing what. If you cannot do that, it is better to say the world stands ready to increase resources to the IMF as necessary."
Barack Obama, under pressure from his own Congress, was deeply reluctant to contribute to an expansion of IMF funds without clearer signs that the eurozone was sorting out its problems. Admitting he had been given "a crash course in European politics", the US president urged Greek and Italian parliaments to take decisive action to control their deficits, and so combat what he described as some of the psychological origins of the crisis. He also urged the euro area to start putting some resources into its European Financial Stability Fund (EFSF), a rescue fund agreed at the European summit on 27 October.
But the German chancellor, Angela Merkel, said: "There are hardly any countries here which said they were ready to go along with the EFSF."
The Italian prime minister, Silvio Berlusconi, was summoned to a late-night hotel meeting with Merkel, Sarkozy, the IMF director general Christine Lagarde and Obama, where he was instructed to bring Italy under quarterly IMF surveillance to ensure he implements tough austerity measures, including changes to the labour market, pension reform and the sell-off of state assets.
Italy has debts of €1.9tn (£1.6tn), or 120% of GDP, and if it followed Greece down the path towards a financial bailout, or default, the impact on the European banking system would be huge. Italian debt yields rose again on Friday to near unsustainable levels as traders reflected fears of a default by demanding higher returns. Italy faces new tests in further auctions of its debt this month – it has to raise €30.5bn in November, and a further 22.5bn in December.
Sarkozy denied the demands on Berlusconi represented something approaching an IMF coup, saying: "We never wanted to change governments, either in Greece or in Italy. That is not our role; that is not our idea of democracy, but it's clear that there are rules in Europe and if you exonerate yourself from these rules you exclude yourself from Europe."
Berlusconi, facing defections from his own party, insisted he had invited the IMF to offer advice. He said on Friday he had rejected an offer of IMF funds. "I don't think Italy needs that," he said, claiming his country was more solid than France or the UK. "Italian restaurants and vacation spots are always full. Nobody has the sense the country is in a crisis."
British officials privately admit that fear of an economic collapse in Italy is the single biggest concern gripping world leaders. They said: "We cannot have the Italians meeting in crisis every three days. We need some action."
The UK government will now focus on urging its European partners to make progress, and will continue to support extra cash for the IMF. Cameron said he would not need UK parliamentary approval to do this since the Commons had already voted to sanction an increase that would cover the proposed UK additional contribution.
In a sign that the collapse of Italy could lead to a collapse of the single currency, the chancellor, George Osborne, said the Treasury was undertaking scenario planning on such a development.
The EFSF has €440bn available to lend, of which roughly half is expected to be consumed by bailouts of Ireland, Portugal and Greece. The European Central Bank has purchased Italian debt since August, but will not do so indefinitely. Financing could leverage the EFSF's money into something larger, which has led the EU to pursue countries outside the eurozone with surplus cash, such as China.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

32 Comments so far
Show AllI admit that my natural and inconquerable aversion to economics theory and economists in general skews my perspective.
But all of these economic summits seem populated by latter-day characters created by Charles Dickens at the peak of his genius for social satire and caricature.
That is, these "leaders", authorities, and self-important poobahs come off like a board of well-fed but crabby technocrats on the board of some orphanage, pulling in their flunkies and minions and scolding or lecturing them on the need to more rigorously implement draconian policies to better subjugate, oppress, starve, and generally abuse the burdensome orphans into a state of abject complaisance and submission.
I'm sure that aficionados can perceive and credit the sublime and sophisticated professional discourse, economic diplomacy, and statecraft actually taking place, and appreciate its constructive and convivial outcomes.
But through my vinegar-colored glasses, the summits boil down to a gaggle of choleric, prosperous one-percenters rationalizing the imperative to respond with increased severity to pesky and inconvenient requests or demands from masses of ordinary unprivileged citizens for seconds on their meager dollops of watery gruel-- while further reducing the rations while they're at it.So it's no wonder that the "G20 Summit Fails to Allay World Recession Fears".
Love it, O.S. Thanks for laugh...........{~;>
The corporations that own the "leaders" mandate that summits like the G20 result in INCREASING, not allaying fear. How else will shock doctrine politics be taken to the next level wherein additional wealth is transferred from the 99% to the 1%.
Made my day! Still laughing!!
Try it when the clay is still wet. Saves you a whole lot of effort.
Oh, and just for fun, you know what the vast majority of the Sumerian clay tablets record?
Business transactions and taxes.
The G20 meet on the EuroZone Debt Crisis.
or
The Elite who created this gods-forsaken disaster squabbling about how to best cover their asses when the shit really hits the fan.
The vultures continue to feed upon the ignorance and denial of their prey. The elite will have their way until the majority wakes up. Fortunately, the awakening is in the beginning stage and proliferating.
looks like one pillar of nwo can't get funded and is crumbling...is it to be replaced?
Better a world-wide default than a decade of "austerity" to save the banks that brought about this disaster. Defaults effect things for about 2 years. Austerity will last decades. DEFAULT...YES!
Robert1234 -- So correct on the advantages of default over austerity.
Actually, what we desperately need for average people is debt forgiveness -- and let the banks eat cake. I highly recommend anthropologist David Graeber's book -- Debt: The first 5000 years to anyone with the slightest interest in economics -- especially the origins of debt and money.
Really fascinating reading and TOTALLY at odds with the economic myths that originated with Adam Smith.
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2011/08/what-is-debt-%E2%80%93-an-interview-with-economic-anthropologist-david-graeber.html
http://www.powells.com/biblio/72-9781933633862-0
Incapable of surpassing the wit and insight especially of comments here by Obedient Servant, Robert 1234, and Galenwainwright, I only can add a supplement. Telling concerning Galenwainwright's "Elite who created this gods-forsaken disaster" is,
"Sarkozy denied the demands on Berlusconi represented something approaching an IMF coup, saying: 'We never wanted to change governments, either in Greece or in Italy. That is not our role; that is not our idea of democracy, but it's clear that there are rules in Europe and if you exonerate yourself from these rules you exclude yourself from Europe.'" Apparently, if you desire to not "exclude yourself from Europe," when the policies by which you do not "exclude yourself from Europe" create a desire by the populace "to change governments," then you must ignore the desire of the populace, although "that is not our idea of democracy." Oh, and by the way, relevant here is not democracy, but "OUR idea of democracy." Symbolic of dear Nicolas' understanding of democracy is just outside the ritziest shopping area of Paris, cemented into the pavement is a brass plaque announcing the location of the last barricade to fall in the French revolution of 1848. Little can say it better than,
"Grab your weapons, citizens!
Form your batallions!
Let us march! Let us march!
May impure blood
Water our fields!"
OOOH, I just came across this comment:
“A third option envisaged a transitional government of technocrats assuming power for the next two years. . . .
None of these scenarios addresses the deeper crisis in which public support for the country's political system has collapsed with potentially dangerous consequences. ‘The biggest problem in Greek politics is the absence of public support,’ said Christoforos Vernadakis, from opinion polling firm VPRC. ‘Everyone is furious with the politicians and the anger has reached violent proportions.’"
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/bailout-deal-thrown-into-new-chaos-after-greek-pm-wins-vote-6257550.html
Charming isn't it, how “A third option envisaged a transitional government of technocrats assuming power for the next two years," when
"‘The biggest problem in Greek politics is the absence of public support,’ . . . . ‘Everyone is furious with the politicians and the anger has reached violent proportions.’'"
"Damn the [public], full [technocrats] ahead!" "Ramming [technocrats down their throats] speed!"
Why should they allay the fears. This instability and fear is making the 1% a pot full of money. It works well for them. The IMF gets more money and power, how can that possibly be a bad thing? On to Italy, there's profit to be made. Lives to enslave with austerity cuts and privatization. Money. Money. Money. They smell money. The G20 loves it, they breathe and eat only it, they need "their precious".
""We like the rest of the world need the eurozone to sort out its problems. We need more to happen in terms of detail on the European firewall.""
Shouldn't that firewall have been in place and well tested before the credit was extended? You shouldn't have been flying without a net or using a shoddy one to begin with.
Maybe the G20 will start eating themselves and get back down to the G5, 6, 7 or 8? Or perhaps they can vote each other off the island.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123868695694882779.html
Check out those smiling faces and ask yourselves how many of them live in your neighborhoods or serve on your local boards. Yet they set the agenda for the rest of us. Why is that?
Think about it. This body started it's existence in 1973 in the White House, under a republican president that was never elected as either President or Vice President. He came into power as vice president when Agnew resigned, and became president when Nixon resigned. Yet we have him to thank for a world power that now runs all of our lives. A power that elected presidents, premiers, and prime ministers and even kiings, queens and sheiks bow to. How many of these finance officers were ever elected to any office?
How exactly did this body gain such power? Which group of world citizens granted it that? Surely not the 99%. I am thinking most of us were kept uninformed intentionally. Ask yourselves about George Shultz. Where is he today? Where are we today?
Hey are we surprised Israel feels free to threaten war on Iran? I am not.
George P. Shultz:
"Shultz is the chairman of JPMorgan Chase's International Advisory Council and an honorary director of the Institute for International Economics. He is a member of the Hoover Institution at Stanford University, the Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP) Board of Advisors, the New Atlantic Initiative, the prestigious Mandalay Camp at the Bohemian Grove, the Committee for the Liberation of Iraq, and the Committee on the Present Danger. He is honorary chairman of The Israel Democracy Institute (www.idi.org.il). Shultz formerly served on the board of directors for the Bechtel Corporation, Charles Schwab Corporation, and was a member of the board of directors of Gilead Sciences from January 1996 to December 2005. He is currently a co-chairman of the North American Forum and also serves on the board for Accretive Health." Wikipedia
Finger in every pie from world stability and war, finance, to health insurance. Funny thing is I don't remember his name on any ballot.
Not very instructive or informative.
Does "the contentless and deliberately uni[n]formed drivel that makes up more than half the content of every thread on this site" include your post?
Isreal Democracy Institute:
"IDI is an independent, non-partisan "Think-and-Do Tank" that devises ways to strengthen the moral and structural foundations of Israeli democracy. While Israel's policymakers are consumed by crisis management, the Institute sets the nation's best minds to work on the long-term challenges facing the State in realms such as Political Reform, National Security, Religion and State, and Constitutional Law. Since its establishment in 1991, IDI has supported Israel's elected officials, civil servants, and opinion leaders in four ways:
As a Generator of Ideas: IDI conducts comparative policy research of uncompromising quality on the issues critical to Israel's democratic future.
As a Resource for Policymakers: IDI designs research-based blueprints for reform accompanied by practical implementation strategies.
As a Forum for Debate: IDI maintains an open forum for constructive dialogue and consensus-building across society and government.
As a Source of Inspiration: IDI acts to promote the values and norms appropriate for Israel as a Jewish and democratic state. "
All this by the man that brought us the G20. No wonder we are on the bink of war with Iran.
Accreditive Health:
"Operating Model
We bring staff and management where it is needed most.
One set of metrics
Accretive Health’s Operating Model is a YIELD-based model comprised of four sets of assets:
■Process / Methodology
■Technology
■People
■Six Sigma Process Control and Metrics Adapted for Yield"
Doesn't sound like it's really after providing the best care to the patient does it? Adapted to yield...that's something I wouldn't bet my grandma's life on. All this brought to you by the man that formed the G# body
Washington Institute of for Near East Policy:
http://www.washingtoninstitute.org/templateI01.php
Wonder why Israel is calling the shots?
New Atlatic Initiative: one of those bodies like Project for a New American Century. Has morphed into some specteral but still powerful body:
"Launched in June 1996, the now-defunct New Atlantic Initiative was a neoconservative-led project based at the American Enterprise Institute that aimed to strengthen trans-Atlantic cooperation, in part by admitting the transitional democracies of the former Soviet bloc into NATO and the European Union, and establishing a free trade area between an enlarged European Union and North American countries.[1] It was launched following the 1996 Congress of Prague, where more than 300 largely conservative politicians, scholars, and investors discussed “the new agenda for transatlantic relations.”
http://rightweb.irc-online.org/profile/New_Atlantic_Initiative
Amazing to know who established the G20 isn't it?
Committee on Present Danger:
"April 28, 2010
President Barack Obama
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton
Deputy National Security Advisor John Brennan
Washington, D.C.
Dear Mr. President, Madame Secretary, and Mr. Brennan:
We, the undersigned members of the Committee on the Present Danger, write to endorse and support the significant points made in the letter sent on April 9, 2010 by Senator Joseph I. Lieberman to Deputy National Security Advisor John Brennan regarding the removal of the term “Islamic extremism” from the National Security Strategy report and replacing it with the nebulous term “violent extremism”. We agree wholeheartedly with the Senator’s assertion that this action contradicts the accepted military intelligence doctrine to properly identify, define, and know your enemy.
A non-partisan organization of former White House officials, ambassadors, cabinet secretaries, academics, and other members of the foreign policy community, the CPD believes that militant Islamic regimes and movements represent a serious threat to the United States and other free nations. If we are to meet this challenge, we must understand the beliefs and motivations of those who have dedicated themselves to what they call a “jihad” against “infidels” based on their reading of the Koran. As CPD Co-Chairman George P. Shultz has stated: “We face a clear and present danger, so we must identify the danger accurately and realistically, with no punches pulled, and support the necessary actions to deal with the danger decisively.”
We urge you to reconsider this decision and accurately identify the threat we face.
Respectfully,
Members of the Committee on the Present Danger"
http://www.committeeonthepresentdanger.org/
Wake up folks this is the G20. These are the people that will soon bring you a war on Iran.
Use ' <' 'p' ' > ' to get paragraphs back.
It's a coding pain, I know, but it does work