EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- One American Who Isn't For Sale
- Edward Snowden: Saving Us from the United Stasi of America
- Major Loss to Organic Farmers as Court Rules in Favor of Monsanto
- The Judicial Lynching of Bradley Manning
- Remembering Satyajit Ray’s Hirok Rajar Deshe: On Edward Snowden, Resistance and Inverted Totalitarianism
Popular content
Today's Top News
Newborn With Heart Defect Is Denied Insurance Coverage
At birth, Houston Tracy let out a single loud cry before his father cut the cord and handed him to a nurse.
Instantly, Doug Tracy knew something was wrong with his son.
"He wasn't turning pink fast enough," Tracy said. "When they listened to his chest, they realized he had an issue."
That turned out to be d-transposition of the great arteries, a defect in which the two major vessels that carry blood away from the heart are reversed. The condition causes babies to turn blue.
Surgery would correct it, but within days of Houston's birth March 15, Tracy learned that his application for health insurance to cover his son had been denied. The reason: a pre-existing condition.
"How can he have a pre-existing condition if the baby didn't exist until now?" Tracy asked.
New federal legislation that will prevent insurance companies from denying children coverage based on a pre-existing condition comes too late for the Tracys. The legislation, passed by Congress and signed by President Barack Obama this week, won't go into effect until September.
But Houston, who is hospitalized at Cook Children's Medical Center in Fort Worth, needs coverage now.
Without surgery, babies with this condition often die soon after birth, although some may live as long as a year, said Dr. Steve Muyskens, a pediatric cardiologist.
"In his case, we had to intervene in the first days of life," Muyskens said.
The defect
With this condition, oxygen-rich blood goes back to the lungs and oxygen-poor blood goes back to the body, depriving it of oxygen and damaging the heart muscle. Surgery to move the arteries to their normal position is usually done within three to five days of birth. It basically involves swapping the misplaced arteries.
"It sounds simple, but it's complex because you have to move tiny coronary arteries that in a baby are 1 to 2 millimeters," Muyskens said.
Doug and Kim Tracy, who live in Crowley and are self-employed, carry health insurance on their other two children. They said they cannot afford insurance for themselves.
They paid out of pocket for Kim Tracy's neonatal care and the baby's delivery. Doug Tracy said they were told that they could apply for insurance for Houston within 30 days of his birth.
A spokeswoman for Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas declined to comment but issued a statement saying, "Our policy is that if a family has existing coverage with us, a baby can be added to the contract within 31 days without the need for underwriting to assess the baby's eligibility."
But that's only if the parents have coverage, said the spokeswoman, Margaret Jarvis. Read that with the emphasis on parents.
Lawmaker tries to help
After being contacted by the Tracy family, state Rep. Chris Turner, D-Arlington, said he asked the Texas Department of Insurance if there are provisions that can be used to help the family. He said he has not received a complete answer.
Virtually everyone can agree that no one should be denied health coverage because of pre-existing conditions, Turner said.
Tracy said he was appealing the insurance company's decision.
A five-hour surgery to correct the defect was performed Friday, and Houston is doing well. He is being fed through a tube and must learn to swallow. But he should be able to go home within a couple of weeks, Tracy said.
"He's such a fighter, and the doctors say he's got a lot of spunk," Tracy said. "The nurses nicknamed him 'Little Rocky.'"
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



100 Comments so far
Show AllChains we can believe in!
excuse me they just passed healthcare reform that will eliminate this happening.
... as long as you can afford to pay the premiums.
Wanna bet that people who have 'pre-existing conditions' will face predatory and discriminatory practices?
The genetically inferior will be the new blacks.
no, the waiver of pre-existing conditions is not in effect until 2014.
the kid will have to wait.
Not for children. I believe the pre-existing condition malarky ends with Obama's signing the bill at least for children.
There was a glitch and they are not, they were supposed to be covered. Our wizards are supposed to be fixing this, one among many mistakes they made. Its adults that kick in for 2014.
Pretty disgusting, imho!
Hey....in some circles, it's said that when St. Patrick drove the snakes out of Ireland, they all came out in the form of politicians. You know what, though? The snakes are coming out of EVERYWHERE in the form of politicians!
Really??
Oh, no, djb. This:
"excuse me they just passed healthcare reform that will eliminate this happening."
is total baloney. This "HCR" bill won't eliminate stuff like this happening. Runaway costs will prevail, and healthcare won't be improved, either, with this bill. This is a Republican bill that was written more than fifteen years ago, which is why all the squawking by the GOP about how "liberal" this bill supposedly is, rings hollow and is totally hypocritical.
There are so many details of this bill just beginning to come out into the public.
Obama, Pelosi and Reid tried to tell us that the insurance companies will no longer be allowed to "deny" coverage.
Well, uh...that's not exactly true.
They can deny the coverage and then just pay a $100/day "fine". You do the math. Some schmuck has a massive heart attack, needs surgery, things go badly, he's on a ventilator and has "just enough" brain functioning that he can't be pulled off. His bill/day in the ICU is, oh....probably about $5000. Gee....which would you pay to make sure your stockholders don't get too peeved as the months wear on and on? $5000 per day or $100 per day??
My prediction is that by the time all these "details" emerge and someone gets the bright idea to compile them all into one neat little article, suddenly it will all make sense to a lot of people why this legislation stinks.
And why people like me and millions of others knew that the ONLY way to cover EVERYONE with high quality care and to SAVE MONEY would have been to eliminate the for-profit insurance corporations from the equation and move to an Improved Medicare for All system instead....
Live and learn I guess.
You know the facts so use them by calling your rep. and Senators often to demand we move to at least single payer for those with mandated insurance coverage. Your anger is shared by millions of others.
Steady there; I think DJB was being sarcastic.
Yes, djb. They did just pass healthcare reform that would eliminate this from happening.
And they passed reform that will be paying taxpayer dollars to the very rotten corporations that have been doing all they can to NOT pay for healthcare for decades.
The Democrats made a deal with the devil.
I believe we had the golden opportunity to deep-six the "for-profit" insurance companies out of our healthcare equation once and for all and instead we allowed them to sink their hooks ever deeper into our bank accounts, now making it a probable impossibility that we will EVER be able to rid ourselves of them.
Nice going Barry!
"The Democrats made a deal with the devil."
The devil would be, of course, the republican party.
q
q
The devil is actually in the details! :)
You know... it's the fetus' own fault... shouldn't have lived so carelessly and put it's health at such risk.
Those compassionate insurance companies have to draw a line somewhere... after all... if they allow this what's next? Will they actually have to approve treatment for the post-natal and then actually pay the claims?!?!? That would mean the CEO's couldn't take home tens of millions in personal compensation every year and that just won't do.
So really... what's next?
If you're born and not perfect... you're denied.
If you're healthy and then get sick... you're denied.
If you go to your doctor and he orders a course of treatment... you're denied.
If you get treatment and submitt the charges to the insurance company... you're denied.
LOL!
It's a "protection racket". These "insurance companies" are nothing more than legitimized organized crime families.
BTW... if this doesn't outrage you enough... read the story about outsourcing insurance company tasks to India. The companies here outsource to India, who is now outsourcing the actual jobs back here to depressed areas with cheap labor.
Change we can believe in!
Homeless Bob: Got a URL for the outsourcing story?
Thanks in advance
And the rightwing fascist fanatics say they don't want a government bureaucrat between them and their doctor. I guess it's better to have a soulless corporate bureaucrat between them and their doctor.
I don't know how these sons of bitches sleep at night.
"I don't know how these sons of bitches sleep at night."
By closing their minds...and their hearts.
How can they close a heart they don't have. As far as the mind thingy goes...the republikkkan creed is "mind over matter"...they have no mind, but it really doesn't matter.
Speaking of bastard republikkklans, didja hear on Yahoo News today where republikkklan Fascist Tom Coburn of Oklahoma stalled the vote on unemployment benefits being extended until after the Easter break? That's gonna prevent anyone newly layed off from getting UI and those who have been on UI for more than 6 months will temporarily lose benefits. That is going to hit a lot of people very hard.
The asshole says we cannot afford to keep the benefits going because it would add to the deficit. But lawd knows they gotta spend all that money on illegal wars and bankster bailouts. Priorities doncha know!
They could also be taking so many of their own pharmaceuticals, they're gone forever ...
I'm no fan of the so-called "insurance reform" that those whom we laughingly call our representatives passed into law. If there was something in my post that led you to believe that I support that corporate give away, it was unintentional.
sociopath |ˈsōsēōˌpaθ|
noun
a person with a personality disorder manifesting itself in extreme antisocial attitudes and behavior and a lack of conscience.
DERIVATIVES
sociopathic |ˌsōsēōˈpaθik| adjective
sociopathy |ˌsōsēˈäpəθē| noun
In the 1830's, it was called "moral insanity."
They would have it treated, but for them too, there are preexisting conditions preventing coverage. So they can't help themselves.
What was very chilling for me was listening to Angela Braly "calmly" putting her philosophy out in simple terms to Congress.
Perhaps a type of dissociative disorder, too.
Meet the top 15, here:
@www.businessinsider.com/here-are-the-15-health-care-big-wigs-who-cant-sleep-because-of-health-care-reform-2010-3#herbert-fritch-healthspring-1
You can call BC/BS of Texas to let them know your thoughts on this matter:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Texas
1001 E. Lookout Drive
Richardson, Texas 75082
General Information: (972) 766-6900
Already did...and the girl I talked to said the calls were coming fast and furious. Apparently the families friends sent e-mails to all their friends asking them to call and forward the e-mail to anyone they knew. Thats how I got it.
The internet is a wonderous tool.
Well, guess what?
The new legislation wouldn't have helped this newborn anyway.
The pre existing coverage for children actually takes effect in six months. After all those bold faced liars plainly said immediately, it's really six months. And, they still can deny coverage. Something like this is a perfect example of what they'll do. The fetus is to blame, you know.
A little off topic but, if you wanna get your blood boiling
check this out. There is an exemption from the mandate for Congressional staffers. In other words, if they don't want to buy insurance, they don't have to.
They are all unworthy to roam free.
Did you read the entire article? fpmy September is in 6 months.
Right, six months for the pre existing condition clause to take effect.
That is not immediately.
They ALL said as soon as the legislation is signed, kids with a pre existing condition would not be denied. Obama's included in that group but then the man lies every time he opens his mouth
Immediately used to mean right away. Like when Wall Street gets their money immediately. For sick kids in the US, immediately is six long months away.
But on other posts we were told the bill had to be defeated. Now, I see people are angry because the bill does not go into effect for 6 months. The principled stand argument in opposing the bill for lack of single payer and inclusion of mandates does not seem so black and white when real life tragedyiesget in the way.
Isn’t it just great that the same people that are against abortion is for the death penalty and have no problem killing a baby (or grown up for that matter) in the name of privatization or rather in the name of capitalism.
In the conservative mind; If you yourself take the decision that you don’t want to give birth (abortion) it is a really bad thing. But, if you actually give birth and your child has a medical condition it’s ok for the insurance company to put the child away. That’s even a good thing because then the reps. know that capitalism works – scary world these guys have created.
I think Jesus would be happier with the European system were even sick people are allowed to live, thank God!
It’s so good with double moral standards, when one is consumed you have one more to go :-)
Mickelo, dude you seriously need to get with the program. NO ONE except God has the right to take a life away, and that includes Abortion Doctors! Seriously what the hell are you thinking! (Executioners, soldiers, drone pilots, and police, to mention, a few are of course excluded from this rule...)
The insurance companies are just doing gods work. If god decides to "take this child home" why should an insurance company stand between god and this child? Remember this baby is only a former fetus and does not enjoy the same rights that a fetus does.
Buddy you really need to go to church and get your ass straighten out!
This is WHY health care reform is needed and passed.
There REALLY ARE DEATH PANELS:
THEY ARE CALLED "INSURANCE COMPANIES"!
This may have clamped down in some ways, but generally the insurance executives have made out like bandits.
It comes down to the fact that more tax money will go to insurance parasites who can still KEEP the money IF they DENY the care. That's the formula. The only difference now is that more tax money goes to AIG and AETNA and Wellpoint etc.
This bill isn't going to stop the insurance death panels, it's just going to outlaw a few of their favorite weapons.
You've got THAT right!
This legislation is not health care, it is insurance care.
Thank you Mr. Obamageddon.
Single payer health care should have been put on the table a long time ago, not Hillarycare or Obamacare. When will the public ever learn? Never it seems. Both political sides keep saying "just wait, we'll get it next time" again and again. 10 years from now, the health care crisis will get worse assuming this continues and we'll be back with more tragic events such as this one.
P.S.: I can hardly wait for the regressive bill apologists to come swarming in badmouthing TX and/or telling us to wait forever.
Fine. And, what single-payer advocacy groups are you active in in your state?
Fine, PA wins and MO loses as far as state wide single payer is concerned. I haven't been as active on single payer as my niece in St Louis but even she used to find it difficult for even some of the liberals and progressives to sit down and learn. Ironically, she ran across social conservatives who supported it and that was last year. Maybe I will try getting actively involved in my local community on that issue. I don't know what it will take for single payer in MO statewide but we'll find out. In the meantime, if Washington passes HR 875 to outlaw gardening, I'll be joining the pitchfork gang of small organic farmers.
Stanley1979
"if Washington passes HR 875 to outlaw gardening, I'll be joining the pitchfork gang of small organic farmers"
You are kidding, right?? What is HR875?
http://www.knowthelies.com/?q=node/3887
http://www.campaignforliberty.com/blog.php?view=12671
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h111-875
First, government washes its hands off of health care and throws us to the insurance wolves, then it dips its hands into messing up public education, and now they want to take our gardens away? What an irony that government not only wants to wash their hands off of health care for its citizens but they want to poison us. My neighbors and I are not about to let government take over our gardens and force us to the Monsanto wolves !
Here's a link to the contents of HR 875, http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h111-875
I saw nothing connected to gardening, although it's conceivable for a garden to be termed a "Food Production Facility"--"The term ‘food production facility’ means any farm, ranch, orchard, vineyard, aquaculture facility, or confined animal-feeding operation." People engaging in backyard chicken or other meat-related small operation have more issues to deal with. The bill was introduced last year.
That's what they are getting at and the corporate interests know how to get their corporate trial lawyers and judges to see things their way. I hope this bill stays off the political radar.
Thanks!
FYI, This legislation bans states from enacting single payer for, I think, seven years or get sued by the insurance companies.
See? They covered all the angles for big insurance.
Oh, that's right. Big insurance wrote the bill. Congress tallied their checks.
Not if state governments can fight the bill. Check out what my governor just signed.
http://www.governor.virginia.gov/news/viewRelease.cfm?id=88
It's kind of ironic to see a Republican fighting corporate fascism these days but someone's gotta do it.
To freepressmyass:
If you are correct, that this is in the bill:
"This legislation bans states from enacting single payer for, I think, seven years or get sued by the insurance companies.".....
I am going to flip a freakin' gasket right out of my brain!!!!
Well, I was going to do some gardening work today, but now that you've dropped this BOMBSHELL OF INFORMATION ON MY HEAD....I guess I'll have to start making some calls and doing some emails.
Thanks a LOT!
He or she is exactly correct. And there is plenty more besides in the Senate bill to delight you as it surfaces.
Abbybwood, if your sarcasm is meant to convey that you don't believe this, you're partly right. It's not exactly like that, but only because that's already the law. Search your favorite sites for "ERISA" and "ERISA Waiver".
The thing about this bill is that it does NOT contain an automatic ERISA Waiver for states that try their own single payer system. There was an amendment by Dennis Kucinich to the House bill early on that had a lot of Republican votes in committee. It was seen by Republicans as a state's rights thing. I guess they got knocked in the head by their handlers for voting yes on a Kucinich item.
Someone please explain to me why my Koolaid-swilling "liberal" Democratic friends, who are celebrating the passage of this bill, seem to think that health insurance companies opposed it. I have been trying to tell them that, according to everything I've read about the bill, it's a gift to the insurance industry because they're about to get millions of new clients they would not have otherwise had. One responded, "If it's good for the health insurance industry, why did they run ads opposing it?" Did I miss some kind of huge anti-health care "reform" ads? Unlike my friends, I don't see anything positive about this bill. I'm a supporter of single payer.
In California it's www.CaliforniaOneCare.org
Should have made the no-denial coverage clause retroactive. To 1900.