Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Small Farmers Can Cool the World
COPENHAGEN - Industrial agriculture may emit nearly half of climate-heating greenhouse gases, but that reality has gone unrecognized by negotiators at the climate treaty talks here, say farmers with La Via Campesina, an international movement of hundreds of millions of small-scale peasant farmers.
"Small-scale
farmers use 80 percent less energy than large monocultures," said
Chavannes Jean-Baptiste, a Haitian farmer with Mouvement de Paysan,
through a translator.
"Peasant farmers from La Via Campesina and others can help cool the planet," Jean-Baptiste told a press conference at the Klimaforum09, the alternative climate action talks being held here in Copenhagen Dec. 7-18.
Unlike the official talks, set in a remote location surrounded by police and razor wire, Klimaforum09 is being held in the city's community centre and is free and open to the public.
"System Change for Climate Change" - that's the phrase most often heard at the Klimaforum09 and in parts of Copenhagen.
La Via Campesina's claim that industrial agriculture is by far the biggest source of carbon emissions is based on a recent study that looked at all emissions from the global food system.
This includes oil-dependent industrial farming, together with the expansion of the meat industry, the destruction of world's savannahs and forests to grow agricultural commodities, the use of fossil fuel energy to transport and process food, and the extensive use of chemical fertilizers.
The study was conducted by GRAIN, an international non-governmental organization that promotes the sustainable management and use of agricultural biodiversity to support local communities.
"These results are horrifying. So much carbon is lost from the soil using monoculture practices," said Camila Montecinos, the lead GRAIN researcher from Santiago, Chile.
The study looked at all the available scientific literature and worked with soil scientists to arrive at this "rough" but thorough estimate, Montecinos told TerraViva.
The study does not include methane emissions from animals and their manure because studies conflict and incorporating manure into the soil increases fertility and soil carbon, she explained.
Surprisingly, one-third of the emissions come from food processing and transport, although the former is responsible for most. The bulk of emissions come from land use changes - conversions of forest and grasslands - and from direct agricultural production like fuel use, fertilized and tillage.
Calculations in the report show that policies oriented towards agriculture in the hands of small farmers and focused on restoring soil fertility could, over the next 50 years, capture about 450 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide, which is more than two-thirds of the current excess in the atmosphere.
"The evidence is irrefutable. If we can change the way we farm and the way we produce and distribute food, then we have a powerful solution for combating the climate crisis. There are no technical hurdles to achieving these results, it is only a matter of political will," said Henk Hobbelink, coordinator of GRAIN, in a release.
Governmental policies and trade agreements the world over support industrial agriculture production and the study shows this must change in order to stabilize the climate, Montecinos said. "No governments are talking about this," she noted.
Worse still, many of those policies are pushing small farmers off the land, the ones who are by far the most efficient in terms of carbon emissions and energy use, she said.
Ending such policies and giving the lands back to small farmers could result in major emission reductions on the order of 50 to 66 percent, said La Via Campesina in a news release.
"Such a transformation of world agriculture would not only greatly contribute to solving the climate crisis - it would also provide healthy food for all - as well as provide livelihoods to millions of women and men," the group said.
When asked what he would like to tell the negotiators at the official climate talks, Jean-Baptiste said: "We have to change the model of production and consumption, especially in the northern half of the world."
"Corporate control and concentration has not provided any solutions. Instead people suffering more than ever," Alicia Muñoz from Via Campesina in Chile told TerraViva. "The men standing up there [at the official negotiations] will never solve the problems of poverty and climate change."
"Women need to be involved and part of the solution," she stressed.
- Posted in



9 Comments so far
Show AllIt is time to bury the All Powerful Un-dieing Corporate "Personhood" in order to save this planet.
yes! For more info on this great potential, google LIERRE KEITH, her book and talks. This is an idea to push; it would solve many problems simultaneously. It also confirms where the real threats to our planet & future lie: corporate power.
Finally ! Agriculture gets a hearing on climate change talks. I cannot tell you how much of a relief it would be to reverse the conglomeration mess and give small farmers their freedoms back. Year after year, watching the rural heartland further depopulate into a ghost town thanks to small farmers being run out of their business due to financial persecution from the government shilling for Big Agri has been nothing but depressing. Giving small farmers their chances back so that more of them can arise and agriculture can be decentralized will help cut down the costs of health care, improvement employment and local job growth, and cut down on using fossil fuels used to process the food and transport longer distances. It's like hitting 3 birds with one stone.
Joel Salatin has said much the same of what this article says, except he seemed a bit more optimistic. When I went to his speech at the DC Green Festival a few months ago, he said that if every farmer in America farmed like him, they could sequester all the carbon emitted by man since the industrial revolution began.
Jesus, I sure as hell hope so. And that's why I buy as much of my food as possible from small and local farmers that engage in sustainable practices.
Joel Salatin sounds interesting. I just googled him and he's pretty popular. He has written quite a lot of books and his most recent one "Everything I Want To Do Is Illegal: War Stories From the Local Food Front" looks interesting. On one of the sites, he accurately compared the War on Drugs to the illegality of raw milk. With the way he handles animals on the farm, every farmer doing likewise would produce quality driven meat so that more people can eat meat less frequently. Thank you for mentioning him.
Kill Corporate Personhood NOW.
Although only one man in China, in my experience it seems that every time China has moved away from small farmers the result was economic and social catastrophe. All leaders from Emperor to landowners were held responsible: Confucius and his followers would agree with the accusation of loss of the Mandate of Heaven. Whether earthquakes, weather, natural disaster, overpopulation or corruption, again and again throughout history, when things were not working, peasants resorted to extra-legal violence to expel the Emperor, the symbol of legality, drive the land owners off the land and take ownership of it in family sized portions. Any who resisted were summarily dealt with. In this, more often than not they were assisted by the Confucian scholar class and strangely enough by the military, for if the military command did not their soldiers would.
The Chinese history cannot be understood without this perspective.
But then the Chinese don't expect handouts and don't grant any leeway to the folk who assert control. It is very simple: 'If you are in charge and it is broken you pay' they say. They do not listen to chatter. They stand by no ceremony. If the Chinese controlled America the fat cats of finance, government, the Pentagon and industry would be in the dog box with the mastiffs by now. The peasants not on mastiff duty would not even bother to observe the screaming teeth, fur and blood bath. The would be tilling the soil. Financiers and bankers in the West now would be in the mud of the fields being re-educated or even dead.
The pattern exists today which is why what seems in Western eyes to be the megalithic Communist Party is always so extremely nervous.
Mao, from the scholars perspective, said the peasant was the key to the future. Mao was derided by the chattering classes of the West, including the Marxists. The chattering classes holding the West in their dialectic claim to be the West. Maybe they are indeed and maybe we better have a Chinese peasant's look at them.
If we don't the Chinese will.
That's interesting history, but what are the Chinese doing or capable of doing to remedy or curb and correct the serious problem of poverty in their country today?
This is very good news in all of the respects the article mentions.