Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
In Hot Water: World Sets Ocean Temperature Record
WASHINGTON — Steve Kramer spent an hour and a half swimming in the ocean Sunday — in Maine. The water temperature was 72 degrees — more like Ocean City, Md., this time of year. And Ocean City's water temp hit 88 degrees this week, toasty even by Miami Beach standards.
Kramer,
26, who lives in the seaside town of Scarborough, said it was the first
time he's ever swam so long in Maine's coastal waters. "Usually, you're
in five minutes and you're out," he said.
It's not just the ocean off the Northeast coast that is super-warm this summer. July was the hottest the world's oceans have been in almost 130 years of record-keeping.
The average water temperature worldwide was 62.6 degrees, according to the National Climatic Data Center, the branch of the U.S. government that keeps world weather records. June was only slightly cooler, while August could set another record, scientists say. The previous record was set in July 1998 during a powerful El Nino weather pattern.
Meteorologists said there's a combination of forces at work: A natural El Nino system just getting started on top of worsening man-made global warming, and a dash of random weather variations. The resulting ocean heat is already harming threatened coral reefs. It could also hasten the melting of Arctic sea ice and help hurricanes strengthen.
The Gulf of Mexico, where warm water fuels hurricanes, has temperatures dancing around 90. Most of the water in the Northern Hemisphere has been considerably warmer than normal. The Mediterranean is about three degrees warmer than normal. Higher temperatures rule in the Pacific and Indian Oceans.
The heat is most noticeable near the Arctic, where water temperatures are as much as 10 degrees above average. The tongues of warm water could help melt sea ice from below and even cause thawing of ice sheets on Greenland, said Waleed Abdalati, director of the Earth Science and Observation Center at the University of Colorado.
Breaking heat records in water is more ominous as a sign of global warming than breaking temperature marks on land, because water takes longer to heat up and does not cool off as easily as land.
"This warm water we're seeing doesn't just disappear next year; it'll be around for a long time," said climate scientist Andrew Weaver of the University of Victoria in British Columbia. It takes five times more energy to warm water than land.
The warmer water "affects weather on the land," Weaver said. "This is another yet really important indicator of the change that's occurring."
Georgia Institute of Technology atmospheric science professor Judith Curry said water is warming in more places than usual, something that has not been seen in more than 50 years.
Add to that an unusual weather pattern this summer where the warmest temperatures seem to be just over oceans, while slightly cooler air is concentrated over land, said Deke Arndt, head of climate monitoring at the climate data center.
The pattern is so unusual that he suggested meteorologists may want to study that pattern to see what's behind it.
The effects of that warm water are already being seen in coral reefs, said C. Mark Eakin, coordinator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's coral reef watch. Long-term excessive heat bleaches colorful coral reefs white and sometimes kills them.
Bleaching has started to crop up in the Florida Keys, Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands — much earlier than usual. Typically, bleaching occurs after weeks or months of prolonged high water temperatures. That usually means September or October in the Caribbean, said Eakin. He found bleaching in Guam Wednesday. It's too early to know if the coral will recover or die. Experts are "bracing for another bad year," he said.
The problems caused by the El Nino pattern are likely to get worse, the scientists say.
An El Nino occurs when part of the central Pacific warms up, which in turn changes weather patterns worldwide for many months. El Nino and its cooling flip side, La Nina, happen every few years.
During an El Nino, temperatures on water and land tend to rise in many places, leading to an increase in the overall global average temperature. An El Nino has other effects, too, including dampening Atlantic hurricane formation and increasing rainfall and mudslides in Southern California.
Warm water is a required fuel for hurricanes. What's happening in the oceans "will add extra juice to the hurricanes," Curry said.
Hurricane activity has been quiet for much of the summer, but that may change soon, she said. Hurricane Bill quickly became a major storm and the National Hurricane Center warned that warm waters are along the path of the hurricane for the next few days.
Hurricanes need specific air conditions, so warmer water alone does not necessarily mean more or bigger storms, said James Franklin, chief hurricane specialist at the National Hurricane Center in Miami.



22 Comments so far
Show AllAnthony Watts (Wattsupwithat) will have to investigate those improperly located thermometers.
Google earth has an "ocean" overlay which shows some sunken wrecks, names undersea formations, etc. But recently it has started showing yellow bouy symbols all over the oceans. You click on the bouy and the ocean temperature at said location is displayed. It's pretty neat.
Repower America has set up a hot line to take calls to senators to press for clean energy fighting the 200 million already spent this year by the oil, coal, and gas lobby
Please call 1-877-9-REPOWER right now.
http://repoweramerica.org/
And when the ocean gets warmer, the ocean storms get wilder and ships are endangered.
Just say "El Nino" and everything will go back to business as usual... Oh.... and click your heals three times, close your eyes and repeat your own special mantra....
A lot of heat has accumulated in the oceans due to the radiative imbalance that has been accentuated over the past twenty years by the increasing carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere.
The troposphere has become increasingly resistant to the transfer of surface heat up to ~ 5 mile level where it normally is radiated to space to effect cooling.
Greenhouse gases keep absorbing and reflecting back L-W radiation at lower levels, making heat transfer more difficult to achieve, increasing surface temperatures.
See how much energy that represents here:
http://vortexengine.ca/misc/earth-energy-resources-web.png
A seawater increase of 3C over the top 100 m of the world's oceans represents 20 times the energy contained in all the remaining hydrocarbon reserves in the world.
Within 5 years (crash program) we could convert completely to using this energy source and get off carbon-containing fuels.
The technology is here. http://vortexengine.ca (aka Plan B)
Is there any person or company out there who actually cares about the future of the planet and who is willing and able act positively by sponsoring the development of the AVE??
While this type of energy productions seems desirable on the surface, its still based on the standard entropic model.
There are much better forms of energy production that do not rely on 1800s based standard model entropic principles.
Please see these links on vacuum energy and the Bedini circuit.
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Bedini_SG
http://johnbedini.net/john34/bedinibearden.html
There are home free energy kits and models available right now. But instead of having some calvary (energy corporation) come save the day for humanity, perhaps its up to each of us to take the initiative?
As long as we believe we need some mega-rich corporation to solve the problems of the world, not one dam thing will change.
Instead of spending all our money and resources on money pits. Perhaps start using what money we have that creates new things and energy. I have seen it over and over and over. As soon as people get a dime and 2 cents in their pocket, they're off to the auto dealer to add yet another 6 year mortgage to the gorilla on their back.
If we want this world to change, then we MUST begin with ourselves!
Whew, now I don't have to worry about running my power bill up when I take a hot shower or wash the dishes or my clothes, and then all I have to do is sleep all day while it is hot and stay up all night when is will be a little cooler.
One must always look for that 'happy side' to everything and think positive for corporate sakes.
Looks like sooner, rather than later.
Study the IPCC/Gore chart of Temp dev/CO2 to understand what we face at the defeat and reversal of the spike at the right of the chart.
How do we know that all of the spraying they're doing in the upper atmosphere isn't causing the warming?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n3gKa0z7rjM
What's missing from the article is any discussion of whether the oceans as a whole are warming or cooling in the last few years. It appears the discussion concerns only the upper layers. How do we know warming at and near the surface isn't mirrored by cooling below? Isn't that how El Nino and La Nina work -- warm and cold water exchange places at upper and lower levels of the ocean?
What we need is measurement of oceans at all depths, although that still wouldn't answer all questions. For example: if ocean currents changed so that the oscillations such as Pacific Decadal, El Nino, etc. didn't occur or were dampened, would the result be the same as heating of the ocean overall? How long would it last?
However, overall heating would certainly be a persuasive indication of global warming, if not anthropogenic global warming.
manning;Take just the Currents that travel from the poles to the Equator with the glaciers and ice caps as the cooling mechanism like an air conditioner where it pulls in water instead of air and puts out cold water instead.the warm water flows to the poles near the surface of the water from near the equator and when it gets to the poles the water gets cold because of the glaciers and ice caps circles down deeper in the water and goes back down toward the equator.That is supposed to be the way it works but with the ice and glaciers melting the currents are not working properly and that affects the weather on land and seas.I think that is one of the reasons that cold water fish like cod are disappearing along with over fishing.Have we reached the point of no return?I dont know but it dont look good.Tony
Seems sad that so many of the comments here are of an ignorant slant meaning everything about any warming is based on humans dumping and spraying more crap into the environment which does contribute but NO ONE seems to appreciate the fact of the ICE AGE CYCLES and what contribution that has to any warming and climate change, so all I can say is don't overestimate what we humans are doing with our contaminating the environment but go to NOAA's website and search the 'ice age cycles' to understand better the major reasoning for the warming in this current change of climate.
NOAA, one of the seemingly less 'filtered' governmental sites left to the people.
The above comment makes little sense in the climate debate, only because it was created by an astroturfing boiler room blogger, hired by Exxon/Mobil through their ad agency. There are extremely few real people who could take any of this seriously. Nevertheless we should be kind to the blogger, as he is a working stiff (albeit paid to jam people's minds up).
PaulK (August 21st, 2009 9:31 am) -- What evidence do you have for this? The comments actually seem moderate to me.
Sam, the ice age cycles do not fit this, so there's no particular reason this or other articles should mention it.
If you want to present such an argument, go for it, but just the name doesn't mean much.
Man, you are dumb as dirt and stupid as a stump but mostly because you refuse or belligerantlly did NOT go to NOAA's website I directed to just look up what an ICE AGE CYCLE consists of and just for you itty biiy bird brain IQ of 10, an astonomically determined cycle of an ice age is approximately 100,000 years long with a 90,000 year build up of ice sheets and approximately a 10,000+/- 5,000yr period of warming that melts the ice sheets and just for shits and giggles according to the current verifiable history of ice ages, this planet or the northern latitudes are into approximately 1000 to 1500 year of warming and so combine that with the human pollution I would say things are pretty much on a down hill curvey road into oblivion, so good luck to you and your confederates but even y'all won't be around for the 'next' beginning of the next ice age.
No wonder this world won't last with idiots like this who needs enemies?
"No one could have IMAGINED that CO2 would trap heat in the atmosphere..."
good one, how about those WMD?
I really wish organizations like the AP would give better sources of information rather than anecdotal evidence such as a swimmer at one beach.
I dipped my feet in the water at Popham Beach in Phippsburg, Maine (about 50 miles north of Scarborough, ME) just a few days ago and I can guarantee the water was quite a bit colder than 72 degrees.
Perhaps there was a warm current that was streaming into Scarborough. Or, perhaps there were other variables. Either way, saying that a swimmer was in the water for an hour and a half gives little information. Certainly, nothing verifiable.
I believe in global warming and that much of it is caused by humans, however, we need decent, fact-based reporting that cites where the data is coming from if we're ever to make correct choices.
I agree. The waters in Puget sound are certainly no warmer than ever. I know that world wide temps are increasing, but like you, I want to see data, no suspect stories. Quite frankly, I don't believe that someone was swimming in the ocean for an hour and a half at Scarborough. [I grew up on the Kennebec.] Anecdotes have taken the place of data in much of America's thinking. That is dangerous.
MichaelC
Um, not to be an a-hole, but didn't they show data from NOAA, National Climatic Data Center, the Earth Science and Observation Center at the University of Colorado, etc., etc. addressing the issue with "decent and fact-based information?"
The bit about the person swimming was to show the personal, applicable effects. Of course there are days and areas that the water will still be cool, that's not the point. The point is you never used to experience what people are experiencing now, and they have the scientific data which explains why, and why it's such cause for worry.
"Between the idea
And the reality
Between the motion
And the act
Falls the shadow"