Accused BLM Bid Monkey-Wrencher de Christopher Pleads Not Guilty
Tim DeChristopher pleaded "not guilty" Tuesday to disrupting a Bureau of Land Management oil and gas lease auction in December and pledged to use his prosecution to attack policies he says are allowing climate change to careen out of control.
About 200 supporters rallied for the 27-year-old University of Utah student at the downtown Salt Lake City library and marched with him to the federal courthouse, where he was arraigned and his weeklong trial was scheduled to begin July 6.
DeChristopher faces up to 10 years in prison but he told his supporters that those consequences did not compare with the starvation and homelessness millions will suffer around the world if climate change is not stopped.
"Until [U.S. Attorney for Utah] Brett Tolman can start dishing out punishment penalties like that, I'm not going to back down, and I need to know you are not going to back down, either," he told a cheering crowd.
A grand jury indicted DeChristopher on two felony counts in connection with his bogus bid on oil and gas leases. He submitted winning bids on 13 parcels, though he never intended to pay the $1.8 million owed.
The two counts -- interfering with an auction with intent to "defeat" the federal Onshore Oil and Gas Leasing Reform Act, and making false and fraudulent representations when registering for an auction -- also carry a $750,000 fine.
"They're trying to scare all of you," he told the crowd, many of them carrying posters with his bidder number, 70. "They're trying to discourage all of you from standing up."
As DeChristopher walked to the courthouse at the head of a line of supporters, climate scientist James E. Hansen of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration walked alongside him much of the way. Hansen called DeChristopher's actions "extremely important." Hansen thanked him for providing a platform to test a new legal argument regarding climate change: the notion described in a letter by Thomas Jefferson that "we are using property that belongs to others, to our children and grandchildren and future generations."
Despite protesters' assertion that the case is about larger principles, Utah Petroleum Association President Lee Peacock says it's simply about rules and fairness.
"We abide by the rules that are in place," Peacock said of industry bidders. "We feel like all sides of any particular issue ought to abide by the rules."
He would not comment about DeChristopher's pleas, other than to say they did not surprise him.
Critics have said DeChristopher sabotaged a legal federal proceeding and deprived legitimate bidders of their right to secure leases. Supporters of DeChristopher point out that the lease sale was later halted by a federal judge and 77 of the most disputed parcel leases were halted by Interior Secretary Ken Salazar.
Before starting off on the march to the federal courthouse, DeChristopher attorney Pat Shea urged everyone to obey traffic laws and behave once they reached the courthouse. Inside the courtroom, dozens watched silently.
Shea, a former BLM director under President Clinton, will be joined in DeChristopher's defense by noted defense attorney Ron Yengich.
At the prosecution's request, Magistrate Judge David Nuffer ordered DeChristopher to remain in the United States until his trial, and to surrender his passport to Yengich until further notice. He also set June 22 as deadline for any plea agreement.
Federal prosecutor John Huber said he saw the protest marchers before the arraignment, but he would not comment about their action or the case.
After the arraignment, Shea declined to discuss how the team will defend a man who admits disrupting the auction.
"That'll come out with trial," he said.
Shea told supporters after the court appearance that DeChristopher was meeting with a probation officer and getting fingerprinted. The attorney urged supporters to keep up their efforts. "We're going to have a long march."
Kelli Bellon of Salt Lake City was protesting outside the BLM offices Dec. 19, the day DeChristopher bid on the 13 parcels near Arches and Canyonlands national parks.
"I can't imagine not being supportive of Tim after he's gone out on a limb for us," said the mother of two. "It's huge that he's being prosecuted."
University of Utah economics professor Hans Ehrbar said he was disappointed that more supporters didn't show up Tuesday.
"People are ready to clap if someone else acts, but the urgency has not yet sunk in."
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
26 Comments so far
Show AllNative/Son-
Would/that/there/were/international/standards/which/a/world/body/could/hold/the/Bush/lawbreakers/accountable/
to./DeChristopher/should/be/pardoned/by/President/Obama/if/dully/convicted/in/a/court/of/law./Hope/you're/
helping/in/the/fight/against/global/warming/so/there/will/be/an/inheritance/for/your/people/in/the/future.
Tim DeChristopher Legal Defense Fund:
http://www.bidder70.org
The fact that just a few of the respondents recognized the points of my argument while the others blindly defended the "civil disobedience" aspect ---which only refers to misdemeanors, and this young man aided the prosecution with multiple felony acts---.
So if taking these "progressives" who would defend his actions at their own words, it would be safe to assume that they would be willing to do the same for the "Bush/Admin and followers" and their many crimes against humanity and the rules of law. Bush and his co-conspirators all claim to have made their choices for "the good of America". Or, "to save American lives". This of course opens the door for others to do the same to Americans---for the same reasons.
This is why I often say that " America,my people will ride our horses through your empty cities----and YOU will have emptied them".
Good Luck America, you really really need it.
Since I could not edit---I opted to reply.
If so many of the so called "progressives" approve of the violation of their laws---"if for a good reason of course"----then are they not contributing to their own destruction?
Is this not exactly what so many "Good Germans" did in WWII?
Are so many of you so 'bent and twisted' that you would contribute to your own destruction?
America----if you think the world will tolerate you much longer----ask yourself one very important question.
If Americans can justify so many violations of their own and international law----would Americans tolerate any other country that did the same? They haven't so far. The Americans have attacked several nations in the past on the premise of "the law of self preservation--including all of the Native American Nations.
Do Americans really think that they could stand against the entire world---if the world decided that America was too large a threat to them, and followed the example of America and call into play the "law of self preservation"?
As for my people----we have been here for at least 100 thousand years, and we are the only Nations on the planet to have survived the Americans----we will be here long after you are a vague memory.
"Bush and his co-conspirators all claim to have made their choices for "the good of America". Or, "to save American lives". "
And that's what investigations are for, to determine the validity of these claims.
I agree with NativeSon that it's all too easy to be lured into the Venus Fly Trap of rationalizing leniency for criminals of whom we approve, thus creating a double standard.
There are certainly legitimate reasons to approve of, and sympathize with, one who conscientiously engages in civil disobedience. I very much applaud and admire DeChristopher, and think he ought to be respected and ultimately rewarded for his bold and courageous act. But I can't see how one can argue that he shouldn't have to take his lumps.
If, within the legal process, the authorities choose to treat him with kid gloves (unlikely), or a judge exercises discretion in recognition of DeChristopher's good motives, so be it. But I don't see how due process can, or ought to be, pre-empted.
There IS a sort of win-win outcome available: although I can't be bothered Googling for citations, there are at least two cases, IIRC, one in Scotland and the other in England (?) where a jury declined to convict on the grounds that the purported crimes were justified acts of civil disobedience.
This wasn't some kind of aberration or rogue outcome; in accordance with the law, they had the right to so dismiss the charges on those grounds.
Without having researched the question, I'm pretty sure that US law doesn't have such enlightened alternatives. Which leaves us with "jury nullification", I guess.
I don't particularly trust US judges and juries to take the high road in cases like this.
PS: On the other hand, we have those poor faux-terrorist stooges in Florida being tried for the THIRD freaking TIME because the government MUST have their conviction. Triple jeopardy so far, and no apparent limit to do-overs. I truly hope they are acquitted again; they never should've been re-tried in the first place.
· Yr Obd't Servant
Economic monkey-wrenching is a truly effective strategy that corporations and their government toadies hate with a passion (they are afraid that the general public would do it en mass if they ever find out how easy it is to pull off and how damaging it can be), thus the harsh treatment of Tim deChristopher. I am surprised though that a defense fund has not been established as of yet: the longer this case gets dragged through the courts, the better.
There IS a defense fund set up. Please donate!!
It's here:
http://www.bidder70.org/
native son, what are your thoughts on the oil and gas lease "laws" in place that are designed to protect, not you and i, but the oil and gas companies who, most likely, rammed them thru the pipeline, so to speak?
and mr. obama, surely you have some thought on this matter, no? or like the ongoing crimes against humanity that israel seems to have a get out of jail card on? that's what i thought. mum's the word.
how about this, barackstar, why not just forget about what this young man has done in his recent past? it's time to move forward.
Just so that I understand. And please, if there are any "progressives" out there in "lala land" who can help me understand, flood my reply section with some citations---because I need some help in understanding this particular scenario.
Most of the world "is up on" the Bush administration and its so many "helpers" regarding not only torture, but kidnapping, and conspiracy to commit crimes in other nation's territory, along with illegal wars of aggression and so many other crimes. Not to mention that the violations were of well established laws, already in place, with many other violators serving time in prisons all over the planet, from other countries.
Most of the readers of CD and other "progressive" news sources agree that the "rule of law" should apply to ALL---not just those who are not connected to the "latest set of smirks" elected to power, or appointed to power by the "smirks" who were elected to power.
So here we have this young man, whom many have sent money to ----that is money, during an economic downfall which usually carries more influence from the "intentions"---and many of the "progressives" here on CD are "shouting to the roof tops" this young man's man "good qualities" which were revealed as violations of established laws.
Now, if I remember correctly the news from the last several months revealing that the "Republicans/Bush Regime" committed many offenses against established law for a "good cause" and then were soundly disavowed/disowned and criticized by the very members of this readership who are praising this young man's violations of laws.
So here we have the "progressives" praising the very same conduct that they condemn in others---------------sounds to me like typical conservative hypocrisy----and the same old "Bull Shit" that America has been serving since at least 1776--with the famous "line"---"We hold these truths"
It must be something in the polluted water that makes so many Americans act so stupidly.
And just another affirmation that the USA cannot possibly last much longer, the world has a limited amount of patience----and cannot tolerate the Americans much longer.
Good Luck America, you really really need it.
You can obtain some understanding if you read a little bit of Thoreau's "On Civil Disobedience."
There is a huge difference between "breaking the law" and engaging in civil disobedience against a rigged game to rape our commons for corporate profit. Do you really need someone to explain it to you?
I don't recall the rule of law yet being applied to torture or to illegal wire tapping, where the involved telcos were given retroactive immunity.
However here a citizen is brought to trial for what amounts to civil disobedience, which according to my beliefs is a much lesser category of offence. While I support his actions that does not mean that I disagree with charges being laid for his actions. This case has the potential to test the legal concept of necessity with respect to environmental degradation.
In the following paragraph:
"Now, if I remember correctly the news from the last several months revealing that the "Republicans/Bush Regime" committed many offenses against established law for a "good cause" and then were soundly disavowed/disowned and criticized by the very members of this readership who are praising this young man's violations of laws.
What "good cause" are you referring to?
We do make exceptions for acts of civil disobedience.
And we recognize the failings of democracy when it's individual citizens vs. extremely rich mega corporations.
Here in the Pacific Northwest we have been fighting the BLM and Bush cronies recent attempts to clearcut hundreds of thousands of acres of the last remaining ancient forests ( And will continue to do so throughout the year.) An acre of Northwest ancient forests contains up to 1000 tons of carbon. When it's clearcut that carbon is released within 3-5 years.
It's an ongoing battle with the Oregon BLM (view "Boom, Bust and BLM" video) and it seems that the Obama administration is ignorant of this fact at best. Although some would speculate that the appointment of Salazar as Interior Secretary (in charge of the BLM) and Vlisac as Agriculture Secretary (in charge of the Forest Service) would almost state that the administration is openly hostile to protecting the nation's native forests on public lands.
Visit www.oregonheritageforests.org, www.forestdefensenow.org, www.eco-advocates.org
and come join us literally (physically) or with actions of support from wherever you are.
Thank you Tim DeChristopher for seeing a crack in their armor and taking advantage of it.
Mahalo/for/this,/folks--Obama/needs/to/pardon/Tim/DeChristopher./NOW!!!
Jarhead
He is being prosecuted because some money man could not steal the land then sell it for a big profit and pay the corrupt federal people and judge.
Why are we prosecuting this guy? Let's just have a Truth Commission investigate.
We should be looking forward. This just distracts from important legislative work.
Way to go Tim! Ed Abbey would be proud of you. "Hayduke Lives"
Lee Peacock reminds me all too much of the corrupt Judge Smayles on Caddyshack with his "we abide by the rules" elitist bullshit. Clearly there is a double standard here. Good luck Tim. My prayers are with you.
It's easy to abide by the rules when your money is what made them.
Wasn't this auction canceled?
Right on Tim!