Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates

 

Popular content

Global Recession Emerged From US, Brown to Tell Congress

PM pinpoints poor regulation and sub-prime crisis in America as being at the root of economic crisis

by Patrick Wintour and Andrew Sparrow

Gordon Brown will reject the calls of cabinet colleagues to accept responsibility for the economic crisis when he makes a landmark speech to the US Congress tomorrow.

A statue of George Washington stands in the snow in front of the New York Stock Exchange. A pall of economic gloom hung over President Barack Obama's talks with Prime Minister Gordon Brown, who came armed with a plan for huge reforms of the reeling global finance system. (AFP/Getty Images/Mario Tama) In the speech, the fifth by a serving British prime minister to both houses on Capitol Hill, Brown is in no mood to admit that the British government bears any responsibility for the crisis, insisting it is a banking failure caused by lack of regulation in the US and the rise of sub-prime mortgages.

In an interview in the Daily Telegraph today, the chancellor, Alistair Darling, acknowledged there were "a lot of lessons" to be learnt from a "culture" of limited regulation that encouraged bankers to take risks. Ed Balls, the schools secretary and another close ally of Brown, also admitted "it is clear we were nowhere near tough enough". The comments chime with criticism by Lord Turner, chairman of the Financial Services Authority.

But Brown insists this is not a typical recession caused by a government allowing inflation to rear out of control, and is instead the product of the failure of an international regulatory system to stay abreast of globalisation.

In an interview with National Public Radio this morning, Brown said the global banking collapse needed a global solution. He called for the same standards in banking "of remuneration, accountability, transparency and disclosure all round the world", saying it would lead to a restoration of confidence in banking.

Brown will today hold nearly two hours of talks with Barack Obama at the White House, and take a few questions from reporters. But he is not getting the full-scale press conference with the new president that had been expected by Downing Street. The decision was interpreted as a "snub" in some quarters of the British media, where it was noted that the president was due to find time for a meeting with the Boy Scouts of America this afternoon.

The prime minister's officials played down the significance of the decision, which has taken some of the lustre off his coup in becoming the first European leader invited to Washington for talks with Obama since his inauguration in January.

However, Obama's team pointed out that the busy president did not hold a press conference after meeting the Japanese prime minister, Taro Aso, last week.

A Downing Street spokeswoman said this morning: "We always said that a media event was planned and that's what will happen. The White House will confirm details in the course of the day."

Brown will attend around 45 minutes of talks in the Oval Office followed by a working lunch with the president and his officials.

In his radio interview Brown declined to endorse Obama administration projections that an economic recovery would start strongly next year. "The level of international cooperation achieved in the next few weeks may dictate how quickly we come out of this downturn," he said.

"We are about to put in perhaps the biggest fiscal stimulus the world has ever seen ... and the biggest cut in interest rates the world has probably ever seen. If we can follow that up with greater international cooperation that can make a big difference to our chances of recovery quickly."

ABrown sidestepped questions on whether he had allowed too much personal debt to pile up in the UK.

On Afghanistan, he said the war had changed in two respects: the Taliban were now operating over the Afghan border in Pakistan and the coalition forces were being attacked in a guerrilla campaign using roadside devices. He said there were as many as 2,000 terrorists who used to be in Afghanistan operating in Pakistan, "so we cannot solve the problem without looking at what is happening in Pakistan".

He said Britain had already increased its troop levels, implying there was no need for a further British increase beyond the 8,200 troops operating in Afghanistan already. He also called for a stronger central government in Afghanistan and said he was convinced that the Pakistani government was determined to root out terrorism.

Comments are closed

6 Comments so far

Show All