EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
America’s Predators: Fighting the Afghan War From Las Vegas
In a camouflaged trailer truck in the Nevada desert, a bank of computer screens shows live images of a mud-walled compound in Afghanistan, 8,000 miles away. Those pictures are coming from a Predator unmanned aircraft that you, hunched over the computer in the darkened room not far from Vegas, are flying remotely.
Soon two vehicles stop in front of the targeted mud-baked house. Half a dozen bearded men hurry into the house. Seconds later, you squeeze the trigger in Nevada and a 500-pound bomb flattens the building. Classic Hollywood stuff? Yes, except that this is happening in a real battlefield, and as P.W. Singer, a military expert at Brookings, writes in a new book Wired for War, The Robotics Revolution and Conflict in the 21st Century, war by remote control is growing and leading a fundamental change.
There is a strange disconnect about it. Singer talks of pilots shooting missiles at enemies thousands of miles away and then getting into their Toyotas to be home for the kids' soccer practice. "You are going to war for 12 hours, shooting weapons at targets, directing kills on enemy combatants, and then you get in the car, drive home, and within 20 minutes you are sitting at the dinner table talking to your kids about their homework," he quotes one pilot as saying.
Of course it can all go wrong. Ask the people on the ground in Afghanistan and Pakistan who say missiles fired by drones have often killed civilians.
It is not just military pilots sitting outside Las Vegas flying bombing missions in Afghanistan; there are robots sniffing for IEDs in the streets of Baghdad, and soldiers on the ground flying a whole menagerie of drones over the battlefield.
Small UAVs such as the Raven, which is just over three feet long, or the even smaller Wasp (which carries a camera the size of a peanut) are tossed into the air by individual soldiers and fly just above the rooftops, transmitting video images of what's down the street or on the other side of the hill.
There is more coming. The Pentagon is researching robots the size of flies to carry out reconnaissance work now handled by elite Special Forces troops.
"It sounds like science fiction, but it is fact: On the battlefields of Iraq and Afghanistan, robots are killing America's enemies and saving American lives. But today's PackBots, Predators, and Ravens are relatively primitive machines. The coming generation of "war-bots" will be immensely more sophisticated," Singer writes.
Indeed America is increasingly relying on war by drones. As Danger Room notes, the "big surge in Afghanistan and Iraq has been the astronomical increase in robotic planes." It quotes an air force study to say that there was a 74 percent increase in combat hours flown by Predators in 2008
Is it too much of a good thing and are there dangers here? Yes, there is almost something seductive about this kind of riskless warfare, says Singer. By lowering the human costs of war, you might be tempted into more wars. As General Robert E. Lee famously observed more than a century ago : "It is good that we find war so horrible, or else we would become fond of it."
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

59 Comments so far
Show All"You are going to war for 12 hours, shooting weapons at targets, directing kills on enemy combatants, and then you get in the car, drive home, and within 20 minutes you are sitting at the dinner table talking to your kids about their homework,"
So ameriKan, so primitive so family oriented. The family that preys together stays together. So this is the end result of evolution... humans have become cold blooded reptiles without remorse or feeling thanks to technology.
But let's not forget that we will indeed reap the harvest of poison and hatred that we have sown. Our sins will indeed be visited on our children. Bank on it, predator nation!
israel and ameriKa feeding each others' depravity but don't forget that the rest of the world sees it for what it is.
When will we ever learn that whatever military technologies we develop can come back and be used upon all of us?!!! How hard will it be for some techno-geek to reproduce these technologies and sell them to the highest (or lowest) bidders? What kind of disastrous weapon for surveillance and destruction, for potential attacks anywhere in the world, for complete elimination of human privacy, will be possible with "fly-size" mobile surveillance equipment with bombs that follow! For Christ sake!!!!
"humans have become cold blooded reptiles without remorse or feeling thanks to technology" ... ditto that sentiment Pancho!
How topical, there was a segment on last night's Daily Show about robotic weapons systems. It seems that iRobot, the company that makes the cute little "Roomba" sweeper has been contracted by the DoD to develop unmanned weapons platforms. Samantha Bee from the Daily Show had a great quip, asking if a certain weapons platform might be named the "Doomba".
I say we try for a boycott of all iRobot products.
We are living in the future, I'l tell you how I know. I read it in the paper fifteen years ago. -John Prine
One can only imagine the flimsy character of the intelligence upon which these drone attacks are based. You know, one drug smuggler or tribal chief eliminating a competitor through the good auspicous of a U.S. officer, communicating through two translators 200 miles from the scene. Government officials in both Afghanistan and Pakistan confirm that mistakes are OFTEN made, that "Collateral Damage" is always significant and that for every real fighter killed in this manner ten more enlist.
In regard to General Lee's remark:""It is good that we find war so horrible, or else we would become fond of it." There is absolutely no evidence that the carnage and suffering of the Civil War dampened Americans relish for war. Walt Whitman, visiting the Hospitals in D.C., prophesized that it would but his observations of the stoical sufferings of the wounded and dying and the upbeat spirits of those that survived even the most horrendous slaughters such as at Fredricksburg, told a different story. On the contrary, as far as American committment to war goes the Civil War was ONLY THE BEGINNING!
Is killing people from the safety of your office outside Las Vegas cowardice, terrorism, or both?
Well, you beat me to the punch. I was going to ask the exact same question.
I guess I would only add the words "true blindness" to your list. Warfare is itself blindness, the absolute denial of seeing Yourself in Others. Doing so from such a great distance only compounds that blindness. We truly do refuse to "See". Faceless, nameless enemies we can't see . . . make it all the more easy to bomb the shit out of them.
Furthermore, doesn't this sort of reflect a semblance of proof of just how much a scam these wars are? All those little boys finally get to play with their high-tech toys, just like they did in the safety of their living room with their Nintendos or other ridiculous entertainment systems. AND . . . the military-industrial complex gets to keep feeding the machine and make tons of money.
Coincidentally enough (or perhaps not), as I was reading this article and typing this particular post, my computer was playing the Moody Blues song, "I Know You're Out There Somewhere", which has the wonderful line:
"The words that I remember
From my childhood still are true
That there's none so blind
As those who will not see"
Even in those attacks where no "innocent civilians" are killed, this combinition of cold heartedness combined with sheer cowardice that these remote control attacks entail is stunning. Forget the issue of "innocence" or not. Assuming they are "the enemy", were these "bearded men" (i.e. every man in that region) who I presume weren't even carrying guns, ever given an opportunity to surrender?
And why are they "the enemy" again? They're not my enemy. I have no quarrel with them. Their only quarrel is only with the USAns who invaded their country and want to kill them.
This whole thing is nightmarishly horrific to me. I must be horribly un-modern and old fashioned.
---USAn---
It's strange how 1980s Schwarzenegger movies are becoming prophetic -- Terminator, Running Man (where a fascist government rules what's left of the US after an economic collapse through bread and circuses), Total Recall (where the North is waging war on the South), and Predator.
The article reads...
“…there is almost something seductive about this kind of riskless warfare, says Singer. By lowering the human costs of war, you might be tempted into more wars.”
A stunning sentence because, even in a statement ostensibly arguing against warfare, the implication at the heart of this cost equation suggests that WE are the “humans” and the others, whoever THEY are, don’t count as human in the calculus of war. In order to kill, we must actually deceive ourselves into seeing THEM as inhuman, as objects, in order to bypass—and betray—our own humanity through which we feel our kinship with all people. War may be tempting, but its prerequisite is our constant conscious and unconscious de-humanization of others.
(PS - For a great exploration of this phenomenon, read "The Anatomy of Peace" by the Arbinger Institute)
well spotted
"You are going to war for 12 hours, shooting weapons at targets, directing kills on enemy combatants...
----------------------
How in the world did this country breed so many psychopaths who accept a paycheck for murdering their brothers and sisters half a world away?
Is it all the GM corn and soy we're eating?
Dennis Kucinich's Dept. of Peace cannot come fast enough.
"Is it all the GM corn and soy we're eating?"
No - it's the antidepressants.
I'm sure that Bush was on one or two.
Welcome to the future.
Soon to become a nightmare.
it's a bloody nightmare now..........where have you been??
One of the key points not addressed in this article is that this tele-war is made possible by space-based military communication systems that enable the information from the Predator and the operator to go back and forth.
This ongoing militarization of space is at the heart of long-term US strategic planning to continue and increase our "full-spectrum dominance" over the world's resources.
Remote-controlled Predator drones is only the tiniest tip of the iceberg in the high-tech space-based arsenal that is being planned and developed to enable the US military to enforce access to resources for US-based corporate interests.
Google "full spectrum dominance", "high frontier" or "space 2020" and follow some links. Or go to Obama's revamped White House web site and look over his "defense" priorities, www.whitehouse.gov
Go to the web site of the Global Network for ongoing in-depth analysis of US plans to dominate the Earth from space - www.space4peace.org
Of course, one wishes our friends well and our enemies not-so-well, but the whole idea of making war is to send/deliver ordnance..bombs...not planes, ships or troops.
If the alternative is to actually have soldiers pilots these planes, thereby putting their lives at risk, why is that better?
This is an issue of safety. It's also about putting our technology to good use.
When people say this is cowardly, I wonder if those same people think that using flak jackets and armored Humvees is also cowardly? The point of war is to win, not to arrange as fair a fight as is possible.
Whatever military advantages we have, we should use them, so as not to prolonged the fighting.
Killer idea, Joe. Totally killer.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.", Albert Einstein.
Ed note: white phosphorous, dense metal super weapons, nuclear stick-up, missile defense, bailouts and propaganda!!
Joe, you have a unique talent. Just when my opinion of your politics seems at its nadir you surprise me by sinking to even greater depths.
"Most people would sooner die than think, in fact they do so." Bertrand Russell
At least tell me why you feel that way. If our enemy had nothing but old rifles and broken bottles, should we fight them with the same things? Should our troops in Iraq throw down their body armor because the terrorists don't have any? Do you think the terrorists are going to fight fair?
If all you can do is insult me, then I'll have to assume you are dumbfounded and have no rebuttal.
Would you support flying a drone over cheney's house when they have a Bush Era reunion, because te defintion of terrorist can be elastic but also precise and those guys fit right in? Would that prevent more Americans from dying in war?
I have, any number of times, expounded upon why I think your posts and your politics are empty of logic and devoid of intelligence. Now I find you shedding tears over putting our troops in harms way but avoiding or ignoring the numbers of innocent victims of these sanitary killing machines manned by children who think they are still playing video games.
Did you, I wonder, watch that excellent miniseries, "Generation KIll"? There is one particular scene that sticks in my mind and in my craw as well. The squad of marines is watching a house in the middle of nowhere, children running about playing, women hanging laundry, a normal and everyday scene. Suddenly the whole place disappears in a massive artillery blast. The marines look at one another, one exclaims,"another victory for democracy" and they all depart, badly shaken and another step convinced in the uselessness of violence.
"Most people would sooner die than think, in fact they do so." Bertrand Russell
OK guys . . . as much as I know you don't want to hear this . . .
Joe is correct, at least from a practical, logistical perspective. He does not deserve the spite you throw at him, for he brings up a good point. Just hear me out.
Certainly we can all agree the less death, the better. Therefore, these technologies help prevent the potential deaths of American soldiers, which is a good thing. And certainly, if i was in the position of a military commander or the parent of one of these soldiers, I would want ANYTHING that would decrease the chances of one of my soldiers (or one of my children) being killed. Surely you would agree with that. (And my apologies for calling you Shirley). The point of war IS to win, like Joe said.
And that, Joe . . . is exactly where I turn 180 degrees from agreeing with you any more. The very PROBLEM is that the whole point of war is to win. It reveals all the extreme, worst parts of the "Us vs. Them" mentality writ large. Therefore, any and all advances in technology simply perpetuate the existing problem and spin the world down a vicious cycle of repetitive death and destruction. I disagree with your last statement that it does not prolong the fighting. Quite the opposite, in my opinion. The MIC wants every opportunity to test out its latest little toys, for reasons of practice, profit and, sickeningly so, fun. It DOES prolong the fighting. Yes, Joe . . . I do not support American troops (sorry if that offends you), and I protest all war. I will do everything in my power (short of violence) to undermine and take down the MIC that has this world in such a goddamn stranglehold.
There is an excellent line in the Iron Maiden song "2 Minutes to Midnight":
"While the reasons for the carnage cut their meat and lick the gravy
We oil the jaws of the war machine and feed it with our babies"
All that being said . . . even though I usually don't agree with you, I very much appreciate your comments on this site. You have a lot of people who disagree with you, and I like your courage in continually testing us. Plus, your comments always help ME better formulate my own opinions.
Blessings,
John
"You must unlearn what you have learned" - Jedi Master Yoda
Surely you don't think ALL war is wrong?
What about WWII or the Civil War?
Doesn't there come a point where you have to fight?
What about the Warsaw Ghetto?
BTW I wouldn't have guessed your were an Iron Maiden fan (being into yoga, veganism etc...) Aren't they a "Satanic" Heavy Metal group or am I thinking of someone else?
: ) Not only am I a fan, but I have been a card-carrying member of their fan club for a couple decades. In fact, that is where I get my nickname - one of my favorite albums of theirs is a concept album called "Seventh Son of a Seventh Son". They are bigger now than they have ever been - their concert ticket sales around the world have broken many records (pardon the pun). No, they are not satanic, though the Christian Right would certainly like you to think so. Their drummer, Nicko McBrain, is a born-again Christian.
As far as your other questions . . . my true answers to them would take far too much time and effort than I have at the moment. If only we lived in the same area, we could have a friendly discussion of this very topic over a couple beers. In brief . . . I come from a totally different paradigm. There may be a point at which fighting is realistic and somewhat necessary, but I don't think there is a point where one HAS to fight. Didn't Jesus do a pretty good job of demonstrating that? Both sides in a war think they are right, and thus, both sides then believe there is a time when you HAVE to fight . . . and so they do. The similarities between opposing sides in a war are far greater than any difference they each may perceive. War is a breakdown of our true nature and a failure to see Ourselves in Others.
I'm not sure I would classify the Warsaw Ghetto uprising as a war, though I would agree it was necessary for the people there under the circumstances. And I know it's easy to see some very clear issues of right and wrong with regard to WWII, but I don't think war (and even that war in particular) is as simple as that. Again, not enough time. Sorry.
To be totally honest with you . . . yes, if someone threatened my personal life or that of someone I loved, I would not hesitate to use whatever force I deemed necessary in order to stop that from happening. Likewise, if I were stranded in the forests of Colorado here in the snow, I would most likely kill an animal and eat it for my own survival . . . maybe. Jury is still out on that one - I hope I never have to be tested in that way.
"They hate us for our freedom."
In those isolated cases where commanding officers order their troops into the neighborhoods to make friends with the locals there is seen great success in winning hearts and minds.
This sort of remote control killing wins no hearts and turns minds against us forever.
"Most people would sooner die than think, in fact they do so." Bertrand Russell
"On the battlefields of Iraq and Afghanistan, robots are killing America's enemies and saving American lives... The coming generation of "war-bots" will be immensely more sophisticated," Singer
And that's why we need a global moratorium on technology. This stuff is not saving American lives, on the contrary it threatens American lives.
When you develop these over whelming 'Shock and Awe' robotic weapons, you put in motion three critical realities which will eventually come back to destroy you;
1. Your opponent will develop, copy, steal, your very own technologies and turn them against you. Look at China stealing the blue prints to the US's most miniaturized nuclear warheads in 1999... giving the Chinese a quantum leap in their missile capabilities, increasing the number of nuclear warheads that one of their missiles can deploy from 3 to 15.
2. Radicalizing blowback of victim and world opinion and actions. Does this one really need to be explained?
3. Attacking your unsophisticated opponent with the most sophisticated "war-bots" leaves your opponent with only one option left, to defend themselves with conventional nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons.
Developing these technologies might appear to make us safer today, but it only endangers us more tomorrow. It's a cycle of violence that must be stopped if humans are to survive the next 100 years.
We need a moratorium on all technologies that have any military application. We need transparency. We need diplomacy. We need to tear down the MIC!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.", Albert Einstein.
Ed note: white phosphorous, dense metal super weapons, nuclear stick-up, missile defense, bailouts and propaganda!!
Very, very, very good post.
Exactly. If people would just educate themselves about the horror of war, there would be much less of it. They could start with the World War I poets, then read Stephen Crane and Ambrose Bierce (Civil War), Randall Jarrell, World War II, Brian Turner, Iraq War just for starters, followed by listening and watching every word of testimony by the Winter Soldiers. It's dumb, half-educated people who foment war in every country. As Richard Dawkins recently said in interview with Avi Lewis, "He (George W. Bush) couldn't be as dumb as he looks, but still he must be a pretty dumb man."
Bottle - I'd bet that those who would care have already read the authors you mention, and have also educated themselves about the horrors of war. The rest either just don't care, or actually think war is necessary, and are all for it.
As long as there is racism, intolerance, fanatical religions, there will be war.
i don't know, but i think he's as dumb as he looks................
Picture, if you will, cargo drones flying supplies into remote, cut off villages. Drones flying over fields and planting areas, finding water sources or looking for blights developing in fields.
Picture, if you will, any of our horrifying modern technologies being turned to the service of peace and aid. The fly bot going into the wreckage of an earthquake torn building, searching for survivors.
Picture, if you will, the MIC ever allowing any of their horror toys to be used for the benefit of mankind...
I know, neither can I. Just science fiction, I guess.
minitrue - a beautiful idea. But yes, little chance of MIC allowing them to be used that way - we can hope though.
"...the even smaller Wasp (which carries a camera the size of a peanut) are tossed into the air by individual soldiers and fly..." - "...robots the size of flies to carry out reconnaissance..."
Gee, how long will it be before those "flies" are on our windows, or perched unseen inside our homes? Reality is sounding more and more every day like the science fiction I read for years. Guess it's time to start swatting wasps and flies again.
You got it, that's what the fly camera is really designed for. The goal is to fly down a hallway, into someones office, land on their wall and take pictures and audio from the room. And yes they'd use it against anybody of interest.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.", Albert Einstein.
Ed note: white phosphorous, dense metal super weapons, nuclear stick-up, missile defense, bailouts and propaganda!!
Does a soldier who has no risk to their own life understand the value of the lives of the people they kill, when they show up on a screen like an online combat computer game?
Like other military technologies, will this too be turned onto American streets?
Will this be used to purpetually create false-flag scenarios, keeping Oceania and Eurasia constantly under martial law?
Aloha, salud, lechiem,
- Tobias
http://www.youtube.com/user/tobiasaurusrex
Thanks for the link, Tobias. A ray of hope. I shall pass it on to many.
http://www.youtube.com/user/tobiasaurusrex
We are become evil. How brave. Who's next?
If war becomes too much like a video game, as described in this article, then many people will become too fond of it.
Those who inflict death and destruction from the comfort of their control rooms thousands of miles away from the war zone before going home to spend time with their families don't have to test their consciences because they see few, if any, faces on the receiving end of their work.
Coward Americans Kill Families Eating, Nursing Babies, the Innocent.
Then Rush Home To their Fat Kids, Pizza & More Video Games.
AF scum near me. SUV's. Bush sticker still. Fences to keep the truth out.
Gutless Cowards that are paid to kill women and children.
CD don't stand for Collateral Damage, it stands for Children, Dead.
COWARDS. Not the guts to get in a ring, on a mat or in a cage. REAL CAREFUL to avoid That.
These punks deserve to be doing hard time, turned into b*#@*^s.
This is scary stuff. How long will it be before these drones come under widespread use? Modern technology will soon put these snooping and deadly devices into many hands... devious, perverted, authoritarian and criminal. They will be easily disassembled and secreted. Soon chem trails and UFOs will not be the only things to look for in the sky.
I get the feeling all of you are rooting against our troops.
Here we have a way to protect them from harm, and everyone is calling it evil.
Do you want American soldiers to die?
Do you wan them to get their legs blown off?
We are talking about using these devices in the middle of a war. People are going to get killed regardless of the drones. All this does is protect our troops. What is wrong with that?
This is why it's so important to support the troops no matter how you feel about the war.
The only difference between a jet and a drone, is that if the jet get shot down, an American could die, but if a drone gets shot down, we lose some money. That's it.
We can protect our soldiers from harm by pulling them out of the meaningless "wars" they have been sent over to "fight".
It would also help us (and soldiers since they, I guess, are people too) if the military won't have to build anymore of these fabulous little death machines that keep getting shot down that we the taxpayers have to pay for instead of important things like social programs and environmental issues...stuff that actually affects American lives.
- Insurgent
Joe,
i have to admit, based on your history here, that i am not "hopeful" about you taking my comments seriously.
But i wonder if you can consider for a moment, the role of the United States in the world. i don't mean the role we say we have - i mean, what we actually do.
In the wars we have been involved in since WWII - and the United States has been involved in more wars than any other country on Earth since WWII, and that ain't because fools keep invading us - how many US troops have died? Less than 120,000, pulling numbers out of my head, the vast majority in Korea and Vietnam.
How many Koreans, Vietnamese, Panamanians, Iraqis, and Afghans have died? The number, sir, is well into the MILLIONS. And that does not include those who died in places we didn't send troops to but our hand was in their wars - Guatemala, Nicaragua, Iran, El Salvador, Indonesia, Palestine, Chile, Angola, etc.
And i implore you to follow the links and searches from my previous post in this thread, and do some serious study of what US strategic planning is really all about. Unless and until you do some study of the history and purposes of the US "national security" strategy since WWII, then your protestations about "the troops" ring quite empty.
And if you reduce my arguments to the caricature of "i want American soldiers to die", then please allow me to caricature your position: You, Joe Hope, want US soldiers to murder millions of innocent people.
And finally, the primary difference between jets and drones (addressed repeatedly in numerous posts that you pretend not to understand) is that the drone is yet another in a line of technological "advances" that enable people, and countries, and specifically the United States and US "soldiers", to kill with impunity and without immediate personal bodily risk. Boy, isn't that great?
Especially given the wonderful history of US military practices since WWII, i'm certain that innocent civilians world wide will only applaud this wonderful new tool in our arsenal. Just ask those wedding parties in Afghanistan that we blew up - oh wait they're dead...
How many millions more Joe? "Do you want brides and wedding parties to die? Do you wan them to get their legs blown off?"
As always, hats off to your strictly logical argumentation.
EXCELLENT post!
I was under the impression, though, that the US had sent troops to Guatemala, Nicaragua and El Salvador.
Those were in-the-field School of the Americas "advisors", who provided training, intell, and of course "advice" on how to murder citizens, politicians, and priests en-masse. Ah, Nicaragua, where we had to "free" the people from their fairly, democratically elected officials.
Aloha, salud, lechiem,
- Tobias
http://www.youtube.com/user/tobiasaurusrex
Bizarre it is to be reading these posts on Common Dreams defending the new and improved killing technology.
Of two wars in the Middle East that are the US president's discretionary and preemptive invasions of sovereign nations, many will posit they are illegal and immoral, even unnecessary.
Afghanistan had nothing to do with the attacks of 9/11. And when did Iraq attack the US? How often do these need to be trotted out and retold before they sink in?!
MLK said, "I speak as an American to the leaders of my own nation. The great initiative in this war is ours. The initiative to stop must be ours."
"Somehow this madness must cease." (April 4, 1967)
No, joe, we're rooting for the promised "Truth and Justice" as the American way, not the bombing of wedding parties.
- Tobias
These mad techno types run our world - they have brains of a PhD, the maturity of a four year old, the business instinct of a viper, the compassion of a sociopath.
The universities are distorted to turn creativity and imagination into weaponology. Companies give Powerpoint demos in darkened auditoriums, lavish campaign contributions on legislators and walk away with expensive deals.
Bring the troops home. It is the safest and sanest of all. Use the money to take care of veterans and civilians here. Use intelligence in all the senses of the word to protect our country.
Joe
Joe, zero-troop loss is a failed military policy.
War is hell is a maxim that we should never forget. This is what causes our leaders to pause to think carefully before committing troops.
If war for the US ever became a PS3 game, then we have lost the moral high-ground and any compassion for our declared "enemies". We will have become what we hate.
As a nation, we have completely forgotten the teachings of a great man - Jesus Christ. It is impossible to practice his teachings when the world view is obtained through a TV screen.
If the cause is worth it, it is worth losing men (and women). Such is the horror of war. If war is fought via TV, civilians will lose sight of war, and it would then be conducted with impunity by the ruling elite. The deaths of innocents abroad would never make it to the news without the loss of our own.
Giving one's life for one's country would lose meaning. The consequences of this are too horrifying to imagine.
Never criticize a man until you've walked a mile in their moccasins - Native American proverb.