EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Corporate Win: Supreme Court Says Monsanto Has 'Control Over Product of Life'
- Cornel West: Obama 'Is a War Criminal'
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Disaster Capitalism Strikes as Hedge Funds Circle Near-Bankrupt Municipalities Like Vultures
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
Popular content
Today's Top News
Creating Our Own Hell on Earth
Climate Warming Causes Drought Fueled Mega-Fires
Five years ago my wife and I discontinued using our lawn irrigation sprinkler system. Now we only water our small vegetable garden. Facing evidence of climate change, we are trying to do our part to save water.
With water supplies rapidly shrinking, Governor Sonny Perdue of Georgia declared a state of emergency for 85 counties and asked President Bush to declare it a major disaster area on October 20, 2007. A drought of historic proportions is affecting Tennessee, Alabama and Georgia, as well as parts of North and South Carolina, Kentucky and Virginia. Meanwhile, drought is feeding a fiery fiasco in California.
In the past five days, parts of southern California have become out-of-control, raging infernos as another hot dry summer turns dehydrated forests into combustible tinder‑boxes. On October 21, 2007, CBS 60 Minutes correspondent Scott Pelley reported that "recently there has been an enormous change in Western fires. In truth, we've never seen anything like them in recorded history. It appears we're living in a new age of mega-fires -- forest infernos ten times bigger than the fires we're used to seeing." According to the number of acres burned, 7 of the 10 busiest forest fire seasons in the United States have occurred since 1999 based on records going back 47 fire seasons to 1960.
Pelley said last year's was the worst in recorded history, and this year is already a close second, with two months to go. More than eight million acres have already burned this year. After 30 years of fighting fires, Tom Boatner is now the chief of fire operations for the federal government. He says, "A fire of this size and this intensity in this country would have been extremely rare 15, 20 years ago, but they're commonplace these days, Ten years ago, if you had a 100,000 acre fire, you were talking about a huge fire. And if we had one or two of those a year, that was probably unusual. Now we talk about 200,000 acre fires like it's just another day at the office. It's been a huge change."
Pelley also talked with Tom Swetnam, a fire ecologist at the University of Arizona. Swetnam has the largest collection of tree rings in the world, that go back 9,000 years, with each one of those rings capturing one year of climate history.
Swetnam says recent decades have been the hottest in 1,000 years, with a dramatic increase in fires high in the mountains, where fires were rare in the past. "As the spring is arriving earlier because of warming conditions, the snow on these high mountain areas is melting and running off. So the logs and the branches and the tree needles all can dry out more quickly and have a longer time period to be dry. And so there's a longer time period and opportunity for fires to start. The fire season in the last 15 years or so has increased more than two months over the whole Western U.S.," Swetnam says.
Swetnam contends that climate change -- global warming -- has increased temperatures in the West about one degree and that has caused four times more fires. Swetnam and his colleagues published those findings in the journal "Science," and the world's leading researchers on climate change have endorsed their conclusions.
Pelley mentioned to Boatner that there are a lot of people who don't believe in climate change. Boatner replied, "You won't find them on the fire line in the American West anymore. Cause we've had climate change beat into us over the last ten or fifteen years. We know what we're seeing, and we're dealing with a period of climate, in terms of temperature and humidity and drought that's different than anything people have seen in our lifetimes."
On October 24, 2007, Ellie Venom with the Conservation Voters of South Carolina wrote a guest column titled "Lacking Vision on Energy" in The State paper in Columbia, South Carolina. She is highly critical of Santee Cooper, South Carolina's publicly owned utility, for their proposed construction of a 1,320 megawatt pulverized coal plant in a rural area along the great Pee Dee River. Rather than their pumping tens of thousands of tons of toxic pollutants into the air and water every year, Ms. Veno contends they can invest in efficiency and conservation to meet the demand for electricity. She says, "Our state's lack of vision on energy, whether at the federal, state or local level, is a grim reminder that South Carolina is still wandering lost in the energy dark ages."
When the US Senate tried unsuccessfully to amend the most recent energy bill to require utilities to produce 15 % of their energy from renewable resources like wind, solar and biomass, South Carolina's Lindsey Graham and Jim DeMint voted against it. Ms. Veno says South Carolina politicians have become dependent on campaign contributions from utilities and the coal industry.
Such compromised politicians across our country are ignoring the facts: that CO2 producing fossil fuels such as coal are the primary cause of climate warming; that global warming is occurring at a much faster rate than scientists predicted; that one consequence of global warming is drought; that the US is the primary contributor to the crisis. To save this planet we must each do our part and we must demand that our leaders lead. As we watch the fires in the west, can't we see that we are destroying our beautiful country by our own hand and creating a fiery hell on earth?
Tom Turnipseed is an attorney, writer and peace activist in Columbia, South Carolina www.turnipseed.net
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

37 Comments so far
Show AllEveryone on this planet needs to cut back on everything they do. OPen your cans by hand, shut off constantly on appliances, get smaller cars or bike or even God forbid, walk. Take short showers, forget green grass, give up plastic everything. Unwrap your overwrap produce at the supermarket and hand it to the manager and pack your groceries in cloth bags you bought from home. Make noise about it. And lead by example. Don't wait for others. Oh...and getting rid of a car saved me over $100,000 in ten years.
I find that one way of saving a good amount on your electric bill is to put on the hot water heater only when you really need it..like for a bath or shower. Use cold water for everything else. The water heater and your electric dryer will make that meter spin like a top..check it out for yourself. I shut off the water heater at the breaker box...been doing it for years and have never had any problems.
The planet will respond to the stress of humankind. It's so simple. You can't pave and irrigate and pollute without consequence. Maybe this election, a politician or two will talk about overpopulation? No? Well, the planet will respond. If we do not act in a conscious, conscientious way (with knowing, I guess that means), then we will be treated like bacteria or fungi or insects. We all arise together, we all face the same parameters. We are given a little more choice than sowbugs, but I don't see we've taken advantage of it. Too bad. Breeding like bunnies. But bunnies don't drive Hummers.
I know it is extreme, but I would like to reward one child families and penalize people with more than one child. One child, complete health care and college paid for completely if the child qualifies and lower income taxes. Second child health care but increase in taxes and half the education paid for. Third child health care Taxes go up to 50% of income and no college education. FOurth child taxes go to80% of income and no education. Anyone who wants a big family can pay for it or adopt and meanwhile the children we have would be better cared for then the children of today. We would also end up with a better educated citizenry, Of course it would never happen. Multiple births don't count.
The author says: "To save this planet, we must each do our part and we must demand that our leaders lead."
Seems to me that Republican leaders of recent years in the USA have not been responding well to "demands" for anything from environmentalists. Why don't we get ourselves a clear majority of Democrats in The White House and Congress and try the "demands" on a more receptive audience there?
I like what Tom Turnipseed and his wife are doing to conserve water. I also appreciate dlnelson7's suggestions. On October 15th, 2007, an editorial in the Los Angeles Times stated that "livestock emissions are a leading source of greenhouse gases. One solution may be to eat less meat."
On October 23rd, 2007, an essay in the Los Angeles Times by Dorothy Green and Jamie Simons said that "agriculture uses about 80% of California's developed water." According to "Plant Roots" by Rex Bowlby, 80% of that 80% goes to support animal agriculture.
Eating meat wastes huge amounts of water. It takes 4,000 gallons of water to produce one pound of California beef. Feeding the average meat eater requires approximately 4,000 gallons of water a day. A vegetarian diet needs 1,200 gallons of water a day. For vegans, it is only 300 gallons of water a day.
Eating less meat or, better yet, no meat at all is a major step in the right direction.
Turnipseed calls on us to "do our part." Go vegan for the planet, for your health, and to stop cruelty to farm animals.
New construction should require extreme low-flow toilets and shower-heads; passive solar energy; super-insulation, etc. All automatic sprinkler systems should be banned and in areas of drought all outside watering of any kind should be abolished. It should be illegal to have a lawn in arid climates. We have to re-evaluate everything we do. Areas of Australia have had an extreme drought for years - they have learned alot, and we should learn from them. Bring back rain barrels, too!
dlnelson7- It's not merely the number of people, it's their footprint on the earth. An economic justice leader told me that his children's footprint was 17 times that of people among the poorest on earth.
The US is a country whose story with very generous helpings of myths and lies. But one of the most enduring is that of experimentation, courage, innovation and going where others haven't.
We can get to Hell in a handbasket faster or we can challenge the Bushes, the Cheneys, their corporate backers. They have lied and denied while our planet becomes deep fried.
Americans need to be coaxed away from denial
of a whole lotta things.(Global warming, that our policies are unhealthy for the rest of the world AND us, political leaders have not given us the information for good sound social, economic, political decisions).I know it's a DUH, but we have to make the reality that is intruding on people's mirages into something they can't deny and give them a picture of a world they'd want their children and grandchildren to live in. And unless they expect to expire in the near future, them them too.
We need real changes. But we also have to help the momentum of change by getting people to see that many of the changes aren't painful and that they improve quality of life. For example, car rental services like Flexcar, CityCarshare and others give access to cars without the hassle of owning, parking and maintaining a car. Good mass transit where we feel good after taking a 20 minute ride that we haven't had to wait longer than it would have taken to walk there.
And yes, there are difficult changes, too.
Since the internet seems to be the place of the only intelligent evenhanded discussions, on the topics that really matter, why not have commondreams.org send them to "our representatives" every--day, and remember LOve is the 7th wave,,,,,"
We all need to help but what we really need is some serious changes to the big stuff. Windmill farms not more coal fired plants. Solar roofing being required on all new built buildings and green office buildings. A government program to help already built houses to have solar roofing. Research and development for more efficient alternatives. Regulations which even the playing field for corporations to make their products green.
It isn't the little guy really it is the big guys but people act like they can't be made to change but if they don't the little guys really can't make that much change. Require much more efficiency in cars not teeny incremental changes. Change the cars.
Industry has to be required to go green and fast too. Else nature will force them too but after it is too late.
Merryoldsoul,
I am with you. I would very much like to see our "political leaders" receive common dreams every day. Doubt that they would "have the time" to read them, much less respond.
"A drought of historic proportions is affecting Tennessee, Alabama and Georgia, as well as parts of North and South Carolina, Kentucky and Virginia."
As I read this today, an image of dust-bowl times flashed into my mind. I wonder how we will do in the coming times, when great changes will be required?
I commute to work on the freeway. I can't afford a new car or even to trade to a smaller used car. So I drive my Jeep Cherokee in the right-hand lane at 55 mph. In the rear window I often display a large sign that says,
SLOW DOWN
LEAVE SOME OIL IN THE GROUND
FOR YOUR GRANDCHILDREN
I wish I could do more... but the solution is for everyone to do what they can.
Government could help spread the burden around, but as long as our elected representatives are financed by Fossil Fuels, Inc. Washington will drag it's feet until they've squeezed the last penny out of their coal mines and oil refineries.
The Wall Street Bigshots need time to shift their capital into clean energy industries... THEN you'll hear the cries for more government (taxpayer) assistance for these "new technologies".
dnielson7 hit the issue on the head - overpopulation.
Bill BRG tried to redirect this fact by saying "his children's footprint was 17 times that of people among the poorest on earth" which may be true, but with China and India working hard to catch up with US "footprints", poor nations contribute only a small percentage of the world's population.
You can change people and their lifestyles all you want, impose the most aggressive of technologies, but until the world hits ZPG and REDUCES its population of homo sapiens, global warming will continue to accelerate.
David Suzuki in the 1980s stated that the Earth can sustain a population of 25 million humans.
Every year in West Virginia, 3,000 permits are issued to drill for natural gas or oil, usually to companies that own the mineral rights on land owned by other people, or "surface owners," as they are called. It's virtually impossible to even purchase any rural property that includes mineral rights, as the folks of Appalachia were bamboozled out of the rights to "just what's under the surface" by out-of-state energy companies at least 100 years ago. (Night Comes to the Cumberlands is an excellent book on the subject.)
Much of the time, the companies, like Cabot Gas and Oil and their subsidiaries, never set foot on the properties, pay no taxes, and have no hand in their upkeep. But at some point, after determining that a certain area is likely to produce fuel, they have the right to come onto the land and do whatever it takes to get to the resources.
I purchased my property 26 years ago, and although I was aware that I didn't own the mineral, gas, or oil rights, the lay of the land made it so inaccessible except for the driveway to my home, I was not especially concerned. Besides, it was a matter of either not buying a place here or giving up on the mineral rights. I have only one other somewhat accessible area besides my house site, nearly 1,000 feet below my house, where I had a a water well drilled when I first moved here. It's in a wooded area in a hollow between two hillsides.
Suddenly last spring, I got a call from a company called PetroEdge, an affiliate of Cabot, to let me know that they were going to drill for gas within 300 feet of my water well. I sent objections to the state Department of Environmental Protection (better known as the Department of Environmental Pollution), and got a reply that the permit would in fact be issued because the gas company has the law on its side.
I also had a lawyer check into the deeds, and he found that I had no recourse to stop this drilling. So about 2 weeks ago, it began. Dozers came in and clear cut an entire hillside and moved tons of earth to create a plateau the size of a football field. They dug an immense crater sized pond and lined it with plastic (or rubber) because they will extract large amounts of polluted water and debris from the gas well. They drilled the first few hundred feet and lined it with concrete three times to create a barrier between it and my water well, so one can imagine how invasive it is.
When they finish drilling down a couple thousand feet to bedrock, they will set off explosives to release the gas from the rock. So far, they have avoided the problems that sometimes accompany the drilling, and my water well is functioning perfectly, but the explosives could damage it when they get to that part.
Now, instead of a beautiful wooded hillside, I've got a huge, ugly complex of trucks, monstrous rigs, mounds and mounds of tree roots and branches, ditches, and gravel roads. It's atrocious. They work day and night, making the most godawful noise and keeping the neighbors awake most of the night. The neighbors, who can see what's going on better than I can, had to insist that they bring in portable toilets because they had no facilities the first few days. I assume they were using my woods instead, although I haven't had the stomach to search for evidence.
Since Cabot also owns the neighbor's mineral rights, they probably will be permitted to run their output lines across the pastures to connect up with an existing line across the hollow. That means the neighbors will have to hire a lawyer to find out if Cabot is allowed to do this.
Apparently, I will have to be especially vigilant in order to ensure that my land is restored to its original condition "as much as possible" which includes insisting that they remove the gigantic plastic pond liner, along with the polluted water and debris, and plant something besides wheat or some other grass that usually disappears within a year. If the surface owner doesn't demand it, they just bury the plastic when they backfill the pond because it costs so much for them to remove it. I consider the cost to Cabot to be a bonus along with the inconvenience it will cause them.
I've been told that they will probably be here all winter, raping and pillaging the land to extract their gas and laying pipe to get it to its destination. It's supposedly a million dollar operation.
My only hope is that they don't find any gas. Anyone who believes in prayer is encouraged to pray for no gas. Anyone who believes in good vibes is encouraged to send "no gas" vibes. All concentrated efforts to sabotage the operation with mental energy are welcome. It would be the best of all possible outcomes for Cabot to spend in excess of a million dollars only to come up empty.
In any case, it's not "just" the global warming, the drying up of resources, the forest fires, the melting ice, or the extinction of species. There are small scale damages, too. All over this state, people are being inconvenienced, their land is being ravaged, strangers are crawling over large areas of their property, and they are being subjected to noise pollution, ground water pollution, and danger to their water supply.
I wrote about this on Alternet recently, and someone replied that I must have gotten the land cheaply and you get what you pay for. Holy cow! That's not the point! Yes, I did pay a very reasonble price for my place, but I have worked really hard over the years, built my own home, grow my own vegetables, and live an ecologically sound lifestyle. And since I own absolutely no gas rights, I will have no compensation for this travesty.
There is something very wrong with a government that values corporations over human beings. Either the corporation should be required to pay taxes for their rights, or mineral rights should be revoked after a certain period of time. For 26 years, I've taken care of my place, paid my taxes, and made wonderful improvements on the quality of the property. Cabot did nothing whatsoever, but they are permitted to come here and create this unimaginable destruction. As they say around here, "It ain't right."
"penalize people with more than one child. "
Third world families too?
I was only talking about the industrialized world. Sadly in many developing countries, AIDs , poverty and genocide are curtailing population
I take a modified Navy shower, in cool water. I never liked hot showers anyway. I get my hair just wet enough so I will be able to get lather with my shampoo. Then I turn off the water and shampoo my hair and wash my face. Then I turn the shower on again just long enough to rinse my hair. That gets the rest of my body wet enough to lather up with soap. Then I turn the water on again just long enough to get the soap off my body.
When I drive to work (which isn't often), I no longer take the freeway which was 10 minutes faster but 3 miles longer. Instead of driving at up to 70 mph, I drive at 50 and 55.
LeeAnnG, what a fascinating but disheartening (saddening/horrible, angered, etc) post. I'm sending no-gas vibes/prayers/energy/thoughts to you and to anyone else who is having this happen to them. I had no idea that this was occurring. It is your land, and mineral rights is bullshit. It should be a person's land plain and simple, including what's beneath. It is so wrong, and is just another example of what is happening all over the globe on various scales. Good for you for doing what you can. Just think, karma will come back around to them!
Best of luck to you. Peace~
dlnelson7 October 25th, 2007 1:55 pm re: consequences for having more than one child.
Agreed 100% - but only for 'northern' countries. Heck, let's just start with the U.S.
I was born and raised Catholic and one my my sisters, a die-hard Catholic, has - no kidding - FIVE children between the ages of 3 and 11. All boys. And I wouldn't be surprised if there will be more. The worst part of it all is that the children are for show only - see what good Catholics they are? The children are not abused nor are their basic needs of water, food, cloting, shelter, and education neglected. Sadly however, they are loved only as showpieces, not as children.
Though she's my sister, genetics is about all we have in common. I would, without remorse, have those conditions put on her and her children. And I would, without remorse, have the restrictions put on other U.S. families contributing to the overpopulation of the planet. If they want to have the kids, they must pay more to take care of them. Thank you for finally putting it out there for consideration.
To Daniel David 2:09PM
What the Democrats will do differently?? They are owned and controlled
by big business and big money exactly like the Republicans.
Do not kid yourseld or us or you are just one of those Democratic party
hucksters??
its good to see the conservation efforts people are making. as for overpopulation, i am in total agreement with limiting births. my wife and i decided to not have kids and enjoy taking part in the development of the life of our friend's child. we spend time with the little monster each week and can still enjoy the reason that we got together in the first place, to be with each other. selfish to some, but i think it helps one or two folks we know and some others that we do not. we also try to recycle more, use less and make an effort to increase this pattern.
IN THEIR BACK YARD
To get some action going on the West Virginia mineral rights exploration problem:
Find a well known, upscale gated community with available mineral rights nearby - obscure mineral rights that no one is interested in, so they're cheap. Buy or rent them as a foolish speculator.
Secure some heavy equipment that makes lots of noise. It may be necessary to get some sound detection equipment to demonstrate legitimate exploration.
Claim it's premature testing to measure sonic waves generated by pounding various implements repeatedly into the ground for maximum vibration. Have some people run around in yellow hats with clipboards prepped with responses for questions.
Just when the complaints are at a pitch, stop, but leak rumors of prolonged stages of more testing before final drilling, which may require temporary evacuation of the surrounding community into used FEMA trailers from Katrina.
Reserve seat for crowded upcoming legislative hearings held to change the laws on mineral rights exploration.
I love those great ideas for conserving our resources (all except for not eating any meat) and with enough people doing those things it can make a difference. Unfortunately, the majority of people will not do those things unless they are broke, starving, or they are no longer available. Maybe the best way to limit family size would be to stop giving tax exemptions for each family member. Problem is the Bush Bible bunch are against contraception and abortion all over the world so that is not helping. Another thing to consider is that by reducing production and consumption our national income will drop drastically. How do we pay off Bush`s $10 trillion debt with reduced income?
LeeAnnG, your story makes me grit my teeth. Throughout the state this is happening, and worse where there is coal to be had. Isn't there some5thing you can do, like forming a statewide campaign to change the law? Isn't there a referendum process in WV? So many people are being driven off the land by these ruthless "investors" looking for a quick buck on Easy Street at the expense of everyone else, not to mention the unthinkable destruction to the earth and wildlife. The entire state is being pillaged by Huns. The people must have recourse, something more than the state environmental agency. The people of the state of WV can make their own laws!
Conservation is not the answer...alternative energy is. No, I don't mean silly crapola like Ethanol. I mean real alternatives--bio-diesel, EV cars, wind, and solar.
Also extreme weather is not necessarily evidence of impending doom. The killer drought in California--with its wildfires--was matched by the second wettest year on meteorological record in Texas, with flash floods drowning people in the middle of the summer. It may not be global warming. It could be the cycles of nature. El Nino is extreme...and it wasn't invented by carbon dioxide emissions.
People do need to clean up the planet, to be certain, but stop panicking. There's lots of time to develop a cleaner world.
Peace on Earth and *Freedom* are two areas where panic is much more justified at the moment.
'If you work for a living, why do you kill yourself working?" Tuco from "Buono, il brutto, il cattivo, Il (1966)
I hate to say this folks, but even if you cut all your consumption by half it wouldn't matter because we are exponentially adding people to the planet--thus global warming will continue and increase.
Conservation is very important, but the elephant in the room is population and without slowing growth all our efforts will amount to climate change catstrophe proceeding apace.
Great article Tom. It's getting late, but here is an entry I wrote a short while ago on opednews concerning the subject. When time permits, I would like to comment on Tom's article in particular.
I am happy for Al Gore and I think his Nobel Peace prize is well deserved. Before "An Inconvenient Truth" was released, I never thought too much about climate change. My family and I watched the documentary some time ago however, and as a result of this viewing, climate change and efficient power generation have become acceptable dinner table topics of conversation. Additionally, I spent four months studying solar collectors and different kinds of heat engines-even to a point of designing a diffuse light collector and water boiler that can generate high temperature super heated steam to run a 10 HP electric generator (i.e., more than enough power to run a typical household).
One of the best solutions for clean power generation is to use the sunlight from the vast areas of the American Southwest in conjunction with focused parabolic light collectors. Using heated oil from this system, it is possible to then run hot oil through heat exchangers to heat water into steam, which in turn fuels turbines/generators. Electric power can then be distributed across the entire US at a reasonable cost.
It may sound boring, but making more efficient turbines should be of paramount importance to combating Global warming. Internal combustion engines will never achieve more than about 35% efficiency, whereas Tesla turbines can achieve efficiencies of 60% to 90%. Tesla turbines are also relatively easy to build in a typical machine shop with common tools.
One mostly unrecognized fact is that rockets are the most efficient heat engines (97%). Recently, I had the idea of using a miniature rocket engine with kerosene permeated with micro bubbles of air (to use as an oxidizing agent) to fuel a Tesla turbine. Using this method, I think it would be possible to more than double the efficiency of current car engines. I've talked with the co-owner of the company that I work for about trying this (we currently make fuel pumps for large machinery), and he was at least open to the idea.
LeeAnnG
I have read about the topping of the mountains which is awful enough but your comment on how it has impacted your life in your own home really leaves one with a taste of how insignificant the individual or nature is in the eyes of these behemoth corporations. Very sad.
The fires in California, well what can you say? California, just like Florida, has large areas of vegetation that were adapted to periodic burning well before humans arrived and man's efforts to control and quell these natural patterns only cause the eventual fires to be even more massive. The slash pine ecosystems throughout Florida and Southern Georgia require fire in order for their cones to release their seeds as just one example.
Global warming is a problem that is affecting all of us. How much it had to do with the fires, no one can say with certainty. Perhaps it was a variable, who knows, it's not really important as the party is about to end as hubcap_halo and others say without control of human over population. None of this talk about what each individual can do really matters as long as there is no discussion about over population of Homo sapiens. And there won't be as we as a species are collectively in denial about the Biodiversity Holocaust we are causing while continuing to grow our own species exponentially.
With exponential growth, by the time species with limited capacity to understand start noticing the warning signs, it is already too late. This 8 minute video "Are Humans Smarter Than Yeast?" explains this incapacity to understand the concept of population "overshoot" of any monoculture such as our own until the symptoms appear, and then it's usually too late.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hM1x4RljmnE
I think that population has to be controlled world wide or famine, disease and natural catastrophes will do it for us. I have absolutely no issues with what China is doing. We need more 1 child families. We are beyond the carrying capacity of this world and even redistribution of resources from the rich to the poor will not solve the problem. The overarching global issue underlying many resource conflicts in the world is overpopulation.
Freia getting out the vasectomy scissors.
Paul from Texas, we can get 400 to 800 mpg per passenger with high speed electric rail. We can get 200 mpg with 800 lb cars driven by 20 hp series hybrid diesel electric power. A person may limit miles driven to 2000/year so that's 10 gal of biodiesel/year, so at 500 gal/acre that's 50 drivers/acre, so with 100 million drivers that's 2 million acres. This is a tiny fraction of the 300 to 350 million acres the US currently dedicates to production of beef/dairy/pork/poultry feed.
Mark, annual energy consumption in the US is 2.93e13 kWh (100 quad BTUs), which could be completely supplied by solar thermal fields covering 7.7 million acres, or 0.4% of US (minus AK) land area. This scheme utilizes most of the rankine cycle waste heat in industrial processes and sector heating/cooling and schedules most heavy industry to summertime when the majority of energy is available. Diversity in energy sources makes sense of course (25% solar, 25% wind, 25% biofuels, 25% other) so the solar thermal field area may be cut by four to 1.9 million acres, or 0.1% of US (minus AK) land area.
This is 1/184 current crop area, 1/395 current grazing area, and 1/63 current developed area. The materials requirement is significant, but 1/4 current materials in private cars. Cut our mindless energy consumption by four and total energy costs drop to very modest. We nearly wipe out carbon emissions and other pollutants, and wipe out our dependence on capitalists, their mindless militarism, and their despot friends.
What to do?
Maybe we could stage a non-violent protest and hold up little hand-painted signs: Honk if you love the Earth!
Imagine an endless line of Hummers driving by, and all of them honking like crazy!
Thanks to all for the supportive comments. I have one correction to make - it appears that the mineral rights owners do pay taxes. I have not researched this extensively, but I got a Surface Owners Rights guide from SOROWV (Surface Owners Rights Organization of WV) and found some statements that say mineral rights can be purchased if the state is foreclosing due to non-payment of taxes, so I assume this means there are separate taxes for mineral rights. One small thing I don't have to be indignant about.
According to WV law, the mineral rights owners have the upper hand over surface owners. There are efforts to change this, but it's a difficult process. And this one is too outrageous to contemplate: if a surface owner's access to his or her house is in danger due to the location of the gas or oil well, this is not grounds for preventing the drilling! Unbelievable! I just read that today, too.
Here's another interesting fact. West Virginia, a relatively small state in size, has more oil and gas wells than any other state in the union except for Texas! There are idle and capped wells all over the state, too. I don't know whether they are mostly productive wells being kept as "money in the bank" or if they are at the end of their useful life.
It was a travesty that energy companies were permitted to come into Appalachia at the end of the 19th and beginning of the 20th centuries and trick the people into the sale of mineral rights. It should not have been legal, obviously. The locals thought the city folks were just plain stupid for not realizing they'd have to go through the surface to get to what's underneath. Of course, they didn't understand that the contracts of sale they signed specifically stated that the companies could do whatever they needed to do to get under the surface.
Individual stories do touch a nerve, but my situation somehow exemplifies the entire state of affairs when it comes to the battles between making money and protecting people and the environment.
In a few months, the gas well will be dug, the pipeline will be run (across my neighbors's pastures because Cabot owns their mineral rights too), and the operation will be complete except for general upkeep.
But for millions of human beings, the effects of eviscerating the land for the sake of profit, the pollution of our streams, land, and air, global warming, and other catastrophes will continue.
If thousands of West Virginia victims of large energy corporations cannot stop the onslaught, I'm really not very optimistic about anything we can do.
I received this email through one of my list-serves.
'The practice of mountain-top removal for stripmining and coal production is about to be made much simpler for coal companies. This is because the Bush Administration, through the Office of Surface Mining (OSM) is seeking a revision to the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 -- this rule would repeal a regulation which protects streams from coal mining activities by weakening the mandate that a 100-foot buffer zone be built around them.
'Should this ruling go through, it will both ease environmental protections and expand mountaintop removal coal mining specifically in areas rich in headwaters; the OSM itself states that it "continues to believe prohibiting
all surface activities in the stream buffer zone would not be a viable alternative because it would significantly affect coal recovery in areas with extensive water resources in a way not required by the SMCRA."
'The effects of mountain-top removal on aquatic life through the dumping of mountain 'overfill' or 'spoil' into streams cannot be understated, nor can the effects of complete removal of entire forest ecosystems along with topsoil and bedrock.
...
'Currently, there is a public comment period open until NOVEMBER 24th through the OSM () on this ruling. You can also send a letter to your congressperson about this issue, and in support of the Clean Water Protection Act, HR 2169 through the following website:
"
Interesting stats, rtdrury @ 2:35 am, can you cite references? Or are they the result of your own calculations.
I came to a related conclusion with regard to Florida. I estimate that 1 acre of solar collector functioning at 20% efficiency generates some 75 times as much energy as an acre of sugar cane converted to ethanol. Or about 150 times as much energy as an acre of corn converted to ethanol. This energy would be generated for 30-40 years without the farmer lifting a finger: no farm machinery, no fertilizers, no pesticides, no irrigation, no water pollution, no subsidies and no undocumented labor.
But instead of pursuing that course, we're talking about increasing the subsides for corn enthanol.
By the way, the last edition of Nova dealt with the future prospects of solar energy.
It mentioned that Germany has created 170,000 new jobs manufacturing PV collectors. Gray, cloudy Germany is on track to obtain 30% of its energy needs from solar by year 2020.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/transcripts/3406_solar.html