EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Corporate Win: Supreme Court Says Monsanto Has 'Control Over Product of Life'
- How the US Turned Three Pacifists into Violent Terrorists
- Cornel West: Obama 'Is a War Criminal'
- Revealed: How US State Department 'Twists Arms' on Monsanto's Behalf
- Victory in Seattle as Teachers Win Battle in Standardized Test Boycott
Popular content
Today's Top News
Atrocities in Afghanistan: A Troubling Timetable
Peace activists can hasten an end to the U.S. war in Afghanistan by demanding a timetable for U.S. military withdrawal. A bill in the U.S. Congress introduced by Representatives McGovern and Jones, requires such a timetable. In the Senate, a similar bill has been introduced by Senator Feingold. Arguments in favor of a timetable for withdrawal of U.S. forces from Afghanistan should include readiness to examine disturbing patterns of misinformation regarding U.S./NATO attacks against Afghan civilians.
It is worth noting that even General McChrystal acknowledges that U.S. forces have killed civilians who meant them no harm. During a biweekly videoconference with US soldiers in Afghanistan, he was quite candid. "We've shot an amazing number of people and killed a number and, to my knowledge, none has proven to have been a real threat to the force," said General McChrystal. "To my knowledge, in the nine-plus months I've been here, not a single case where we have engaged in an escalation of force incident and hurt someone has it turned out that the vehicle had a suicide bomb or weapons in it and, in many cases, had families in it."
Those families and individuals that General McChrystal refers to should be our primary concern. We should try to imagine the sorrow and horror afflicting each individual whose tragic story is told in the "timetable" of atrocities committed against innocent people. How can we compensate people who have endured three decades of warfare, whose land has been so ravaged that, according to noted researcher Alfred McCoy, it would cost $34 billion dollars to restore their agricultural infrastructure. We should notify our elected representatives that the $33 billion dollar supplemental funding bill sought by the Obama administration to pay for U.S. wars in Afghanistan and Iraq could be directed toward helping Afghanistan replant its orchards, replenish its flocks, and rebuild its irrigation systems. We should insist on an end to atrocities like those which follow.
The list below describes, in part, the suffering and agony that people in Afghanistan have endured since April, 2009. To focus on this list doesn't excuse atrocities committed by Taliban fighters. It does indicate our own responsibility to urgently educate others and ourselves about a deeply disturbing pattern: U.S./NATO officials first distribute misleading information about victims of an attack and later acknowledge that the victims were unarmed civilians.
Date: April 9, 2009
Place: Khost Province, Ali Daya
Circumstances: U.S. forces were positioned on the rooftop opposite the home of Brigadier Artillery officer Awal Khan. In a night raid, U.S. forces burst into Awal Khan's home. Awal Khan was away from home. His family members ran to the rooftop, believing that robbers had entered the home. When they emerged on their rooftop, U.S. forces on the opposite roof opened fire, killing Awal Khan's wife, his brother, his 17 year-old daughter Nadia, and his fifteen year-old son, Aimal and his infant son, born just a week earlier.
U.S. /NATO initial response: April 9, 2010, coalition forces issue a statement that the four people killed by troops were "armed militants." Later that same day [another statement] (http://washingtonindependent.
U.S. /NATO acknowledgement that the people killed were unarmed civilians: The Times of London reported the following, on April 11, 2009: The US military conceded that its forces killed the civilians in error during the night-time raid that targeted the neighbouring compound of a suspected militant. The father of the dead family is a lieutenant-colonel in the Afghan Army fighting the Taleban in the restive province of Ghazni. The US military reported that two males, two females and an infant were believed to have died in the incident, and two other women were wounded. A relative of the dead family told reporters that the dead infant was a boy born last week. "This was a terrible tragedy," a US spokesman, Colonel Greg Julian, told The Times. Date: December 26, 2009 Place: Kunar Province Circumstances: In a night raid, U.S. forces, claiming to attack a bomb-making factory, attacked a house where eight youth, aged 11-18, were sleeping. They pulled the youngsters out of their beds, handcuffed them, and executed them. Villagers said that seven of those killed were students and one was a neighboring shepherd. U.S. /NATO acknowledgement that the people killed were unarmed civilians: February 24, 2010--U.S. forces issued an apology, admitting that the U.S. had killed seven schoolboys and a neighboring shepherd. Date: February 2010 Place: Helmand Province During this month, U.S./NATO forces launched a military offensive against three hamlets in the Marja district. Researcher Prof. Marc Herold presents [a detailed summary and analysis] (http://www.rawa.org/temp/ Date: February 12, 2010 Place: Paktika Province Circumstances: In a night raid, U.S. forces attacked a home where 25 people, 3 of them musicians, had gathered for a naming celebration. A newborn was being named that night. One of the musicians went outside to relieve himself. A flashlight shone in his face. Panicked, he ran inside and announced that the Taliban were outside. A police commander, Dawoud, the father of the newborn, ran outside with his weapon. U.S. forces opened fire, killing Officer Dawoud, a pregnant mother, an eighteen year old, Gulaila, and two others. U.S. / NATO initial response: February 12, 2010--U.S. forces claimed that the women had been killed earlier, in an honor killing. Nato's initial press release bore the headline: "Joint Force Operating in Gardez Makes Gruesome Discovery." The release said that after "intelligence confirmed militant activity" in a compound near a village in Paktika province, an international security force entered the compound and engaged "several insurgents" in a firefight. Two "insurgents" were killed, the report said, and after the joint forces entered the compound, they "found the bodies of three women who had been tied up, gagged and killed." March 16, 2010--The UN issued a scathing report, stating that the U.S. had killed the women. Villagers told Jerome Starkey, reporting for the Independent, that U.S. troops tried to tamper with evidence by digging bullets out of the womens' bodies and out of the walls. U.S. /NATO acknowledgement that the people killed were unarmed civilians: April 6, 2010--Almost two months later, the Pentagon was finally forced to admit that international forces had badly bungled the raid that night in Paktika, and that U.S. troops had, in fact, killed the women during their assault on the residence. One of the women was a pregnant mother of ten, and the other was a pregnant mother of six children. (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/ Date: February 21, 2010 Place: Convoy en route to Kandehar Circumstances: U.S. aerial forces attacked a three-car convoy traveling to a market in Kandehar. The convoy had planned on continuing to Kabul so that some of the passengers could get medical treatment. At least three dozen people were passengers in the three cars. The front car was an SUV type vehicle, and the last was a Land Cruiser. When the first car was hit by U.S. air fire, women in the second car jumped out and waved their scarves to indicate that they were civilians. U.S. helicopters continued to fire rockets and machine guns, killing 21 people and wounding 13. U.S./NATO initial response: February 22, 2010--The day after the attack, the U.S.-led military coalition said that NATO forces had fired on a group of "suspected insurgents" who were thought to be on their way to attack Afghan and coalition soldiers a few miles away. When troops arrived after the helicopter strike, they discovered women and children among the dead and wounded. (http://www.mcclatchydc.com/ Feb 24, 2010--General Stanley McChrystal delivered a videotaped apology. Date: April 12, 2010 Place: Kandahar Circumstances: According to the New York Times, "American troops raked a large passenger bus with gunfire near Kandahar on Monday morning, (April 12)." The attack killed five civilians and wounded 18. (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/ Initial U.S./NATO response: [A statement]( http://www.isaf.nato.int/en/ U.S. /NATO acknowledgement that the people killed were unarmed civilians: April 12, 2010--"ISAF deeply regrets the tragic loss of life in Zhari district this morning. According to ISAF operational reporting, four civilians were killed, including one female, and five others were treated for injuries at the scene of the incident today. Upon inspection, NATO forces discovered the vehicle to be a passenger bus." (http://www.isaf.nato.int/en/ April 13, 2010--The New York Times reported that "a military spokeswoman confirmed that a convoy traveling west, in front of the bus, opened fire, but said the second convoy was traveling east toward the passenger bus. She also said the driver of the bus was killed. A survivor, however, identified himself as the driver and said he did not violate any signal from the troops. ‘I was going to take the bus off the road,' said the man, Mohammed Nabi. ‘Then the convoy ahead opened fire from 60 to 70 yards away,' he said." (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/ Date: April 20, 2010 Place: Khost Province Circumstances: A NATO military convoy attacked a car approaching a checkpoint, claiming that the car sped up after being warned to stop. Four young men were killed. [According to the New York Times,] (http://www.nytimes.com/ Initial U.S. / NATO response: April 21, 2010--From the New York Times: "Without offering proof, NATO described the dead as two insurgents and their "associates." In a statement on Tuesday, NATO said the vehicle ignored warning shots and accelerated toward the military convoy. But the statement did not challenge the Afghan account that no weapons were found in the vehicle." (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/ U.S. /NATO acknowledgement that the people killed were unarmed civilians: April 22, 2010--NATO acknowledged Wednesday that four unarmed Afghans who were killed this week when a military convoy opened fire on their vehicle were all civilians, correcting an earlier claim that two of the dead were ''known insurgents.'' (http://www.nytimes.com/ Date: April 28, 2010 Place: Surkh Rod district, near Jalalabad Circumstances: According to Safiya Sidiqi, a member of the Afghan parliament, dozens of Afghan and U.S. soldiers entered her family home, blindfolded and handcuffed men and women, and killed her brother-in-law, Amanullah, a 30 year old car mechanic with five children. "They shot him six times. In his heart, in his face, in his head," Sidiqi said on Thursday, April 29th. Both legs were broken. (http://www.washingtonpost. Initial U.S./NATO response: April 29, 2010--An Afghan-international security force killed one armed individual while pursuing a Taliban facilitator in Nangarhar last night. (http://www.isaf.nato.int/en/ U.S. /NATO acknowledgement that the person killed was an unarmed civilian: None, as yet. The case is still under investigation.
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



31 Comments so far
Show AllMany of these incidents reek of political assassinations or murdering relatives of uncooperative politicos.
Imagine the intensity and pervasiveness of insanity among USA troops that are able to kill, in cold blood, women waving scarves.
The USA is an imperial nation with a military largely composed of serial murderers.
Profound thanks to Kelly & Pearson for providing a partial list of atrocity incidents in Afghanistan.
Jim Shea
America the beautiful has been involved in crimes against humanity from day one.
Native Americans were the first victims and it has never stopped.
Over two million Vietnamese were killed when they posed no threat to the American people.
But one of the turning points in Nam was when grunts started fragging officers.
The Vietnamese now put the figure at 4.5 million.
350,000 Cambodians
300,000 Laotians ( in the most intensely bombed country on earth and it was kept secret all the time it occurred, no one Laotian dies every two days from USA munitions.
And having the horrors of dead bleeding bodies coming into living rooms every night on the news, made it a little harder to ignore or forget what was going on. And yet, it still took almost 10 years of killing and dying for it to come to an end - draft or no draft. Even disturbing the Amerikan people with flag-draped coffins is a no-no in this sanitized for public consumption atrocity people still try to defend. Though our horror as we watch our government and soldiers slaughter the innocent is nothing compared to the Afghanis and Iraqis experience (and name-your-war others) some of us are just as helpless in some ways. We march, we protest, we write letters, we vote, we scream, we cry with each atrocity, but the larger population either doesn't care or actually comes up with patriotic bullsh*t to defend the killing. America still is the number one terrorist organization in the world.
Thank God we have such courageous witnesses to the ravages of war like Kathy and Dan and their compatriots with The Voices of Creative Nonviolence. They are doing great work as witnesses in Iraq, Palestine and the Gaza Strip as well. To those who wish, send them a check at The Voices, 1249 W. Argyle Street, Chicago, IL 60640
Ford:
Thanks for the updated body count.
Torturing captives or throwing them out of helicopters was very common in Nam.
None other than Colin Powell played a role in the My Lai cover-up. And he then moved up the ladder, all the way to the White House and is a so-called role model for other blacks.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/My_Lai_Massacre
In his report Powell wrote: "In direct refutation of this portrayal is the fact that relations between American soldiers and the Vietnamese people are excellent."
My Lai was just one of many war crimes in Nam...etc.
"Peace activists can hasten an end to the U.S. war in Afghanistan by demanding a timetable for U.S. military withdrawal"
You got to be kidding.
"Please, Mr. Obama, we DEMAND a time table, you know, like for when the killing and torturing is going to stop. Can you give us a date maybe? Pretty please."
One suggests some of you buttodown suburban "Peace Activists", male and female, start learning to piss in public. It will get some of your School Bus yayas out and do you a world of psychological good.
Also learn to piss in the right direction.
America commits these atrocities not because its people are crueler or more insensitive than others, but because it has the power to do so. Economically and militarily America, at present, dominates the world. However, its power is rapidly declining. And with the legacy of hatred it has left in its wake, Americans may soon find themselves the victims rather than the perpetrators of violence. If/when that happens,rather than complain, we should remember our silence when others were suffering. As MLK Jr said "He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it. He who accepts evil without protesting against it is really cooperating with it."
Brothers Karamazov?
"America commits these atrocities not because its people are crueler or more insensitive than others ..."
I'm not so sure about that. Lack of sensitivity to the suffering of others may not be an inherent American trait, but it sure does seem to be heavily promoted as a part of the American exceptionalist "winning-is-everything" culture and widely accepted as such, not just amongst U.S. military robots. In fact, America takes considerable pride in its "robustly competitive" and aggressively macho societal behavior and often pokes fun at other cultures for being "excessively" sensitive and polite by comparison.
Those who cause the most suffering WILL suffer the most- fascist amerika is heading for enormous suffering !
Chicken egg. Let us apply that logic to the Capitalist and the most successful amongst them.
They become ruthless and pyschopathic because they are very wealthy or...
They are very wealthy because they are ruthless and psychopathic.
Maybe the reason why the United States of America is the worlds Superpower, is because they are more brutal and ruthless then other nations.
This is what took Rome to to the height of its powers. When Carthage Collpased they sold all the peopl einto slavery and then sowed the lands of Carthage with salt so nothing would ever grow there again.
Very briefly, no.
And by the way, if one wants to make an ancient analogy, the US is closer to Carthage than it is to Rome in most ways.
Very briefly, no.
Years ago I had a disturbing insight at a 10-year HS reunion: I had known all the guys in jeans and sneakers, but by 28 years of age, the dentists looked like dentists, and the desk jockeys looked like desk jockeys.
On inspection, the dentists also sounded like dentists, and the desk jockeys sounded like desk jockeys.
If you hire people as mercenaries,
hire them for cruelty,
hire them with more money
than someone else can hire them,
hire more,
pay them more so they will willingly do worse --
that becomes a very bad thing,
and a bad thing that was not there before.
It would be silly to imagine that Americans were somehow intrinsically crueler than other peoples. At the moment, sadly, we seem to be subjected to more thorough training.
So how did pissing come in to the discussion ?
A PTSD Nam era person I knew...green beret no less...told me about torturing a VC. The captive was buried alive with a hose for a breathing tube. Every so often our brave warriors would put a funnel in the breathing tube and piss away, much to the surprise the fellow underground.
The buried "prisoner of war" died of course. The purpose of the cruelty was to encourage other captives to talk. They then were tortured to death one at a time.
Turned out none of them had "actionable intelligence".
Most thought, "What the hell, they're just gooks".
Nothing has changed since the days of Johnson and Nixon. As the girls in Bangkok used to say, "same same."
Bummer Obomber is nothing but a corporate oreo, a tool of the fascist establishment.
Or, in other words, a cheap Chicago con-artist and merciless war criminal living at our expense in the White House, Washington D.C., the global epicenter of terrorism.
God Bless Amerika
Credit where credit is due--brilliant rebranding, and the US is still virulently racist so that it would succeed.
Among the first of the (forgotten) atrocities in Afghanistan was the cluster bombs that just happened to be the same size and color yellow as the 'food aid' packets (containing Pop-tarts (tm) no less...). You literally took your life in your hands if you went out to gather the US dropped 'aid'.
your work and tireless advocacy for justice is appreciated. Your plea for helping a small minority of reps to push for a withdrawal is tired. You and the majority of common dreams readers know this constant email and calling and demonstrations ...does nothing.
we have to have mass organization outside the two parties...for general strikes....for nonviolent (but which will cause violence by the police) direct action.
Please.
I remember hearing the same thing under Carter, and Reagan. HOW long will it take 'americans' to learn...you have a great responsibility to stop this madness.
begging politicians does not do the job.
You have to shut down cities...you have to do mass organizing for direct action.
you have to ,....at the least.....threaten revolution.
my god.
such fealty to the very systems and institutions that cause mass murder...as if moralistic pleas can change them. Power only concedes to power.
bottom up direct democracy....and attack.
Kudos to Tommy......one of the most brilliant and accurate analysis I've seen here on Common Dreams in some time.
HOwever, while the concept is right on the money, who the hell has the courage to actually do something about it?
Terror aims to reduce the civilian population to quivering obedience. It works, which is why the U.S. uses it constantly.
Yet they're not obeying, or not well.
Why would that be?
Afghans, strangely, do not like people invading and occupying their lands, so they respond as Americans would like to think they, themselves, would react to invasion and occupation. Americans, of course, are in no way like Afghans, since they are perfectly willing to kiss the asses of bosses just to hold on to a wage slave job.
Let us then praise Afghan freedom fighters and patriots who resist the American "heroes" who kill Afghan families from a safe 30,000 feet or who guide drones from the safety of North Dakota.
And, if what is written here can be so clearly documented, can you just imagine how many other instances of needless killings of civilians by US & NATO forces there have been.
While I admire Kelly & Pearson for their good intentions, the idea of representing some cause that advocates non-violence probably has them living somewhere in the "Twilight Zonew", obviously out of touch with reality.
Short of something like a military coup and a subsequent takeover of the U. S. government (which I'm not about to suggest), I do not see any hope on the near or far horizon for this country to cease it's warmongering actions
WIth the financial problems this country has on a domestic basis, I know we must be the laughing stock of the civilized world. We're either wasting billions of taxpayers dollars in places like Iraq & Afghanistan (and perhaps next in Iran if Israel has their way), or attempting to buy friendship with foreign aid.
All the while, we're being supported by China.....Anyone ever stop to wonder what would happen if their government said tomorrow. "Not one more dollar"....THINK ABOUT IT.
Where is the old Dennis Kucinich who would always say "out of Iraq now !" ? Never mind, I guess he's going for the "timetables" too just like he did on health care. So much for any principled Democrats.
Does anyone really want to "bring the troops home?" Take away the guns and gunships from our sadistic killers over there and leave them to fend for themselves.
Since the 2003 War in both Iran and Afghanistan, Exxon-Mobile, Chevron and Gulf are extracting 75 percent of Iraqi oil for the next 30 years. I was at the anti-war rally in 2004, the rally of people and protesters marched in front of Madison Square Garden where the Republican Convention was being held, re-nominating George W. Bush for another tern and to run against John Kerry (the Democratic nominee) and myself. There were many protestors had signs that the war (people were shouting) is about oil and not about terrorism.
The war in Afghanistan is 7 years old now, and the respective historical comparisons to Vietnam are astounding: Oil, Opium/heroin trade (Vietnam and the heroin triangle of Laos and Cambodia), the war escalating to Pakistan and the oil rich border regions of Kashmir, Pakistan and India (the war in Vietnam, in fact, escalated into Laos and Cambodia), the human rights violations in Afghanistan as this article articulated so well (in Vietnam it was the Phoenix program, and, of course Mai Lai massacre).
The War in Afghanistan is about pipelines: CEYAN-TBILSIS-BAKU-Caspian Sea-Turkmenistan pipeline, and, the Unocal's COOP pipeline: which will transport Caspian Sea natural gas from Turkmenistan to Afghanistan and Pakistan and to India.
It seems astoundingly and illuminatingly that "somehow" Al Qaeda is everywhere in the World: Yemen, Somali, Pakistan, Iraq, Afghanistan, Lebanon, etc., the enemy may be within (the US: a CIA supported multi-factions (Al Qaeda) fighting an invisible and made-up enemy, in order to imperialize US Corporate oil interest.
There is a book by an Ontario Scholar, Researchers and author: Michel Chossudovsky "AMERICA'S "WAR ON TERRORISM" where he presents convincing evidence that the enemy "Al Qaeda" is really the CIA, through meticulous research, Chossudovsky uncovers a military-intelligence ploy behind the September 11 attacks, and the cover-up and complicity of key members of the Bush Administration. According to Chossudovsky, the “war on terrorism" is a complete fabrication based on the illusion that one man, Osama bin Laden, outwitted the $40 billion-a-year American intelligence apparatus. The "war on terrorism" is a war of conquest. Globalization is the final march to the "New World Order", dominated by Wall Street and the U.S. military-industrial complex.
Chossudovsky states the compelling truth that when people across the US and around the World find out that Al Qaeda is not an outside enemy but a creation of US foreign policy and the CIA, the legitimacy of the bipartisan war agenda will tumble like a deck of cards."
The war on terror is about a fictional enemy in Al Qaeda and is really about pipelines: Unocal COOP pipeline which will transport Caspian Sea natural gas from Turkmenistan through Afghanistan, Pakistan and to India (see internet: War on Terrorism or Oil War? See the Map of the Pipeline), and, the Trans-Caspian Sea pipeline of CEYAN(Turkey)-TBILSIS(Georgia)-BAKU(Azerbaijan)-Caspian Sea-to Turkmenistan.