Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Honduran Coup: The US Connection
While the Obama administration was careful to distance itself from the recent coup in Honduras — condemning the expulsion of President Manuel Zelaya to Costa Rica, revoking Honduran officials' visas, and shutting off aid — that doesn't mean influential Americans aren't involved, and that both sides of the aisle don't have some explaining to do.
The story most U.S. readers are getting about the coup is that Zelaya — an ally of Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez — was deposed because he tried to change the constitution to keep himself in power.
That story is a massive distortion of the facts. All Zelaya was trying to do is to put a non-binding referendum on the ballot calling for a constitutional convention, a move that trade unions, indigenous groups, and social activist organizations had long been lobbying for. The current constitution was written by the Honduran military in 1982, and the one-term limit allows the brass-hats to dominate the politics of the country. Since the convention would have been held in November, the same month as the upcoming presidential elections, there was no way Zelaya could have remained in office in any case. The most he could have done was to run four years from now.
And while Zelaya is indeed friendly with Chavez, he is at best a liberal reformer whose major accomplishment was raising the minimum wage. "What Zelaya has done has been little reforms," Rafael Alegria, a leader of Via Campesina, told the Mexican daily La Jornada. "He isn't a socialist or a revolutionary, but these reforms, which didn't harm the oligarchy at all, have been enough for them to attack him furiously."
One of those "little reforms" was aimed at ensuring public control of the Honduran telecommunications industry, which may well have been the trip-wire that triggered the coup.
The first hint that something was afoot was a suit brought by Venezuelan lawyer Robert Carmona-Borjas claiming that Zelaya was part of a bribery scheme involving the state-run telecommunication company Hondutel.
Carmona-Borjas has a rap-sheet that dates back to the April 2002 coup against Chavez. He drew up the notorious "Carmona decrees," a series of draconian laws aimed at suspending the Venezuelan constitution and suppressing any resistance to the coup. As Chavez supporters poured into the streets and the plot unraveled, Carmona-Borjas fled to Washington, DC. He took a post at George Washington University and brought Iran-Contra plotters Otto Reich and Elliott Abrams to teach his class on "Political Management in Latin America." He also became vice-president of the right-wing Arcadia Foundation, which lobbies for free-market policies. Weeks before the June 28 Honduran coup, Carmona-Borjas barnstormed the country accusing Zelaya of collaborating with narco-traffickers.
Carmona-Borjas' colleague, Reich, a Cuban American with ties to right-wing factions all over Latin America and former assistant secretary of State for hemispheric affairs under George W. Bush, has been accused by the Honduran Black Fraternal Organization of "undeniable involvement" in the coup.
This is hardly surprising. Reich was nailed by a 1987 congressional investigation for using public funds to engage in propaganda during the Reagan administration's war on Nicaragua. He is also a fierce advocate for Orlando Bosch and Luis Posada Carriles, both implicated in the bombing of a Cuban airliner in 1973 that killed all 73 on board.
Reich is also a ferocious critic of Zelaya. In a recent piece in the Weekly Standard, he urged the Obama administration not to support "strongman" Zelaya because it "would put the United States clearly in the same camp as Cuba's Castro brothers, Venezuela's Chavez, and other regional delinquents."
One of the charges that Reich levels at Zelaya is that the Honduran president is supposedly involved with bribes paid out by the state-run telecommunications company Hondutel. Zelaya is threatening to file a defamation suit over the accusation.
Reich's charges against Hondutel are hardly happenstance, as he is a former AT&T lobbyist and served as Senator John McCain's (R-AZ) Latin American advisor during the senator's 2008 presidential campaign. McCain has deep ties with telecom giants AT&T, MCI, and Qualcomm and, according to Nikolas Kozloff, author of Hugo Chavez: Oil, Politics and the Challenge of the United States, "has acted to protect and look out for the political interests of the telecoms on Capitol Hill."
AT&T, McCain's second largest donor, also generously funds the International Republican Institute (IRI), which has warred with Latin American regimes that have resisted telecommunications privatization. According to Kozloff, "President Zelaya was a known to be a fierce critic of telecommunications privatization."
When Venezuelan coup leaders went to Washington a month before their failed effort to oust Chavez, IRI footed the bill. Reich, as then Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice's special envoy to the Western Hemisphere, met with some of those leaders.
Republicans in Congress have accused the Obama administration of being "soft" on Zelaya. Sen. Jim DeMint (SC) protested the White House's support of the Honduran president holding up votes for administration nominees for the ambassador to Brazil and an assistant secretary of state. Meanwhile, Zelaya's return was unanimously supported by the UN General Assembly, the European Union, and the Organization of American States.
But meddling in Honduras is a bipartisan undertaking.
"If you want to understand who is the real power behind the [Honduran] coup, you need to find out who is paying Lanny Davis," says Robert White, former U.S. ambassador to El Salvador and current president of the Center for International Policy. Davis, best known as the lawyer who represented Bill Clinton during his impeachment trial, has been lobbying members of Congress and testifying before the House Foreign Affairs Committee in support of the coup.
According to Roberto Lovato, an associate editor at New American Media, Davis represents the Honduran chapter of CEAL, the Business Council of Latin America, which strongly backed the coup. Davis told Lovato, "I'm proud to represent businessmen who are committed to the rule of law."
But White says the coup had more to do with profits than law. "Coups happen because very wealthy people want them and help to make them happen, people who are used to seeing the country as a money machine and suddenly see social legislation on behalf of the poor as a threat to their interests," says White. "The average wage of a worker in free trade zones is 77 cents per hour." According to the World Bank, 59% of Hondurans live below the poverty line.
The United States is also involved in the coup through a network of agencies that funnel money and training to anti-government groups. The National Endowment for Democracy (NED) and the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) contribute to right-wing organizations that supported the coup, including the Peace and Democracy Movement and the Civil Democratic Union. Many of the officers that bundled Zelaya off to San Jose were trained at the Western Hemispheric Institute for Security Cooperation, the former "School for the Americas" that has seen torturers and coup leaders from all over Latin America pass through its doors.
The Obama administration condemned the coup, but when Zelaya journeyed to the Honduran-Nicaragua border, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton denounced him for being "provocative." It was a strange statement, since the State Department said nothing about a report by the Committee of Disappeared Detainees in Honduras charging 1,100 human rights violations by the coup regime, including detentions, assaults, and murder.
Human rights violations by the coup government have been condemned by the Inter-American Commission for Human Rights, the International Observer Mission, Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, the Committee to Protest Journalists, and Reporters Without Borders.
Davis claims that the coup was a "legal" maneuver to preserve democracy. But that's a hard argument to make, given some of its architects. One is Fernando Joya, a former member of Battalion 316, a paramilitary death squad. Joya fled the country after being charged with kidnapping and torturing several students in the 1980s, but he has now resurfaced as a "special security advisor" to the coup makers. He recently gave a TV interview that favorably compared the 1973 Chilean coup to the June 28 Honduran coup.
According to Greg Grandin, a history professor at New York University, the coup makers also included the extremely right-wing Catholic organization, Opus Dei, whose roots go back to the fascist regime of Spanish caudillo Francisco Franco.
In the old days, when the United States routinely overthrew governments that displeased it, the Marines would have gone in, as they did in Guatemala and Nicaragua, or the CIA would have engineered a coup by the local elites. No one has accused U.S. intelligence of being involved in the Honduran coup, and American troops in the country are keeping a low profile. But the fingerprints of U.S. institutions like the NED, USAID, and School for the Americas — plus bipartisan lobbyists, powerful corporations, and dedicated Cold War warriors — are all over the June takeover.
- Posted in




56 Comments so far
Show AllAny time land reform is discussed in Latin America, think coffee oligarchy. How an article like this can ignore such an important commodity to the region is just negligent. It's like discussing the current operations in the Helmand Province of Afghanistan without mentioning opium.
http://theformofmoney.blogharbor.com/blog/_archives/2009/4/2/4150732.html
Best Article on CD so far explaining the dynamics behind the coup. They have been obfuscated, but as clarity emerges, I know/knew I'd get the facts here.
Which are the reverse of my guesses. Common Dreams. Rad as usual.
Zelaya, I pray you return to power.
Why bother so much about Zelaya returning to power? It's August, and they're having presidential elections in November.
"Why bother so much about Zelaya returning to power?" Well Zelaya is the legitimate President of Honduras whether you or the golpistas like it or not.
Of course Zelaya is the legitimate president of Honduras. However, given the short time he had left, why bother to make such a ruckus? What exactly can he accomplish in his crippled condition? it's evident his proposal to form a constitutional convention isn't going anywhere, and he was doing a fairly poor job in other areas.
Native, it's important to be involved in politics, even if our individual efforts are puny and somewhat inconsequential. I try to formulate moderate positions I believe are more effective in the long term.
For example, in 1999 I participated in anti war demonstrations against the bombing of Yugoslavia by Clinton. I felt this was illegal, a disproportionate use of force, and a war crime. It's evident I was in a tiny minority, and we failed...the bombing went on and on, hundreds of innocent victims lost their lives, and the outcome was probably worse than the original situation. But I felt I had to do it anyway, and I did succeed in teaching my children how to protest peacefully, make good quality signs, and the biggest lesson of all, that the US media lies in a coordinated fashion with the government.
Regarding my knowledge or lack thereof...don't forget to focus on your opinion and the facts you know, rather than wasting your time attacking those you disagree with. You know, I believe it's just a matter of time, but I'm sure eventually this is a lesson you can learn.
Native: I don't annoy my elders...my parents and grandparents are all dead. I know you keep ignoring my advice, but I'm used to it, my children have ignored it for years.
I'm afraid I'm doing very little now, other than writing letters to the editor and donating money to organizations and politicians I think can help - my favorite causes are antiwar.com and sites like that. I would participate in anti war demonstrations, but they're fairly rare nowadays. Besides, I'm too old to get arrested, my sister went to the Republican convention and she was arrested, told me they were herded around like cattle and never got to do much.
You know, maybe I need to pay for a billboard in Dallas, so that travelers on the way to the city can see the picture of the guy being tortured at Abu Ghraib.
Another "Mission Accomplished" moment - another democracy replaced with a bribable military dictatorship - more US backed misery for Latin America.
I always thought that Mission Impossible was sponsored by the CIA.
Government by death squad is probably more humane than water boarding.
It will be difficult to tell the government from the mafia.
"All Zelaya was trying to do is to put a non-binding referendum on the ballot calling for a constitutional convention, a move that trade unions, indigenous groups, and social activist organizations had long been lobbying for."
Unlike Americans, at least Hondurans are informed enough to realize that the referendum is the best way to take back their government, something oligarchies have known and fought against forever.
"when Zelaya journeyed to the Honduran-Nicaragua border, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton denounced him for being "provocative."
That's putting it just a spot mildly. Ms. Clinton's admonishment about Zelaya's visit to the border was a broader condemnation of anti-coup demonstrations: "We have consistently urged all parties to avoid any provocative action that could lead to violence." This is pure hypocracy when you consider that the U.S. Congress and White House have "consistently" expressed support for the election protesters in Iran for street demonstrations that not only "could lead to violence" (of the government against the protesters) but have actually done so. Why the double standard when demonstrations are directed against regimes that we happen to favor?
Kudos to Hallinan for shining a light on this story, astonishingly absent or under-reported in our mainstream media in the US beyond brief, misleading soundbites, not that there's not plenty of people paying attention and calling for more transparency about US involvement (Reich, AT&T, et al) and MUCH stronger condemnation of the coup by Obama and Clinton. ah, 'what tangled webs we weave when we practice to deceive', no?
Actually, all this information and much MORE was posted by this poster here on CD.
Gringos are really not interested--except for those with "special interests" in Honduras and the rest of the region where I live.
The US has used the Honduras Caper as a distraction for putting SEVEN--count 'em--military bases in Colombia to replace the one they lost in Ecuador.
Uribe the Narcoparapal of the gringo government is currently circulating around South America trying to sell leaders on the military bases with the weaponry aimed at them.
Significantly the little shit did not bother to try to sell Chavez on the idea--but yesterday was given short shrift (he's short anyway) by Evo Morales, although there was a photo in the Mexican papers this morning of Uribe LITERALLY trying to put the arm on Evo--and Evo looking fed up. Short shit also made lightning visits to Chile and Argentina--where no results of his pressuring were disclosed.
Zelaya earned a lot of credibility in his 2 days here in Mexico--where he was given the usual Head of State welcome. He will be going to Brazil tomorrow to meet with Lula.
Regarding Colombia: I have read in the BBC recently that Venezuela, Ecuador and Bolivia are getting rightly fed up of Uribe prostituting himself to the Americans and America's psychopathic war on drugs. Uribe better watch his step because he is wratcheting up tensions among his neighbors. I don't know how the Colombians can stand Uribe.
It's the rows of machine guns in between.
Uribe doesn't know much beyond narcotrafficking, organizing paramilitaries and bending over and spreading his cheeks.
But for the US, that's way enough for them to take him off the DEA trafficking list and give him billions of your money to protect the drug flow to Gringolandia.
Everybody is sick of Uribe--ESPECIALLY Colombians--but he bribes folks to vote referenda to keep him in power.
Does Colombia even share a border with Bolivia? Or are you including Bolivia while excluding Panama, Brazil and Peru because they aren't led by governments allied with Venezuela?
You are splitting hairs. Bolivia is a neighbor of Colombia, I didn't say it was a next door neighbor. BTW I was quoting the BBC, so if you have a problem, take it up with them. Anyways, there's another CD article that says the US plans to install seven more bases in Colombia. You seriously don't think that was meant to menace Bolivia, Ecuador and Venezuela?
Bolivia is as much a neighbor of Colombia's as Paraguay, I guess - and don't forget BBC correspondents aren't exactly experts in the region, they have a tendency to get run over because they forget to look left when they cross the street.
Regarding the US installing seven bases in Colombia, it does sound like vaporware. At most, the US is negotiating to put some soldiers in existing Colombian bases. My sources say they want to put up radar balloons to detect small planes carrying drugs from Colombia to neighboring states. These planes carry drugs out, and carry weapons and ammo in, so of course an interdiction effort would help defeat the FARC, who are the main end-users for the weapons.
Neighboring states such as Brazil are nervous because they don't want to see the drug trade squeezed out of Colombia - the drug kingpins would just move their operation into Brazil, etc. This in turn will mean they have to spend money chasing the drug runners, and fighting the drug financed militias sure to emerge. Brazil in particular doesn't want to see this happen.
Let me ask you a simple question: Why would the US build bases inside the continent to threaten Brazil or Venezuela? It just doesn't make any sense. If the US wants to threaten Venezuela, then all it has to do is beef up the logistics base at Guantanamo, place an airwing at the airport there, and then move a few carriers and subs 300 miles offshore Venezuela. Then if they want to attack, they do it from the sea, and there's very little Venezuela can do to stop them.
As for attacking Brazil, that's ludicrous. Brazil's doing fine, it's now producing more oil than Venezuela, it has plans to increase production to produce much more than Venezuela ever did, plus it has its own biofuels industry, and usually plays ball with the USA. Lula is a quality leftist, and Obama will probably be very keen to support whomever replaces him after the forthcoming elections (unlike Chavez and Uribe, Lula seems to be more of a self-effacing character who is willing to change things slowly, and knows very well term limits are a good thing).
Sioux Rose
MAMMON: Funny you should bring up coffee. When I try to think ahead to what it will feel like (and cost) to live in the USA once the TRUE status of its dollar (inflated to that of a hot air balloon) comes full circle, I wonder how much a pound of decent coffee will cost.
Aside from learning to grow some vegetables and beans, I am not of the mind to invest in weapons. My fantasy is that the local gun-crazies come by my place for a cup of coffee (I am stocking up) in exchange for protection, or a filet of fish as trade in that occasional protein needed to survive.
the 200 families strike again! john mccain backing a corp.?
shocking! i bet if they gave him a globe he wouldn't be able
to find it.the meek shall inherit the earth? not any time
soon!just when will america mind its own business? one
of these days the world will get tired of our act become
allies and put us in our place. little georgie bush had
us closer to that then you could only imagine! lucky for
us that he's gone but with obama you woldn't want to bet
it doesn't get like that again. as for hillary she must
have the sorest privates in america for all the years spent
sitting on fences! OUCH!
Honduran soldiers take over state hospitals - Health Care John McCain style?
Just as an aside Zelaya's wifes last name is Castro.
And Uribe has allowed the murder of thousands of Unionists every year.
TEGUCIGALPA, Honduras — The Obama administration has backed away from its call to restore ousted Honduran President Manuel Zelaya to power and instead put the onus on him for taking "provocative actions" that polarized his country and led to his overthrow on June 28. (McClatchy)
American never met a military dictatorship it couldn't bribe.
Apparently the Obama maladministration is so encouraged by the success of its "Blame the Victim" strategy in the Middle East that they're using the same approach in Honduras!
· Yr Obd't Servant
For a Century, Central and South America has been the best U.S. laboratory for imperialism, but it is now rapidly failing. The whole world sees through the continued raw belligerence of American foreign policy in favor of corporate America and the local ruling wealthy elite. It all adds to continuing blow back to U.S. foreign policy and the never ending war on terrorism. The American Empire will collapse, just like all Empires in the past. Only then will the American people really wake up to the raw evils of corporate capitalism. We will be the last nation in the world to catch on.
What's your preferred system to replace capitalism?
And what's 21st Century Socialism? I've looked for a pamphlet or booklet, or website describing its basic principles, and I can't find it. I've been reading quite a bit about Venezuela, if THAT's 21st Century Socialism, then it needs a serious tuneup - it isn't going to work very well.
"And it is working just fine in Venezuela."
Exactly! My late father used to say, "If it ain't broke, don't fix it".
Native, that website you posted shows what a guy named Bohmer from ZNET thinks 21st Century Socialism is. Notice he says: "Chávez's understanding of socialism is continually evolving and becoming more concrete as are his policies and proposed structural and systemic changes." Don't blame me, I'm just quoting the guy.
What I'm looking for is a Venezuelan government site, or something written by a Venezuelan official close to Chavez, in which they outline just what the heck is this 21st Century Socialism. I can read in Spanish, French, Russian, and English, and thus far I can't find anything solid to read about it, just the musings and thoughts written by leftists who support Chavez without understanding what the guy is thinking.
Now, when I see a politician use slogans, and neglect to give me a concrete list of things he wants to do, then I start smelling a rat. I've had too much baloney fed to me over the years, so I'd rather be very careful about what I'm fed.
Note that my caution is the result of experience, and also comes from the fact that I have access to information the likes of which you don't get to see.
None of these hundreds of articles are written by Chavez or people close to him. Look for it, you won't find it. I'm afraid Chavez has a romantic vision, whereby he'll install communism in a gradual fashion - he seems to be taking Venezuela towards something like Cuba, but with some veneer of capitalism whenever it's convenient.
As a matter of fact, quite a few of Chavez' potential moves were discussed by me with a Cuban official several years ago, when we discussed the many mistakes made by Castro. He concurred with me that Castro had been an amateur, and I suspect what the more sophisticated Cubans think is now being taught to the Venezuelans. Unfortunately for Cuba, their government has evolved into an hereditary autocracy, and they're stuck with Castro's ideas even though they've taken Cuba into absolute poverty. And unfortunately for the Venezuelans, Chavez seems to be inventing his 21st Century Socialism as he goes. The result seems to be a slowly collapsing Venezuelan economy.
Capitalism is all-powerful corporations controlling people, whereas democracy, socialism and communism is powerless corporations controlled by people.
Huh, capitalism and democracy are compatible. On the other hand, history shows communism and democracy don't mix very well, because communism concentrates power at the top, and it evolves into autocracy. Examples are Cuba and North Korea, where we see hereditary autocracies at work.
Keeping U.S. Base in Honduras -- What coup is all about
For the identical thing happened to Honduras in 1957 when President Ramón Morales led his country into the Central American Common Market (CACM) and initiated programs for land reform and education for all.
For six years of such liberty was all that capitalists could endure, and then came the coup of 1963 and end of CACM in 1970. Then came the coups of 1975 and 1978. And all a smoke screen, as military gets all the attention while capitalists laugh all the way to the bank.
All in harmony with Empire USA, for in 1981 Honduras became a home for thousands of guerrillas fighting the Nicaraguan government, and the United States established bases and began holding regular military exercises in an effort to put additional pressure on Nicaragua’s Sandinista government.
Empire USA has only one military base left in Central America, the one in Honduras. And as deadly force is the lubricant that gets things done in capitalism, if the military might of the U.S. were not present, greatly less fearful would the people be to organize and resist. A main reason why President Zelaya was planning to convert that U.S. Air Force base into a public airport. Another being it has the only runways long enough for jumbo jets.
Multinational capitalism works only so long as people are kept in submission to capitalist governments, and this must be done at the national level. And this is why the rich capitalists of Honduras decide when there shall be a coup, Obama and Clinton act like they did the coup, and all of corporate owned media keeps everyone focused on Washington.
A fundamental flaw in this otherwise interesting article is that it completely fails to address key issue:
The sever loss of political support by the President, the vote against him in the legislature supporting his removal, and perhaps most importantly the Supreme Court order for his arrest.
Also missing is any analysis of the constitutional issue - the constitution has an unusual clause that anyone even attempting to raise the topic of removing the one term limit automatically loses their citizenship and is then inelegible to be president.
These topics cannot just be ignored in any discussion claiming to address the situation. They're critical facts.
We might all prefer for this to be a simple story where a progressive standing up for the people is attacked by the oligarchy in cahoots with all kinds of evil people, and there's one simple answer. But his lack of political support and his actions making him vulnerable on the constitutional issue make it more complicated than that.
Indeed, as I said before, Zelaya is a reckless character.
Oh let me get this right, Honduras's legitimate President Zelaya gets kidnapped and thrown out of his country by those golpista goons and he's the reckless one? Your assertion is right out of Alice in Wonderland.
You tell me what this is:
Zelaya, by his actions manages to get the Supreme Court, Congress, the military, all the rich folk, and at least half the population mad at him, is arrested and shipped out of the country, a replacement President is sworn in, and he ends up sitting in his pajamas in Costa Rica.
His actions should be qualified as:
a) enlightened
b) wise
c) stupid
d) weird
e) reckless
You pick the answer.
Uhu, so you think he got himself kicked out of power to "smoke out" his oposition? An interesting idea. Maybe he realized his ideas were going nowhere, and he was about to be replaced in a few months anyway, so he forced the issue to be kicked out and create conditions for a civil war? Interesting hypothesis.
I don't know why you think it's patently clear the people of Honduras support Zelaya 100 %. Give me enough cash and I can organize demonstrations and resistance in the Vatican. And it's clear Zelaya is getting outside cash, so those demonstrations don't impress me.
Zelaya has done such a poor job in the presidency, I'd bet that, come election time in November, Zelaya's party, the Liberals, won't even get their man into office. Now let's go look for poll results we think are reliable to back up our bs.
100% is not the requirement for democratic election.
Election in November? What an optimist!
Since when do most people support a raise in minimum wage? If you are not in that category, it is easy to ignore. Or oppose. The middle class might have to pay their cooks and gardeners more.
I would rather have a leader who stands up for the poor than one who triangulates or one who supports the ultra rich.
Joe