Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Detroit to Bulldoze Thousands of Homes in Fight for Survival
Tired of Detroit's status as the symbol of everything wrong with urban America, its new mayor has come up with a radical solution: to bulldoze the city.
David Bing, a businessman and former all-star basketball player who entered politics late in life, says he has no choice.
A vacant home in Detroit. (Photo: AP Photo/Paul Sancya) The 2010 census is expected to reveal a population of about 800,000, down from a peak of 1.8 million in the Motor City heyday of the late 1950s.
The long decline of the car industry and all its spin-off business has been exacerbated by the collapse of a housing market that has left prices close to what they were 50 years ago, when lifestyle magazines featured Detroit as the most desirable city in the United States.
Decent three-bedroom homes can be bought for $10,000, but no one wants to buy.
Decades of poor and at times corrupt administration have also taken their toll, and with the city facing a deficit of between $85 and $124 million this year, the answer, says Mr Bing, is to accept reality and reduce the size of the city.
"There is just too much land and too many expenses for us to continue to manage the city as we have in the past," he said. "If we don't do it, this whole city is going to go down."
Plans currently being devised would be the most revolutionary carried out by a major American city.
Large chunks of neighbourhoods would be razed and converted to parks, urban farms or simply abandoned. As an opening bid, Mr Bing has vowed to demolish 3,000 homes this year, and a further 7,000 over the following three years. Some are speculating that up to 40,000 homes could eventually go.
The plans are being watched by influential figures who believe other cities - including Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Baltimore and Memphis - could follow suit. The Obama administration is being advised by Dan Kildee, who pioneered the policy in Flint in his role as treasurer of Genesee County.
In Detroit's Brightmoor neighbourhood on the city's northwest side, it is easy to see the logic of his vision. On many blocks only two or three homes are inhabited, the rest have been vacated by repossession, abandoned or burned down by arsonists. They become magnets for rodents, rubbish or drug gangs.
The mayor has said that some people will have to move as more viable parts of neighbourhoods are built up and others flattened.
This has prompted cries of "ethnic cleansing" and "cleansing of the poor", accusations that defenders of the idea say ring hollow in a city that is 85 per cent black, whose top officials are mostly black, and where poverty rates are way above the national average.
Brightmoor resident Monique McLean, 29, would welcome the chance to be relocated. "It is terrible here, there's nowhere for kids to play and I don't fee safe at night. People have moved out and soon there will be no one left on the street," she said, standing outside her three-bedroom home. "I would be glad to get out of here. I would be glad to get out of Detroit, period." At one end of the street lies an abandoned car, and at the other a home gutted by fire with a three-piece living room suite rotting on the front yard. Every shop on a half mile stretch of high street nearby is shuttered. Even the pawnshop has closed down. Only three small Christian ministries are open for business.
Saving Detroit will be a mammoth effort. Almost a third of the city's 139 square miles is vacant or derelict, though its land area would comfortably fit Manhattan, San Francisco and Boston, cities with combined populations of three million.
By reducing the amount of the space the city serves, millions of dollars would be saved, said Charles Pugh, president of the city council, and other areas improved.
"We have to police property, put out fires, light the streets, pump water and shovel snow for all these sparsely populated areas where people really shouldn't be living," said Mr Pugh, who revealed shortly before his election last year that his own home had gone into foreclosure. "It's really, really inefficient." John George, a native of the city's northwest side, has been campaigning to improve blighted neighbourhoods for 21 years and describes Mr Bing as a "breath of fresh air".
Through his non-profit group Motor City Blight Busters, Mr George has founded a community centre near Brightmoor in Old Redford, financed a city garden, an art gallery, a restaurant and will soon open a jazz café. In the 1990s the group refurbished homes; now it mostly demolishes them.
"Why spend $50,000 on doing up a home that won't sell for $20,000? With the economy the way it is, we don't have time to wait. A lot of these areas are almost vacant now. To do otherwise would be like going to the dentist when you only have three teeth in your mouth. What's the point?"
- Posted in



56 Comments so far
Show AllAnd so it goes for the have-nots and do the mortgage co.'s get money because of this action?What a sick joke that would be!And yet,yes yet there are the Red Wings,the Pistons,Tigers there;now tell me how this picture makes any sense at all.Tony
Makes sense if you are trying to manage for further growth or stabilize a failing system. The have-nots only drain resources, but the haves bring resources into the system. Therefore it is best to consolidate the havenots into smaller easily managed areas in order to create more spaces for either the haves or the system itself.
This of course screws the havenots, but so far no one in America has been able to both design a better system and simultaneously get the haves to sign on to it. In Europe, places like Norway have systems which largely address these issues, but aren't feasible in the USA because they are too much socialism. USA haves fight socialism tooth and nail, and their money talks politics very well.
Judah - "aren't feasible in the USA because they are too much socialism. USA haves fight socialism tooth and nail, and their money talks politics very well."
A significant CORRECTION is due here - The HAVES fight Socialism for the POOR... they are quite happy to apply it to themselves since the middle classes and the poor are continually tapped to pay for their greed.
As someone who grew up in the Detroit area in the 50's, I can say that I support the idea put forth in the article. Sitting around "a waitin' 'n a prayin" AINT gonna bring back what was once Detroit.
In fact, as this sorry century progresses, it is much more likely that as resources become more scarce and essential commodity prices continue to rise beyond the poor and middle classes ability to pay, MANY, MANY more US cities will take on the appearance of Detroit.
As a solution I propose... "Bulldoze ALL of AMERICA and return ownership to its original inhabitants". It would be the beginning of a much healthier planet Earth.
So we have "yellow socialism" here with socialised losses and privatised profits for the rich.But bulldozing all the potentially affordable housing is not a solution,unless you are a banker or realtor,it just causes gentrification.What is wrong with urban homesteading?Have you heard about the work in urban renewal being done in blighted South Bronx areas.It was once as brutal as East L.A. or Detroit but is improving .
What are you going to do with 300 million displaced U.S.A.ns after you put them out on the street?Oh I know ,the original inhabitants will grant us a few acres and we can build some shelters and try to get work in the local casino.(apologies for snark)
peace
I apologize for oversimplification.
The 'socialism for the rich' you talk about, I have always considered that simply quid pro quo bribery and abuse of the system.
Gotta remember that the Detroit metro area must have two or three million at least. That's why there are all those sports teams. Plus the fact that there are fans that come from Toledo and Windsor, not to mention outstate Michigan.
Is no one considering an urban homesteading program?People could be given properties for $1 with a contract to improve them over time.If needed homeless people could be given homes and HUD assistance or local workfare jobs to pay for the utilities and upkeep.
Razing homes when millions are homeless is just pathetic.There must be a better way.I understand Mr.George's and the city council position,but the gentrification of a city during a depression,to preserve a tax base would be a callous mistake.
How about offering homes to youth who enroll in community colleges or dropouts who get a GED diploma?Returning veterans could use a home,other states could contribute their welfare,and Medicaid rolls and would give their teaming masses buss tickets to get there!Just sayin' but i could be wrong.
peace
Absolutely, Johnny! It's just madness to bulldoze the houses.
The ones that can be spared should be carefully taken apart and the good bits --wood, foundation stone, glass, fixtures, etc. harvested for use elsewhere. Hire out-of-work people to do the job, the pay being subsistence and pocket money now and a home, or share in a home later.
Agreed,Mairead do you know what happened to the Linn Dinh post?
peace
johnny and Mairead - PLEASE RETURN to whatever Planet you came from... YOU obviously are out of your depth here on planet Earth.
Ohhh, Ohhh, WAIT... I'm makin' a wish to the Cosmic Gods that O'Bummer is gonna stop lyin' his worthless ass off every time he opens his yap!!! I REALLY think it's gonna work this time!!!
STAY TUNED!!!
PS - perhaps you both should be chasin' chum over on HuffPost.
You might be on the wrong planet, but as long as this one can produce little girls like Alexis Goggins, I think I'll take my chances here.
Comment deleted by author.
So you want to "Bulldoze all of America and return it to the origional inhabitants"g.m. that is a worthy fantasy,and a lot more reasonable than some urban renewal .Again "mansacks" please send me some of that herb you are huffin'and we will argue later about if Detroit is worth saving.After all, you grew up there.
peace
There is a plan to bulldoze the houses and use the land as urban farms. The only prob is that it's being proposed by a rich white businessman who probably wants to buy the land for pennies on the acre and then employ people to tend the land for menial wages.
conundrummer,or possibly redevelop it.A C.S.A. might survive as they are member supported but a private urban farm would be tough.It has to be a community garden to survive the pressures of blight crime vandalism and resistance by developers or city planners.
It is foolish to not save or recycle existing housing,and expensive to create urban gardens without a dedicated free ,user based ,labor force.
peace
do you know what happened to the Linn Dinh post
------------------
No, I don't think I saw it at all.
johnny - Your protestations are wonderfull and magnanamous in the "perfect and fairytale world which exists between your ears".
Unfortunately, I can virtually guarantee you that if YOU were given and Acre in one of these Detriot neighborhoods, you would RUN screamin' for the hills before you could even put in your Home Depot White Plastic Picket Fence. The denizens who manage to survive these nightmarish conditions would EAT you for breakfast on your first day in the hood. It's just a matter of survival, my friend, and YOU aint gotta clue.
well mr golden bollocks,(i assume you are not an investment bankster)as a homeless squatter who doesn't frequent the "home dump "and lives at 50% of the federal poverty level,i protest your assumptions about my demographic group.If you gave me an acre and a mule in Detroit,you could join a neigborhood C.S.A. and help us garden.(If you move back there)
If you have a perfect and fairytale world between your ears please send me some of what you are smoking.Bulldozers are not a solution!If you think that the hood is too tough to repair,O.K. so why not let the "denisons who manage to survive these nightmarish conditions" have a chance to prosper in an environment they are invested in.
peace, by the way gold is way up!maybe it is time to visit the pawn shop!
recycle homes no bulldoze
Judah said "USA haves fight socialism tooth and nail, and their money talks politics very well."
Unfortunately, a lot of the 'havenots' fight it too.
The author implores that their couldn't be anything wrong with Mayor's plan because you know, it's not racist:
"This has prompted cries of "ethnic cleansing" and "cleansing of the poor", accusations that defenders of the idea say ring hollow in a city that is 85 per cent black, whose top officials are mostly black, and where poverty rates are way above the national average."
No other bad motivitations are possible then right? Let's all listen to our Mayors when they tell us they have no other choice? Blight just sort of happens magically right?
No way - most localities are tied to bonds and servitude to Wall Street. Big Money usually calls for "exodus". In other areas of the Country, Wall Street intentionally blighted entire suburbs with foreclosures, which can be a win-win for developers that the same Banks underwrite. This is especially true in older neighborhoods that surround economically strong areas.
The major concern is for the citizens,as it always SHOULD be in our near dead Democracy. Do the ones that live in these areas (each and every one) have a say in the matter? Or will they too be taken advantage of by a Municipality that will ulitmately use eminent domain to clear 'em out?
A brief, stupid article, that barely scratches the surface of our enourmous National problems.
Absolutely, Squeak.
I just hope that Detroit has someone who can channel Jane Jacobs a little. If she were still with us, she'd be toeing that elitist mayor's butt right now.
Real estate speculators make big money in a crisis like this. Crises are a methodology for accumulation on the part of the rich.
The author implores that their couldn't be anything wrong with the Mayor's 'plan' because you know, it's not racist:
"This has prompted cries of "ethnic cleansing" and "cleansing of the poor", accusations that defenders of the idea say ring hollow in a city that is 85 per cent black, whose top officials are mostly black, and where poverty rates are way above the national average."
No other bad motivitations are possible then right? Let's all listen to our Mayors when they tell us they have no other choice? Blight just sort of happens magically right?
No way - most localities are tied to bonds and servitude to Wall Street. Big Money usually calls for "exodus". In other areas of the Country, Wall Street intentionally blighted entire suburbs with foreclosures, which can be a win-win for developers that the same Banks underwrite. This is especially true in older neighborhoods that surround economically strong areas.
The major concern is for the citizens,as it always SHOULD be in our near dead Democracy. Do the ones that live in these areas (each and every one) have a say in the matter? Or will they too be taken advantage of by a Municipality that will ulitmately use eminent domain to clear 'em out?
A brief, stupid article, that barely scratches the surface of our enourmous National problems. The idea to raze parts of the City may be a good idea, but let's add some substance shall we?
The way I understand it is that the city government exists to serve the people not to rule them or reshape the city to suit the government.
More likely it's being done to benefit developers and friends of the those in office.
It's stupid, wasteful, criminal and just plain wrong.
I've witnessed the bulldozing of big old buildings and it is sickening to watch. Much of the workmanship that has gone into many of these buildings will never be duplicated, to say nothing of the salvageable and almost irreplaceable wood that could so easily be recycled if we lived in a civilized society.
They don't just bulldoze, they splinter and crush to make for easier hauling, to a landfill. In most cases I've observed it was a "business decision," to replace the majestic with a modular structure with no redeeming architectural value whatever, such as a KFC or Burger King.
This is a total failure of imagination and organization, and in the long run also a failure of economics. So much easier to hire a machine-based contractor to pulverize, than to organize humans with hand tools to save our heritage. This is really a form of low-level warfare, destroying the village in order to save it. What would the Elders say?
Maybe if we thought of Detroit as the last tree standing on Easter Island...
-30-
This is really a form of low-level warfare
--------------------------------------------
Bravo,OMR! I'd not thought of that before, but when you say it, it rings completely true. Unfortunately. :-(
In my small town I too have seen the destruction of our historic residential district in the name of "progress". The local college bought up and demolished dozens of older houses to make parking lots rather than do the obvious which was to build a parking garage on empty land they already owned. Their excuse was the garage would be too expensive and they were doing the town a favor since most of the houses were rentals and removing them and their unsavory tenants would improve the neighborhood. It was a sad day indeed when a lovely 100-year-old Victorian 3-story was flattened by a bulldozer and carted to the landfill with never a mention of saving any part of it.
Sadly our history as a nation is being destroyed as our older buildings are razed and the unique character of our neighborhoods is lost forever.
God Damn parking garage! Why can't we provide some public transportation?
To revitalize our cities we need jobs. We need to undo the harm the Democrats did to our nation when they passed NAFTA. If our government had given those trillions of dollars (of our tax funds) to create jobs and help people to buy homes, instad of giving it no questions asked to the banksters, we would not be in the fix we are now.
We need to recognise that our democracy is dead and our elected officials are corrupt and that the two major political parties are the two ugly heads of the one corporate monster that is eating us.
We must stand up and fight back. Stop taking that damn Prozac and look around and see what is happening. Talk to your neighbors. Pull the plug on that damn TV. All is not well. It is not fine. We are over our heads in shit and what do you say, "Tastes good!" ?
I agree. I am so tired of industrial efficiency. We must teach our children to preserve by allowing them to learn the skills of preservation and value of doing so. Urban renewal was a failure.
I don't see how transforming Detroit from a clasic ghost town to Gaza will help anyone. There are a lot of people being forced out of their homes on the Gulf coast by BP's Toxic Flood - they will be looking for good homes to live in and care for - if David Bing will take this hint.
How international;Gaza comes to Detroit!(Sarcasm).Good one.Tony
Caring for good homes requires a sustainable economy that enables people to live and care. That is precisely what Detroit is in need of.
I suspect the economy is perfectly fine out in the suburbs - and while I haven't been to Detroit, this looks like just more destruction of exactly the sort of walkable main-street type neighborhoods we need to wean ourselves from the automobile. When I travel through the smaller cities and town in the Midwest, I see exactly the same thing on a smaller scale - dead downtowns and big boxes and Applebees out on the by-pass. I'd die of sensory deprivation syndrome if I had to live in such places.
The entire country is over-built, not just Detroit. But it's not just housing. The entire country is overbuilt in every way. Too much of everything. People don't realize it because the media hasn't offered this fact up on the menu - yet. They'll do so when it's profitable.
MANY USans are entrenched in the value system that accepts plunder as the norm. If you want to be successful, you participate in it, you build, you consume, lots of materials, and lots of energy, and you don't ask questions. Now get out there and build something. Then tear it down. Then build it again. Pay your pentagun tax. And enjoy the spoils of empire.
"Home"land?
Let's see... Lots of empty factories/warehouses/commercial buildings, and lots of houses to remove to make way for urban farms. Use stimulus money to underwrite the project of unemployed people dismantling houses (but not homes) and putting the reusable materials into storage for future use. Better than money in the bank.
Bulldoze thousands of homes? -- They could call in the Israeli's to do it since they're pretty much experts at doing that sort of thing.
BTW, I heard there's a white house in Washington that probably needs dozing too.....
This did not happen overnight or by accident.
It began 30+ years ago and it continues today.
Read Kevin Phillips "Bad Money" re the conscious shift to a service and financial economy, while gutting manufacturing via "free trade" (not balanced or fair trade) that has cost the US millions of jobs, trade deficits and huge and growing financial deficits, shrinking communities like Detroit and others.
We need to save manufacturing in the US. See the book "Cheap" and McCormack's article re saving manufacturing. We lost some 42,000 US factories since 2001 alone! We are letting the corporations and government policies to undercut Americans of all backgrounds and to gut community after community.
The book "Cheap" gives an idea of how cheap imported goods are not cheap at all, in the millions of jobs that have been lost:
http://www.amazon.com/Cheap-High-Cost-Discount-Culture/dp/B002ZNJWGS/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1265828820&sr=8-1
From Publishers Weekly
Atlantic correspondent Shell (The Hungry Gene) tackles more than just discount culture in this wide-ranging book that argues that the American drive toward bargain-hunting and low-price goods has a hidden cost in lower wages for workers and reduced quality of goods for consumers. After a dry examination of the history of the American retail industry, the author examines the current industrial and political forces shaping how and what we buy. In the book's most involving passages, Shell deftly analyzes the psychology of pricing and demonstrates how retailers manipulate subconscious bargain triggers that affect even the most knowing consumers. The author urges shoppers to consider spending more and buying locally, but acknowledges the inevitability of globalization and the continuation of trends toward efficient, cost-effective production. The optimistic call to action that concludes the book feels hollow, given the evidence that precedes it. If Shell illuminates with sharp intelligence and a colloquial style the downside of buying Chinese garlic or farm-raised shrimp, nothing demonstrates how consumers, on a mass scale, could seek out an alternative or why they would choose to do so. (July)
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
http://www.hereandnow.org/2010/02/rundown-210-2/ Here's a good but sad NPR story online re his article and what he and others suggest. It's an eye-opening story. Highlights are in the paragraph below. An uneven playing field is killing us. VAT (Value Added Taxes) help foreign companies dramatically undercut us.
Why Is Nothing Made In America Anymore?
More than 42,000 U.S. factories have closed since 2001, when China entered the World Trade Organization. But Richard McCormack says that’s not the only reason why so little is made here anymore. We speak with McCormack, who is editor of Manufacturing and Technology News. We also speak with Brian O’Shaughnessy, chairman of Revere Copper Products, who is also a leading voice in the Coalition for a Prosperous America, a business group trying to change U.S. international tax and trade policy.
---------------
* Read Richard McCormack’s article (below)
http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=the_plight_of_american_manufacturing
The Plight of American Manufacturing
Since 2001, the U.S. has lost 42,400 factories -- and its technical edge.
Richard McCormack | December 21, 2009
This is the way the waste land ends
- not with a bang but with a bulldozer
I saw this coming *months* ago.
Detroit is just one of dozens of cities contemplating the same thing. They are just ahead of the curve on implementation.
I had a friend who lived in Flint. She said driving through downtown Detroit was like being in the middle of a 'Mad Max' movie or downtown Baghdad.
Just think what it will be like if the predicted June collapse of the US dollar happens. You couldn't pay me to be anywhere near California.
Aloha Mr. Big Bucks or Urban Land Speculator like Oprah
May I suggest you purchase from Detroit all the structures slated for bulldozing and do the folowing.
Hire the 1000's of unemployed and able bodied welfare clients. Have them deconstruct the buildings and create large salvage yards of useable bricks, nails, lumber and other building materials for resale to frugal builders and green conscious remodelers
Jobs for people, not bulldozers, are created. Money stays in the community. Citizens will not be standing and watching but bending and heaving!
This razing becomes a positive event where 100's of Detroit residents are participating and youth can learn about trades.
America we've been sold out.
Bulldoze homes?
Fight for whose survival?
Somehow I do not think this is for the survival of people who have trouble affording homes.
"The Market" at work.
Joe
Bingo, Joe. And when the dust settles, a few rich people will be even richer, and everyone else including Earth will be poorer.
I think Fr. Ball's 1381 sermon/advice is still good (I translate from English):
'Be aware or be woe[ful].
Know your friend from your foe.
When you have enough for your needs, tell yourself "enough!" and enjoy your life.
Seek always to behave well and better, and keep free of sin.
Seek peace, and bide therein.'
- By reducing the amount of the space the city serves, millions of dollars would be saved... -
How many resources can we save if we bulldoze a few McMansions?
That would depend on who's in them at the time, wouldn't it?
The city of Detroit lost 1 million residents, where did they go? I wondered how many are homeless or in shelters in Michigan or another state (Illinois, Wisconsin, Indiana, Ohio) etc., and I wondered on the reality of demolishing 7000 homes, that could be rehabilitated, and building in additon new factories, shops, stores, etc., alternatively in Detroit, Flint, Michigan etc. to created a job base (100,000 jobs for example). See the book: "Manufacturing A Better Future for America" by Richard McCormack's and the loss of 42,000 factories since 2001
I wondered whether they are gearing up, and on historical examples after the 1935 Nuremberg Agreement in Nazi Germany, and similar policies in 1933-1937 in Munich, Berlin or Dresden, Germany in the wholesale destruction of abandoned building, etc., because of polices in Nazi Germany that caused the dislocution of cities and people, as in Detroit and Flint Michigan, in 1936, 1937--where Detroit, or anywhere in Michigan or in neighboring states of Illinois, Wisconsin, Indiana, Ohio-- are gearing up as in as in the intention in the 1935 Nuremberg Agreement, are there sub-camps or concentration camps in those states (Michigan, Illinois, Wisconsin, Indiana, Ohio, etc.) and cities to reduce the people similarly as they did the Gypsies and Jewish people in Nazi Germany 1933-1935, 1936, 1937?
"David Bing, a businessman and former all-star basketball player who entered politics late in life, says he has no choice."
That alone sums up what they mayor stands for. Like New Orleans, their goal is to cash in on a bad situation and crush the poor and middle cleass to make room for the wealthy elite. I wouldn't be surprised to find New Orleans and Detroit turned into country clubs for the elites 10 years from now.