Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Police, Protesters Clash Ahead of WTO Conference
GENEVA - Swiss police fired tear gas and rubber bullets on Saturday at hooded protesters who broke windows and set cars alight during a demonstration ahead of a major WTO conference in Geneva.
These are among the vehicles set on fire by anti-capitalist protesters Saturday in Geneva, Switzerland. (Dominic Favre / AP) Thousands marched in the protest ahead of the World Trade Organisation ministerial meeting beginning on Monday, with the vast majority of demonstrators not participating in the violence.
Organisers later decided to end the demonstration due to the violence and because police prevented the march from continuing to WTO headquarters, the Swiss ATS news agency reported.
Some 200 violent protesters infiltrated the march and "began to inflict damage right from the start of the demonstration," police spokesman Patrick Puhl said. Police fired tear gas and rubber bullets to stop them.
Officers had moved in after protesters broke windows at a jewellers, banks and a hotel. Vehicles parked along the march route, particularly luxury cars, were damaged, with at least four set alight, Puhl said.
One young protester dressed as a vampire told AFP he "understood people's anger as the crisis had hit them very hard" while an elderly woman said that the recent economic turmoil gave people "plenty to be angry about."
Organisers put the total number of protesters at 5,000, while police said it was 3,000.
Police spokesman Eric Grandjean told AFP that 33 demonstrators had been arrested, including 14 Black Block members for their involvement in the riots and four others for looting items from local stores.
Three South Koreans had been barred from entering Switzerland for the protest after being accused of violent behaviour at past demonstrations, a police spokesman said.
Dosuk Han, head of the Korean League of Small Farmers, as well as Kangsil Lee and Jejoon Ju from a campaign group for farmers, were being held at the Geneva airport on Saturday, protest organisers said in a statement.
The organisers demanded their immediate release.
Next week's gathering falls on the 10th anniversary of the ministerial meeting in Seattle, which was marked by violent street protests.
More than a hundred ministers will gather for the WTO conference, though there have been concerns linked to the United States and European Union.
Diplomats in Geneva note that the fact that the United States still has no ambassador to the WTO is a sign President Barack Obama's administration has put little emphasis on trade talks at the moment.
Meanwhile, the European Union will lose its Trade Commissioner Catherine Ashton on the second day of the WTO ministerial, as she is due to step into her new post as foreign policy chief.
"It is true that the American administration's political calendar is currently more focused on the reform of the health system, the environment and financial regulation than on trade," WTO head Pascal Lamy told AFP.
"But nevertheless, the United States is committed to the negotiations."
As for the European Union, he noted that Development Commissioner Karel de Gucht has been proposed to replace Ashton, calling him a "solid and skillful negotiator."

17 Comments so far
Show All"Organisers put the total number of protesters at 5,000, while police said it was 3,000."
the other 2,000 were agents provocateurs.
BULL SHIT
are you trying to provoke me?
You are so right. Maybe not 2000, but certainly the violent ones.
As someone engaged to a small degree with the anarchist community, there really are plenty of people who believe that targeted property damage can be an effective tactic. Furthermore, they don't consider property damage to be "violence" any more than a boycott or blocking an entrance is. No living things are being harmed, and a broken window transfers the money from the big corporation to a local window repairman's pocket. Additionally, there are cases where such property damage has been effective at getting the authorities to move on the protester's demands.
You are free to disagree, but please don't discount a person agency for their actions by calling them an agent-provocateur, or "violent".
To update the Wobbly saying, diversity of tactics gets the goods.
"targeted property damage can be an effective tactic"
right - just look how effective 0's drones are.
violent |ˈvī(ə)lənt|
adjective
using or involving physical force intended to hurt, damage, or kill someone or something : a violent confrontation with riot police.
• (esp. of an emotion or unpleasant or destructive natural force) very strong or powerful : violent dislike | the violent eruption killed 1,700 people.
• (of a color) vivid.
• (Law) involving an unlawful exercise or exhibition of force.
DERIVATIVES
violently adverb
ORIGIN Middle English (in the sense [having a marked or powerful effect] ): via Old French from Latin violent- ‘vehement, violent.’
Thesaurus
violent
adjective
1 "he gets violent when drunk" - brutal, vicious, savage, rough, aggressive, abusive, physically abusive, threatening, fierce, physical, wild, ferocious; barbarous, barbaric, thuggish, pugnacious, cutthroat, smash-mouth, homicidal, murderous, cruel.
2 "a violent blow" - powerful, forceful, hard, sharp, smart, strong, vigorous, mighty, hefty; savage, ferocious, brutal, vicious.
3 "violent jealousy" - intense, extreme, strong, powerful, vehement, intemperate, unbridled, uncontrollable, ungovernable, inordinate, consuming, passionate.
4 "a violent movie" - gory, gruesome, grisly, full of violence.
offensive violence is coercion - something no committed anarchist condones.
Violence and intimidation for political ends is Terrorism. The poseurs that think their NihilistAnarchist Cause is served by turning demonstrations into riots enable agents provacateurs, enable the MSM labling, cast a negative light on the legitimate protests and make protest itself seem more dangerous, supressing turnout.
In other words, grow up.
Did you respond to my specific points?
Can you provide a single example of needed social change - the labor movement, the US civil rights movement, the recent Oscar grant incidents in Oakland, and yes, even Indian independence, that didn't at least require civil unrest?
There already is violence, it is coming from the police, and it is imposed on the world's poor by the elites every day.
The MSM ignores peaceful protests.
Now that's ridiculous. The drones are specifically used for killing people.
Seattle all over again. Do they think we cannot see it?
Here we go again! Paint all the WTO protestors as violent just like they did when I was in Seattle, which lets the MSM demonize the protestors as "bad" guys and the evil WTO as "good" guys. I guess you are right, MichaelC.
The 'violent protestors' started setting fires and breaking windows almost immediately?
Yeah, they are definitely agent provocateurs.
And I wouldn't be surprise to find some of them are on the wanted list from Italy's war crimes trials against the CIA...
As soon as I heard there was so-called violence, I immediately thought of the CIA. Of course we shall never know. It will be blamed on the people....
whatever. Infiltrators or not, plenty of wealthy locales in this world should be set alight. We're getting literally slaughtered by the elites in this world, and its high time we returned the favor. It's obvious controlled protest doesnt work, just like the anti-commies say, peace through strength.
One thing is clear - the elites think they can shove labor around, and laugh in the common man's face and not only pay shit wages, but drain savings accounts at the same time.
Its high time some major banker was treated to a show-trial. That might get someone's goddamned attention. Let the authorities escalate - they do anyway just for looking at their sorry sell-out bitch asses. You have to tire them out til they don't want to oppress anymore. That's why it took the unions in the USA to fight violence with violence, and that's how they came out on top. Fuck the elites. Knock one down in the street when you see him. Better yet, if everyone would just block traffic into malls that would do plenty, but the poor in the US dont organize - YET.
The Elite dont drive luxury cars, they have limo drivers... They live on enormous estates outside of the cities...
The Elite arent threatened by broken glass, they have taken out insurance policies, and profit off of property destruction...
Using the tactics of the oppressor has never liberated anyone... it only leads to a security state & loss of civil liberties...
property destruction justifies the use of force by the cops against the peaceful protestors, even innocent bystanders...
The "labor movement"leadership in the USA was infiltrated by FBI & CIA & Mafia long before the manufacturing base was shipped overseas...The unions have hardly come out on top, the AFL-CIO boss wears armani suits & pink neck scarves...
19th century tactics dont work in the 21st century, what with the crowd control technology & loss of civil rights...
Good luck organizing the working poor, or even getting them to turn off the football game...
The banksters were just given a show trial, between gifts of $trillions of bailouts... it is called Congressional Hearings...
There were Jews in the Warsaw Ghetto, Vichy-government French, and comfortable Irish in 1919, who made EXACTLY the same arguments you are making. In all cases these arguments were made by the privileged and comfortable.
I'm afraid I have to agree that breaking stuff is not going to get us where we want to be. I really want to believe that the people who were setting fires and breaking windows were not on our side, because we do not need those kinds of friends. By "our side," I hope it is understood that I mean those of us who believe that capitalism has been running amok for a long time now and is close to destroying humans' ability to maintain any kind of civilization on Earth.