Another US War Resister From Canada Court-Martialed
In June, 2008, by a vote of 137 to 110, Canadian parliamentarians in a non-binding resolution asked the Harper government not to deport US war resisters “who have refused or left military service related to a war not sanctioned by the United Nations.” Yet, one month later, in a controversial move, Canadian police jailed and then deported on July 15, 2008, US war resister Robin Long for having not reported a change of address. Canadian Immigration put Long into the waiting hands of US law enforcement authorities who immediately turned Long over to the US Army.
In a court-martial convened in record time at Fort Carson, Colorado, on August 23, 2008, US war resister Robin Long was convicted of being absent without leave from the Army and sentenced to 15 months imprisonment and a dishonorable discharge. Long agreed to a plea bargain with the US Army — the maximum sentence for the charges was three years imprisonment.
Long had gone to Canada after he was sent from his non-deployable unit at Fort Knox, Kentucky to Fort Carson, Colorado to be deployed as an individual replacement into a unit deploying to Iraq. He was outspoken publicly in Canada about his opposition to the Bush administration’s war on Iraq. Long lived in Canada for three years before he was deported. His Canadian citizen partner and their 2- year-old son still live there.
Long’s fifteen month sentence is the longest length of imprisonment for a war resister. US Army Sergeant Kevin Benderman, a 10 year Army veteran who had served in Iraq, also was sentenced to 15 months imprisonment. Although he had never gone AWOL, he refused to deploy to Iraq in a unit that was incompetently led. Benderman and his wife Monica also were very outspoken on the war itself. He was imprisoned for 13 months.
Long is the third US war resister who went to Canada to be court-martialed. On July 16, 2008, James Burmeister was court-martialed at Fort Knox, Kentucky and given a six months jail sentence and bad conduct discharge. Burmeister had served two tours in Iraq and was injured in 3 Improvised Explosive Device (IED) explosions. Despite a traumatic brain injury and severe post traumatic stress, he was ordered to return to Iraq. Instead, he went to Canada for 10 months. While in Canada, Burmeister spoke publicly about the Army’s use of a “bait and kill” technique to lure persons into a kill zone where they were then shot. He voluntarily returned from Canada and turned himself over to the military in May, 2008. Because of his dishonorable discharge, Burmeister’s traumatic brain injury and post traumatic stress will not be treated by the Veteran’s Administration when he is released from jail and treatment while in military prisons will be minimal, if at all.
US Marine Ivan Brobeck completed a standard 7-month tour in Fallujah, Iraq in 2004. While in Iraq, he decided that the US war on Iraq was the “problem, not the solution.” Upon his return from Iraq, he went to Canada in April, 2005. He voluntarily returned to the United States and turned himself into the Marines in November, 2006. He was court-martialed on December 5, 2006 and convicted of unauthorized absence and “missing a military movement.” He was sentenced to imprisonment for 8 months and a dishonorable discharge. He was released from prison in February, 2007.
Not all service members who went to Canada have been court-martialed upon their return to the United States. US Army Specialist Darrell Anderson served a tour in Iraq in 2004 and was wounded there. When facing orders for a second deployment to Iraq, Anderson went to Canada in January, 2005. He was outspoken in Canada about the shooting of innocent civilians at Iraqi checkpoints. He spent 20 months in Canada and returned voluntarily to Fort Knox in September, 2006 to get treatment for his post traumatic stress. Anderson was not court-martialed by the Army for his absence but instead was given an administration separation and an “other than honorable” discharge.
Approximately 30 US service members have been court-martialed for their opposition to the Iraq war. Their sentences have ranged from confinement to their military base for three months (in one instance) to 15 months imprisonment. The average sentence is 6-8 months imprisonment although three have received sentences of 12-13 months) and either a dishonorable or bad conduct discharge.
Around two hundred US service members remain in Canada awaiting the Canadian government’s determination of whether they will be accorded refugee status or whether they will be denied and deported back to the United States. Although Canada has refused to send its military to Iraq as a part of the “coalition of the willing,” Canada is cooperating with the Bush administration in punishing those in the US military who are opposed to the war on Iraq. By returning the war resisters to the United States military, the Canadian government is insuring they will be court-martialed and imprisoned, a dramatic, 180 degree change from the Canadian government’s policies during the war on Vietnam that granted immediate political asylum to all US service members and draft resisters who went to Canada.
In other instances of Harper administration alliance with the Bush policies, Canada has paid Canadian citizen Maher Arar $10 million dollars for the Bush administration’s kidnapping, extraordinary rendition to Syria where he was tortured for ten months. Also, the Harper administration is using the politically tainted FBI’s National Crime Information Center data base to deny entry to US citizens who have been arrested in the United States for misdemeanor violations while protesting the war on Iraq and torture.
Please support the war resisters in jail and in Canada with your letters and financial support.
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
43 Comments so far
Show All"I was just following orders." sound familiar?
It's one thing when a person joins b/c they want to fight for freedom and whatnot. But what happens to that person when they are on the ground and they see that freedom is not what we are bringing to the table. Killing innocent people and justifing it with "those were the rules of engagement" does not make one a hero. Raining down discontent and devestation in the form of bombs will not ever convince the people who happen to survive that we are the "good guys". Our government has killed civilians and continue to do so.
Who here can honestly say, that if a bomb was dropped on their home and their famliy members were killed, they would turn around and thank our military for spreading democracy? They probably would pick up a gun and join the revolution, oops, I mean the insurgents.
I must be mistaken... I was suffering the impression that the majority of our forces in Iraq are Reservists, not including contractual, private enterprises. Quite a few of those were holding regular jobs, have, or had, families, mortgages, water and electric bills...and are in their fifties, having been reservists for upwards of twenty years for extra income, pensions, get away for awhile, etc.
I agree with Siouxrose that our species needs to take, build, a strong conceptual leap, bridge, over the chasms in our current thinking if we are to survive a very violent universe. That alone will, or should, consume our intellectual energies. Why waste it on petty power/wealth struggles that are ultimately self-defeating and destructive of the 'good' we do.
I just don't know about all that alchemy and Capricorn, Saturn rising, mumbo-jumbo, God/Dog stuff. Or I do, but not relevant.
During Gulf War I the Army had eighteen Divisions...Clinton stupidly cut it to ten...which is why the Guard and Reserve had to be overused...the U.S. War concept was always to have the ability to fight a two front war simoultaneously ...Clinton blew that strategy...
"I was suffering the impression that the majority of our forces in Iraq are Reservists, not including contractual, private enterprises. Quite a few of those were holding regular jobs, have, or had, families, mortgages, water and electric bills...and are in their fifties, having been reservists for upwards of twenty years for extra income, pensions, get away for awhile, etc."
you are not mistaken...the concept of the Guard and Reserve was to free up the Regular Army to Deploy and the older Reservists would man the fort here
Actually, the older Guard troops tend to be the best soldiers for Iraq; many come from a law enforcement background and they are mature enough that they don't open fire the first time a civilian back-talks them.
Yes...that is true also...you are very right
This, of course, assumes that they do not die of heart attacks from being out of shape in the Heat over there. Several have. The general fitness level of a lot of the guys I knew in the Guard left a lot to be desired, to say the least.
Weekend Warriors...yup
That is why the Military has a 20 year retirement...Age and Gravity take its toll
On the other hand, I remember one 50 plus guy who would run PT on Sunday morning, and after the two mile run, which he finished before a lot of guys half his age, would stand around chain smoking and drinking from his canteen. I made the mistake of asking for a drink once; it was Southern Comfort.
At this time, National Guardsmen make up about 25% of the forces in Iraq. At one point it was 50%, several years ago.
The best commentary here would be THE PRESENT CRISIS, a poem by James Russell Lowell.
Snow Wolf, you are always telling somebody to think about this or that. Are you sure you are thinking or merely preaching the gospel of conquest in the name of the empire of the USA.
Well of course I want people to think...these Guys are not Draft Dodgers...they are deserters...and frankly Military Courts are very lenient in cases like this...15 months confinement and a "Duck Dinner" or "Big Chicken Dinner" is a cakewalk considering desertion in wartime can be considered a capital offense..
Empire USA?...what planet are you on?...we are not colonialists...you know this...and I only WISH we were doing it for the oil
Goodness SnowWolf . . . what planet are YOU on? Not an Empire? The US has military bases in over 60 countries. What do you call that if NOT an Empire?
"The US has military bases in over 60 countries."
Which country's governments want the bases out?
SEVENTH SON: Another enlightened warrior, you understand. A few men in this thread have their concept of masculinity tied up with the illusion of patriotism. I wonder if they really think the law of karma will hold them unaccountable for shooting at villagers who posed NO direct threat to them or their own families just so the military industrial complex, the engine in the US's failing wealth machine, can unload old inventory to make space for the newest fashion in KILLING instrumentations. THIS is the paradigm that MUST change, that mankind must graduate beyond... and part of the process calls for the integration of VENUS, an appreciation for beauty, for architecture, for painting, music, dance, theater, art.. OTHER ways for people to express themselves. Anger, aggression, competition ARE parts of the human experience, part of the human ego in its lowest substructure, but hardly account for the entirety of who we are as a set of peoples. It is very important to recognize that the church/state of many lands has operated in a way that limited access to basic needs (food, clothing, shelter) for too many, then strategically pitted group against group while the relative claim to wealth for the most part remained with the established elites. They make war at their pleasure, and while America was founded to BE something else, this dark snake of consciousness long woven into the human psyche has managed to subduct this nation's heart and soul. The surgical removal of the beast and the ensuing healing process will take at least ONE generation, possibly more.
Years ago I consulted with a trance medium who told me there will be WAR on our soil in the teens (i.e. 2013 or so). America cannot continue on as a wounded giant, drunk on its own power, stamping out entire nations and claiming their resources, hiding these egregious acts behind words like "democracy" or "freedom." Karma is karma, and the astro-logos shows IT IS COMING back around, and as I see it, 2010 really begins to demonstrate this inviolate Truth. Karm is no respecter of nations, particularly those that act (new version of "Divine right of king?) as if the LAWS do not apply to them!
For my own curosity, if your trance medium was right and we had a war on our soil, then if you had your way in disbanding our military services, wouldn't it be a very short war? Wouldn't we just surrender?
The thing that confuses me is what anyone that proposes dismantling the military proposes to do if your prediction was true? What would you do?
If you think patriotism is an illusion, where are you living? How do you live there? Who allows you to make that choice?
And it started a LONG time ago when the control-fetishists of the patriarchal religions started wiping out the more matriarchal systems of thought and buried the Divine Feminine. That is not to say we need the return of only FEMALE-dominated spirituality . . . we need the balance back.
I totally agree ( ~ 4,ooo year of "IT" reigning down )
But it's gone "beyond reason" for the last 400 years, since Descartes eliminated ( split off ) the sacred ( soul spirit ) from the body of mankind's already hollowed sense of meaning ( focusing upon only "thinking" as BEING ). This further extricated male dominion of nature, from the mandatory balance of womankind, _ a n d _ placed woman at the bottom of the hierarchy:
__ Male God
__ "male" holy spirit
__ male Jesus
__ male Clergy
__ male head of household
__ male children
__ wife
__ female children
__ dog ( some cultures have the pet above the women )
__ foreigners
The net impact is that the soulful exercise of morality ( the means ) plays out TODAY on a very low priority on the rationalized scale of expediency and profit ( the ends ).
What even worse, is that we are to "safely" delegate ( i.e. sanitized & sculpted ) issues of morality to our oh so effective religious organizations -- many of which are now hawking ( i.e. boosterism ) the warmongering line of FEAR and egregious profiteering & commercialism. And let's not forget the "sacredness of life" lack of birth control to drive population = poverty, for easier manipulation and profit ( while wars, our majority industry being weapons, and death -- are "relatively" OK ?????? ).
Humankind is naturally peaceful, life, and growth seeking
___ ( not war, scarcity, and death seeking ) ___
_____ W E __ M U S T __ C H O O S E __ W I S E L Y _____
Namaste
I hate to sound nasty, but you sound EXACTLY like whoever is the latest Reverend Crazy telling us that God, who hates fags, has informed him that America will be destroyed pronto for our sins. I guess all religions really are the same; just replace "God" with "Trance Medium".
Hey " ' t r u t h ' ", …
¿ are you any relation to Edward Teller, our dedicated Armageddon master of near infinite fusion bombs and star wars ?
Your apparent proclivity for PSYOPS & subterfuge while assaulting useful commentary, illustrates who you likely work for.
____ S・o ___ W・h・y _____ ☠ __E 。X。A。C。T。L。Y __ ☠
____ do you make _ A・L・L _ of the _ i m p l i e d __
____ N E G A T I V E __ a s s o c i a t i o n s _ o f _____
__ gay bashing ( hate crimes "fags" ),
__ false religion,
__ sins,
__ America destroyed promptly
__ nasty,
__ crazy, and __ t h e n __
_____ S I O U X R O S E ______ ?
.
☠ __ ☠ __ ☠ __ ☠ __ ☠ __ ☠ __ ☠ __ ☠ __ ☠ __ ☠ __ ☠ __
The __ n e t __ E・m・o・t・i・v・e ___ ☠_I・N・D・E・X _☠
__ of your ( actually + cleverly ) _ h a t e _ filled few words,
____________ is _ O F F _ the S C A L E , ____________
☠ __ ☠ __ ☠ __ ☠ __ ☠ __ ☠ __ ☠ __ ☠ __ ☠ __ ☠ __ ☠ __
__ and the only purpose I can imagine is to ACTUALLY sound
__ very NASTY and ( indirectly ) attack someone
__ who actual has constructive and empowering ideas !
___ ¿ And _ h o w _ does suggesting a possibility of having a war on our soil,
___ EQUATE to it being "destroyed promptly" ?
¿ Perhaps you actually have something to say, _ c o n s t r u c t i v el y _ ?
Namaste
What is it with you and the crayons? Do you really think it helps your case? Why don't you just use plain text like everyone else?
Siouxrose is spewing religious idiocy, just like the crazy reverend running around with the "God hates fags" signs. Like in his prophecies, an angry god (Mother Earth, in this case, I suppose), is going to chastise us, and good. Soon.
Pardon me if I decline to believe in your Gods, whether they reside in Heaven or are embodied in the Earth or some animal or plant.
Sorry TruthTeller . . . Siouxrose is no Reverend Hagee.
How is believing in something as crazy as a "trance medium" any different from what the snake handlers are doing in jesus-land?
How is AVOIDING the core issue of her statement, have anything to do with a "trance medium"?
You might consider how foolish it looks to attempt to discount all of SIOUXROSE's well made comments, by just picking out a small portion to focus upon.
______ And BTW, a trance medium is considered demonstrating scientifically measurable phenomenon, in many very respectable universities by thousands of researches -- so equating it to SNAKE OIL is quite a mistaken belief of your own, and is perhaps a century behind the accepted consensus world view.
So, by the lack of your ANY other response, does that means that you must agree with everything else she said ?
We really are interested if you disagree about male domination of family, corporations, and gov'tal policies -- and the effective CASTRATION of morality and ethics that directly results.
Namaste
Wow I guess I just offended your faith based religious beliefs. Don't stress it, though, I spend a good deal of my time irritating other faith based believers in religion, called Christians.
2B or not 2B ?
__ vs. __
2B irritating ?
.
It's not me doing the stressing, nor being so …
Namaste
"How do you support them?"
You don't support them...there is a world of difference between a draft dodger and a deserter...especially during wartime...
although I could never do it I can understand somebody going to Canada to avoid being drafted...
This Guy volunteered...and if he had second thoughts he should have applied for CO status or refused to go and stood a Courts Martial (there is honor in that)
your sympathy is misplaced...think about it...
That whole idea of being court-martialed (or worse) for deciding you don't want to fight anymore.
Ya know what I don't get? We keep espousing on and on about "Just say No". It's (still) everywhere in our public discourse. They tell us "Just say No". "Just say No." And of course, they mean only drugs . . . never mind the fact that some of those drugs are avenues to break through the illusion of reality and see how government and religion are f**king us every day of our lives. But when someone in the military decides to have second thoughts about killing and wants to "Just say No", they are punished for it. And Goddess forbid another draft comes along. No one will be able to "Just say No" then!
What War is that ?
__ Oh the Global War OF Terror that the USA is waging,
__ that undeclared war ?
Namaste
It doesn't matter where. That is a matter of semantics. This isn't a war anyway, its an occupation.
A volunteer is just that, a volunteer.
Yes, it does matter.
No, it's not just semantics.
When the USA causes the wars for creating FEAR, terror, torturing, greed-fueled suffering, control of American's perceptions ( PSYOPS ), and power ( world domination ). America's richest <1% benefit, while the other 99% suffer -- and the entire 2nd & 3rd world suffer too
And yes, it's now about "occupation" in Iraq -- but the WAR __ O F __ TERROR ( note: not "ON" ) continues to creates millions of new victims ( of FEAR ) everyday
Namaste
Sure, agreed. And, if you do not like it, STAY OUT OF THE ARMY. No one drafted this guy.
Perhaps I didn't make my point clear, its not about war, its not about occupation, its about a person that volunteered to serve and then deserted. Its not resisting the war when you volunteer and agree to serve. You don't get to change your mind. The time for that is before you join.
Its not complicated at all in my view. This is why we got rid of the draft. So no one would have to serve that didn't want to. It's strictly voluntary.
Unfortunately the poisonous corruption of uber-wealth is spreading northward from the US. When Canadian politics and media are nothing but an echo chamber for the messages of the super-rich, they will be no different than America.
Except for their lousy beer.
Very few people in the Army today have current enlistment contracts dating to before the Iraq war. They KNOW they are going to fight when they sign up. If you do not want to fight, do not enlist; pardon me for having scant sympathy for this person.
"Very few people in the Army today have current enlistment contracts dating to before the Iraq war."
Really? How do you know?
"They KNOW they are going to fight when they sign up."
Where in this article does it say that the person in question signed up after the Iraq war started, and knew he was going to fight?
And you have no sympathy for US Armed Forces personnel who oppose the war, and are put in jail for it?
Soo... you support oppressing and jailing people in retaliation for exercising dissent and standing up for what's right?
HOW do I know? From firsthand experience. Most enlistment contracts are either 4 or 6 years. GO back six years and your are in August of 2002, so the only people in today who signed up WITHOUT knowing about Iraq are those who went in for six between August of 02 and March of 03.
When you sign on the dotted line, you do so understanding that the purpose of the Army is to kill people and break things. If that is not for you, of if you disagree with this particular conflict, fine. Don't enlist.
If we were talking about draftees here, my take on this would be totally different, but we are not. This guy voluntarily enlisted. NO ONE made him do so.
Your perspective in my opinion is correct. A deserter is not the same thing as a "war Resister" and when you volunteer you no longer are a private citizen.
As you point out, draftees are an entirely different story and who could blame them, I know most of us didn't.
"How do you support them?"
One way, though longer-term, is to create safe havens in your city or town ( like immigrant sanctuary cities) for war resisters. Shorter-term send money, organize protests, raise consciousness, write representatives, etc.
How do you support them? How can you contact them?
you'll find all the information and links you need at www.couragetoresist.org
Yes Siouxrose, I have always had trouble (except when I was a young boy) with the narrow definition of "hero" being someone who uses violence. Our media perpetuates this myth constantly. It's disgusting.
"But wait!" they tell me, "This person is defending peace and freedom. He is a true hero." And my answer is always the same: "Let me get this straight. You believe someone willing to use weapons to kill others is doing more for peace than the Buddhist monk sitting on the top of a hill meditating?"
Like my bumper sticker says: "Killing for peace is like screwing for virginity."
We don't need another presidential candidate. We don't need different foreign policy. We don't even need to ban guns or anything like that. What we need is a MASSIVE paradigm shift. And I agree with you . . . it is on the way. I can feel it.
There will come a time, and it won't be too far up the road, when these persons who had the courage of their convictions will be seen as truer leaders, braver souls than the FOOLS who let themselves be seduced (or willfully consented) by a campaign of ceaseless, merciless carnage. It is way past time that the very concept of "hero" be deconstructed. So long as it is assigned to those who bomb the weak and plunder the poor, the very word is raped of meaning.
I watched "A Clockwork Orange" last night for the first time since my college days, and the type of personality drawn TO violence, is quite a study in human depravity.