June, 24 2021, 01:53pm EDT

"EU, Quit Being Big Pharma's Puppet," Say U.S. Members of Congress and Civil Society Groups at EU D.C. HQ Protest
German opposition to WTO Covid-19 IP waiver pits EU against Biden-Harris administration and rest of the world, threatens to prolong pandemic.
WASHINGTON
Members of Congress, and human rights, health, faith and labor leaders descended on the European Union delegation headquarters in D.C. to urge the EU, and in particular Germany, to end their dangerous opposition to the COVID-19 emergency waiver of WTO intellectual property barriers so more vaccines and treatments can be produced worldwide.
Speakers at the vibrant protest and press conference called on the EU to stop blocking the 130+ WTO countries trying to secure the waiver and instead engage in good-faith negotiations to achieve a comprehensive TRIPS waiver quickly so that greater supplies of vaccines, treatments and diagnostic tests can be produced in as many countries as possible, as quickly as possible, to end the global pandemic. They called out the EU's TRIPS submission as an attempt to distract and delay without offering anything new.
Protesters chanted "Hey EU, it's obscene to stop the waiver and block vaccine!" as an enormous papier-mache Angela Merkel puppet colluded with a pharma "corporate fat cat" to deny healthcare workers gigantic vaccine syringes.
Today's event was the latest example of growing U.S. pressure directed toward the EU, which has become increasingly isolated in its opposition to the waiver. In recent weeks, waiver advocates have held vigils across the U.S. at German consulates, reading the names of loved ones lost to COVID-19. Earlier this week, more than 130 U.S. civil society organizations called on President Joe Biden to use all available diplomatic means to persuade the European Union to negotiate on the TRIPS waiver in good faith. Absent speedy agreement on a waiver that is long-lasting and comprehensive -- so that people worldwide have access to COVID-19 vaccines, as well as diagnostic tests and treatments -- no one in any country is safe, the groups wrote.
Photos and video available here.
Civil society groups are planning more demonstrations against vaccine apartheid nationwide at over a dozen German consular offices in the days leading up to Chancellor Angela Merkel's visit to the U.S. and in D.C. during her visit -- unless Germany has relented on its opposition to the waiver. More than 130 countries, parliamentarians and citizens worldwide want agreement on a waiver at the next WTO General Council, on July 26, if Germany and the EU would just get out of the way of this critical step toward ending the pandemic.
Statements From Speakers:
U.S. Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.):
With the deadly Delta variant spreading rapidly, both here and abroad, the stakes couldn't be higher. It's quickly becoming the dominant strain in the US and more will be coming if other countries don't get vaccinated because the virus will continue mutating. We need shots in arms all over the world in order for the global economy to ever return to normal. And that is precisely why we need the TRIPS waiver so badly. We are calling on our European friends to stand with us, against Big Pharma, and support the waiver so we can ensure vaccine equity throughout the world. Currently, just 0.8% of people living in low-income countries have so far received a vaccine, compared with 20.9% of people globally, according to the New York Times interactive graphic, which sources data from local governments. Enough with the excuses, EU, let's get this done. Countries can't afford to be locked down back and forth forever. We must get this under control, and donated vaccines are nice and appreciated, but it's not fast enough.
U.S. Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.):
If you're going to profess to stand up for human rights and for dignity, then it begins by allowing every person to have access to a vaccine. You can't say you stand up for human rights, and then privilege profits and corporations over people's human rights. That is hypocrisy. We know that when you have a TRIPS Waiver, you will incentivize manufacturing across the world. ... People say, 'there is not enough manufacturing in the Global South.' The reason there isn't enough manufacturing in the Global South is because the incentive isn't there to invest in it because of IP laws.... We saw in India... part of the reason it was awful is because there was no provision to vaccinate the world... What's happened in India could happen anywhere. We're still not out of the woods... Let us not be rose-eyed about European history, the history of colonialism, the history of oppression... Europe still has a lot to do to make up for the injustices of the previous century. They need to start now, by getting people access to the vaccine.
U.S. Rep. Jesus G. "Chuy" Garcia (D-Ill.):
A global recovery requires a global response based on health needs - not big pharma. The COVID-19 virus doesn't recognize borders, and neither should global recovery efforts. That's why more than 130 countries around the world support a TRIPS waiver to facilitate global vaccine access, and we call on the EU to stop blocking this commonsense measure that saves lives.
Sara Nelson, Association of Flight Attendants-CWA, International President
Flight attendants need to live and we need to work, just like all the people we connect around the world in transportation on our airplanes, buses and trains. Shame on Germany and the EU for blocking a worldwide mobilization of vaccine production and distribution. As long as the virus lives anywhere our lives and livelihoods are in jeopardy. TRIPS waiver now.
Abby Maxman, Oxfam America, President:
We have multiple safe and effective vaccines, what we lack is the political will to increase their supply and facilitate the distribution of these vaccines to everyone, everywhere. The EU must do the right thing or get out of the way. Chancellor Merkel must decide to put people over profits. We need a people's vaccine now.
Paul O'Brien, Amnesty International USA, Executive Director:
Our world has been torn apart between vaccine haves and have-nots during this pandemic. We have the technology and resources to manufacture and distribute the 10-15 billion vaccines the world needs and the EU and some of its member states are blocking it to protect the private intellectual property power of pharma corporations. That is not just wrong-headed; it's not just going to prolong the pandemic, creating the space and time for new variants to hurt us all. It is going to divide our world even more between the haves and have-nots and may unleash a catastrophic upsurge in the denial of human rights for those who already face too much discrimination as the most vulnerable lives are lost, health systems for the have-nots are overwhelmed, protests are repressed as we see in Colombia, and economic inequality grows. If Europe cares about strengthening human rights globally, this may be the most important decision they can make today just by ending their resistance to sharing the vaccine recipe.
Pauline Muchina, American Friends Service Committee, Public Education & Advocacy Coordinator (PEAC) for the Africa Region:
As an African woman, I have joined other women of the world to cheer for Angela Merkel's leadership. Today, we call on Chancellor Merkel to remember the women of the world and their families and don't let us down by refusing to approve the TRIPS waiver. Help us save billions of lives through the mass production of COVID-19 vaccines. To the leaders blocking the TRIPS waiver, act now and save lives. We don't need late apologies that are empty words. You have the opportunity to save lives now, and prevent a catastrophe. Stop vaccine apartheid.
Reverend Amy Reumann, Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, Senior Director for Witness in Society
As Lutherans, we believe that caring for the health of others expresses both love for neighbor and responsibility for a just society. Ensuring access to healthcare tools such as vaccines and treatments is a social responsibility, and therefore, we must treat this global pandemic as such.
Lori Wallach, Public Citizen, Director of Global Trade Watch:
Germany has steered the European Union into the outrageous position of stopping a critical public health initiative the rest of the world demands to save lives and livelihoods in face of the unprecedented COVID threat. The EU's opposition is Trump-level cynical given EU officials say COVID vaccines should be a universal common good and that no one is safe unless everyone is while acting as Big Pharma's puppet at the WTO with tactics to delay and derail a waiver of WTO IP barriers the rest of the world supports.
Matthew Rose, Health GAP (Global Access Project), Director of U.S. Policy and Advocacy:
The European Commission must end its deadly opposition to the TRIPS waiver for COVID-19 vaccines, tests, and treatments. By continuing to block the waiver that is supported by more than 100 countries representing billions of people, the EU is standing on the side of Big Pharma and vaccine apartheid and is extending the pandemic, causing more suffering and death for those left waiting for access to the life-saving vaccines that are increasingly available on-demand in rich countries.
Statements From Participating Organizations:
Arthur Stamoulis, Citizens Trade Campaign, Executive Director
Over 130 U.S. civil society groups across a wide range of sectors called on President Biden this week to use all available diplomatic means to persuade the European Union to negotiate on the TRIPS waiver in good faith. Every day the EU continues to obstruct a fast and comprehensive final agreement means more needless death, more families pushed into poverty and greater chances of a viral mutation that can evade current vaccines and start the pandemic all over for everyone. Activists across the United States are already planning demonstrations at German consulates during Chancellor Merkel's upcoming visit. Too many lives are at stake to allow her government to drag out the waiver talks forever.
Tulika Singh PhD, Right to Health Action, Fundraising Lead
After 19 agonizing days in a crowded hospital in India, my grandmother died of COVID-19. Thinking about her last moments in isolation haunts me. I am afraid for the health of my 89-year old grandfather, who continues to be at high-risk of COVID-19. We simply cannot afford to delay life-saving vaccines and allow this virus to take more lives. Without action from the EU to support a comprehensive TRIPS waiver, people will not get the vaccine till 2024. None of our family members are safe until everyone has the vaccine. We have the choice to control this pandemic and save millions of lives if the EU acts now.
Julie Steendam, European Citizens' Initiative No Profit on Pandemic, Coordinator
Internal pressure on the European Commission is rising: already 205.000 European citizens have signed the official legislative petition No Profit on Pandemic, and the European Parliament has voted in favour of the patent waiver. And also from the outside they become isolated, when Americans start protesting at EU offices. It's time for Europe to show which interests they defend: private profits or people's safety.
Public Citizen is a nonprofit consumer advocacy organization that champions the public interest in the halls of power. We defend democracy, resist corporate power and work to ensure that government works for the people - not for big corporations. Founded in 1971, we now have 500,000 members and supporters throughout the country.
(202) 588-1000LATEST NEWS
UN Report Estimates Bold Climate Action Would Deliver $100 Trillion in Benefits by 2100
"If we choose to stay on the current path—powering our economies with fossil fuels, extracting virgin resources, destroying nature, polluting the environment—the damages would stack up."
Dec 09, 2025
A new report from the United Nations Environment Program has found that addressing the global climate emergency would deliver major economic benefits, in addition to creating a cleaner and more habitable planet.
The seventh edition of the Global Environmental Outlook (GEO), released on Tuesday, estimates that making up-front investments in climate action now would begin to yield global macroeconomic benefits starting in 2050, potentially growing to $20 trillion per year by 2070 and $100 trillion by 2100.
The report, which was the product of nearly 300 multi-disciplinary scientists across more than 80 countries, argues that a total of $8 trillion in annual investment from this year until 2050 would be needed to achieve its climate goals. But, the report stresses, the cost of inaction would be far greater.
"If we choose to stay on the current path—powering our economies with fossil fuels, extracting virgin resources, destroying nature, polluting the environment—the damages would stack up," the report warns. "Climate change would cut 4% off annual global GDP by 2050, claim many lives, and increase forced migration."
Other likely consequences of inaction, warns the report, include "Amazon forest dieback and ice-sheet collapse," along with the loss of "hundreds of millions more hectares of natural lands." The report also projects that global food availability will fall if the climate crisis is not addressed, and that increased air pollution will cause an additional 4 million premature deaths per year.
The report recommends a rapid move away from fossil fuels, as well as a drastic rethinking of agricultural subsidies so that they no longer "directly favor activities that have significant harmful effects on the environment, including on biodiversity."
Robert Watson, a co-chair of the GEO assessment, said in an interview with the Guardian that the climate crisis cannot simply be seen as an environmental issue given that it is now "undermining our economy, food security, water security, human health," and also creating national security problems by increasing "conflict in many parts of the world."
In an interview with BBC, Watson also accused US President Donald Trump's administration of sabotaging the report by refusing to even accept its conclusions about the damage being done by human-induced climate change.
"The US decided not to attend the meeting at all," he explained. "At the very end they joined by teleconference and basically made a statement that they could not agree with most of the report, which means they didn't agree with anything we said on climate change, biodiversity, fossil fuels, plastics, and subsidies."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Report Exposes Instacart's Hidden AI Price Experiments That Could Cost Families $1,200 Per Year
"At a time when everyday Americans are struggling with high prices, it is particularly egregious to see corporations secretly conducting individual experiments to see how much a person is willing to pay," said one advocate.
Dec 09, 2025
Consumer advocates on Tuesday called on the Federal Trade Commission and state officials to investigate artificial intelligence-enabled pricing experiments used by Instacart, the grocery shopping app millions of Americans rely on, that charge up to 23% more for some shoppers than others when they buy the same item at the same store.
Consumer Reports joined the advocacy group Groundwork Collaborative and the labor-focused media organization More Perfect Union to uncover Instacart's pricing experiments enabled by Eversight, an AI pricing software that Instacart acquired in 2022. The company's CEO said last year that the experiments have helped the company “to really figure out which categories of products our customers [are] more price sensitive on"—in other words, to tailor prices based on a customer's shopping habits, whether they're near a competing store, and other factors.
The groups' study, Same Cart, Different Price, describes how researchers ran five tests with 437 participants, studying the prices of a basket of items bought at two Target stores and three Safeway stores using Instacart.
In one test at a Safeway in Washington, DC, shoppers logged on to the app to buy a carton of eggs from the same brand at the same time and found that the price they were given varied widely. Some shoppers were charged just $3.99 for the eggs, while others saw a price as high as $4.79—20% higher.
Shoppers at a Safeway in Seattle saw a 23% difference in prices for Skippy peanut butter, Oscar Mayer turkey, and Wheat Thins crackers. At two different Safeways in Washington, DC, Instacart quoted shoppers at one store a price that was 23% higher than at another for Signature Select Corn Flakes.
"It’s time for Instacart to close the lab. Americans shopping for groceries aren’t guinea pigs and shouldn't have to pay an Instacart tax.”
For the same basket of groceries, shoppers at the Seattle store were asked to pay as much as $123.93, while others were charged just $114.34.
"The average price variations observed in the study could cost a household of four about $1,200 per year," said Groundwork.
Justin Brookman, director of tech policy at Consumer Reports, said Instacart's tactics "hurt families who are simply trying to purchase essential groceries."
"At a time when everyday Americans are struggling with high prices, it is particularly egregious to see corporations secretly conducting individual experiments to see how much a person is willing to pay," said Brookman. "Companies must be transparent and upfront with people about pricing, so that they can make informed choices and keep more of their hard-earned money. We encourage the Federal Trade Commission and state attorneys general to investigate Instacart’s pricing tactics."
Groundwork noted that Instcart's website acknowledges that it runs price tests, but states that "shoppers are not aware that they’re in an experiment" and are having their grocery prices selected for them via algorithm.
While Instacart has claimed its price experiments are "negligible," the groups emphasized that they're being used "against the backdrop of the fastest increase in food prices since the late 1970s."
After previous reporting on companies' use of "shrinkflation," "dynamic pricing," and other practices that keep prices high even as pandemic-era labor and supply chain issues have subsided, "today’s report shows Instacart’s experiments are yet another way corporate pricing tactics are squeezing American families," said Groundwork.
The study did not find evidence that Instacart is giving shoppers different prices based on their ZIP code or income, as companies like Amazon, Delta Air Lines, and Home Deport have been accused of doing.
But the groups said Eversight gives the company the capability to use that data to make pricing decisions tailored to particular shoppers.
“Instacart is quietly running pricing experiments on millions of shoppers during the worst grocery affordability crisis in a generation, and it’s costing households as much as $1,200 a year,” said Groundwork Collaborative executive director Lindsay Owens. “They have turned the simple act of buying groceries into a high-tech game of pricing roulette. When the same box of Wheat Thins can jump 23% in price because of an algorithm, that’s not innovation or convenience, it’s unfair. It’s time for Instacart to close the lab. Americans shopping for groceries aren’t guinea pigs and shouldn't have to pay an Instacart tax.”
The groups credited some state and federal lawmakers who have begun to take notice of pricing practices like Instacart's; US Rep. Greg Casar (D-Texas) introduced the Stop AI Price Gouging and Wage Fixing Act in July with the aim of prohibiting the use of automated systems to set prices. New York has enacted the first-of-its-kind Algorithmic Pricing Disclosure Act, which requires companies to prominently disclose to customers, "This price was set by an algorithm using your personal data" when they use methods like Instacart's. Other state legislation has been introduced in Colorado, California, and Pennsylvania to ban the use of surveillance to set prices.
The groups called on the FTC to take action under Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, which bans "unfair methods of competition." Those could include “'price discrimination not justified by differences in cost or distribution,' which appears to match Instacart’s pricing experiments and fluctuations," the report reads.
The FTC could also bring enforcement cases or initiate rulemaking to officially label AI-enabled pricing strategies as an "unfair or deceptive practice," affirming that companies who use them are breaking a consumer protection standard.
"Fair and honest markets are the bedrock of a healthy economy," reads Tuesday's report. "Companies like Instacart offer great convenience, but they are increasingly pursuing corporate pricing practices that unfairly decouple the price of a product from its true cost. As more consumers learn about, and decry, these practices, perhaps companies will change course. But if they do not, policymakers should intervene and require them to change their practices."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Rights Group Warns US Allies Against Complicity in 'Criminal' Trump Boat Bombings
"The UK, Canada, and other allied nations who partner with the United States on counternarcotics efforts have ample evidence that the US is unlawfully killing people at sea," said Human Rights Watch.
Dec 09, 2025
A leading human rights organization on Tuesday pushed allies of the United States to more forcefully condemn and take steps to stop President Donald Trump's deadly boat strikes in international waters, attacks that experts have characterized as extrajudicial killings.
"The UK, Canada, and other allied nations who partner with the United States on counternarcotics efforts have ample evidence that the US is unlawfully killing people at sea,” Sarah Yager, Washington director at Human Rights Watch (HRW), said in a statement. “The rules-based international order depends on countries speaking out against violations, even when they’re committed by powerful friends.”
HRW specifically urged countries at risk of complicity to closely examine their maritime cooperation and intelligence-sharing with the Trump administration, which claims—without evidence—that every vessel targeted was involved in drug smuggling operations that posed a threat to the US.
"The UK, France, and the Kingdom of the Netherlands have significant influence in the Caribbean due to their overseas territories in the region," the group said. "All three governments are also participants in Campaign Martillo, a multinational counternarcotics detection, monitoring, and interdiction operation that includes US Navy and Coast Guard vessels, along with military and law enforcement units from a dozen other nations, including Canada."
"Australia and New Zealand, which are part of the 'Five Eyes' intelligence sharing community with the United States, UK, and Canada where the governments share all signals and geospatial intelligence by default, may also find themselves implicated in the strikes and should take steps to evaluate their own risks," HRW added.
While officials from the nations named by HRW have criticized and distanced themselves from the Trump administration's strikes, their comments have largely been vague and tepid—especially when compared to the responses of some South American leaders. Australian Foreign Minister Penny Wong, for instance, said her country "is not involved in these US actions" and that "it is for the United States to articulate the legal basis of its actions."
HRW also pointed to Canadian Foreign Minister Anita Anand's statement that “the United States has made clear that it is using its own intelligence” to target the vessels in international waters.
"It is not sufficient to accept the US government’s assurances that it is not leveraging shared intelligence for its unlawful strikes," said HRW. "In contrast, when asked directly about the legality of the strikes, [Ahmed] declined to address the matter, saying instead that 'it is within the purview of US authorities to make that determination.'"
Last month, the UK reportedly suspended some intelligence sharing with the US due to the boat strikes. But US Secretary of State Marco Rubio called the CNN reporting a "fake story," and the UK's foreign secretary cited Rubio's comment when asked about the report.
HRW said major US allies "should make public any internal legal assessments as to whether the US strikes are violating international law, use their bilateral relationships to raise concerns directly with US officials, and push for individual criminal accountability for those responsible."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular


