

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Members of Congress, and human rights, health, faith and labor leaders descended on the European Union delegation headquarters in D.C. to urge the EU, and in particular Germany, to end their dangerous opposition to the COVID-19 emergency waiver of WTO intellectual property barriers so more vaccines and treatments can be produced worldwide.
Speakers at the vibrant protest and press conference called on the EU to stop blocking the 130+ WTO countries trying to secure the waiver and instead engage in good-faith negotiations to achieve a comprehensive TRIPS waiver quickly so that greater supplies of vaccines, treatments and diagnostic tests can be produced in as many countries as possible, as quickly as possible, to end the global pandemic. They called out the EU's TRIPS submission as an attempt to distract and delay without offering anything new.
Protesters chanted "Hey EU, it's obscene to stop the waiver and block vaccine!" as an enormous papier-mache Angela Merkel puppet colluded with a pharma "corporate fat cat" to deny healthcare workers gigantic vaccine syringes.
Today's event was the latest example of growing U.S. pressure directed toward the EU, which has become increasingly isolated in its opposition to the waiver. In recent weeks, waiver advocates have held vigils across the U.S. at German consulates, reading the names of loved ones lost to COVID-19. Earlier this week, more than 130 U.S. civil society organizations called on President Joe Biden to use all available diplomatic means to persuade the European Union to negotiate on the TRIPS waiver in good faith. Absent speedy agreement on a waiver that is long-lasting and comprehensive -- so that people worldwide have access to COVID-19 vaccines, as well as diagnostic tests and treatments -- no one in any country is safe, the groups wrote.
Photos and video available here.
Civil society groups are planning more demonstrations against vaccine apartheid nationwide at over a dozen German consular offices in the days leading up to Chancellor Angela Merkel's visit to the U.S. and in D.C. during her visit -- unless Germany has relented on its opposition to the waiver. More than 130 countries, parliamentarians and citizens worldwide want agreement on a waiver at the next WTO General Council, on July 26, if Germany and the EU would just get out of the way of this critical step toward ending the pandemic.
Statements From Speakers:
U.S. Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.):
With the deadly Delta variant spreading rapidly, both here and abroad, the stakes couldn't be higher. It's quickly becoming the dominant strain in the US and more will be coming if other countries don't get vaccinated because the virus will continue mutating. We need shots in arms all over the world in order for the global economy to ever return to normal. And that is precisely why we need the TRIPS waiver so badly. We are calling on our European friends to stand with us, against Big Pharma, and support the waiver so we can ensure vaccine equity throughout the world. Currently, just 0.8% of people living in low-income countries have so far received a vaccine, compared with 20.9% of people globally, according to the New York Times interactive graphic, which sources data from local governments. Enough with the excuses, EU, let's get this done. Countries can't afford to be locked down back and forth forever. We must get this under control, and donated vaccines are nice and appreciated, but it's not fast enough.
U.S. Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.):
If you're going to profess to stand up for human rights and for dignity, then it begins by allowing every person to have access to a vaccine. You can't say you stand up for human rights, and then privilege profits and corporations over people's human rights. That is hypocrisy. We know that when you have a TRIPS Waiver, you will incentivize manufacturing across the world. ... People say, 'there is not enough manufacturing in the Global South.' The reason there isn't enough manufacturing in the Global South is because the incentive isn't there to invest in it because of IP laws.... We saw in India... part of the reason it was awful is because there was no provision to vaccinate the world... What's happened in India could happen anywhere. We're still not out of the woods... Let us not be rose-eyed about European history, the history of colonialism, the history of oppression... Europe still has a lot to do to make up for the injustices of the previous century. They need to start now, by getting people access to the vaccine.
U.S. Rep. Jesus G. "Chuy" Garcia (D-Ill.):
A global recovery requires a global response based on health needs - not big pharma. The COVID-19 virus doesn't recognize borders, and neither should global recovery efforts. That's why more than 130 countries around the world support a TRIPS waiver to facilitate global vaccine access, and we call on the EU to stop blocking this commonsense measure that saves lives.
Sara Nelson, Association of Flight Attendants-CWA, International President
Flight attendants need to live and we need to work, just like all the people we connect around the world in transportation on our airplanes, buses and trains. Shame on Germany and the EU for blocking a worldwide mobilization of vaccine production and distribution. As long as the virus lives anywhere our lives and livelihoods are in jeopardy. TRIPS waiver now.
Abby Maxman, Oxfam America, President:
We have multiple safe and effective vaccines, what we lack is the political will to increase their supply and facilitate the distribution of these vaccines to everyone, everywhere. The EU must do the right thing or get out of the way. Chancellor Merkel must decide to put people over profits. We need a people's vaccine now.
Paul O'Brien, Amnesty International USA, Executive Director:
Our world has been torn apart between vaccine haves and have-nots during this pandemic. We have the technology and resources to manufacture and distribute the 10-15 billion vaccines the world needs and the EU and some of its member states are blocking it to protect the private intellectual property power of pharma corporations. That is not just wrong-headed; it's not just going to prolong the pandemic, creating the space and time for new variants to hurt us all. It is going to divide our world even more between the haves and have-nots and may unleash a catastrophic upsurge in the denial of human rights for those who already face too much discrimination as the most vulnerable lives are lost, health systems for the have-nots are overwhelmed, protests are repressed as we see in Colombia, and economic inequality grows. If Europe cares about strengthening human rights globally, this may be the most important decision they can make today just by ending their resistance to sharing the vaccine recipe.
Pauline Muchina, American Friends Service Committee, Public Education & Advocacy Coordinator (PEAC) for the Africa Region:
As an African woman, I have joined other women of the world to cheer for Angela Merkel's leadership. Today, we call on Chancellor Merkel to remember the women of the world and their families and don't let us down by refusing to approve the TRIPS waiver. Help us save billions of lives through the mass production of COVID-19 vaccines. To the leaders blocking the TRIPS waiver, act now and save lives. We don't need late apologies that are empty words. You have the opportunity to save lives now, and prevent a catastrophe. Stop vaccine apartheid.
Reverend Amy Reumann, Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, Senior Director for Witness in Society
As Lutherans, we believe that caring for the health of others expresses both love for neighbor and responsibility for a just society. Ensuring access to healthcare tools such as vaccines and treatments is a social responsibility, and therefore, we must treat this global pandemic as such.
Lori Wallach, Public Citizen, Director of Global Trade Watch:
Germany has steered the European Union into the outrageous position of stopping a critical public health initiative the rest of the world demands to save lives and livelihoods in face of the unprecedented COVID threat. The EU's opposition is Trump-level cynical given EU officials say COVID vaccines should be a universal common good and that no one is safe unless everyone is while acting as Big Pharma's puppet at the WTO with tactics to delay and derail a waiver of WTO IP barriers the rest of the world supports.
Matthew Rose, Health GAP (Global Access Project), Director of U.S. Policy and Advocacy:
The European Commission must end its deadly opposition to the TRIPS waiver for COVID-19 vaccines, tests, and treatments. By continuing to block the waiver that is supported by more than 100 countries representing billions of people, the EU is standing on the side of Big Pharma and vaccine apartheid and is extending the pandemic, causing more suffering and death for those left waiting for access to the life-saving vaccines that are increasingly available on-demand in rich countries.
Arthur Stamoulis, Citizens Trade Campaign, Executive Director
Over 130 U.S. civil society groups across a wide range of sectors called on President Biden this week to use all available diplomatic means to persuade the European Union to negotiate on the TRIPS waiver in good faith. Every day the EU continues to obstruct a fast and comprehensive final agreement means more needless death, more families pushed into poverty and greater chances of a viral mutation that can evade current vaccines and start the pandemic all over for everyone. Activists across the United States are already planning demonstrations at German consulates during Chancellor Merkel's upcoming visit. Too many lives are at stake to allow her government to drag out the waiver talks forever.
Tulika Singh PhD, Right to Health Action, Fundraising Lead
After 19 agonizing days in a crowded hospital in India, my grandmother died of COVID-19. Thinking about her last moments in isolation haunts me. I am afraid for the health of my 89-year old grandfather, who continues to be at high-risk of COVID-19. We simply cannot afford to delay life-saving vaccines and allow this virus to take more lives. Without action from the EU to support a comprehensive TRIPS waiver, people will not get the vaccine till 2024. None of our family members are safe until everyone has the vaccine. We have the choice to control this pandemic and save millions of lives if the EU acts now.
Julie Steendam, European Citizens' Initiative No Profit on Pandemic, Coordinator
Internal pressure on the European Commission is rising: already 205.000 European citizens have signed the official legislative petition No Profit on Pandemic, and the European Parliament has voted in favour of the patent waiver. And also from the outside they become isolated, when Americans start protesting at EU offices. It's time for Europe to show which interests they defend: private profits or people's safety.
Public Citizen is a nonprofit consumer advocacy organization that champions the public interest in the halls of power. We defend democracy, resist corporate power and work to ensure that government works for the people - not for big corporations. Founded in 1971, we now have 500,000 members and supporters throughout the country.
(202) 588-1000"This disgraceful vote does not change Congress' legal duty, and it certainly does not silence the millions of Americans who oppose another illegal war," said an ACLU director.
As US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth declared Thursday that "the amount of firepower over Iran and over Tehran is about to surge dramatically," four Democrats in the House of Representatives voted with nearly all Republicans to reject a bipartisan war powers resolution that would have halted President Donald Trump and Israel's assault on the Middle East country.
Democratic Reps. Henry Cuellar (Texas), Jared Golden (Maine), Greg Landsman (Ohio), and Juan Vargas (Calif.) stood with the GOP for the 212-219 vote against H.Con.Res.38, which was led by Reps. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) and Thomas Massie (R-Ky.). The only other Republican to support the resolution was Rep. Warren Davidson (Ohio)—though GOP Rep. Tony Gonzales (Texas), who is facing an unrelated scandal, did not participate.
Dylan Williams, vice president for government affairs at the think tank Center for International Policy, highlighted that given Massie and Davidson's votes, "if those four Democrats had stuck with their caucus and their voters, it would have passed."
"Everyone who opposed the resolution owns this war—along with the casualties, rising gas prices, and regional chaos that comes with it."
The House vote came just a day after Democratic US Sen. John Fetterman (Pa.) and all of the chamber's Republicans but Sen. Rand Paul (Ky.) rejected S.J.Res.104, a similar resolution sponsored by Paul and Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.). As with the Wednesday vote, a range of critics called out Congress for enabling Trump's illegal and already seemingly endless war.
"This is a shameful abdication of Congress' constitutional authority to take the country to war," said Defending Rights & Dissent, noting the rising death toll. "US and Israeli strikes have hit elementary schools, hospitals, and the capital city of Tehran, home to 10 million. Six US service members have died. Trump is carrying out yet another regime change war of choice, and the American people have been overwhelmingly clear that they don't support it."
"This was Congress' best chance to stop further killings, to stop an all-out regional war with no end in sight, and to uphold the constitutional principle that prevents presidents from going rogue," the group continued. "We are deeply disappointed in both chambers' failure to stand up to this dangerous insanity."
Christopher Anders, director of the ACLU's democracy and technology division, stressed in a statement that "this failed war powers vote is nothing short of cowardly, but Congress can't dodge the Constitution forever."
"By refusing to rein in President Trump's unauthorized war with Iran, Congress has allowed President Trump to make a mockery of the Constitution and is trying to duck responsibility for putting service members and civilians in great danger," Anders added. "But, this disgraceful vote does not change Congress' legal duty, and it certainly does not silence the millions of Americans who oppose another illegal war. We will hold President Trump accountable for this abuse of power."
In the lead-up to Thursday's vote, one unnamed "senior progressive House Democrat" told Axios that the groups including Justice Democrats, MoveOn, Progressive Change Campaign Committee, and Our Revolution "will primary anyone" who votes no.
After the vote, Justice Democrats shared the congressional office numbers of the four Democrats, and said to "call these spineless Dems who support Trump's new forever war with Iran and tell them to go to war themselves if they want it so bad."
Another progressive group, a youth-led climate organization Sunrise Movement, also took aim at the House Democrats who voted with the GOP, declaring on social media: "Absolutely ridiculous. Call them out. Vote them out."
Council on American-Islamic Relations government affairs director Robert S. McCaw commended all lawmakers "who voted to uphold Congress' constitutional duty and demand an end to unauthorized hostilities with Iran," particularly Massie and Davidson for their "courage to break with their party and stand on principle."
It is also "deeply disappointing" that some Democrats "joined Republicans to defeat this effort and enable an unconstitutional war," he said, warning that "their votes helped give the administration a green light to continue a dangerous escalation that threatens American lives and regional stability."
Earlier this week, Cuellar, Golden, and Landsman joined Democratic Reps. Jim Costa (Calif.), Josh Gottheimer (NJ), and Jimmy Panetta (Calif.) to introduce a competing war powers resolution that would let Trump wage war on Iran for a month. Noting that proposal, McCaw argued that "Americans did not elect Congress to issue a '30 days of carnage hall pass' for an unauthorized war. If a war is unconstitutional today, it should not be allowed to continue for another month."
“The Constitution is clear: Congress, not the president, has the authority to decide when this nation goes to war," he added. "The American people must continue pressing their elected representatives to reclaim that authority and stop another disastrous war in the Middle East before it spirals further out of control."
As of Thursday, the Iranian government put the death toll at 1,230, though US and Israeli attacks continue, and Hegseth said that "we have only just begun to fight and fight decisively... If you think you've seen something, just wait. The amount of combat power that's still flowing, that's still coming, that we'll be able to project over Iran is a multiples of what it currently is right now."
On top of the lives lost, recent reporting suggests that Trump's war on Iran could be costing US taxpayers $1 billion per day. Calling the House vote "profoundly disappointing," Demand Progress senior policy adviser Cavan Kharrazian said that "everyone who opposed the resolution owns this war—along with the casualties, rising gas prices, and regional chaos that comes with it."
"Congress needs to stop listening to warmongering elites," Kharrazian added, "and start listening to the American people who are sick and tired of being dragged into forever wars."
"Israel built AI targeting systems in Gaza—approved kills in 20 seconds, 10% error rate accepted," said one expert. "Now those same systems are running over Iran... and there’s an arms industry IPO-ing off the back of it."
After Israel's unprecedented use of artificial intelligence to select bombing targets in Gaza, experts are now sounding the alarm regarding what one analyst on Thursday called a lack of human supervision over Israeli AI targeting in Iran.
"Similarities between Israel's bombing of Gaza and Tehran are growing stronger," Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft executive vice president Trita Parsi said Thursday on X. "In both cases, it appears Israel is using AI without any human oversight."
"For instance, Israel has bombed a park in Tehran called 'Police Park,'" Parsi added. "It has nothing to do with the police. But it appears AI identified it as a target since Israel is bombing all government-related buildings. No one in Israel bothered to check and find out that it is just a park."
Borrowing from startup vernacular, tech journalist Jacob Ward calls Israel's use and export of AI technology in the post-Gaza era "lethal beta."
"Gaza was the prototype," Ward explained in a video posted this week on Bluesky. "Iran is the launch."
"[It's] a live-fire, live-ordnance lab experiment on people, killing people, that creates a pipeline of exportable products to the rest of the world, and it has become a big industry in Israel—and it's something that we in the United States have been dealing with and doing business with for some time as well."
Israel built AI targeting systems in Gaza — approved kills in 20 seconds, 10% error rate accepted. Now those same systems are running over Iran and being exported all over the world. I’m calling this “lethal beta,” and there’s an arms industry IPO-ing off the back of it. Full breakdown at
[image or embed]
— Jacob Ward (@byjacobward.bsky.social) March 3, 2026 at 4:45 PM
Previous investigations have detailed how the IDF uses Habsora, an Israeli AI system that can automatically select airstrike targets at an exponentially faster rate than ever before. One Israeli intelligence source asserted that the technology has transformed the IDF into a “mass assassination factory” in which the “emphasis is on quantity and not quality” of kills.
Mistakes were all but inevitable, but expert critics argue Israeli policy has made matters worse. In the tense hours following the Hamas-led attack of October 7, 2023, mid-ranking IDF officers were empowered to order attacks on not only senior Hamas commanders but any fighter in the resistance group, no matter how low-ranking.
According to a New York Times investigation, IDF officers were also permitted to risk up to 20 civilian lives in each airstrike, and up to 500 noncombatant lives per day. Even that limit was lifted after just a few days. Officers could order any number of strikes as they believed were legal, with no limits on civilian harm.
Senior IDF commanders sometimes approved strikes they knew could kill more than 100 civilians if the target was considered high-value. In one AI-aided airstrike targeting one senior Hamas commander, the IDF dropped multiple US-supplied 2,000-pound bombs, which can level an entire city block, on the Jabalia refugee camp in October 2023.
That bombing killed at least 126 people, 68 of them children, and wounded 280 others. Hamas said four Israeli and three international hostages were also killed in the attack.
The Washington Post reported Wednesday that the US military in Iran has "leveraged the most advanced artificial intelligence it’s ever used in warfare, a tool that could be difficult for the Pentagon to give up even as it severs ties with the company that created it."
According to the Post, Palantir's Maven Smart System—which contains Anthropic's Claude AI language model—reportedly helped US commanders select 1,000 Iranian targets during the war's first 24 hours alone.
Experts are urging a more cautious approach to military AI use. Paul Scharre, executive vice president at the Center for a New American Security, told the Post that “AI gets it wrong... We need humans to check the output of generative AI when the stakes are life and death.”
It is not publicly known whether AI was used in connection with any of the deadliest massacres of the current war on Iran, which has left more than 1,000 Iranians dead, including around 175 children and others who were killed by what first responders and victims' relatives said was a double-tap strike on a girls' school last Saturday in the southern city of Minab.
Last week, Trump ordered all federal agencies including the Department of Defense to stop using all Anthropic products in apparent retaliation for the San Francisco-based company's refusal to allow unrestricted government and military use of its technology over fears it could be used for mass surveillance of Americans and in automated weapons systems, also known as "killer robots."
Trump gave the Pentagon six months to phase out Anthropic products, allowing their continued use in the Iran war pending replacements.
Project Nimbus—a $1.2 billion cloud-computing and AI contract signed in 2021 between the Israeli government and Amazon Web Services and Google Cloud—provides cloud infrastructure, AI tools, and data storage for the IDF and other agencies. The deal prohibits Google or Amazon from refusing service to Israeli government, military, or intelligence agencies.
Academics and jurists are gathered this week in Geneva, Switzerland—with a second four-day round of talks starting August 31—for a United Nations-sponsored conference on lethal autonomous weapons systems.
Attendees are examining the risks posed by killer robots that can select and engage targets without meaningful human control. They are also studying the legal, military, and technological implications of autonomous weapons systems and working to build international consensus on regulation.
“The current failure to regulate AI warfare, or to pause its usage until there is some agreement on lawful usage, seems to suggest potential proliferation of AI warfare is imminent,” Craig Jones, a political geographer at Newcastle University in England who researches military targeting, told Nature's Nicola Jones on Thursday.
While some proponents of AI weapons systems have claimed their use will reduce civilian harm, Jones stressed that "there is no evidence that AI lowers civilian deaths or wrongful targeting decisions—and it may be that the opposite is true."
"If the United States is at war, then Pete Hegseth is a war criminal. If the United States is not at war, then Pete Hegseth is a murderer."
US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Thursday was condemned for his boasts on Wednesday about sinking an Iranian military ship after allegations emerged that it was "defenseless" at the time it was torpedoed in international waters by a US submarine.
Military.com reported Thursday that the Iranian ship had been departing from a biennial multinational naval training exercise that it had been invited to participate in by the Indian government.
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi has so far remained silent on the US attack on the ship, but other politicians in India delivering sharp condemnations.
According to the Times of India, opposition leader Rahul Gandhi tore into Modi for not speaking up after the US torpedoed a boat that his government had invited into its waters.
"The conflict has reached our backyard, with an Iranian warship sunk in the Indian Ocean," Gandhi said. "Yet the PM has said nothing. At a moment like this, we need a steady hand at the wheel. Instead, India has a compromised PM who has surrendered our strategic autonomy."
In a social media post, former Indian Foreign Secretary Kanwal Sibal said there was no way that the Iranian ship could have been perceived as any kind of military threat.
"I am told that as per protocol for this exercise ships cannot carry any ammunition," he wrote. "It was defenseless... The attack by the US submarine was premeditated as the US was aware of the Iranian ship's presence in the exercise to which the US navy was invited but withdrew from participation at the last minute, presumably with this operation in mind."
Drop Site News reporter Ryan Grim noted that, in addition to striking what appears to have been a defenseless boat, the US also didn't help rescue any of the shipwrecked men who were aboard the vessel.
"The Sri Lanka Navy was left to pull the dead bodies from the water," Grim commented. "I am hard pressed to think of any other nation throughout history that would do something so cowardly and despicable. We are genuinely in a league of our own, and American media—mostly shrugging off the bombing of a girls school and acting as if carpet bombing Tehran is a normal military tactic—is deeply complicit."
Author Bruno Maçães also pointed to the decision to leave the shipwrecked crew at sea as an act of historic depravity.
"Really quite extraordinary that the US bombed an Iranian ship and then left the surviving sailors to drown," Maçães wrote. "There are many many accounts of the Nazis or Imperial Japan saving survivors at sea. I see we have now dropped below that level."
Mohamad Safa, executive director of PVA Patriotic Vision, an international multilateral organization with special consultative status at the United Nations Economic and Social Council, said that the US attack on the Iranian ship constituted either a war crime or straight-up murder.
"What Pete Hegseth ordered the military to do violates international law," he wrote. "The Iranian ship was near Sri Lanka, in international waters outside the combat zone and on a training exercise. Under the Geneva Conventions, you are obligated to rescue the crew of a ship that you sink during war. Abandoned any survivors and leaving them to drown is illegal and a war crime."