How the Presidential Candidates Have Moved (Or Not) on Climate

For Immediate Release

Contact: 

Jason Kowalski
Email:
jason@350action.org
Phone: (202) 670-5345

How the Presidential Candidates Have Moved (Or Not) on Climate

Full list of links to videos and articles at the bottom

MANCHESTER, New Hampshire - Over the last six months, a network of climate activists, college students and volunteers have been showing up at rallies and events across the country to ask Presidential candidates about an issue that can often go missing from the campaign trail: climate change.

Coordinated by 350 Action, the 501(c)(4) political arm of 350.org, these paid staff and volunteers have helped push the leading Democratic candidates to adopt more progressive positions on the issue, and exposed some of the most outrageous cases of climate denial on the Republican side of the race.

“The 2012 election went by with only the slightest mention of climate change,” said Yong Jung Cho, Campaign Coordinator with 350 Action. “This year, we set out to make it one of the most talked about issues in the race, and expand the debate to force candidates to address issues of climate justice, and how the environment intersects with other issues like race, class, and immigration.”

350 Action estimates that it has asked more than 70 direct questions and reached every top presidential candidate multiple times.

On the Democratic side of the race, the 350 Action team has helped push Sanders, Clinton and O’Malley to address some of the highest profile climate and environmental justice issues facing the nation, driving each candidate to take progressively stronger stances as the race has continued.

Persistent questioning drove one of the most notable political “evolutions” of the campaign thus far: Hillary Clinton’s position on the Keystone XL pipeline. 350 Action volunteers first asked the former Secretary of State about her position on the project on July 28th, when she responded that “If it is undecided when I become president, I will answer your question.” A 350 Action volunteer pushed Clinton again on September 17th and responded, “I have been waiting for the administration to make a decision. I can’t wait much longer.” The very next day, September 18th, she got pressured again. Finally on September 22nd, after a question from a 350 Action volunteer in Iowa, Clinton pivoted and said, “I oppose it.”

All three Democratic candidates have also faced questions on offshore drilling, fracking, fossil fuel extraction on public lands, fossil fuel divestment, the investigation into ExxonMobil’s climate lies, and whether they will take a pledge to refuse fossil fuel industry contributions. On the last question, both Martin O’Malley and Bernie Sanders answered “yes,” while Clinton said she didn’t think she received much money from the industry, but she was “gonna take a look.” (Reports have shown that almost all of the Clinton campaign’s top bundlers have ties to the fossil fuel industry).

The massive methane leak in Porter Ranch has brought a harsh spotlight on the dangers of fracking into the presidential election. Just last week, Bernie Sanders told a 350 Action campaigner that he would shut down the well and expressed his strong stance against this extreme extraction. When a student with 350 Action asked Hillary Clinton about fracking, she expressed her support for Porter Ranch communities but refused to take a strong position on fracking. Asked again only hours later, Clinton told a 350 Action volunteer that “unless spills can be prevented it should not go forward.”

As for the Republicans, 350 Action and their supporters have had more luck eliciting declarations of climate denial and defenses of the fossil fuel industry than any significant evolution on the issue. Texas Senator Ted Cruz told a student in January that, “It is in fact a fact that the polar ice caps are bigger today than they were before…we have had 18 years of no significant warming whatsoever.” Both statements are factually incorrect. In November, Florida Senator Marco Rubio told a 350 Action volunteer that “it doesn’t matter” if fossil fuels cause climate change because his priority is keeping the economy strong. Asked this January about investigations into whether ExxonMobil lied about climate change to the American public, Rubio said the inquiries were “nothing but a left wing effort to demonize industries in America.”

“I never thought that when I grew up I’d become a professional question-asker,” said Miles Goodrich, a recent graduate from Bowdoin College, who has been stationed in New Hampshire for the last 4 months. “I certainly never raised my hand this much in school. The key is to find a good position visible to the candidate, get your hand up early, keep the question succinct, and always go for a follow up. They usually try and dodge the issue the first time.”

While 350 Action’s teams on the ground have peppered the candidates with questions around the country, its volunteers and everyday voters unaffiliated with the campaign who have kept the climate issue in the spotlight, according to Cho, the organization’s coordinator.

“There will be moments where we’ve got someone waiting to ask a climate question and then another Iowa or New Hampshire voter will get called on and take the words right out of our mouths,” she said. “With the crazy weather, big political developments like Keystone and the Paris Climate Talks, and disasters like the water in Flint and the methane leak in California, climate and energy issues are on the forefront of many voters’ minds. People are looking for leadership, we’re just helping ask the right questions to see who’s ready to provide it.”

During the busy primary months ahead, 350 Action will continue to pressure all presidential candidates to take stronger stances on the climate movement’s top priorities and pressing issues of the day. In particular, the campaign is looking for commitments to end fossil fuel development on public land, strong stances against fracking, support for a rapid just transition to 100% renewable energy, and a commitment to pursue environmental justice for communities across the United States and around the world.

###

2016-dem-candidates-kiitg-comparison

Democratic Candidate Questions and Answers

Keystone XL

  • Clinton 2010: inclined to approve KXL
  • Sanders Nov 2011: “In my view, the evidence is overwhelming that this pipeline is not in the best interest of our environment or the economic interest of the American people, and the president should reject it.”
  • Clinton July 28 2015: “if it is undecided when I become president, I will answer your question…I will not express an opinion until they have made a decision, and then I will do so.”
  • Clinton Sept 17 2015: “I have been waiting for the administration to make a decision. I can’t wait much longer. And I am putting the White House on notice. I’m going to tell you what I think soon because I can’t wait.”
  • Clinton Sept 18 2015: “what I have said is that you will hear from me shortly, and you will, but you’re not gonna hear from me today”
  • Clinton Sept 22 2015: “I oppose it”


Arctic drilling

  • Sanders Nov 4: introduces “Keep It In The Ground” Act, banning all new fossil fuel extraction on public lands, including the Arctic
  • Clinton Oct 16: “we want to keep more fossil fuels under the ocean and in the ground, that’s why I’m against Arctic drilling”
    • Aug 18 tweet: “The Arctic is a unique treasure. Given what we know, it’s not worth the risk of drilling”

Fracking

  • Sanders Oct 2014: supports state fracking bans in Vermont and California
  • Sanders Jan 21: “I’m against fracking, I’m against pipelines.”
  • Clinton Jan 22:I oppose irresponsible use of technology. I oppose a failure to disclose the chemicals. I oppose a lack of monitoring of methane. So, those are all the problems, and I don’t know whether they can be solved or not.”
  • O’Malley Jan 24: supports (regulated) fracking

New fossil fuel extraction on public lands

Divestment

Exxon investigations

  • O’Malley Oct 16 tweet: “We held tobacco companies responsible for lying about cancer. Let’s do the same for oil companies & climate change. http://omly.us/1RfPi0U
  • Sanders Oct 20: Calls for Federal investigation of Exxon’s climate crimes
  • Clinton Oct 29: “there’s a lot of evidence they misled people”
    • Dec 8: “Exxon Mobil funded all of this climate research, like starting 30, 35 years ago, and guess what! Their scientists found out that fossil fuels contributed to greenhouse gas emissions which contributed to global warming. Those were Exxon Mobil scientists who made that report. And then the company decided to try to just keep sixin’.”

Offshore drilling in the Atlantic

  • O’Malley Feb 2015: “very much opposed to drilling off the Atlantic coast”
  • Sanders Nov 4: introduces “Keep It In The Ground” Act, banning all new fossil fuel extraction on public lands, including offshore drilling in the Atlantic.
  • Clinton Dec 16: “I was doing a phone interview with, in South Carolina, I am, you know, not in favor of drilling off our coast”
    • Clinton Dec 16: “very skeptical about need or desire for us to pursue offshore drilling”

Campaign contributions from fossil fuel industry

  • Sanders/O’Malley July 6/7: sign pledge to refuse fossil fuel industry contributions
  • Clinton Dec 16: vows to look into FFI contributions “Well I’m gonna take a look, you’re asking me a question I never paid attention to because they don’t actually come and talk to me. I think they think I’m a lost cause, which I probably am.”

GOP Questions and Answers

Ben Carson

9/30/15

Of course there’s climate change. Any point in time temperatures are going up or temperatures are going down. When that stops happening, that’s when we’re in big trouble.

Marco Rubio

1/8/16

“[The Exxon Investigation] is nothing but a left wing effort to demonize industries in America.”

11/4/15

“It doesn’t matter” if fossil fuels cause climate change.

John Kasich

1/8/16

“I really have an opinion why [Republicans deny climate change] but I’m not gonna tell you, because it’s not good. I am running in a Republican primary.”

Chris Christie

1/6/16

“No I won’t ban fossil fuel extraction because it’s a stupid idea.”

Jeb Bush

11/3/15

“[Burning fossil fuels] has also seen a reduction in the amount of carbon emitted.”

Ted Cruz

1/12/16

“It is in fact a fact that the polar ice caps are bigger today than they were before…we have had 18 years of no significant warming whatsoever.”

PAST RELEASES:

January 22, 2016: Video: Asked About Fracking, Clinton Refuses to Take Strong Position

January 21, 2016: Sanders Strongly Against Fracking, Says He Would Shut Down Porter Ranch Well

January 14, 2016: Ahead of Tonight’s GOP Debate, Denial of Basic Climate Science Reigns Among Candidates and Networks

January 13, 2016: Video: Ted Cruz Stands with ExxonMobil on Climate Denial

January 11, 2016: Video: Kasich Hints to Why GOP Candidates, Republicans Deny Climate Science

January 8, 2016: Video: Marco Rubio Calls #ExxonKnew “Nothing But a Left-Wing Effort to Demonize Industry”

December 17, 2015: Hillary Clinton Opposes All Offshore Drilling, Vows to Look Into Fossil Fuel Industry Donations

November 5, 2015: Marco Rubio Says Climate Change “Doesn’t Matter”

November 4, 2015: “Keep It In the Ground Act” Raises the Bar for Presidential Leadership on Climate

October 29, 2015: Hillary Clinton Calls for Federal Investigation of Exxon

January 21, 2015: 350 ACTION RESPONDS TO SENATE VOTE ON SCHATZ KXL AMENDMENT

August 26, 2013: 350 ACTION PETITIONS THE W.M.O. TO NAME HURRICANES AFTER ACTUAL POLITICIANS WHO DENY CLIMATE CHANGE

###

350 Action is the independent political action arm of the non-profit, non-partisan climate justice group 350.org.

Share This Article