Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
US Airports Expand Passenger Full-Body Screening
BOSTON - Airport officials on Friday showed off new X-ray scanning machines they will use to screen more passengers with full-body imaging as called for by security advocates, a step that has alarmed civil libertarians.
An airport staff member demonstrates a full body scanner at Manchester Airport. (AFP/File/Paul Ellis) The $170,000 machines made by a unit of OSI Systems Inc (OSIS.O) show guards images of passengers' bodies through their clothes, revealing any objects hidden beneath clothing.
Three to be activated on Monday at Boston's Logan International Airport will be the first of 150 the U.S. Department of Homeland Security officials hope to deploy in the next few months using funds from last year's American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, also known as the stimulus.
The agency aims to have 450 advanced scanners at airports by the end of the year.
U.S. congressional leaders called for more full-body imaging after a Nigerian man was charged with trying to blow up a U.S.-bound airliner on Christmas Day using explosives smuggled onboard in his underwear.
Officials in Boston, where two of the four airliners hijacked on Sept. 11, 2001, took off, said they asked to be the first to receive the machines, which the agency will also deploy soon in Chicago and Los Angeles, among other cities.
For some randomly selected passengers they will replace the ubiquitous metal detectors.
Passengers can choose a pat-down search instead, though in past tests nearly all preferred the imaging scanners, officials said.
Logan airport previously had tested another imaging machine made by L-3 Communications Holdings (LLL.N) that analyzed natural "millimeter wave" energy radiated by travelers' bodies.
The new machines, made by Rapiscan Systems, a unit of OSI Systems, are known as "backscatter" machines and bounce low-energy X-rays off passengers.
PRIVACY CONCERNS
Both machines create similar ghostly on-screen images of the flesh beneath clothing. In a demonstration for journalists using Transportation Security Administration workers as volunteers, however, software obscured the individuals' faces and groin areas to address privacy worries.
A cellphone one volunteer had concealed above her hip showed up clearly on the screen.
To win popular acceptance, TSA officials also set the machines to quickly discard the images rather than store them, and placed guards out of sight of passengers so they cannot tell who they are screening.
Groups including the American Civil Liberties Union are closely watching the rollout, citing worries over invasion of privacy for everyday travelers and raising concerns that images of naked celebrities could leak out to the public.
Travelers interviewed had mixed reactions at Logan airport. Sean Weston of Boston said he did not mind the machines, especially if the process used to pick passengers for screening is fair.
But his mother, Kathy Weston of Connecticut, was worried. "I think it's an invasion of your privacy," she said. Would the TSA's extra privacy measures ease her concerns? "None of it sounds delightful," she said.
(Editing by Daniel Trotta and Mohammad Zargham)
- Posted in



84 Comments so far
Show AllSo that was real the reason for the Xmas bomber. OSI probably hired him just for the occasion.
http://haskellfamily.blogspot.com/2010/01/truth-about-flight-253-has-been.html
"using funds from last year's American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, also known as the stimulus."
and these machines will stimulate precisely what?
Perhaps a vast Orwellian security state where these will be installed in all government and megacorp (tm) buildings. After all the police state needs "seed capital," no? You didn't think the stimulus was actually to help the little guy or gal did you?
"and these machines will stimulate precisely what?"
These machines vdb,
Will stimulate private profits to one Michael JerkOff who is the "consultant" for the machines manufacturer. You see, this jerk, traitor and enemy of the US Constitution, Michael JerkOff, former Head of FEMA and DHS, is pushing these dangerous x-rays on us that could cause cancer so that he can loot the US treasury the way his boss the bushmonkey did.
Translation: no improvement of security since it can't detect the Undi-bloomer. Massive fraud for the taxpayer.
These Jerks have destroyed Aviation. They've made it so miserable nobody wants to fly anymore. So instead of everybody using a fairly efficient late-model airliner, which burns fuel only for four hours, now one-hundred private autos and RV's will belch exhaust for days poking across the US.
TJ
these machines may stimulate genetic damage.
maybe we should board planes naked...it will be much easier and simpler.
Naked and free.
"To win popular acceptance, TSA officials also set the machines to quickly discard the images rather than store them, and placed guards out of sight of passengers so they cannot tell who they are screening."
Yeah, I am so relieved because we trust them at their word, right? NO. Funny how often I was "randomly selected" back when I was flying around to/from AK. Am I male? young? person of (any) color? out-spoken? differently-dressed? uncooperative? NO.
I already didn't like flying anymore which is sad because it used to be fun and exciting and stuff. Now it's ridiculous - the last I heard they seldom catch the actual weapons smuggled through security during tests of the system. If the PTB were adept at this fascistic repressive nascent security state thing, they would have sent a patsy or a faux armed 'terrorist' to be 'caught', and then the flying public would think, 'Oh! it's really keeping us safe!' :P
So a bunch of voyeurs hide in another room and "randomly" select a lot of cute young women while they let the old fat men pass right on through.
Sounds like Amerikkka to me.
Oh, and by the way--who are the financial beneficiaries of this bit fascist technology?
"Three to be activated on Monday at Boston's Logan International Airport will be the first of 150 the U.S. Department of Homeland Security officials hope to deploy in the next few months..." This and other parts of the article seem to imply that full-body screening machines are not already in use, but according to CNN* today, "Forty body-imaging machines already have been put into use at 19 airports nationwide as part of a field test, according the Department of Homeland Security." Also, the "150" does not comport with the CNN piece: "The Transportation Security Administration expects to deploy 450 units by the end of this year."
I'm against even one full-body screen, but we do need to know exactly what's going on.
* http://www.cnn.com/2010/TRAVEL/03/05/body.scanners.airports/?hpt=T2
Coming to an airport near you. Feel safe yet?
http://www.suspectdetection.com/about.html
I think the real invasion of privacy is to have unnecessary X-rays passed through one's body. I would like to hear from epidemiologists an estimate of how many people will develop cancer 20 or 30 years from now because of the extra X-ray exposure.
I'm old enough to remember the shoe-fitting equipment which used x-rays on children's feet to see if your shoes fit correctly. They were used all over the nation from the late 40's through at least the 70's. From 1950, though, they knew they leaked radiation! I am not reassured that our government will now use x-ray machinery to scan our entire body. I haven't been on a plane now for over 3 years and am not certain I want to go on one again at least through a US airport!
This sounds really disgusting! Not only is the full body X-Ray Scan for airports a totally unnecessary invasion of privacy, but one gets exposed to enough radiation when s/he boards an airplane as it is. Why add insult to injury?
>>>>>U.S. congressional leaders called for more full-body imaging after a Nigerian man was charged with trying to blow up a U.S.-bound airliner on Christmas Day using explosives smuggled onboard in his underwear.<<<<<<
Not mentioned: these scanners would not have detected the underwear bomber's bomb. Low density plastic explosives would not even be as visible as, for example, an elastic waistband. They are spending hundreds of millions to develop new, even more expensive machines to replace these machines that have already sucked up billions to develop and deploy. The new machines are only experimental and not to scale at this point, but I'm sure we'll buy them when they are ready.
Somebody asked who profits: Remember Michael Chertoff had been recommending them but then it turned out he was hawking them for his clients.
Seriously, why can't people just take off their clothes for a minute before they get on board? I guess I'm a hippie but I'd rather pay less for my ticket and create jobs building wind turbines than pay for this obsolete technology. If people are so prudish, we could divide into two lines at the gate, boys in one, girls in the other, and put our clothes thru the carry on scanners, which can be used to detect plastic explosives at a much lower cost.
Of course it's a sin to fly anyway considering the atmosphere so if these scanners keep people at home they may be worth the money after all.
The real reason for this nonsense is to let the populace know, up close and personal, that the "authorities" have complete control over you. Your privacy, your sense of dignity and pride are stripped away.
This will make you a more docile citizen. If you object, you get marked in a database.
This is 1984, updated 25 years, with modern technology.
All this...just by tapping into the vast sea of unknowing, unwarranted fear out there.
The British security experts have already tested out these machines, and they don't work. They won't make anybody safer, but travelers such as that one Dutchman who stopped that bombing will. That has nothing to do with some high tech this or that. It has to do with low tech, guts and the willingness to put the body on the line for others. These machines are all about making a pile of money for a gang of rip off, con artists. That's all they will do besides violate people's privacy and maybe endanger people's health as the Spanish and German governments are already saying.
AD
NO ONE EVER STICKS together anymore to really impose a BOYCOTT....remember BOYCOTT days?
i believe they were called "Labor Unions" and "Strikes"...
like the greeks... who have SHUT DOWN THE COUNTRY TWICE in the past two months... protesting the "Shock Doctrine" economic proposals to bail out the bankers' bad bets over there...
funny irony... reagan FIRED the air traffic controllers... not that THAT had ANYthing to do with 9/11...
Your or should I say your grandchildren's tax dollars at work. More American paranoia. Just what the world needs. The country is being run by mentally unstable people.
Have you noticed recently (like in the last 20-30 years) the only news about air travel is bad news. Crashes, hijackings, attempted suicide missions, increased prices, decreased service, longer delays, reduction in service, overbooking, etc.?
Were someone to set out to kill the idea of air travel in the mind of the public they couldn't have made a more thorough or convincing case. On balance this is probably a good thing since jet aircraft are tremendous wasters of fossil fuels, there are other less costly means to get from point a to point b, and (at least for business anyway)there are other ways to do what formerly had required air travel to accomplish.
Like with the postal service, it feels like the end of an era or epoch and probably not any too soon.
Poet
Trains for travel within the continent. Teleconferencing for business. Planes still needed for visiting loved ones who live across oceans.
Joe
Unless cruise ships are converted to ocean liners, which of course could also be a target, like any form of mass trasnsit come to think of it. It looks like we are headed back to isolated provincialism. As I said, the end of an epoch seems to be arriving.
Poet
And make Michael Chertoff a boat load of money since he runs one of the companies that makes the machines.
I support full body scans and cavity searches. However, I must wonder, from time to time, why a country that has no problem knowing when and where you used your cell-phone last night, who you called, and what you said, can't seem to figure out where trillions of American dollars are being 'invested' in Swiss bank accounts and offshore hedge funds. 'Gosh, that's so difficult' they tell us, as they clap the handcuffs on and close the jail cell door.
The little guy is going to jail for tax evasion.
The big guy is going to run for governor of California for the same crime (check out Bill Simon if you don't believe me).
"I support full body scans and cavity searches."
Please tell me you are joking?
Or referring to the consensual, recreational kind.
· Yr Obd't Servant
When I have an x-ray at a hospital or Dr.'s office, the technician sets up the shot, then retires behind a shielded wall to limit exposure.
Now every American will, eventually, be subjected to such x-ray scans when entering or leaving government buildings, possibly banks, air ports, crossing the border, etc.
Remember, radiation effects are cumulative, even x-rays. Frequent fliers are really asking for it. Someone that commutes by air, say from San Francisco to Los Angeles. Two full body scans per day, five days a week. I think NOT!
Ahhnuld Schwarzenegger featured this kind of pervasive, intrusive personal scanning in a movie some years back:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7CX9Agzeh-c
I guess we can say that the PTB have been working very hard to make many of Arnie's films a reality.
Came across the following advice:
Please Take The Following Security Measures
Act as if you know where you are going even if you don't know.
Be as unpredictable as you can be.
For instance: Don't go to your favorite restaurant every Wednesday at 6:30 p.m.
Determine your route in advance.
Always keep distance between yourself and others.
Travel on main, well-lighted roads.
Don't talk to strangers.
Always lock your doors.
Don't keep a key to your apartment or home under the door mat,
or under a potted plant on the front steps.
Don't keep all of your money in one place.
If you think you are being followed, immediately beat a path to public space.
Walk erect and briskly; be alert at all times.
Dress in camouflage.
Report anything unusual or abnormal.
Always remember: You may be a target, even without your knowledge,
simply because of your nationality, ethnicity, political beliefs,
religion, or sexual orientation.
It is always safer to drive close to the center of the road.
Don't accept food from strangers.
Be careful whom you trust.
When going to disease-infested areas, be sure in advance
to get proper pillsand inoculations.
Wear a condom.
Better yet: Don't have sex, especially with strangers.
At night, walk in well-lit areas.
Better still: Don't walk at all.
Drive in heavily armored vehicles.
Install high concrete barriers or walls around your communities to keep out
those who hate you. Call them gates or fences.
If you think you might be attacked, strike first without pausing to assess
whether the threat is real or imagined.
The time it takes to think might cost you your life.
Remember: No place is safe yet some places are safer than others;
you may not be able to determine which is which.
If you know where you are going to die
stay away from that place
Mcoyote,
you forgot to mention that we should also embrace fear, lots and lots of it, and also embrace and support the state security apparatus in its quest to make us all safe.
a day en fascist amerika....
Passengers can choose between a pat-down search (Federal Fondling) or to stay home instead,
Full body scanners are x-ray machines. They cause cancer. They cause people's deaths.
Oh, and they should charge co-pays at the airport.
I would rather get to the front of the line, then take off every stitch of my clothes for the TSA to ogle me. Of course, I'm a guy and I happen to have little shame.
----
Alternatively, a protester might allow his/herself to be scanned, but with an alluring bondage costume under his/her clothes. If they're going to see naked bodies all day they might as well get all excited about their work.
True story:
As aircrew after 911, my company decided to have security fondle all employees (just to keep them afraid of sub-contracted security no doubt, Wackenthut) So this security weenie yells "UNZIPP YOUR PANTS" at my flight crew since he knows he's vested with the authority to arrest anyone who protests. It's his big chance to get even with pilots since we've been ignoring his azz for years.
Next week, same thing, except now there's a little room for the dork to humiliate us in. "UNZIPP YOU PANTS" he orders me.
"YOU DO IT" I countered, "IT'S YOUR JOB"
he argues, and I explain that I am not refusing, but that legally I cannot expose myself in a public place so he'll have to do the dirty deed.
he unzipps my uniform trowsers and sticks his gloved fingers in. I let loose with the most orgasmic moaning heard by all his co-workers. We come out of the little room and I slink by with the "Just phucked" look on my face.
He never made me do it again.
I recommend all air travelers refuse the x-ray and wear a silly smilie just to shorten the alternative process.
TJ
Awesome! More mental monkey wrenching the tight ass establishment please! More Hunter Thompsons fewer whiny Dim fans please!
Your assignment this week boys and girls is to watch Repo Man and read Hunter Thompson's Fear and Loathing on the campaign trail.
So, ummm, what country actually manufactures these machines? Please tell me that it's
not in China. After the hacking of Google and others, ( wasn't that from Chinese
government people?) Are these awful things made in the USA? If you insist on robbing people of their dignity, at least give Americans some jobs out of it.
I don't like the idea of countries like China manufacturing our computers, so please, don't let them be manufacturing these. Hey repubs, shouldn't this be a national security issue? Can we get our jobs back that way?
On the other hand, if these things morph into other uses, then you'll have a whole lot more viewers on C-Span. Congress, you'll really have no where to hide! Of course, it could do wonders for the undergarment industry. Victoria's secret, unplugged!
Oh yeah, Apple, don't even THINK about adding this" TRU VIEW " feature to one of your apps.
And you will still get the possibility of a further gate grope after the Nude-O-Scope.
Did anyone hear about the testing of drinks airside with litmus paper? Or the 4 goons who observe passengers boarding - it's called a staredown.
I don't think I could manage that last one without howling with laughter.
Jet airplanes consume five times the fuel as equivalent speed rail transport. This is simply due to the cost of taking a jet to high altitude. They can't fly at low altitude for various reasons.
The fascist pigs are delighted at the extra fuel consumption. They had to promote air travel over rail, because they were "obligated by law" to serve the petro-fuel shareholder interests.
Every major choice is made in the "Good ol USA" to better serve the shareholder interests. So travel by air, not rail, and be thankful you get to ride above the clouds.
Now this show must go on, so the fight with brown people must commence to fuel the show with the fossil resources under their ancestral lands. The brown people should give up their ancestral lands to the whiteys, like the Native Americans gave up theirs.
Imperial Blowback ensues. But of course the show must go, as a "legal obligation" to shareholder interests, so, no more privacy for the consumption slaves! Get naked in front of Big Brother, for love of country!!!
I thought the name of the company was rather instructive, especially if you pronounce the first 'a' with a long 'a' sound:
Rapiscan
Then if you just change the 'n' to 'm', I think you get a really clear picture of what is really going on.
We should develop the "Clockwork Orange" drug where the sceener would get nauseous when thinking sexual thoughts.
If the machine blacks out the private areas, how would we catch the underwear bomber?
Screeners should complete a thousand hours of viewing nude pictures of average people with blacked out faces in normal or non-sexual poses. The too much chocolate syndrome.
Can we have a radiologist check our scans for different forms of cancer. Part of Obama's health plan?
Hire nudists who have seen far too many other nudists. If you have been to a nudist beach, you have been exposed to way too many overweight and out of shape americans.
Acutally, the more I think about this job, the more I get revolted. The whole system will collapse when screeners have become repulsed by faceless, genitaless scans. The scans will become worthless as no one will be paying attention. It's just another profit center for OSI.
While millions of Americans worry whether they can survive the economic disaster that has struck them why do you fart around with an infinitesimal issue for them such as airport security?
I think these airport procedures are part of the overall program to cow the people.
Joe
I prefer to be screened instead of drowning in the Atlantic Ocean.
Crowsnest,
Since the Nude-a-scope won't detect bad stuff stuffed up you anus,
Would you prefer to be reamed by a "steel eel" with a camera on the end than risk a one-in-a-billion flight hour attack?
Would you prefer to give up all your civil liberties for a little temporary security?
If so, you deserve neither and will lose both.
TJ
The full-body screening cannot catch every attempt to blow up an airliner but would have caught the underwear-bomber. That's good enough for me. Hopefully a time will come when our devastating foreign policy will stop and the body-screening machines will not be necessary any longer. That is what I am working for.
With regards to losing civil liberties, the full-body screenings are kindergarten stuff compared to the powers given our government in the so-called "Patriot act". Are you willing to throw away your phone and computer Mr. Holier-than-thou Jefferson? Have you ever demonstrated in Washington against the Patriot act? If your answer is no then I can safely throw your holier-than-thou stuff in the waste basket because you are just a big mouth bitcher and nothing else.
With regards to fear at breakfast, I refused the call to serve in Hitler's army in February of 1945 when I was still a German national at the risk of being shot or hanged if caught. I am not afraid of terrorists. They are much, much less of a threat to me than the SS and SD were then. I want to live. I don't relish to die by boarding the wrong plane anywhere in the world. That's all.
Crowsnest,
Yes I did march in protest in 2003 against bush and his patriot act.
You are incorrect that the nude-a-scope could have caught the under-ware bomber. Although it cannot see anything below the skin, such as an orifice because it's using 2mm waves, it also cannot distinguish between elastic in underware and the dangerous stuff.
Don't you understand this?
And exactly how many have been killed by terrorists in the US since 2001?
ZERO.
But millions have died from flu and auto accidents in that same period. You are giving up you dignity and fourth amendment liberty for no logical reason at all, imho. You should be afraid of cars and people sneezing.
If you were conscripted to join the German Army in 1945, as you say, that makes you about 85 sir. Again, since you're near life expectancy, I submit that your fear of under-ware bombers is illogical.
We're all going to die. The only question is: are you going to do it on your feet or your knees.
TJ
Could we combine that with a colonoscopy and get some free health care, at least?
Joe
Mmmmmm fear, it's what's for breakfast.
The American public is duped again! How often does it have to occur before someone gets a clue? One Nigerian does something very foolish and all of a sudden the American public are electronically stripped of not only their clothes but their self respect. What a crock! Do you think the government will ever get a clue? I have my doubts. The only way to stop terrorism is to stop killing people in the Middle East and stop interfering in their countries. That is the only way, like it or not.