Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Pakistan Orders Troops To Open Fire If US Raids
ISLAMABAD, Pakistan - Pakistan's military has ordered its forces to open fire if U.S. troops launch another air or ground raid across the Afghan border, an army spokesman said Tuesday.
The orders, which come in response to a highly unusual Sept. 3 ground attack by U.S. commandos, are certain to heighten tensions between Washington and a key ally against terrorism. Although the ground attack was rare, there have been repeated reports of U.S. drone aircraft striking militant targets, most recently on Sept. 12.
Pakistani officials warn that stepped-up cross-border raids will accomplish little while fueling violent religious extremism in nuclear-armed Pakistan. Some complain that the country is a scapegoat for the failure to stabilize Afghanistan.
Pakistan's civilian leaders, who have taken a hard line against Islamic militants since forcing Pervez Musharraf to resign as president last month, have insisted that Pakistan must resolve the dispute with Washington through diplomatic channels.
However, army spokesman Maj. Gen. Athar Abbas told The Associated Press that after U.S. helicopters ferried troops into a militant stronghold in the South Waziristan tribal region, the military told field commanders to prevent any similar raids.
"The orders are clear," Abbas said in an interview. "In case it happens again in this form, that there is a very significant detection, which is very definite, no ambiguity, across the border, on ground or in the air: open fire."
U.S. military commanders accuse Islamabad of doing too little to prevent the Taliban and other militant groups from recruiting, training and resupplying in Pakistan's wild tribal belt.
Pakistan acknowledges the presence of al-Qaida fugitives and its difficulties in preventing militants from seeping through the mountainous border into Afghanistan.
However, it insists it is doing what it can and paying a heavy price, pointing to its deployment of more then 100,000 troops in its increasingly restive northwest and a wave of suicide bombings across the country.
After talks Tuesday with British officials in London, Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari said he did not "think there will be any more" cross-border raids by the U.S. He declined to comment on the order to use lethal force against American troops.
Instead, he and British Prime Minister Gordon Brown issued a joint statement saying Afghanistan and Pakistan should lead the efforts to battle border militancy. The joint statement left out any mention of the United States.
American officials have confirmed their forces carried out the Sept. 3 raid near the town of Angoor Ada but given few details of what happened.
Abbas said that Pakistan's military had asked for an explanation but received only a "half-page" of "very vague" information that failed to identify the intended target.
Pakistani officials have said the raid killed about 15 people, and Abbas said they all appeared to be civilians.
"These were truck drivers, local traders and their families," he said.
How to reverse a surge in Taliban violence in Afghanistan has become a major issue in the U.S. presidential campaign and refocused attention on the porous border with Pakistan.
Pakistan's military has won American praise for a six-week offensive against militants in the Bajur tribal region that officials here say has killed 700 suspected insurgents and about 40 troops. Troops backed by warplanes killed eight more alleged militants Tuesday, officials said.
In the same timeframe, there has been a surge in missile strikes apparently carried out by unmanned U.S. drones. Such attacks killed at least two senior al-Qaida commanders earlier this year.
Abbas did not say when exactly the orders for Pakistani troops to open fire to prevent cross-border raids by U.S. troops were issued. He wouldn't discuss whether Gen. Ashfaq Parvez Kayani, who replaced Musharraf as army chief last year, personally took the decision or if the orders had been discussed with American officials.
The spokesman also played down suggestions that the instructions had been put into practice before dawn on Monday, when U.S. helicopters reportedly landed near Angoor Ada only to fly away after troops fired warning shots.
Abbas insisted no foreign troops had crossed the border and that "trigger-happy tribesmen" had fired the shots. Pakistani troops based nearby fired flares to see what was going on, he said.
The U.S. military in Afghanistan said none of its troops were involved.
In a rare public statement last week, Kayani said Pakistan's sovereignty would be defended "at all cost." Abbas said Pakistani officials had to consider public opinion, which is skeptical of American goals in the region and harbors sympathy for rebels fighting in the name of Islam.
"Please look at the public reaction to this kind of adventure or incursion," Abbas said. "The army is also an extension of the public and you can only satisfy the public when you match your words with your actions."
- Posted in



17 Comments so far
Show AllI will believe it when I see it.
One more war (work in process).....
Gee, you think? What is an army for, if not to defend its citizens and its borders? Oh, right...get paid to oppress the population, in between parades.
This whole war is Cheneys wet dream- surrounding Russia on all sides so he can give it to Vladimir up the Caucus.
The sacrifice of American conscience again and again makes evil digestible.
This seems as good a place as any to posit a quote from George F. Kennan (MEMOIRS: 1925-1950): "One of the most consistent and incurable traits of American statesmanship (is) its neurotic self-consciousness and introversion, the tendency to make statements and take actions with regard not to their effect on the international scene to which they are ostensibly addressed but rather to their effect on those echelons of American opinion, congressional opinion first and foremost, to which the respective statesmen are anxious to appeal."
No respect these days, even from little South American countries! Hmmmmm.
Go Obama! Let's get this war/party started!
Pakistan warning the US not to f**k with its people anymore.
Turkey invading northern Iraq to get the Kurds.
Bolivia and Venezuela kicking out their U.S. Ambassadors.
Russia sending warships to the Caribbean, and crushing Georgia and its American-supplied military.
Iran building anti-ship missiles to wipe out the U.S. fleet in the Persian Gulf as fast as they can, and ignoring American threats.
Ecuador kicking out the U.S. military base unless *they* can build a military base in Miami.
North Korea and Cuba, countries of 22 and 11 million, openly defying the U.S. for decades. (The U.S. is 302 million)
Once the schoolyard bully gets fought to a draw by a smaller, weaker, crippled kid (Iraq), he gets no respect anymore, and can no longer intimidate by glares and threats.
And all this time, China (1,400 million) is getting stronger and more technically advanced, biding it's time for the inevitable showdown.
HyperPower, superPower, bigPower, Power, agingPower... I think the correct term for the U.S. is open to debate. At some point, the entire post-WWII system comes crashing down, and it won't be good for the USA. The IMF and the World Bank are almost totally marginalized. Wall St. is in a free fall. Detroit is bleeding daily.
Perfect time for a senile old dumb corrupt corporate guy and a clueless apprentice corrupt corporate hockey Mom to take charge.
Turkey DID NOT INVADE Iraq to get the KURDS! They border crossed because the PKK, Kurds, started murdering Turks again, since they've murdered 38,000 since 1986. Or are we the only COUNTRY that can Fucking protect its borders?????
I live there 6 months a year, the PKK are Kurdish, They are harboured in the Kurdish part of Iraq and are protected there. They border cross into Iran and call themselves PJAK there when they murder Persians.
Learn of what you speak, if it was your daughter[as it was mine a few miles away from their latest Terrorist bombings in July]you would per chance have, at minimum used "The Google", before stating an opinion not a fact.
BillofRights
For example:
"Turkish ground troops enter Iraq in operation against Kurdish fighters"
Published: February 22, 2008
http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/02/22/mideast/turkey.php
You send thousands of military troops over a border to kill people, I am using the word 'invade'. You can call it a 'limited operation to weaken Kurdish militants' if you wish. True, they didn't try to get ALL Kurds, just the PKK. Which are, as you say, "harboured in the Kurdish part of Iraq and are protected there". Did the U.S. try to get ALL Iraqi's, or just the ones they wanted dead and out of power... Invasions seldom kill EVERYONE.
So, what's your point ? That Turkey had a good reason to invade ? I didn't say they didn't.
My point was, that countries like Turkey would not DARE to disobey the U.S. three or four decades ago. The U.S. is desperately trying to keep it's "ally" Turkey from going after its other "ally", the Kurds of northern Iraq. But as you say, Turkey has it's own interests, and the U.S. is a weakened 'superPower' so Turkey can take calculated risks disobeying the Empire.
As can all the other countries I mentioned.
Do some research before you post figures like 38,000 as being Turks murdered by Kurds when you probably already know - if you spend six months of the year in Turkey, AND take an interest in this Country, that the majoriy of that figure is dead KURDs!
You think the Armenians had it bad. Over a Million Kurds have been slaughtered in Turkey, and it is only in recent years that they have been allowed to work, speak their own language and play their own music.
Catch up on Turkish Daily and Hurriyet - English, where you will find in earlier postings that both Turkey and Iran bomb the Kurds by bilateral agreement.
Enjoy your holiday...
Does this Invasion Ban, how quaint to need one, include Predators? Are Hellfire missile strikes okay since no US serviceman encroach Pakistan's borders?
Hellfires have killed a lot of women and children.
Will a Pakistani F-16 drop one?
That would make a statement without American blood on Pakistani bayonets.
All this activity has been an attempt by george, the punk, to get Zawahiri's head on a platter on Fox News before the election, swing it to johnny and sarah-isn't she just the CUTEST thing with those dead wolves laying at her feet!
The USA, winning hearts and minds the world over...now even their "allies" are shooting at them
"The only means of strengthening one's intellect is to make up one's mind about nothing, to let the mind be a thoroughfare for all thoughts." - John Keats
That the new Pakistani government has ordered this is no surprise. In fact, they are probably over the moon about it as it will serve as a public example of how they are not Washington's puppets (unlike Musharref) so soon after they took over. It might even temporarily unite the disparate ethnic and political rivals whom populate the Pakistani scene. That they would unite versus the United States is quite disturbing given that Pakistan has nukes.
Imagine that. A foreign country bombs your buildings and citizens and your army is ordered to shoot back.
Another pissing session on the Constitution and International Law.
This Republic requires a Restoration.