October, 07 2022, 09:52am EDT
![350.org](https://assets.rbl.ms/32012661/origin.jpg)
Activists pressure governments to keep their promise to end public fossil finance ahead of COP27 deadline
This week, activists in 8 countries are calling on governments and institutions to deliver on their pledge to fully shift international public finance from fossil fuels to clean energy by the end of this year, made at last year's global climate conference in Glasgow.
GLOBAL
This week, activists in 8 countries are calling on governments and institutions to deliver on their pledge to fully shift international public finance from fossil fuels to clean energy by the end of this year, made at last year's global climate conference in Glasgow. One month before COP27 kicks off in Egypt, analysis shows that while some countries are making progress, others are not yet on track - putting an opportunity to shift USD 28 billion a year in public finance out of fossil fuels and into clean energy at risk.
Last year's Glasgow commitment requires the 39 signatories to end new direct overseas support for fossil fuels by the end of 2022 and fully prioritize international public finance for a clean and just energy transition. The commitment covers international public finance flows, including export finance and (multilateral) development finance.
With one month until COP27 and two months to the end of 2022 deadline, a small but growing number of signatories, most recently France and Finland, have published new or updated fossil fuel exclusion policies. Others, including Canada, the United States, Italy, and Germany are lagging behind. All signatories need to take further action to deliver on the clean energy finance part of their commitment. Activists gathered in Ghana, the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Japan, Italy, the Netherlands, and Belgium, calling on signatories to get on track and uphold their commitments.
The events today include a protest outside the White House in Washington, actions outside government offices in Tokyo, Ottawa, Rome and Amsterdam, a protest in Ghana with African civil society calling for support for clean energy, and activists handing in letters to the London embassies of Germany and Spain, two key laggards.
Research from Oil Change International and International Institute for Sustainable Development shows that if countries follow through, this will directly shift USD 28 billion a year out of fossil fuels and into clean energy, more than doubling their international clean energy finance from USD 18 billion a year to USD 46 billion.
Soon after COP26, Russia's unprovoked invasion of Ukraine created an unprecedented energy upheaval, and in recent months there have been signals of countries potentially backsliding on commitments by investing in gas and liquefied natural gas (LNG) to replace Russian supply.
The recent policy update in France, which fully excluded public finance for LNG, shows that some signatories understand that this moment requires countries to keep their promise to stop funding fossils and double-down on a clean and just energy transition. Over the next few weeks in the lead up to COP27, other signatories, including the United States, Canada, Germany, Italy, and the Netherlands must follow suit - and civil society will be tracking their progress.
Adam McGibbon, Public Finance Strategist at Oil Change International, said:
"It's time for leaders to stop talking and start leading. Almost a year ago, these countries pledged to stop fuelling the fire with public money. If Olaf Scholz, Joe Biden and Justin Trudeau turn up to COP27 without a plan to keep their promise to stop funding fossil fuels, then why are they turning up at all?"
Tasneem Essop, Executive Director at CAN International said:
"Hard earned taxpayers' money cannot be used by governments anymore to prop up fossil fuel projects domestically or abroad. This criminal waste of public resources is driving the climate emergency and exacerbating conflicts, the cost of living, poverty, sickness and climate disasters. Public finance- the people's money- must be used to help people transition to clean and sustainable energy systems and towards a climate safe future for all."
May Boeve, Executive Director at 350.org said:
"It's time for governments to show what real climate leadership looks like and end international public finance for fossil fuels. No ifs or buts, ducking and diving, wheeling and dealing. If we want to keep global heating below 1.5 degrees, a managed decline of fossil fuel production is the only way, and the only language these profit-mongering fossil fuel companies understand is money. It's time to turn off the money pipeline to dirty fossil fuels and invest in all of our futures."
Niels Hazekamp, Senior Policy Advisor at Both ENDS (Netherlands), said:
"With just one month to go to COP27, the Netherlands and many other countries that committed to stop billions of fossil fuel export support before the end of 2022 have yet to fulfill their promise. This is a critical moment for government leaders to show they take action to mitigate climate change. The time to deliver is NOW."
Kenneth Nana Amoateng, Executive Director at AbibiNsroma Foundation, Ghana, said:
"Ending international public finance for fossil fuels and shifting investments into clean energy is the way to go. Redirecting huge investments of public finance to renewable energy technologies will support communities to have clean, affordable and modern energy which will ensure energy justice, protect human rights and support sustainable livelihoods."
Kate DeAngelis, International Finance Program Director, Friends of the Earth United States, said:
"The United States has failed to show climate leadership by refusing to release its guidance on ending overseas fossil fuel finance. As the largest historical contributor to climate change, the United States must step up and make clear to the world that its support for international fossil fuel projects is a relic of the past."
Hemantha Withanage, chair of Friends of the Earth International, Sri Lanka, said:
"We cannot lose momentum for the clean energy transition. It's truly time to stop public international money funding dirty fossil fuels, which stoke the climate crisis and cause such harm to communities in the global South. Not even a year after COP26, we see rich country governments doing their best to wriggle out of the bold declarations they made in Glasgow. In my country Sri Lanka, and everywhere facing this energy crisis, we need public finance for people-centred, renewable energy."
Isabelle Geuskens, Just Energy Transition Officer, Milieudefensie (Friends of the Earth Netherlands), said:
"We cannot afford to be kept waiting, or end up with a watered down Glasgow commitment. Science is clear, there is no more room for new fossil projects, as existing fossil projects are already putting our future at risk. The past months, we have seen industry and policymakers coming up with desperate attempts to undermine the crucial policy commitments made in Glasgow; claiming the war in Ukraine justifies further fossil development, as well as that poor countries should be able to continue with fossil for their "development". Under the guise of crisis and "care", the fossil lobby tries to continue with its dirty projects that are leading to severe human rights abuses, environmental pollution, life threatening climate change, and economic collapse. It locks countries in the south into a fossil future with growing debts, meanwhile undermining their just transition to renewables."
350 is building a future that's just, prosperous, equitable and safe from the effects of the climate crisis. We're an international movement of ordinary people working to end the age of fossil fuels and build a world of community-led renewable energy for all.
LATEST NEWS
US Voter Registrations Surge as Republicans Try to Limit Ballot Access
One group said it has registered over 100,000 new voters since U.S. President Joe Biden dropped out of the 2024 race.
Jul 26, 2024
The group behind a popular get-out-the-vote technology platform said Friday that it's registered more than 100,000 new U.S. voters since President Joe Biden withdrew from the 2024 presidential race, a surge that came amid mounting Republican efforts to make it harder to register and vote.
Vote.org said that 84% of voters registered in the new wave are under age 35. Nearly 1 in 5 new registrees is 18 years old. Andrea Hailey, the group's CEO, said that "since 2020, we have led the largest voter registration drive in U.S. history," with more than 7.8 million people registered.
After dropping out, Biden endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris to face former Republican President Donald Trump and Sen. JD Vance (R-Ohio) in the November election. The new presumptive Democratic candidate has already earned endorsements from many Democrats in Congress and groups advocating on issues including climate, labor, and reproductive rights.
Vote.org's success comes as Republicans at the federal level are proposing and passing legislation creating obstacles to the ballot box.
Earlier this month, U.S. House Republicans passed Rep. Chip Roy's (R-Texas)
Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act, which would require proof of American citizenship to vote in federal elections. Republicans claim the bill is meant to fix the virtually nonexistent "problem" of noncitizen voter fraud.
However, Rep. Summer Lee (D-Pa.)
slammed the bill as a "xenophobic attack" meant to silence "Black voices, brown voices, LBGTQIA+ voices, [and] young voices."
Lee said the SAVE Act underscores the need to pass her recently introduced Right to Vote Act, "which would establish the first-ever affirmative federal voting rights guarantee, ensuring every citizen may exercise their fundamental right to cast a ballot."
Earlier this year, U.S. Senate Democrats also reintroduced the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act, legislation its sponsors say will "update and restore critical safeguards of the original Voting Rights Act."
Meanwhile, Republican-controlled state legislatures and red-state governors are enacting laws imposing tough restrictions on voter registration, with violations punishable by stiff fines that critics say are meant to dissuade people from registration drives and similar efforts.
Again under the guise of preventing fraud, Republican Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis last year signed legislation limiting voter registration drives, with fines of up to $250,000 for violators.
"These draconian laws and rules are like taking a sledgehammer to hit a flea," Cecile Scoon, an attorney and president of the Florida chapter of the League of Women Voters,
toldThe New York Times in an article published Friday.
Three years after Kansas passed a law making "false representation" of an election official a crime, campaigners say it's become extremely difficult to sign up new voters.
"In 2020, even with the pandemic, we had registered nearly 10,000 Kansans to vote. Now, we haven't been able to register anyone," Davis Hammet, president of the youth voter mobilization group Loud Light, told the Times.
In Louisiana, Republican state lawmakers quietly passed legislation making it easier for election officials to toss out absentee ballots with missing details, limiting how people can mail in other voters' ballots, and restricting the ability to assist people with disabilities with their ballots.
"What we've found is that these measures have a disproportionate impact on voters with disabilities, both Black and white," NAACP Legal Defense Fund senior policy counsel Jared Evans
toldNola.com earlier this week.
"It's clear that their goal is to make it harder to vote, harder for specific communities to vote especially," Evans added. "What they don't realize is that these laws hurt white voters, too."
In Nebraska, Republican Secretary of State Bob Evnen last week
ordered county election offices to stop registering voters with past felony convictions who have not received official pardons. The move came after the state's unicameral Legislature passed a bill granting voting eligibility to felons immediately after they have completed their sentences instead of waiting two years.
"We refuse to accept thousands of Nebraskans having their voting rights stripped away," ACLU of Nebraska legal and policy fellow Jane Seu said in a statement. "We are confident in the constitutionality of these laws, and we are exploring every option to ensure that Nebraskans who have done their time can vote."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Critics Warn Manchin-Barrasso Permitting Bill 'Is Taken Straight From Project 2025'
"You thought Project 2025 was just a threat after the election? It's actually happening *right now,*" said one climate campaigner.
Jul 26, 2024
Climate and environmental defenders on this week implored U.S. senators to block a permitting reform bill introduced this week by Sens. Joe Manchin and John Barrasso that one campaigner linked to Project 2025, a conservative coalition's agenda for a far-right overhaul of the federal government.
Common Dreamsreported Monday that Manchin (I-W.Va.) and Barrasso (R-Wyo.)—respectively the chair and ranking member of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee—introduced the Energy Permitting Reform Act of 2024.
The Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) noted that although the proposal "includes several positive reforms for the accelerated development of transmission projects," it also advocates "limiting opportunities for communities to challenge projects, loosening oversight for drilling and mining projects, extending drilling permits and fast-tracking [liquified natural gas] permits, and several other provisions friendly to fossil fuel giants."
"This dangerous bill doesn't deserve a floor vote."
These are nearly identical policies to what's proposed in Project 2025's Mandate for Leadership. The plan, which was spearheaded by the Heritage Foundation, calls for "unleashing all of America's energy resources," including by ending federal restrictions on fossil fuel drilling on public lands; limiting investments in renewable energy; and rolling back environmental permitting restrictions for new oil, gas, and coal projects, including power plants.
While Manchin has been trying—and failing—to pass fossil fuel-friendly permitting reform legislation for years, Brett Hartl, director of public affairs at the Center for Biological Diversity, said that his "Frankenstein legislation is taken straight from Project 2025, and it's the biggest giveaway in decades to the fossil fuel industry."
Hartl said the bill "deprives communities of the power to defend themselves and gives that power to Big Oil by making it harder for communities to challenge polluting projects in court," and "prioritizes the profits of coal barons over public health."
"And it mandates oil and gas extraction in our oceans," he continued. "The insignificant crumbs thrown at renewable energy do nothing to address the climate emergency."
"Monday was the hottest day in recorded history," Hartl noted. "It's shocking that as the climate emergency continues to break records around us, the Senate continues to fast-track the fossil fuel expansion that is killing us. This dangerous bill doesn't deserve a floor vote."
Hartl added that "to preserve a livable planet," Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) "must squash this legislation now."
Manchin—who has said this will be his last term in office—has been a steadfast supporter of the fossil fuel industry, partly because his family owns a coal company. The senator says his permitting reform bill "will advance American energy once again to bring down prices, create domestic jobs, and allow us to continue in our role as a global energy leader."
However, Allie Rosenbluth, Oil Change International's U.S. manager, warned Thursday that "this bill is yet another dangerous attempt by Sen. Manchin to line the pockets of his fossil fuel donors, sacrificing communities and our climate along the way."
"Don't be fooled: The Energy Permitting Reform Act is another dirty deal to fast-track fossil fuels above all else," she continued. "It would unleash more drilling on federal lands and waters, unnecessarily rush the review of proposed oil and gas export projects, and lift the Biden administration's pause on new LNG exports."
"We urge Congress to reject this proposal and commit to action that protects frontline communities from the impacts of fossil fuel development and the climate crisis," Rosenbluth added.
"Don't be fooled: The Energy Permitting Reform Act is another dirty deal to fast-track fossil fuels above all else."
NRDC managing director of government affairs Alexandra Adams said Wednesday that "this bill is a giveaway for the oil and gas industry that will ramp up drilling and environmental destruction at a time when we need to be putting a hard stop to fossil fuels."
"We cannot afford to roll back so many of our bedrock environmental and community legal protections and offer a blank check to the oil and gas industry," she stressed. "We need new solutions for permitting if we are going to meet our clean energy potential and address the climate challenge. But this is not it."
"This bill would altogether be a leap backward on climate, health, and justice if passed into law," Adams added. "The Senate should reject it and look toward alternative solutions already being considered."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Nothing To Eat': War-Torn Sudan Faces Mass Famine as Military Delays Aid
Both parties in Sudan's civil war are to blame for a looming mass famine, experts say, and the military's blocking of U.N. aid at a border crossing with Chad exacerbates the problem.
Jul 26, 2024
Sudan's military is blocking United Nations aid trucks from entering at a key border crossing, causing severe disruptions in aid in a country that experts fear may be on the brink of one of the worst famines the world has seen in decades, The New York Timesreported Friday.
The border city of Adré in eastern Chad is the main international crossing into the Darfur region of Sudan, but the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF), the state's official military, which is engaged in a civil war with a paramilitary group called the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), has refused to issue permits for U.N. trucks to enter there, as it's an RSF-controlled area.
U.S. and international officials have issued increasingly alarmed calls for steady aid access to help feed the millions of severely malnourished people in Darfur and other areas of Sudan.
Last week, Linda Thomas-Greenfield, the United States ambassador to the U.N., said that the SAF's obstruction of the border was "completely unacceptable."
Both warring parties in Sudan continue to perpetrate brazen atrocities, including starvation of civilians as a method of warfare. This piece focuses on the SAF's ongoing obstruction of essential aid. The situation is catastrophic. The policy is criminal. https://t.co/FKhqQh3EI9.
— Tom Dannenbaum (@tomdannenbaum) July 26, 2024
The Sudanese who've made it out of the country and into Adré reported dire and unsafe conditions in their home country.
"We had nothing to eat," Bahja Muhakar, a Sudenese mother of three, told the Times after she crossed into Chad, following a harrowing six-day journey from Al-Fashir, a major city in Darfur. She said the family often had to live off of one shared pancake per day.
Another mother, Dahabaya Ibet, said that her 20-month-old boy had to bear witness to his grandfather being shot and killed in front of his eyes when the family home in Darfur was attacked by gunmen late last year.
Now the mothers and their families are refugees in Adré, where 200,000 Sudanese are living in an overcrowded, under-resourced transit camp.
In addition to those that have made it out of the country, there are 11 million people internally displaced within Sudan, most of whom have become displaced since the civil war began in April 2023.
An unnamed senior American official told the Times that the looming famine in Sudan could be as bad as the 2011 famine in Somalia or even the great Ethiopian famine of the 1980s.
In April, Reutersreported that people in Sudan were eating soil and leaves to survive, and The Washington Postcalled it a nation in "chaos," reporting that World Food Program trucks had been "blocked, hijacked, attacked, looted, and detained."
In late June, a coalition of U.N. agencies, aid groups, and governments warned that 755,000 people in Sudan faced famine in the coming months.
The U.S. last week announced $203 million in additional aid to Sudan—part of a $2.1 billion pledge that world leaders made in April, which some countries have not yet delivered on.
Some officials including Thomas-Greenfield, who has dubbed the situation in Sudan "the worst humanitarian crisis in the world," have called for the U.N. Security Council to allow aid delivery into the country even in the absence of SAF approval; it's believed that Russia would veto such a measure.
Sudan's civil war has seen a great deal of international interference. Amnesty International on Thursday published an investigatory briefing showing that weapons from Russia, China, Serbia, Turkey, Yemen, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) had been identified in the country. And The Guardian on Friday reported that the passports of Emirati citizens had been found among wreckage in Sudan, indicating the UAE may have troops or intelligence officers on the ground, though the UAE denied the accusation.
The International Service for Human Rights on Friday warned that both the SAF and RSF were engaged in wrongful killings and arrests, especially targeted at lawyers, doctors, and activists. The group called for an immediate cease-fire.
The SAF and Sudanese government figures have cast doubt on international experts' claims about famine in the country.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular