October, 07 2022, 09:52am EDT
Activists pressure governments to keep their promise to end public fossil finance ahead of COP27 deadline
This week, activists in 8 countries are calling on governments and institutions to deliver on their pledge to fully shift international public finance from fossil fuels to clean energy by the end of this year, made at last year's global climate conference in Glasgow.
GLOBAL
This week, activists in 8 countries are calling on governments and institutions to deliver on their pledge to fully shift international public finance from fossil fuels to clean energy by the end of this year, made at last year's global climate conference in Glasgow. One month before COP27 kicks off in Egypt, analysis shows that while some countries are making progress, others are not yet on track - putting an opportunity to shift USD 28 billion a year in public finance out of fossil fuels and into clean energy at risk.
Last year's Glasgow commitment requires the 39 signatories to end new direct overseas support for fossil fuels by the end of 2022 and fully prioritize international public finance for a clean and just energy transition. The commitment covers international public finance flows, including export finance and (multilateral) development finance.
With one month until COP27 and two months to the end of 2022 deadline, a small but growing number of signatories, most recently France and Finland, have published new or updated fossil fuel exclusion policies. Others, including Canada, the United States, Italy, and Germany are lagging behind. All signatories need to take further action to deliver on the clean energy finance part of their commitment. Activists gathered in Ghana, the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Japan, Italy, the Netherlands, and Belgium, calling on signatories to get on track and uphold their commitments.
The events today include a protest outside the White House in Washington, actions outside government offices in Tokyo, Ottawa, Rome and Amsterdam, a protest in Ghana with African civil society calling for support for clean energy, and activists handing in letters to the London embassies of Germany and Spain, two key laggards.
Research from Oil Change International and International Institute for Sustainable Development shows that if countries follow through, this will directly shift USD 28 billion a year out of fossil fuels and into clean energy, more than doubling their international clean energy finance from USD 18 billion a year to USD 46 billion.
Soon after COP26, Russia's unprovoked invasion of Ukraine created an unprecedented energy upheaval, and in recent months there have been signals of countries potentially backsliding on commitments by investing in gas and liquefied natural gas (LNG) to replace Russian supply.
The recent policy update in France, which fully excluded public finance for LNG, shows that some signatories understand that this moment requires countries to keep their promise to stop funding fossils and double-down on a clean and just energy transition. Over the next few weeks in the lead up to COP27, other signatories, including the United States, Canada, Germany, Italy, and the Netherlands must follow suit - and civil society will be tracking their progress.
Adam McGibbon, Public Finance Strategist at Oil Change International, said:
"It's time for leaders to stop talking and start leading. Almost a year ago, these countries pledged to stop fuelling the fire with public money. If Olaf Scholz, Joe Biden and Justin Trudeau turn up to COP27 without a plan to keep their promise to stop funding fossil fuels, then why are they turning up at all?"
Tasneem Essop, Executive Director at CAN International said:
"Hard earned taxpayers' money cannot be used by governments anymore to prop up fossil fuel projects domestically or abroad. This criminal waste of public resources is driving the climate emergency and exacerbating conflicts, the cost of living, poverty, sickness and climate disasters. Public finance- the people's money- must be used to help people transition to clean and sustainable energy systems and towards a climate safe future for all."
May Boeve, Executive Director at 350.org said:
"It's time for governments to show what real climate leadership looks like and end international public finance for fossil fuels. No ifs or buts, ducking and diving, wheeling and dealing. If we want to keep global heating below 1.5 degrees, a managed decline of fossil fuel production is the only way, and the only language these profit-mongering fossil fuel companies understand is money. It's time to turn off the money pipeline to dirty fossil fuels and invest in all of our futures."
Niels Hazekamp, Senior Policy Advisor at Both ENDS (Netherlands), said:
"With just one month to go to COP27, the Netherlands and many other countries that committed to stop billions of fossil fuel export support before the end of 2022 have yet to fulfill their promise. This is a critical moment for government leaders to show they take action to mitigate climate change. The time to deliver is NOW."
Kenneth Nana Amoateng, Executive Director at AbibiNsroma Foundation, Ghana, said:
"Ending international public finance for fossil fuels and shifting investments into clean energy is the way to go. Redirecting huge investments of public finance to renewable energy technologies will support communities to have clean, affordable and modern energy which will ensure energy justice, protect human rights and support sustainable livelihoods."
Kate DeAngelis, International Finance Program Director, Friends of the Earth United States, said:
"The United States has failed to show climate leadership by refusing to release its guidance on ending overseas fossil fuel finance. As the largest historical contributor to climate change, the United States must step up and make clear to the world that its support for international fossil fuel projects is a relic of the past."
Hemantha Withanage, chair of Friends of the Earth International, Sri Lanka, said:
"We cannot lose momentum for the clean energy transition. It's truly time to stop public international money funding dirty fossil fuels, which stoke the climate crisis and cause such harm to communities in the global South. Not even a year after COP26, we see rich country governments doing their best to wriggle out of the bold declarations they made in Glasgow. In my country Sri Lanka, and everywhere facing this energy crisis, we need public finance for people-centred, renewable energy."
Isabelle Geuskens, Just Energy Transition Officer, Milieudefensie (Friends of the Earth Netherlands), said:
"We cannot afford to be kept waiting, or end up with a watered down Glasgow commitment. Science is clear, there is no more room for new fossil projects, as existing fossil projects are already putting our future at risk. The past months, we have seen industry and policymakers coming up with desperate attempts to undermine the crucial policy commitments made in Glasgow; claiming the war in Ukraine justifies further fossil development, as well as that poor countries should be able to continue with fossil for their "development". Under the guise of crisis and "care", the fossil lobby tries to continue with its dirty projects that are leading to severe human rights abuses, environmental pollution, life threatening climate change, and economic collapse. It locks countries in the south into a fossil future with growing debts, meanwhile undermining their just transition to renewables."
350 is building a future that's just, prosperous, equitable and safe from the effects of the climate crisis. We're an international movement of ordinary people working to end the age of fossil fuels and build a world of community-led renewable energy for all.
LATEST NEWS
National Team Member Becomes at Least 265th Palestinian Footballer Killed by Israel in Gaza
Muhannad al-Lili's killing by Israeli airstrike came as the world mourned the death of Portugal and Liverpool star Diogo Jota and his brother André Silva in a car crash in Spain.
Jul 04, 2025
Muhannad Fadl al-Lili, captain of the Al-Maghazi Services Club and a member of Palestine's national football team, died Thursday from injuries suffered during an Israeli airstrike on his family home in the central Gaza Strip earlier this week, making him the latest of hundreds of Palestinian athletes killed since the start of Israel's genocidal onslaught.
Al-Maghazi Services Club announced al-Lili's death in a Facebook tribute offering condolences to "his family, relatives, friends, and colleagues" and asking "Allah to shower him with his mercy."
The Palestine Football Association (PFA) said that "on Monday, a drone fired a missile at Muhannad's room on the third floor of his house, which led to severe bleeding in the skull."
"During the war of extermination against our people, Muhannad tried to travel outside Gaza to catch up with his wife, who left the strip for Norway on a work mission before the outbreak of the war," the association added. "But he failed to do so, and was deprived of seeing his eldest son, who was born outside the Gaza Strip."
According to the PFA, al-Lili is at least the 265th Palestinian footballer and 585th athlete to be killed by Israeli forces since they launched their assault and siege on Gaza following the October 7, 2023 Hamas-led attack on Israel. Sports journalist Leyla Hamed says 439 Palestinian footballers have been killed by Israel.
Overall, Israel's war—which is the subject of an International Court of Justice (ICJ) genocide case—has left more than 206,000 Palestinians dead, maimed, or missing, and around 2 million more forcibly displaced, starved, or sickened, according to Gaza officials.
The Palestine Chronicle contrasted the worldwide press coverage of the car crash deaths of Portuguese footballer Diogo Jota and his brother André Silva with the media's relative silence following al-Lili's killing.
"Jota's death was a tragedy that touched millions," the outlet wrote. "Yet the death of Muhannad al-Lili... was met with near-total silence from global sports media."
Last week, a group of legal experts including two United Nations special rapporteurs appealed to the Fédération Internationale de Football Association, the world football governing body, demanding that its Governance Audit and Compliance Committee take action against the Israel Football Association for violating FIFA rules by playing matches on occupied Palestinian territory.
In July 2024, the ICJ found that Israel's then-57-year occupation of Palestine—including Gaza—is an illegal form of apartheid that should be ended as soon as possible.
During their invasion and occupation of Gaza, Israeli forces have also used sporting facilities including Yarmouk Stadium for the detention of Palestinian men, women, and children—many of whom have reported torture and other abuse at the hands of their captors.
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Highly Inspiring' Court Ruling Affirms Nations' Legal Duty to Combat Climate Emergency
"While the United States and some other major polluters have chosen to ignore climate science, the rest of the international community is advancing protections," said one observer.
Jul 04, 2025
In a landmark advisory opinion published Thursday, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights—of which the United States, the world's second-biggest carbon polluter, is not a member—affirmed the right to a stable climate and underscored nations' duty to act to protect it and address the worsening planetary emergency.
"States must refrain from any conduct that reverses, slows down, or truncates the outcome of measures necessary to protect human rights in the face of the impacts of climate change," a summary of the 234-page ruling states. "Any rollback of climate or environmental policies that affect human rights must be exceptional, duly justified based on objective criteria, and comply with standards of necessity and proportionality."
"The court also held that... states must take all necessary measures to reduce the risks arising, on the one hand, from the degradation of the global climate system and, on the other, from exposure and vulnerability to the effects of such degradation," the summary adds.
"States must refrain from any conduct that reverses, slows down, or truncates the outcome of measures necessary to protect human rights in the face of the impacts of climate change."
The case was brought before the Costa-Rica based IACtHR by Chile and Colombia, both of which "face the daily challenge of dealing with the consequences of the climate emergency, including the proliferation of droughts, floods, landslides, and fires, among others."
"These phenomena highlight the need to respond urgently and based on the principles of equity, justice, cooperation, and sustainability, with a human rights-based approach," the court asserted.
IACtHR President Judge Nancy Hernández López said following the ruling that "states must not only refrain from causing significant environmental damage but have the positive obligation to take measures to guarantee the protection, restoration, and regeneration of ecosystems."
"Causing massive and irreversible environmental harm...alters the conditions for a healthy life on Earth to such an extent that it creates consequences of existential proportions," she added. "Therefore, it demands universal and effective legal responses."
The advisory opinion builds on two landmark decisions last year. In April 2024, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that the Swiss government violated senior citizens' human rights by refusing to abide by scientists' warnings to rapidly phase out fossil fuel production.
The following month, the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea found in an advisory opinion that greenhouse gas emissions are marine pollution under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and that signatories to the accord "have the specific obligation to adopt laws and regulations to prevent, reduce, and control" them.
The IACtHR advisory opinion is expected to boost climate and human rights lawsuits throughout the Americas, and to impact talks ahead of November's United Nations Climate Change Conference, or COP30, in Belém, Brazil.
Climate defenders around the world hailed Thursday's advisory opinion, with United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk calling it "a landmark step forward for the region—and beyond."
"As the impact of climate change becomes ever more visible across the world, the court is clear: People have a right to a stable climate and a healthy environment," Türk added. "States have a bedrock obligation under international law not to take steps that cause irreversible climate and environmental damage, and they have a duty to act urgently to take the necessary measures to protect the lives and rights of everyone—both those alive now and the interests of future generations."
Amnesty International head of strategic litigation Mandi Mudarikwa said, "Today, the Inter-American Court affirmed and clarified the obligations of states to respect, ensure, prevent, and cooperate in order to realize human rights in the context of the climate crisis."
"Crucially, the court recognized the autonomous right to a healthy climate for both individuals and communities, linked to the right to a healthy environment," Mudarikwa added. "The court also underscored the obligation of states to protect cross-border climate-displaced persons, including through the issuance of humanitarian visas and protection from deportation."
Delta Merner, lead scientist at the Science Hub for Climate Litigation at the Union of Concerned Scientists, said in a statement that "this opinion sets an important precedent affirming that governments have a legal duty to regulate corporate conduct that drives climate harm."
"Though the United States is not a party to the treaty governing the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, this opinion should be a clarion call for transnational fossil fuel companies that have deceived the public for decades about the risks of their products," Merner added. "The era of accountability is here."
Markus Gehring, a fellow and director of studies in law at Hughes Hall at the University of Cambridge in England, called the advisory opinion "highly inspiring" and "seminal."
Drew Caputo, vice president of litigation for lands, wildlife, and oceans at Earthjustice, said that "the Inter-American Court's ruling makes clear that climate change is an overriding threat to human rights in the world."
"Governments must act to cut carbon emissions drastically," Caputo stressed. "While the United States and some other major polluters have chosen to ignore climate science, the rest of the international community is advancing protections for all from the realities of climate harm."
Climate litigation is increasing globally in the wake of the 2015 Paris climate agreement. In the Americas, Indigenous peoples, children, and green groups are among those who have been seeking climate justice via litigation.
However, in the United States, instead of acknowledging the climate emergency, President Donald Trump has declared an "energy emergency" while pursuing a "drill, baby, drill" policy of fossil fuel extraction and expansion.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Trump Admin Quietly Approves Massive Crude Oil Expansion Project
"This thinly analyzed decision threatens the lifeblood of the American Southwest," said one environmental attorney.
Jul 04, 2025
The Trump administration has quietly fast-tracked a massive oil expansion project that environmentalists and Democratic lawmakers warned could have a destructive impact on local communities and the climate.
As reported recently by the Oil and Gas Journal, the plan "involves expanding the Wildcat Loadout Facility, a key transfer point for moving Uinta basin crude oil to rail lines that transport it to refineries along the Gulf Coast."
The goal of the plan is to transfer an additional 70,000 barrels of oil per day from the Wildcat Loadout Facility, which is located in Utah, down to the Gulf Coast refineries via a route that runs along the Colorado River. Controversially, the Trump administration is also plowing ahead with the project by invoking emergency powers to address energy shortages despite the fact that the United States for the last couple of years has been producing record levels of domestic oil.
Sen. Michael Bennet (D-Colo.) and Rep. Joe Neguse (D-Colo.) issued a joint statement condemning the Trump administration's push to approve the project while rushing through environmental impact reviews.
"The Bureau of Land Management's decision to fast-track the Wildcat Loadout expansion—a project that would transport an additional 70,000 barrels of crude oil on train tracks along the Colorado River—using emergency procedures is profoundly flawed," the Colorado Democrats said. "These procedures give the agency just 14 days to complete an environmental review—with no opportunity for public input or administrative appeal—despite the project's clear risks to Colorado. There is no credible energy emergency to justify bypassing public involvement and environmental safeguards. The United States is currently producing more oil and gas than any country in the world."
On Thursday, the Bureau of Land Management announced the completion of its accelerated environmental review of the project, drawing condemnation from climate advocates.
Wendy Park, a senior attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity, described the administration's rush to approve the project as "pure hubris," especially given its "refusal to hear community concerns about oil spill risks." She added that "this fast-tracked review breezed past vital protections for clean air, public safety and endangered species."
Landon Newell, staff attorney for the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, accused the Trump administration of manufacturing an energy emergency to justify plans that could have a dire impact on local habitats.
"This thinly analyzed decision threatens the lifeblood of the American Southwest by authorizing the transport of more than 1 billion gallons annually of additional oil on railcars traveling alongside the Colorado River," he said. "Any derailment and oil spill would have a devastating impact on the Colorado River and the communities and ecosystems that rely upon it."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular