

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Ginny Cleaveland, Deputy Press Secretary, Fossil-Free Finance, Sierra Club, ginny.cleaveland@sierraclub.org, 415-508-8498
Today the country's most powerful financial regulator, the Federal Reserve, announced that six of the nation's largest banks will participate in a pilot climate scenario analysis exercise designed to allow better measurement and management of climate-related financial risks.
The banks in the pilot exercise are Bank of America, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, and Wells Fargo. The pilot will be launched in early 2023 and is expected to conclude at the end of the year.
The Fed's announcement follows guidance released earlier this year from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) and Federal Depository Insurance Corporation (FDIC) detailing their expectations for how big banks must respond to climate risks.
The Sierra Club's Fossil-Free Finance campaign called the news a promising starting point in the urgent effort to rein in Wall Street's harmful practices that are driving climate change and destabilizing our economy. The Sierra Club and Rainforest Action Network's annual Banking on Climate Chaos report reveals that US banks are some of the biggest financiers of fossil fuels in the world.
"The climate crisis already affects financial institutions and the broader economy, but banks are seriously unprepared to respond and adapt. In fact, big banks still pour billions into fossil fuels, ignoring the serious risks posed by climate change and threatening the savings of everyday Americans in the process. As the country's most powerful financial regulator, the Federal Reserve is finally sending a strong signal to banks to start taking climate risk seriously and prepare for the clean energy transition. This is a promising first step in the urgent effort to rein in Wall Street's dangerous and reckless behavior and protect our financial system from a climate-driven economic crash," said Adele Shraiman, Campaign Representative in the Sierra Club's Fossil-Free Finance campaign.
As America's central bank and most powerful financial regulator, the Federal Reserve is responsible for fighting inflation, promoting full employment, and keeping our financial system stable. The agency also has a legal mandate to respond to emerging threats, like climate change, that could have severe impacts on the stability of our financial system if left unchecked.
As the US grapples with another summer of extreme weather -- soaring temperatures, intense droughts, scorching wildfires, and flash floods -- it's becoming increasingly urgent for our financial regulators to use their authority to adequately prepare for the ways the climate crisis will threaten our financial system.
Read more in this Sierra Club articles that outlines next steps for the Federal Reserve -- including stress tests with climate considerations and higher capital requirements for high-carbon assets -- and how the pilot exercise can help prevent another 2008 crash: Major US Financial Regulators Move to Protect Financial System From Climate Risk.
The Sierra Club is the most enduring and influential grassroots environmental organization in the United States. We amplify the power of our 3.8 million members and supporters to defend everyone's right to a healthy world.
(415) 977-5500"Alex Pretti was killed by DHS agents in broad daylight in front of all of our eyes," said Ellison. "Both the rule of law and the sense of justice we all carry within us demand a full, fair, and transparent investigation into his death."
Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison on Sunday condemned the Trump administration's response to federal agents' killing of intensive care nurse Alex Pretti in Minneapolis over the weekend as "flat-out insane," noting that video footage of the shooting discredits the narrative rushed out by top officials.
"This is their employee who they trained—apparently, allegedly,” Ellison, a Democrat, told the Washington Post in an interview. "So for them to jump out there and say, ‘He’s done nothing wrong, the victim is a bad person,’ is flat-out insane and is a complete break with what we consider to be reasonable law enforcement behavior. It fails every test of professionalism.”
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) claimed following the shooting that Pretti "approached US Border Patrol officers with a 9 mm semi-automatic handgun," aiming to "maximum damage and massacre law enforcement." DHS Secretary Kristi Noem declared that "this is a violent riot when you have someone showing up with weapons and are using them to assault law enforcement officers.”
Stephen Miller, the White House deputy chief of staff, described Pretti as a "would-be assassin."
Video footage of the killing quickly exposed the Trump administration's narrative as a demonstrative lie.
"I think that reasonable people watching the video could conclude that [Pretti] had a gun and a holster, that it was taken off of him in plain view on the video, and that after that, he was shot," Ellison told the Post. "I think that a person who saw those things would not be hallucinating."
Ellison is set to appear before a federal judge on Monday as part of Minnesota's lawsuit against the Trump administration over Immigration and Customs Enforcement activities and deadly abuses in the state.
"I share the intense grief and anger of so many that another Minnesotan—Alex Pretti, 37 years old, an ICU nurse who served veterans—was fatally shot during the Trump administration’s Operation Metro Surge," Ellison said in a statement. "On Monday, my office and I will be in court arguing to end this illegal and unconstitutional occupation of our cities and the terror and violence it’s inflicting. This must stop. Now.”
"The federal government appears to have taken measures that directly led to the destruction of evidence."
In a filing submitted hours after Pretti's killing, Ellison and other Minnesota officials asked a federal court to prevent DHS and the Trump Justice Department from concealing or destroying evidence related to the shooting.
"According to reports, federal personnel may have seized cell phones, taken other evidence from the scene, and detained witnesses," the filing states. "It is unclear whether federal personnel otherwise processed the scene—let alone how carefully. Then just a few hours after the shooting, federal personnel left, allowing the perimeter to collapse and potentially spoiling evidence."
"From a law enforcement perspective, this is astonishing," the filing continues. "The federal government’s actions are a sharp departure from normal best practices and procedure, in which every effort is taken to preserve the scene and the evidence it contains... [T]he federal government appears to have taken measures that directly led to the destruction of evidence."
The US District Court for the District of Minnesota granted the request for a temporary restraining order, ruling that the Trump administration is "enjoined from destroying or altering evidence related to the fatal shooting involving federal officers that took place in or around 26th Street and Nicollet Avenue in Minneapolis on January 24, 2026, including but not limited to evidence that Defendants and those working on their behalf removed from the scene and/or evidence that Defendants have taken into their exclusive custody."
Ellison applauded the court's decision, saying in a statement that the ruling protects the integrity of Minnesota's investigation into Pretti's killing.
“Alex Pretti was killed by DHS agents in broad daylight in front of all of our eyes," said Ellison. "Both the rule of law and the sense of justice we all carry within us demand a full, fair, and transparent investigation into his death. We will not settle for less."
“The abuses of power we’re seeing from ICE are the latest proof that she has lost control over her own department and staff,” said one Democratic senator.
Demands for Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem's impeachment are growing, and not just from progressive Democrats in deep-blue districts.
Rep. Lauren Gillen (D-NY), one of just seven House Democrats who voted last week for a bill that further would further increase funding for US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), called for Noem's impeachment in a Sunday social media post, one day after federal immigration agents killed Minneapolis resident Alex Pretti.
"Another US citizen has been killed at the hands of ICE and there must be accountability, which is why Secretary Noem must be impeached immediately," Gillen wrote. "Under her leadership, ICE has targeted US citizens and children and killed Americans. She is not focused on safety or border security; she’s focused on chaos and self-promotion, undermining local law enforcement and stoking violence as a result. The American people deserve better."
Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.), ranking member of the House Homeland Security Committee, called for impeaching Noem on Saturday and then reiterated his call on Monday with a social media post that read, "It's time for impeachment!"
Sen. Jackie Rosen (D-Nev.) on Sunday also called for impeaching Noem, whom she described in a statement to the Associated Press as an "abject failure leading the Department of Homeland Security for the last year."
"The abuses of power we’re seeing from ICE are the latest proof that she has lost control over her own department and staff," Rosen added.
Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), who has been demanding Noem's impeachment since an ICE agent gunned down Minneapolis resident Renee Good earlier this month, described removing the homeland security secretary from her post as only the first step in bringing an end to the federal government's attacks on immigrant communities across the country.
"Voting NO on the DHS funding bill is the bare minimum," she wrote in a Sunday social media post. "Backing Kristi Noem’s impeachment is the bare minimum. Holding law-breaking ICE agents legally accountable is the bare minimum. ICE is beyond reform. Abolish it."
Even some Republicans have started protesting the federal government's operations in Minnesota.
Chris Madel, a Republican candidate for governor in Minnesota, announced on Monday that he was suspending his campaign in the wake of Pretti's shooting.
In a video posted on social media, Madel accused the Trump administration of enacting "retribution on the citizens of our state" with an operation that has "expanded far beyond its stated focus on true public safety threats."
" United States citizens, particularly those of color, live in fear," Madel added. "United States citizens are carrying papers to prove their citizenship. That’s wrong."
"My support for funding ICE remains the same," said one Republican following the horrific killing of Alex Pretti.
Republicans in the US Senate indicated Sunday that they planned to move ahead this week with government funding legislation that includes $10 billion for Immigration and Customs Enforcement after a federal agent gunned down intensive-care nurse Alex Pretti in Minneapolis, a killing captured on video from multiple angles.
"My support for funding ICE remains the same," declared Sen. Pete Ricketts (R-Neb.), a sentiment echoed by other GOP lawmakers ahead of votes on a package of six government appropriations bills approved by the US House last week.
"We're not defunding ICE," said Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) after the horrific shooting of Pretti. "Live with it."
An unnamed Senate Republican aide told Punchbowl that "government funding expires at the end of the week, and Republicans are determined to not have another government shutdown. We will move forward as planned and hope Democrats can find a path forward to join us."
One of the bills up for consideration in the Senate this week would provide $64.4 billion in taxpayer money to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), including $10 billion for ICE—an agency that is already more heavily funded than many national militaries. Last summer, congressional Republicans and President Donald Trump approved $170 billion in new funding for immigration enforcement, which ICE has used to massively jack up weapons spending.
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) reportedly has the votes from his caucus to block the DHS funding bill.
Senate Democrats have proposed separating the DHS legislation from the rest of the appropriations bills to avoid a looming January 30 shutdown and debate ICE reforms. The American Prospect's David Dayen reported late Sunday that Democrats are "going to ask for real investigations into the murders (including an end to impeding the state/local investigations)" as well as an end to arrest quotas and mask-wearing by ICE agents.
"Federal agents cannot murder people in broad daylight and face zero consequences," said Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.), the Democrats' top appropriator in the Senate. "I will NOT support the DHS bill as it stands. The DHS bill needs to be split off from the larger funding package before the Senate—Republicans must work with us to do that. I will continue fighting to rein in DHS and ICE."
Murray also stressed that "blocking the DHS funding bill will not shut down ICE."
"ICE is now sitting on a massive slush fund it can tap, whether or not we pass a funding bill," the senator added. "But we all saw another American shot and killed in broad daylight. There must be accountability, and we must keep pushing Republicans to work with us to rein in DHS."
"The Senate must immediately take out any additional funding for the Department of Homeland Security in the current spending bill. Congressional Republicans must answer for these killings."
Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), the top Republican appropriator, did not mention ICE funding in her statement on Pretti's killing, saying only that "this tragic shooting needs to be thoroughly and transparently investigated."
Assuming unified support from their caucus, Senate Republicans need at least seven Democratic votes to pass the funding package with DHS appropriations included. Last week, seven House Democrats voted with Republicans to approve the DHS funding.
Lisa Gilbert, co-president of the watchdog group Public Citizen, said in a statement that "this federal enforcement agency is running rampant with an outrageous budget that dwarfs most countries’ militaries."
"The Department of Homeland Security must get ICE off our streets now, and the Senate must immediately take out any additional funding for the Department of Homeland Security in the current spending bill," said Gilbert. "Congressional Republicans must answer for these killings."
Amy Fischer, Amnesty International USA's director for refugee and migrant rights, asked, "How many more people must die before US leaders act?"
"The US Senate faces an urgent choice in the coming days: continue pouring billions of taxpayer dollars into a lawless agency that endangers lives with impunity, or take meaningful action to rein in ICE and stop funding its abuses," said Fischer.