January, 10 2021, 11:00pm EDT
Continued Delays to Confirmation Process of Biden Nominees Are A Threat to National Security and Public Safety
Democrats will officially take control of the Senate in the coming weeks. Unfortunately, President Trump and his allies in Congress have done everything in their power to slow down the transition and undermine President-elect Biden's ability to hit the ground running on day one. Senate Republicans must guarantee that the will of the American people is respected and the security of our country protected by ensuring a swift nomination process for the incoming Biden administration.
WASHINGTON
Democrats will officially take control of the Senate in the coming weeks. Unfortunately, President Trump and his allies in Congress have done everything in their power to slow down the transition and undermine President-elect Biden's ability to hit the ground running on day one. Senate Republicans must guarantee that the will of the American people is respected and the security of our country protected by ensuring a swift nomination process for the incoming Biden administration.
The Senate is already behind in the confirmation process
President-elect Biden has less than two weeks until he's officially sworn into office, and the Senate is already behind in the confirmation process for his incoming administration. Control of the Senate cannot be used as an excuse for delays; Republicans were always going to be in control of the Senate during the lame duck period and it was their responsibility to keep nomination processes moving forward. Right now, the Senate should be taking important steps to "advise and consent" on nominees: reviewing committee questionnaires, financial paperwork, and FBI background checks, as well as scheduling confirmation hearings. Senate Republicans must ensure a swift confirmation process for the Biden administration or risk putting our country and the safety of its citizens in jeopardy.
Yet a recent Washington Post report shows that Biden is at risk of entering office without a single confirmed Cabinet position, making this the first time a new administration would not have at least part of its national security team in place since the Cold War. By comparison, four years ago, hearings for President Trump's national security nominees were well under way: Homeland Security (1/10/17), State (1/11/17), Attorney General (1/11/17), and Defense (1/12/17). Many of President Obama's national security nominees had hearings on a similar timeline: State (1/13/09), Homeland Security (1/15/09), and Attorney General (1/15, 1/16/09).
So far, just one of President-elect Biden's nominees has a hearing scheduled ahead of Inauguration Day. Meanwhile, Antony Blinken, President-elect Biden's pick for Secretary of State, completed his paperwork before the new year but has reached a standstill with Senate Republicans as they attempt to obstruct a speedy confirmation process for the nominee. There has seemingly been no action in moving forward on Biden's Homeland Security nominee, Alejandro Mayorkas, despite both a massive Russian cybersecurity attack and domestic insurrectionist at the U.S. Capitol in the span of weeks. Additionally, in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic and a "messy" vaccine rollout, it has never been more critical for an incoming administration to have a Health and Human Services Secretary ready to tackle our nation's biggest public health challenges.
Delays mean irrevocable loss of time and American lives
As the COVID-19 pandemic continues killing thousands of Americans daily, and as we approach 400,000 deaths, American lives remain at risk if Republican senators continue to delay the confirmation process for President-elect Biden's nominees. Hospitals are reaching capacity daily, forced to use make-shift morgues to store the overflow of bodies, and vaccine distribution is at a standstill with the potential to waste thousands of life-saving doses before they can be administered. Delays in vaccine distribution will have much larger implications than just public health: kids will be delayed from returning to safe, in-person learning and small businesses will be forced to remain closed, further risking the possibility they never reopen their doors, and so much more.
The new administration must also be prepared to inherit routine national security matters, whether it concern the safety of Americans abroad, threats from adversaries foreign and domestic, managing the National Guard, or the ever-growing threat of cyber attacks. Just weeks ago, the United States was victim to what is being deemed the "worst cyberespionage failure to date," originating from Russia. As Trump's reign ends, the response to this attack will likely fall on President-elect Biden and his administration, who must be ready to act on day one. Additionally, Biden's national security team will have to investigate the massive security failure that allowed pro-Trump insurrectionists to take over the U.S. Capitol with seemingly relative ease, resulting in multiple deaths. There are still many unanswered questions, including details about the explosive devices left around our nation's capital. Delaying the hearings for Biden's Cabinet puts the safety of our entire country at risk. It is time for Republican senators to stop the foot-dragging and fulfill their Constitutional oath by moving forward with hearings for members of the new administration.
- HEADLINE: US: Hack of federal agencies 'likely Russian in origin' [AP, 1/6/2021]
- HEADLINE: As Understanding of Russian Hacking Grows, So Does Alarm [New York Times, 1/2/2021]
- HEADLINE: Four dead after pro-Trump rioters storm Capitol in violent attempt to stop confirmation of Biden's win [CNBC, 1/7/2021]
- HEADLINE: World Leaders Are Shocked, Worried by Trump Supporters' Actions at U.S. Capitol [Wall Street Journal, 1/7/2021]
- HEADLINE: Washington Post: "Riot in the Capitol is a nightmare scenario for cybersecurity professionals" [1/7/2021]
The stakes couldn't be higher, and our country cannot afford to wait until January 20 to begin this process. The American people resoundingly voted for President-elect Biden's vision of cleaning up President Trump's messes, getting the pandemic under control, and rebuilding our economy to prioritize working families. However, since the presidential election, the Trump administration and Senate Republicans have worked to obstruct or delay the incoming Biden administration's ability to tackle our country's biggest national security and public health challenges right out of the gate.
- HEADLINE: Washington Post: "Biden in danger of having no confirmed Cabinet secretaries on first day of presidency" [1/8/2021]
- HEADLINE: Reuters: "Biden: Trump aides setting 'roadblocks' for his transition team" [12/28/2020]
- HEADLINE: Washington Post: "Biden accuses Trump appointees of obstructing transition on national security issues" [12/28/2020]
- HEADLINE: NPR: "Biden's National Security Adviser: Pentagon Hasn't Granted Meetings Since Dec. 18" [12/29/2020]
- HEADLINE: Roll Call: "Budget process, COVID spending being undermined by OMB, Biden transition says." [Roll Call, 12/30/2020]
- HEADLINE: The Independent: "Senate GOP vows to block quick assembly of Biden's Cabinet..." [The Independent, 12/17/2020]
- HEADLINE: KHN: "Senate Republicans Throw the Brakes on Timing for Becerra Hearings." [KHN, 12/8/2020]
- HEADLINE: Bloomberg: "Republican threatens 'brawl' over Biden's EPA, Interior picks." [Bloomberg, 12/18/2020]
The American people have spoken. They overwhelmingly voted for President-elect Biden and they want him to implement his agenda of undoing the chaos and harm caused by President Trump. They want the new Administration to take the pandemic seriously and get this public health crisis under control, stop prioritizing special interests, and start building an economy that works for working families. That starts with a functioning government and Cabinet filled with experienced, highly qualified public servants. It's time for Republican senators to stop dragging their feet, accept the will of the people, and start working with their Democratic colleagues to schedule hearings for President-elect Biden's nominees in order to ensure a smooth transfer of power so the Biden administration can get to work for the American people on day one.
Watchdog group Accountable.US recently launched the Accountable Senate War Room to fight back against those lawmakers who seek to overturn the will of the people by standing in the way of the smooth transition of power and the swift approval of nominees to ensure that the government can function and deliver results for the American people.
Accountable.US is a nonpartisan watchdog that exposes corruption in public life and holds government officials and corporate special interests accountable by bringing their influence and misconduct to light. In doing so, we make way for policies that advance the interests of all Americans, not just the rich and powerful.
LATEST NEWS
National Team Member Becomes at Least 265th Palestinian Footballer Killed by Israel in Gaza
Muhannad al-Lili's killing by Israeli airstrike came as the world mourned the death of Portugal and Liverpool star Diogo Jota and his brother André Silva in a car crash in Spain.
Jul 04, 2025
Muhannad Fadl al-Lili, captain of the Al-Maghazi Services Club and a member of Palestine's national football team, died Thursday from injuries suffered during an Israeli airstrike on his family home in the central Gaza Strip earlier this week, making him the latest of hundreds of Palestinian athletes killed since the start of Israel's genocidal onslaught.
Al-Maghazi Services Club announced al-Lili's death in a Facebook tribute offering condolences to "his family, relatives, friends, and colleagues" and asking "Allah to shower him with his mercy."
The Palestine Football Association (PFA) said that "on Monday, a drone fired a missile at Muhannad's room on the third floor of his house, which led to severe bleeding in the skull."
"During the war of extermination against our people, Muhannad tried to travel outside Gaza to catch up with his wife, who left the strip for Norway on a work mission before the outbreak of the war," the association added. "But he failed to do so, and was deprived of seeing his eldest son, who was born outside the Gaza Strip."
According to the PFA, al-Lili is at least the 265th Palestinian footballer and 585th athlete to be killed by Israeli forces since they launched their assault and siege on Gaza following the October 7, 2023 Hamas-led attack on Israel. Sports journalist Leyla Hamed says 439 Palestinian footballers have been killed by Israel.
Overall, Israel's war—which is the subject of an International Court of Justice (ICJ) genocide case—has left more than 206,000 Palestinians dead, maimed, or missing, and around 2 million more forcibly displaced, starved, or sickened, according to Gaza officials.
The Palestine Chronicle contrasted the worldwide press coverage of the car crash deaths of Portuguese footballer Diogo Jota and his brother André Silva with the media's relative silence following al-Lili's killing.
"Jota's death was a tragedy that touched millions," the outlet wrote. "Yet the death of Muhannad al-Lili... was met with near-total silence from global sports media."
Last week, a group of legal experts including two United Nations special rapporteurs appealed to the Fédération Internationale de Football Association, the world football governing body, demanding that its Governance Audit and Compliance Committee take action against the Israel Football Association for violating FIFA rules by playing matches on occupied Palestinian territory.
In July 2024, the ICJ found that Israel's then-57-year occupation of Palestine—including Gaza—is an illegal form of apartheid that should be ended as soon as possible.
During their invasion and occupation of Gaza, Israeli forces have also used sporting facilities including Yarmouk Stadium for the detention of Palestinian men, women, and children—many of whom have reported torture and other abuse at the hands of their captors.
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Highly Inspiring' Court Ruling Affirms Nations' Legal Duty to Combat Climate Emergency
"While the United States and some other major polluters have chosen to ignore climate science, the rest of the international community is advancing protections," said one observer.
Jul 04, 2025
In a landmark advisory opinion published Thursday, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights—of which the United States, the world's second-biggest carbon polluter, is not a member—affirmed the right to a stable climate and underscored nations' duty to act to protect it and address the worsening planetary emergency.
"States must refrain from any conduct that reverses, slows down, or truncates the outcome of measures necessary to protect human rights in the face of the impacts of climate change," a summary of the 234-page ruling states. "Any rollback of climate or environmental policies that affect human rights must be exceptional, duly justified based on objective criteria, and comply with standards of necessity and proportionality."
"The court also held that... states must take all necessary measures to reduce the risks arising, on the one hand, from the degradation of the global climate system and, on the other, from exposure and vulnerability to the effects of such degradation," the summary adds.
"States must refrain from any conduct that reverses, slows down, or truncates the outcome of measures necessary to protect human rights in the face of the impacts of climate change."
The case was brought before the Costa-Rica based IACtHR by Chile and Colombia, both of which "face the daily challenge of dealing with the consequences of the climate emergency, including the proliferation of droughts, floods, landslides, and fires, among others."
"These phenomena highlight the need to respond urgently and based on the principles of equity, justice, cooperation, and sustainability, with a human rights-based approach," the court asserted.
IACtHR President Judge Nancy Hernández López said following the ruling that "states must not only refrain from causing significant environmental damage but have the positive obligation to take measures to guarantee the protection, restoration, and regeneration of ecosystems."
"Causing massive and irreversible environmental harm...alters the conditions for a healthy life on Earth to such an extent that it creates consequences of existential proportions," she added. "Therefore, it demands universal and effective legal responses."
The advisory opinion builds on two landmark decisions last year. In April 2024, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that the Swiss government violated senior citizens' human rights by refusing to abide by scientists' warnings to rapidly phase out fossil fuel production.
The following month, the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea found in an advisory opinion that greenhouse gas emissions are marine pollution under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and that signatories to the accord "have the specific obligation to adopt laws and regulations to prevent, reduce, and control" them.
The IACtHR advisory opinion is expected to boost climate and human rights lawsuits throughout the Americas, and to impact talks ahead of November's United Nations Climate Change Conference, or COP30, in Belém, Brazil.
Climate defenders around the world hailed Thursday's advisory opinion, with United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk calling it "a landmark step forward for the region—and beyond."
"As the impact of climate change becomes ever more visible across the world, the court is clear: People have a right to a stable climate and a healthy environment," Türk added. "States have a bedrock obligation under international law not to take steps that cause irreversible climate and environmental damage, and they have a duty to act urgently to take the necessary measures to protect the lives and rights of everyone—both those alive now and the interests of future generations."
Amnesty International head of strategic litigation Mandi Mudarikwa said, "Today, the Inter-American Court affirmed and clarified the obligations of states to respect, ensure, prevent, and cooperate in order to realize human rights in the context of the climate crisis."
"Crucially, the court recognized the autonomous right to a healthy climate for both individuals and communities, linked to the right to a healthy environment," Mudarikwa added. "The court also underscored the obligation of states to protect cross-border climate-displaced persons, including through the issuance of humanitarian visas and protection from deportation."
Delta Merner, lead scientist at the Science Hub for Climate Litigation at the Union of Concerned Scientists, said in a statement that "this opinion sets an important precedent affirming that governments have a legal duty to regulate corporate conduct that drives climate harm."
"Though the United States is not a party to the treaty governing the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, this opinion should be a clarion call for transnational fossil fuel companies that have deceived the public for decades about the risks of their products," Merner added. "The era of accountability is here."
Markus Gehring, a fellow and director of studies in law at Hughes Hall at the University of Cambridge in England, called the advisory opinion "highly inspiring" and "seminal."
Drew Caputo, vice president of litigation for lands, wildlife, and oceans at Earthjustice, said that "the Inter-American Court's ruling makes clear that climate change is an overriding threat to human rights in the world."
"Governments must act to cut carbon emissions drastically," Caputo stressed. "While the United States and some other major polluters have chosen to ignore climate science, the rest of the international community is advancing protections for all from the realities of climate harm."
Climate litigation is increasing globally in the wake of the 2015 Paris climate agreement. In the Americas, Indigenous peoples, children, and green groups are among those who have been seeking climate justice via litigation.
However, in the United States, instead of acknowledging the climate emergency, President Donald Trump has declared an "energy emergency" while pursuing a "drill, baby, drill" policy of fossil fuel extraction and expansion.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Trump Admin Quietly Approves Massive Crude Oil Expansion Project
"This thinly analyzed decision threatens the lifeblood of the American Southwest," said one environmental attorney.
Jul 04, 2025
The Trump administration has quietly fast-tracked a massive oil expansion project that environmentalists and Democratic lawmakers warned could have a destructive impact on local communities and the climate.
As reported recently by the Oil and Gas Journal, the plan "involves expanding the Wildcat Loadout Facility, a key transfer point for moving Uinta basin crude oil to rail lines that transport it to refineries along the Gulf Coast."
The goal of the plan is to transfer an additional 70,000 barrels of oil per day from the Wildcat Loadout Facility, which is located in Utah, down to the Gulf Coast refineries via a route that runs along the Colorado River. Controversially, the Trump administration is also plowing ahead with the project by invoking emergency powers to address energy shortages despite the fact that the United States for the last couple of years has been producing record levels of domestic oil.
Sen. Michael Bennet (D-Colo.) and Rep. Joe Neguse (D-Colo.) issued a joint statement condemning the Trump administration's push to approve the project while rushing through environmental impact reviews.
"The Bureau of Land Management's decision to fast-track the Wildcat Loadout expansion—a project that would transport an additional 70,000 barrels of crude oil on train tracks along the Colorado River—using emergency procedures is profoundly flawed," the Colorado Democrats said. "These procedures give the agency just 14 days to complete an environmental review—with no opportunity for public input or administrative appeal—despite the project's clear risks to Colorado. There is no credible energy emergency to justify bypassing public involvement and environmental safeguards. The United States is currently producing more oil and gas than any country in the world."
On Thursday, the Bureau of Land Management announced the completion of its accelerated environmental review of the project, drawing condemnation from climate advocates.
Wendy Park, a senior attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity, described the administration's rush to approve the project as "pure hubris," especially given its "refusal to hear community concerns about oil spill risks." She added that "this fast-tracked review breezed past vital protections for clean air, public safety and endangered species."
Landon Newell, staff attorney for the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, accused the Trump administration of manufacturing an energy emergency to justify plans that could have a dire impact on local habitats.
"This thinly analyzed decision threatens the lifeblood of the American Southwest by authorizing the transport of more than 1 billion gallons annually of additional oil on railcars traveling alongside the Colorado River," he said. "Any derailment and oil spill would have a devastating impact on the Colorado River and the communities and ecosystems that rely upon it."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular