SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
");background-position:center;background-size:19px 19px;background-repeat:no-repeat;background-color:#222;padding:0;width:var(--form-elem-height);height:var(--form-elem-height);font-size:0;}:is(.js-newsletter-wrapper, .newsletter_bar.newsletter-wrapper) .widget__body:has(.response:not(:empty)) :is(.widget__headline, .widget__subheadline, #mc_embed_signup .mc-field-group, #mc_embed_signup input[type="submit"]){display:none;}:is(.grey_newsblock .newsletter-wrapper, .newsletter-wrapper) #mce-responses:has(.response:not(:empty)){grid-row:1 / -1;grid-column:1 / -1;}.newsletter-wrapper .widget__body > .snark-line:has(.response:not(:empty)){grid-column:1 / -1;}:is(.grey_newsblock .newsletter-wrapper, .newsletter-wrapper) :is(.newsletter-campaign:has(.response:not(:empty)), .newsletter-and-social:has(.response:not(:empty))){width:100%;}.newsletter-wrapper .newsletter_bar_col{display:flex;flex-wrap:wrap;justify-content:center;align-items:center;gap:8px 20px;margin:0 auto;}.newsletter-wrapper .newsletter_bar_col .text-element{display:flex;color:var(--shares-color);margin:0 !important;font-weight:400 !important;font-size:16px !important;}.newsletter-wrapper .newsletter_bar_col .whitebar_social{display:flex;gap:12px;width:auto;}.newsletter-wrapper .newsletter_bar_col a{margin:0;background-color:#0000;padding:0;width:32px;height:32px;}.newsletter-wrapper .social_icon:after{display:none;}.newsletter-wrapper .widget article:before, .newsletter-wrapper .widget article:after{display:none;}#sFollow_Block_0_0_1_0_0_0_1{margin:0;}.donation_banner{position:relative;background:#000;}.donation_banner .posts-custom *, .donation_banner .posts-custom :after, .donation_banner .posts-custom :before{margin:0;}.donation_banner .posts-custom .widget{position:absolute;inset:0;}.donation_banner__wrapper{position:relative;z-index:2;pointer-events:none;}.donation_banner .donate_btn{position:relative;z-index:2;}#sSHARED_-_Support_Block_0_0_7_0_0_3_1_0{color:#fff;}#sSHARED_-_Support_Block_0_0_7_0_0_3_1_1{font-weight:normal;}.sticky-sidebar{margin:auto;}@media (min-width: 980px){.main:has(.sticky-sidebar){overflow:visible;}}@media (min-width: 980px){.row:has(.sticky-sidebar){display:flex;overflow:visible;}}@media (min-width: 980px){.sticky-sidebar{position:-webkit-sticky;position:sticky;top:100px;transition:top .3s ease-in-out, position .3s ease-in-out;}}.grey_newsblock .newsletter-wrapper, .newsletter-wrapper, .newsletter-wrapper.sidebar{background:linear-gradient(91deg, #005dc7 28%, #1d63b2 65%, #0353ae 85%);}
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
If the party sidelines him, it will communicate that honesty, visionary thinking, and moral courage are liabilities rather than assets.
Zohran Mamdani’s mayoral campaign presents Democrats with a stark moral choice. To undermine him is to endorse ethical bankruptcy, anti-Muslim bigotry, and political cowardice. His candidacy has rattled the city’s political establishment and media elite, laying bare a persistent double standard. Were Mamdani white or Black, his run might be heralded as a refreshing departure from politics as usual—an outsider offering bold ideas and authenticity, qualities the party claims to prize. Instead, the hesitation and barely disguised panic gripping centrist Democrats stem directly from his kurta-wearing, Hindi-speaking, unapologetically Muslim identity—amplified by his refusal to sanitize criticism of Israel’s genocidal war on Palestinians. His opponents cite inexperience, but what truly frightens them is conviction.
Take The New York Times, whose editorial board recently declared Mamdani doesn’t even “deserve a spot” on the ballot. Their rationale—his democratic socialism is “unsuited” to New York’s challenges—reads less like analysis and more like ideological gatekeeping. The Washington Post, not to be outdone, warned that Mamdani could return the city to the “bad old days of dysfunction,” as if public investment in housing and transit were equivalent to urban decay. These critiques don’t stem from governance concerns—they betray discomfort with someone willing to speak moral truths that threaten political orthodoxy.
What frightens the political class isn’t that Mamdani’s ideas are impractical, but that they’re popular and meaningful for people struggling to survive.
Inexperience is another alarm raised by the establishment about Mamdani’s candidacy. But it's a code word—what they really mean is that M is for Muslim. Experience, after all, cuts both ways. The preening narcissist, Eric Adams, the current mayor, has plenty: experience with self-promotion, ethical scandals, and corruption. If Mamdani lacks experience in backroom deals and transactional governance, that may well be his greatest strength.
His proposals—free public transit, city-run grocery stores, rent stabilization—are derided as utopian only because they demand rethinking what's possible in a city as wealthy and unequal as New York. The pushback isn’t logistical—it’s ideological. What frightens the political class isn’t that Mamdani’s ideas are impractical, but that they’re popular and meaningful for people struggling to survive.
Predictably, the right has launched a barrage of dog whistles, accusing Mamdani of being anti-American and antisemitic, willfully conflating criticism of Israeli policy with religious hatred. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.), Charlie Kirk, and others exploit his Muslim identity to incite fear. But the real scandal is that so-called centrist Democrats are enabling this slander through silence—or worse, by joining in. Their cowardice reveals just how cheaply they value the principles they profess.
Even supposed reformers in the Democratic Party have distanced themselves, fearful of alienating donors or swing voters. Representatives like Tom Suozzi (D-N.Y.) and Laura Gillen (D-N.Y.) rushed to denounce Mamdani’s success, treating his grassroots support as a threat rather than a mandate. Their calculation is transparent: appease the center, ignore injustice, and hope nobody notices.
The irony is glaring: a party that purports to champion justice retreating from a candidate who refuses to dilute his convictions. The term, Islamophobia minimizes what should rightly be identified as anti-Muslim bigotry—deliberate, calculated, and hateful. Democrats bear a troubling record here, from their silence on Muslim profiling to lukewarm responses to overt anti-Muslim hostility. Also, who can forget former President Joe Biden’s embrace of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, a war criminal and architect of genocide? Mamdani’s very presence in the race unsettles those deeply attached to political inertia and comfortable with the status quo.
Mamdani’s campaign offers Democrats a crucial test of their professed values. To sideline him is to communicate that honesty, visionary thinking, and moral courage are liabilities rather than assets. If Democrats cannot rally behind a candidate who genuinely embodies their stated ideals, they will unequivocally reveal that their claims of justice and progress are nothing more than hollow rhetoric.
Usually, such a great primary win in overwhelmingly Democratic New York City guarantees a smooth path to a November win against a Republican opponent. Not this time.
People are asking about my reaction to Zohran Mamdani’s spectacular and decisive upset in the Democratic primary victory for Mayor of New York over ex-Gov. Andrew Cuomo. Mamdani’s victory was so overwhelming that Cuomo conceded generously, saying that Mamdani ran a “…highly impactful campaign…” “He deserved it. He won.”
Here are my observations:
1. Usually, such a great primary win in overwhelmingly Democratic New York City guarantees a smooth path to a November win against a Republican opponent. Not this time. No sooner than Wednesday, a clutch of wealthy Wall Streeters, real estate giants, and supporters of the genocidal Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu were meeting to plan the strategy to defeat this 33-year-old three-term state assemblyman in the November general election.
Mamdani’s agenda is no more socialist than that of FDR.
2. Mamdani won with one repeated pledge—“affordability” to live in the nation’s largest city. That meant 1) freezing rent on 1 million rent-stabilized apartments; 2) free bus fares; 3) free, universal childcare; 4) “city-owned grocery stores,” 5) a higher minimum wage and higher taxes on the super-rich and higher corporate taxes.
Mamdani has other options at the ready that he did not even mention. Such as ending costly property tax abatements for large commercial buildings and ending the daily rebate of a tiny sales tax of $15 to 20 billion a year on stock transactions, transferred by Wall Street brokers to NY state. Those revenues can be shared with New York City. (See: greedvsneed.org). To expand affordable housing, Mamdani can tap into the National Cooperative Bank in Washington, D.C., which has long provided loans to construct cooperative housing projects—that is, housing owned by its residents.
3. With 993,546 votes counted, Mamdani beat Cuomo by 71,000 votes. The primary voter turnout was almost 1 million voters. In the general election turnout will be many more of the 7 million eligible voters. Therein lies a possible vulnerability in November. Mamdani got his vote out with 50,000 volunteers, including a surge of younger voters. In November, millions more voters may turn out who were not excited enough this month to turn out for this young “Democratic Socialist.” These additional voters might be a much tougher sell.
4. Mamdani’s agenda is no more socialist than that of FDR. In conservative New Hampshire, all liquor stores are owned by the state. In the red state of North Dakota, there is a thriving, prominent State Bank. The Tennessee Valley Authority and scores of city electric companies are owned by public authorities. And the list goes on. Reality will not stop the burgeoning campaign of slander, fakery, and bigotry underway against this charismatic American Muslim. Fascist Greedhound Donald Trump called him a “communist lunatic.”
Many millions of dollars are ready to redefine Mamdani falsely. He is an excellent and credible responder. That skill and veracity apply to his stand against Netanyahu’s mass murdering in Gaza and his position on equal rights for everyone. AIPAC will find him a more difficult candidate to defeat than Rep. Cori Bush (D-Mo.) and Jamaal Bowman (D-N.Y.). He needs to forcefully counter AIPAC, a domestic agent of Netanyahu.
5. For his part, Mamdani has not yet adopted many of the progressive agenda planks ready for use in all campaigns, including local ones, along with new ways to get out the vote. Unlike most Democrats, Mamdani does not contract out his campaign to corporate-conflicted political consultants who have sabotaged Democratic voters for years. He speaks and acts for himself, from his mind and heart. He can make use of our report “Crushing the GOP, 2022” (still very relevant), featuring the political wisdom of 24 civic leaders for waging successful progressive campaigns (See: winningamerica.net). He can use the geographically specific database showing corporate subsidies by local governments (See goodjobsfirst.org). He can make use of the corporate crime trackers to make his case for cracking down on corporate crooks eating away at New York City’s consumer dollars and savings.
6. Finally, Mamdani’s access to the mass media should encourage him to embrace other progressive democratic primary challengers facing the decaying Democratic Party’s establishment that never learns from their losses to the worst, most corrupt, cruel GOP in the party’s history.
Democrats need Zohran Mamdani and other young politicians with fight in their hearts and rage in their bellies who can show that Trump is bad for working people and terrible for America and the world, and who can point the way forward.
Leave it to the Democratic Party to snatch existential crisis from the jaws of electoral victory.
The stunning success of 33-year-old Zohran Mamdani, a self-described democratic socialist, in the race for New York City mayor is causing anguish in the Democratic Party.
It’s one thing for U.S. President Donald Trump to call Mamdani “a 100% Communist Lunatic.” That’s to be expected from the vulgarian-in-chief. It’s another for Matt Bennett, co-founder of the centrist Democratic group Third Way, to warn that Mamdani’s “affiliation with the (Democratic Socialists of America) is very dangerous.”
Mamdani is the corporate Democrat’s biggest nightmare—a young, charismatic politician winning over Democratic voters with an optimistic message centering on the cost of living.
Dangerous for whom? Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) nearly won the Democratic primary for the 2016 presidential election after announcing he was a democratic socialist—and probably would have won had the Democratic National Committee not torpedoed him.
Lawrence Summers, treasury secretary under former Democratic President Barack Obama, says the New York City results make him “profoundly alarmed about the future of the (Democratic Party) and the country.”
Well, I’m profoundly alarmed, too—by just this kind of vacuous statement. If polls are to be believed, the current Democratic Party doesn’t have much of a future. Mamdani and other young politicians with the charisma to connect with the people and a willingness to take on corporate America and Wall Street may be the only way forward for the Democrats.
Nor has the mainstream media greeted Mamdani’s upset victory with much enthusiasm. The Associated Press writes that “the party’s more pragmatic wing cast the outcome as a serious setback in their quest to broaden Democrats’ appeal.”
Pragmatic wing? Since when has the corporate establishment of the Democratic Party distinguished itself by its pragmatism or its quest to broaden Democrats’ appeal? If it were pragmatic—in the sense of wanting to win elections and fire up the base—Democrats would not have lost the House, Senate, and presidency in 2024.
Meanwhile, Jeff Bezos’s Washington Post editorializes that “Democrats should fear that [Mamdani] will discredit their next generation of party leaders, almost all of whom are better than this democratic socialist.”
Bezos—who controls the content of the Post’s editorial page as he sucks up to Trump and is now occupying vast swaths of Venice for his wedding with Lauren Sanchez—is not the most credible source of wisdom when it comes to the identity of the Democrats’ next generation of party leaders.
Not surprisingly, the Post criticizes Mamdani’s proposals for a 2% annual wealth tax on the richest 1% of New Yorkers and for increasing the state’s corporate tax rate from 7.25% to 11.5%: “Mamdani’s tax plans would spur a corporate exodus and drive more rich people out of town, undermining the tax base and making existing services harder to maintain.”
It’s the same argument we’ve heard for 40 years: If you raise taxes on corporations and the wealthy, you’ll drive them away—from your city, your state, your nation.
Rubbish. The reality is that if you invest in your people—in their skills, education, affordable child care, affordable elder care, and the infrastructure needed to link them together—they’ll be more productive, and their higher productivity will attract corporations (and the wealthy). A major way to afford all these things is to raise taxes on corporations and the wealthy.
Mamdani is the corporate Democrat’s biggest nightmare—a young, charismatic politician winning over Democratic voters with an optimistic message centering on the cost of living. Putting together a multiethnic and multiracial coalition backed by a sprawling grassroots campaign that brings out enormous numbers of volunteers. Aiming to fund what average people need by taxing corporations and the rich.
Instead of wringing their hands over him, Democrats should follow his lead.
The largest force in American politics today is antiestablishment fury at a system rigged by big corporations and the wealthy to make them even richer and more powerful.
The corporate Democratic establishment—fat cats on Wall Street, corporate moguls in C-suites, billionaire backers of Democrats who will do their bidding, and the big-named Democrats who endorsed Andrew Cuomo—are the biggest problem for the party. They are standing in the way of it’s mounting a forceful response to Trump and providing a blueprint for the future.
Trump is killing the economy, fueling inflation with his tariffs, reducing the U.S. government to rubble, and destroying our relationships with our allies. He’s readying another giant tax cut for the wealthy and big corporations—this one to be financed by cuts in Medicaid, food stamps, and other things average people need, along with trillions more in national debt.
My old friend James Carville advises Democrats to “roll over and play dead.” With due respect to James, Democrats have been rolling over and playing dead too long. That’s one reason the nation is in the trouble we’re in.
If Democrats had had the guts years ago to condemn big money in politics, fight corporate welfare, and unrig a market that’s been rigged in favor of big corporations and the rich, Trump’s absurd bogeymen (the deep state, immigrants, socialists, trans people, diversity-equity-inclusion) wouldn’t have stood a chance.
My simple advice to congressional Democrats: Wake the hell up. According to polls, most Americans don’t want a Trump Republican budget that slashes Medicaid, food stamps, and child nutrition in order to make way for a giant tax cut mostly for the wealthy.
Most don’t want tariffs that drive up the prices they pay for food, gas, housing, and clothing. Most understand that tariffs are taxes paid by American consumers. Most don’t want a government of, by, and for billionaires. Most believe in democracy and the rule of law and don’t want Trump trampling on the Constitution, acts of Congress, and federal court orders.
Not only should Democrats be making noise about all this, they should stop relying on so-called “moderates” to speak for them. The nation is in clear and present danger. Democrats must stand up for American ideals at a time when the Trump regime is riding roughshod over them.
Democrats need Zohran Mamdani and other young politicians with fight in their hearts and rage in their bellies who can show that Trump is bad for working people and terrible for America and the world, and who can point the way forward.
We need a new generation of leaders who are the voices of democracy, freedom, social justice, and the rule of law. A new generation that gives meaning to the “we” in “we the people.”
Instead of fretting over Mamdani, the Democratic Party should embrace him as the future.