

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Honoring the lives of feminist Haitian leaders who died in the massive
earthquake on January 12th, will be the focus of International Women's
Day on March 8, 2010, which is also the 100th anniversary of this
annual celebration.
The main activity will take place that day
in Plaza Catherine Flon in Champ de Mars in the center of Port au
Prince, a park that symbolizes Haitian women's participation to the war
towards independence two centuries ago.
Honoring the lives of feminist Haitian leaders who died in the massive
earthquake on January 12th, will be the focus of International Women's
Day on March 8, 2010, which is also the 100th anniversary of this
annual celebration.
The main activity will take place that day
in Plaza Catherine Flon in Champ de Mars in the center of Port au
Prince, a park that symbolizes Haitian women's participation to the war
towards independence two centuries ago.
It is being organized by
the Haitian women's organizations locally to acknowledge and honor the
human suffering of the catastrophe in Haiti, promore feminist values
based on the human rights of all, the struggle for well being of all in
Haiti and urban planning, reaffirm feminist struggles despite the loss
of significant feminist leaders, strengthen solidarity and display a
MEMORIA which will take the form of testimonies, a mural and a slide
show.
Women's groups around the world are asked by the Haitian
women's movement to organize a memorial activity as part of their
celebration of International Women's Day in their countries and
communities.
"We are calling organizations throughout the world
to join us that day to honor and mourn our loss of feminist activists
which will allow us to revive and recreate momentum of the Haitian
women's movement to continue the important work of our fallen leaders
and the legacy they have left for those of us who continue the work,"
said Lise Marie Dejean of Solidarite Fanm Ayisyen (Solidarity with
Haitian Women, or SOFA).
She added that surviving feminists will
organize an activity in Haiti's Catherine Flon plaza that day where
some will share what they learned from the three feminist leaders to be
honored: Myriam Merlet, Magali Marcelin, and Anne Marie Coriolan.
All
three leaders had a long standing trajectory in feminist activism
reforming a judiciary that never took rape seriously, creating
organizations and houses to protect girls and women against domestic
violence and trafficking, publishing a feminist newspaper, expanding a
documentary center and an historical archive, and struggling for the
protection of sexual and reproductive rights.
Merlet was a
feminist activist, and an advisor and former chief-of-staff for the
Haitian Minister of Women. As an outspoken activist, Merlet helped draw
international attention to the use of rape as a political weapon, and
other issues related to violence against women and girls. She was one
of the founders of Enfofanm, the first feminist information and
documentation center that also promotes women's rights.
Magali
Marcelin, a lawyer, activist and actress, who two years ago urged women
to pack a courtroom in Haiti, where she succeeded in getting a guilty
verdict against a man who battered his wife. Marcelin was a founder of
Kay Fanm, a women's rights organization that deals with domestic
violence, offers services and shelter to women and provides
microcredit, or loans, to women working in markets.
Anne Marie
Coriolan served as a top adviser to the women's ministry. Assisted by
their efforts, the ministry developed key initiatives to raise
awareness of violence against women and created programs to help women
gain financial independence. Coriolan was also the founder of
Solidarite Fanm Ayisyen (Solidarity with Haitian Women, or SOFA), an
advocacy and services organization.
To honor these three
feminist leaders, among other killed in the quake, activities are being
planned worldwide, including a special roundtable at the United Nations
Headquarters in New York during the CSW (Commission on the Status of
Women) organized by The Feminist International Solidarity Camp, CAFRA
(Caribbean Association for Feminist Research and Action), the Huairou
Commission, The Association for Women's Rights and Development (AWID),
among many other organizations and networks.
The proceedings of
the CSW which will take place during the Beijing +15** sessions, will
include a panel about women in Haiti towards a proposed resolution for
CSW to adopt regarding Haiti and Haitian women. Women's organizations
and networks claim that the world has responded with shock and quick
action to the devastating earthquake in Haiti in January 12th. However,
emergency relief can be either a catalyst for women's leadership and
community autonomy, or it can impose unequal power structures,
militarized responses, and dependency. Several women's organizations
are already working to assure that women's voices are present now, in
emergency relief decisions, and in the rebuilding of Haiti. In
addition, women's groups are working to guarantee that women's human
rights are upheld in this crisis situation and in the months ahead.
Local
activities in other countries for March 8th have already been announced
by women's organizations in Chile, Argentina, Honduras, Puerto Rico,
Brazil, Canada, etc.
The Feminist International Camp is also requesting a statement of solidarity from the Nobel Women's Initiative.
The
initiative to commemorate the 8th of March by honoring Haitian
feminists emerged from a Haitian women's meeting on January 24th in
Port au Prince, which was then adopted at a Latin American and
Caribbean meeting of the International Feminist Solidarity Camp Myriam
Merlet, Magali Marcelin, and Anne Marie Coriolan, held in the Dominican
Republic on January 26-27.
Catherine Flon is widely regarded by
Haitians as one of the heroes of the struggle to put an end slavery, as
she sew the first Haitian flag on May 18th 1803 on the last day of the
colonial congress session where leaders of the revolution at that
session "solemnly swore an oath to liberty or death on the flag which
then lead the slaves to victory and freedom. This oath is known
historically as the Oath of the Ancestors.
International Women's
Day emerged out of women's activities in labor movements during the
19th and early 20th centuries, established formally at the Socialists
International Meeting in Copenhagen in 1910, attended by over 100 women
from 17 countries.
International Women's Day expanded and was
celebrated in a growing number of countries, and in 1977 the UN General
Assembly adopted a resolution proclaiming a United Nations Day for
Women's Rights and International Peace. In passing this resolution, the
UN "recognized the role of women in peace efforts and development and
urged an end to discrimination and an increase of support for women's
full and equal participation."
MADRE is an international women's human rights organization that partners with community-based women's groups to advance women's human rights, challenge injustice and create social change in contexts of war, conflict, disaster and their aftermath. MADRE advocates for a world in which all people enjoy individual and collective human rights; natural resources are shared equitably and sustainably; women participate effectively in all aspects of society; and all people have a meaningful say in policies that affect their lives. For more information about MADRE, visit www.madre.org.
"At a time when Israel is committing genocide against Palestinians in Gaza... Congress should be cutting off military support—not integrating the US military and Israeli defense sector," said one critic.
A US congressional committee on Thursday rejected an amendment to strip a provision from next year's Pentagon funding bill aimed at deepening integration of the US and Israeli militaries under the guise of reducing aid.
Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) introduced an amendment to strike Section 224—which would establish a formal "United States–Israel Defense Technology Cooperation Initiative"—from the 2027 National Defense Authorization Act. The proposed NDAA authorizes $1.15 trillion in baseline military spending, while the Trump administration’s full defense request seeks an unprecedented, debt-exploding $1.5 trillion in armed forces and related funding for the coming fiscal year.
Section 224 would require the US defense secretary to designate a Pentagon executive agent responsible for coordinating and expanding US-Israel defense technology cooperation.
In Thursday's voice vote, members of the House Armed Services Committee (HASC) from both parties rejected the amendment to remove Section 2024 from the NDAA, with only Khanna and Rep. Sara Jacobs (D-Calif.) backing the measure.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu—who is wanted by the International Criminal Court for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity in Gaza—has called Section 224 "my plan."
While proponents of Section 224 contend that the measure would reduce US taxpayer funding for Israel, Khanna argued that the provision amounts to a blank check for a country that most Americans oppose sending more aid to.
“The American people are tired of the arrogance and insolence of Prime Minister Netanyahu telling America what we should do," the congressman said Thursday while promoting his amendment. "The entire country of Israel has a GDP that is less than a single town in my district, yet somehow Netanyahu thinks he could tell the American people what we should do."
“I am for Team America," Khanna added. "I am for the interests of this country, and I believe that's what [President] Donald Trump ran on. That includes American interests against any foreign country. We should have American sovereignty and make it clear that we strike 224. If we want to give aid to Israel, if we want to sell them weapons, that should be a vote for the entire Congress.”
In a letter to Rep. Marlin Stutzman (R-Ind.)—who is not on the HASC—Netanyahu said he is "heartened" by Section 224's plan to “develop a new Memorandum of Understanding with the United States government” that will reduce “US financial military assistance over the next decade” and replace it with “a new framework of joint defense cooperation, codevelopment, coproduction, and mutual investment."
The US has provided more than $20 billion in armed aid to Israel during the Biden and Trump administrations since Netanyahu launched the genocidal war on Gaza in retaliation for the Hamas-led attack of October 7, 2023. The current 10-year Memorandum of Understanding between the US and Israel, signed in 2016 during former President Barack Obama's tenure, provided Israel with $38 billion in US military aid and expires in 2028.
Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.)—who has partnered with Khanna on introducing or supporting war powers resolutions aimed at curbing Trump's ability to wage unconstitutional wars in countries including Yemen, Venezuela, and Iran—said last month that if Section 224 made it out of committee, he would work with Khanna to "offer an amendment to strip it from the bill on the floor."
The American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee (ADC) is urging Americans to contact their members of Congress to tell them to reject Section 224.
"This is not 'America First.' It is Israel First," ADC argues on its website. "The resolution language attached to this proposal gives it away: it expresses support for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s initiative to transition the US–Israel relationship toward mutual defense cooperation and joint economic investment. This language turns Congress into a vehicle for advancing Netanyahu’s agenda and asks the American people to treat it as their own national security policy."
"Section 224 would move US support for Israel away from the more transparent foreign aid framework and into a maze of Pentagon procurement, licensing, data-sharing, and backdoor deals that are harder for Congress, taxpayers, and future administrations to monitor, cap, condition, or unwind," the group continued. "Concerns of undefined 'network integration' and 'data fusion' should alarm every American who cares about sovereignty, privacy, civil liberties, and democratic oversight."
"At a time when Israel is committing genocide against Palestinians in Gaza, exporting surveillance technologies used against activists and journalists around the world, marketing military technology tested on Palestinians, and carrying out terrorist attacks as seen in the cell phone [bombings] in Lebanon, Congress should be cutting off military support—not integrating the US military and Israeli defense sector and making accountability harder than ever," ADC added.
In an opinion piece published this week by Common Dreams, Ben Freeman, director of the Democratizing Foreign Policy Program at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, wrote that "lawmakers should reject Section 224 from the NDAA to avoid deep integration with Israel’s military at a time when a growing number of Americans oppose Israel’s actions in the region."
"This unprecedented level of US-Israeli military integration stands in stark contrast to the traditional aid model of defense cooperation, in which Israel already stood out as the top recipient of US military assistance," Freeman said.
"Every day that we do nothing, 11 more Lebanese children are killed or injured by the Israeli military in this US-supported invasion."
House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries helped Republicans tank Rep. Rashida Tlaib’s war powers resolution to limit US military involvement in Lebanon on Thursday, holding up the effort to curb the conflict for at least another several weeks.
Despite Israel’s invasion of Lebanon pushing deeper, with more than 3,500 people killed and 1.2 million displaced since early March, the Michigan Democrat's resolution was defeated in a 324-92 vote, with a large number in her own party joining Jeffries (D-NY) and the Republican majority against it.
In a joint statement shortly ahead of the vote on Tlaib's resolution, House Minority Leader Jeffries of New York, along with Whip Katherine Clark (D-Mass.), and Caucus Chair Pete Aguilar (D-Calif.), said: “We stand with the Lebanese people, the government of Lebanon, and the Lebanese Armed Forces in their efforts to live peacefully and defeat Hezbollah." The statement included no mention of Israel.
The lawmakers said they’d support a different resolution introduced by Tlaib on Wednesday, which was crafted in tandem with Rep. Gregory Meeks (D-NY), the ranking Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee.
That resolution likewise required President Donald Trump to remove US forces “from any hostilities in Lebanon” within seven days of passage. But it also added the caveat that it could not be construed to "prevent or limit security cooperation with the Lebanese Armed Forces."
Jeffries, Clark, and Aguilar said, "There are no US servicemembers involved in combat operations or hostilities in Lebanon."
However, supporters of Tlaib's original measure have noted that the US military is heavily involved in Israel's actions in the country without having boots on the ground.
"The US is actively cooperating with Israel on coordinating strikes, intelligence sharing, and planning, including Trump green-lighting major attacks on Lebanon multiple times," Janet Abou-Elias, a researcher at the Democratizing Foreign Policy Project at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, told Common Dreams.
While the resolution's passage wouldn't "end US involvement overnight," she said, "it fundamentally changes the landscape of accountability" by giving opponents of US collaboration a legal mechanism to conduct oversight.
And while the resolution would not cut off US military aid to Israel, Abou-Elias said Israel could continue its occupation "only for a limited period of time" without US assistance.
"Israel would be absorbing losses while also draining its broader manpower and firepower reserves," she said. "At some point, the cost-benefit of continuing their occupation without US support would shift."
Because war powers resolutions are privileged, they can be forced to a vote even without approval from the Republican majority.
However, committees are given 15 days to act before a resolution is forced onto the floor, followed by three days for a House vote. This means it could take until June 21 for the new version to pass. The Senate would also have to pass it, and it would then take another week to go into effect.
"The people of Lebanon can't wait another month for Congress to act," Tlaib said on social media following news that the proposal would be voted down. "Every day that we do nothing, 11 more Lebanese children are killed or injured by the Israeli military in this US-supported invasion. Congress must pass today's Lebanon war powers resolution."
Abou-Elias said that despite the setback, Tlaib's introduction of the measure was not a wasted effort.
"Even if the resolution doesn't pass today, the vote forces every representative on record on the US participation in the attacks on Lebanon," she said. "That alone has value."
Though resolution failed, proponents of the measure championed the 92 lawmakers who did vote in favor.
“Congress’s failure to act has thus far enabled multiple Israeli invasions of Lebanon and war crimes against Lebanese civilians,” said Beth Miller, political director of Jewish Voice for Peace Action, in a statement. “Tonight’s vote demonstrated that a growing block of members of Congress are beginning to listen to their constituents. Americans don’t want the US involved in atrocities against Lebanese, Palestinians, Iranians, or anyone. This vote is just the beginning, and we will continue to organize until all of Congress acts to end these atrocities.”
"The reality is that 4.5 million people were kicked off the program to pay for tax cuts for the wealthy," said US Rep. Shontel Brown.
Rep. Shontel Brown on Thursday confronted US Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins for her past boasts about kicking millions of Americans off food assistance.
During a House Agriculture Committee hearing, Brown grilled Rollins for saying it was "good news" that 4.5 million fewer people are now enrolled in the Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program (SNAP) than before President Donald Trump took office last year.
"The reality is that 4.5 million people were kicked off the program to pay for tax cuts for the wealthy," said Brown. "Families and children are not leaving the SNAP program because they are doing better."
Rep. @ShontelMBrown: Recently, you described it as good news that roughly 4.5 million people have been moved off SNAP. The reality is that 4.5 million people were kicked off to pay for tax cuts for the wealthy. They are not doing better--
Rollins: They are. pic.twitter.com/qcB2WlAHLv
— Headquarters (@HQNewsNow) June 4, 2026
"They are," Rollins replied, without citing any evidence.
"They are being forced off because of eligibility changes, new administrative barriers, and states preparing for the enormous cost shift that they know is coming," Brown shot back. "And you know this. So I'm really struggling to understand why you think pulling the rug out from under children, seniors, veterans, and families that have fallen on hard times [is] good news."
Rollins then baselessly claimed that all of the people who had been removed from SNAP had been added to the program fraudulently, including "200,000 dead people."
The Associated Press last month published a fact check that examined a similar Rollins claim about the number of people removed from food assistance over the last year, and determined that the most likely culprit were changes made to the program by the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, a 2025 budget law that slashed funding to SNAP by $186 billion over a decade.
"What we’ve seen in terms of the data is that the trend in participation declines seems to be related to the program being harder to access,” Roger Figueroa, an assistant professor at Cornell University, explained to the AP.