

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

A Ukrainian solider takes part in the joint Rapid Trident military exercises with the United States and other NATO countries near Lviv, Ukraine on September 24, 2021, as tensions with Russia remain high over the Kremlin-backed insurgency in the country's east. (Photo: Yuriy Dyachyshyn/AFP via Getty Images)
Anti-war advocates on Monday warned that U.S. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin would be making a dangerous strategic blunder if he suggests that Ukraine and Georgia have a welcome mat toward full integration into the NATO military alliance--a move critics say would dramatically increase the risk of war between Washington, D.C. and Moscow.
"Keeping the 'door' open to NATO expansion antagonizes Russia, and it strings Ukraine and Georgia along for no good reason."
According to The Washington Times, Austin will signal that NATO is holding an "open door" for Georgia and Ukraine as he visits the two nations and Romania this week.
"We are reassuring and reinforcing the sovereignty of countries that are on the front lines of Russian aggression," a senior U.S. defense official told reporters ahead of Austin's trip.
Critics like Matt Duss, foreign policy to Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), renewed long-standing warnings against potential NATO membership for the two former Soviet republics.
Duss, writing on his personal Twitter account, categorized the move as "needlessly provocative," one that "will almost certainly receive wall to wall applause in DC."
According to Antiwar.com contributing editor Daniel Larison:
Encouraging Ukraine and Georgia to believe that NATO membership is still in the cards for them is a serious mistake. It is not surprising that the Biden administration is maintaining the status quo on this issue, but it is a missed opportunity to reverse some of the damage that was done back in 2008 when this dangerous promise was first made to these aspirant states.
Keeping the "door" open to NATO expansion antagonizes Russia, and it strings Ukraine and Georgia along for no good reason. Many European allies will not support bringing these states into the alliance, and there is no compelling reason to add them.
Both countries would be extremely difficult if not impossible to defend in the event of a conflict, and they already have Russian or Russian-backed forces on their territory. Even if they were model democracies, which they most certainly are not, they would be poor candidates for the alliance.
Under Article 5 of the NATO charter--also known as the "collective defense" clause--the United States and other alliance members would be treaty-bound to fight Russia should war break out with Georgia or Ukraine. Russian troops invaded and occupied Abkhazia and South Ossetia in Georgia in 2008, and Ukraine's Crimean Peninsula in 2014. Ukraine is also widely considered the ancient cradle of Russian civilization.
Critics have long argued that NATO, formed in 1949 as a mutual defense pact against the Soviet Union, is a provocative anachronism in the absence of any threat from a long-defunct Warsaw Pact, and should be dissolved.
Peace advocates have greeted each actual or proposed enlargement of NATO--which currently counts 10 former Soviet or Warsaw Pact republics as members, and which has crept steadily eastward since its inception--by warning that such expansion threatens world peace.
"After decades of overreach, the Biden administration now faces a stark choice," writes Stephen Wertheim of the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, "commit to fight for Ukraine, creating a serious risk of war with Russia, or admit that NATO expansion has come to an overdue end."
Austin's trip comes as Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov announced Monday that his country's government was suspending its diplomatic mission to NATO and closing the alliance's Moscow office. The move follows last week's expulsion of eight Russian staff members from Russia's mission in Brussels amid espionage allegations.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Anti-war advocates on Monday warned that U.S. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin would be making a dangerous strategic blunder if he suggests that Ukraine and Georgia have a welcome mat toward full integration into the NATO military alliance--a move critics say would dramatically increase the risk of war between Washington, D.C. and Moscow.
"Keeping the 'door' open to NATO expansion antagonizes Russia, and it strings Ukraine and Georgia along for no good reason."
According to The Washington Times, Austin will signal that NATO is holding an "open door" for Georgia and Ukraine as he visits the two nations and Romania this week.
"We are reassuring and reinforcing the sovereignty of countries that are on the front lines of Russian aggression," a senior U.S. defense official told reporters ahead of Austin's trip.
Critics like Matt Duss, foreign policy to Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), renewed long-standing warnings against potential NATO membership for the two former Soviet republics.
Duss, writing on his personal Twitter account, categorized the move as "needlessly provocative," one that "will almost certainly receive wall to wall applause in DC."
According to Antiwar.com contributing editor Daniel Larison:
Encouraging Ukraine and Georgia to believe that NATO membership is still in the cards for them is a serious mistake. It is not surprising that the Biden administration is maintaining the status quo on this issue, but it is a missed opportunity to reverse some of the damage that was done back in 2008 when this dangerous promise was first made to these aspirant states.
Keeping the "door" open to NATO expansion antagonizes Russia, and it strings Ukraine and Georgia along for no good reason. Many European allies will not support bringing these states into the alliance, and there is no compelling reason to add them.
Both countries would be extremely difficult if not impossible to defend in the event of a conflict, and they already have Russian or Russian-backed forces on their territory. Even if they were model democracies, which they most certainly are not, they would be poor candidates for the alliance.
Under Article 5 of the NATO charter--also known as the "collective defense" clause--the United States and other alliance members would be treaty-bound to fight Russia should war break out with Georgia or Ukraine. Russian troops invaded and occupied Abkhazia and South Ossetia in Georgia in 2008, and Ukraine's Crimean Peninsula in 2014. Ukraine is also widely considered the ancient cradle of Russian civilization.
Critics have long argued that NATO, formed in 1949 as a mutual defense pact against the Soviet Union, is a provocative anachronism in the absence of any threat from a long-defunct Warsaw Pact, and should be dissolved.
Peace advocates have greeted each actual or proposed enlargement of NATO--which currently counts 10 former Soviet or Warsaw Pact republics as members, and which has crept steadily eastward since its inception--by warning that such expansion threatens world peace.
"After decades of overreach, the Biden administration now faces a stark choice," writes Stephen Wertheim of the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, "commit to fight for Ukraine, creating a serious risk of war with Russia, or admit that NATO expansion has come to an overdue end."
Austin's trip comes as Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov announced Monday that his country's government was suspending its diplomatic mission to NATO and closing the alliance's Moscow office. The move follows last week's expulsion of eight Russian staff members from Russia's mission in Brussels amid espionage allegations.
Anti-war advocates on Monday warned that U.S. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin would be making a dangerous strategic blunder if he suggests that Ukraine and Georgia have a welcome mat toward full integration into the NATO military alliance--a move critics say would dramatically increase the risk of war between Washington, D.C. and Moscow.
"Keeping the 'door' open to NATO expansion antagonizes Russia, and it strings Ukraine and Georgia along for no good reason."
According to The Washington Times, Austin will signal that NATO is holding an "open door" for Georgia and Ukraine as he visits the two nations and Romania this week.
"We are reassuring and reinforcing the sovereignty of countries that are on the front lines of Russian aggression," a senior U.S. defense official told reporters ahead of Austin's trip.
Critics like Matt Duss, foreign policy to Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), renewed long-standing warnings against potential NATO membership for the two former Soviet republics.
Duss, writing on his personal Twitter account, categorized the move as "needlessly provocative," one that "will almost certainly receive wall to wall applause in DC."
According to Antiwar.com contributing editor Daniel Larison:
Encouraging Ukraine and Georgia to believe that NATO membership is still in the cards for them is a serious mistake. It is not surprising that the Biden administration is maintaining the status quo on this issue, but it is a missed opportunity to reverse some of the damage that was done back in 2008 when this dangerous promise was first made to these aspirant states.
Keeping the "door" open to NATO expansion antagonizes Russia, and it strings Ukraine and Georgia along for no good reason. Many European allies will not support bringing these states into the alliance, and there is no compelling reason to add them.
Both countries would be extremely difficult if not impossible to defend in the event of a conflict, and they already have Russian or Russian-backed forces on their territory. Even if they were model democracies, which they most certainly are not, they would be poor candidates for the alliance.
Under Article 5 of the NATO charter--also known as the "collective defense" clause--the United States and other alliance members would be treaty-bound to fight Russia should war break out with Georgia or Ukraine. Russian troops invaded and occupied Abkhazia and South Ossetia in Georgia in 2008, and Ukraine's Crimean Peninsula in 2014. Ukraine is also widely considered the ancient cradle of Russian civilization.
Critics have long argued that NATO, formed in 1949 as a mutual defense pact against the Soviet Union, is a provocative anachronism in the absence of any threat from a long-defunct Warsaw Pact, and should be dissolved.
Peace advocates have greeted each actual or proposed enlargement of NATO--which currently counts 10 former Soviet or Warsaw Pact republics as members, and which has crept steadily eastward since its inception--by warning that such expansion threatens world peace.
"After decades of overreach, the Biden administration now faces a stark choice," writes Stephen Wertheim of the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, "commit to fight for Ukraine, creating a serious risk of war with Russia, or admit that NATO expansion has come to an overdue end."
Austin's trip comes as Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov announced Monday that his country's government was suspending its diplomatic mission to NATO and closing the alliance's Moscow office. The move follows last week's expulsion of eight Russian staff members from Russia's mission in Brussels amid espionage allegations.