October, 01 2014, 02:00pm EDT

For Immediate Release
Contact:
Alli McCracken, CODEPINK (Washington)
alli@codepink.org / +1 860 5755692
Elsa Rassbach, CODEPINK & Drone Campaign (Berlin)
elsarassbach@gmail.com / +49 (0) 170 738 1450
Peter Strutynski, Friedensratschlag (Kassel)
peter.strutynski@gmx.de / +49 (0) 160 97628972
'Ban Weaponized Drones': An International Day of Action on October 4th
Anti-drone campaigns in the US, the UK, and continental Europe are mounting the first Global Action Day Against the Use of Drones for Surveillance and Killing on October 4, 2014.
BERLIN
Anti-drone campaigns in the US, the UK, and continental Europe are mounting the first Global Action Day Against the Use of Drones for Surveillance and Killing on October 4, 2014.
More than 40 actions will take place in several countries. Founded at an international meeting in Berlin in December, Global Action Day is working together with the US Network to Stop Drone Surveillance and Warfare, the UK Drone Campaign Network's Week of Action and the Global Network's Keep Space for Peace Week. Both action weeks begin on October 4th.
The locally initiated actions will take many forms: "Fly Kites Not Drones" events inspired by drone resistance in Afghanistan; demonstrations at drone warfare US military bases in the US, the UK and Germany; actions at businesses working with Israeli weapons manufacturers; and the initiation of an international consumer boycott against the Honeywell firm, which provides key parts for the armed US Reaper drones as well as for Apple computers. Lectures and conferences are also planned.
Over the past few months, several new developments have lent increased urgency to the key demand of Global Action Day -- that governments "cease the production and acquisition of armed drones," prohibit any use of military facilities "to enable drone surveillance and to trigger drone killings," and instead "work towards a worldwide ban on these weapons":
- In August and September the US military violated Syrian sovereignty in a "no boots on the ground" war relying heavily on drones -- without approval of the UN, the US Congress, European allies, or the Syrian government. The US relies on Ramstein Air Base in Germany for its global drone wars.
- Awareness of the danger of a drone arms race has risen after Hezbollah struck with armed drones in Syria (as reported by the Iranian Fars news agency on September 21st), becoming the first "non-state" actor and the fourth entity after Israel, the US, and the UK to use drones for killing.
- The British Ministry of Defence is threatening to deploy its 10 armed US Reaper drones (presently in Afghanistan) for missions in the Middle East and Africa, potentially following the US down the path towards a lawless so-called "targeted killing" policy in violation of national sovereignty rights.
- The German Defence Ministry announced in July that it would soon acquire "weaponizable" drones, either US Predators or Israeli Heron TPs (first tested in Israel's 2009 "Cast Lead" attack on Gaza).
No country in continental Europe yet has armed drones in its arsenal. However, Italy, France and the Netherlands have already purchased "weaponizable" US Reaper drones, and France and Italy are seeking to arm theirs. The EU and European countries are also investing in drone research and development.
But the use of drones for "extrajudicial targeted killings" still faces strong opposition in Germany. And in a landslide vote (534 to 49) on February 27th, the European Parliament passed a Resolution demanding strong measures against the use of drones for "targeted killings" and prohibiting robotized fully autonomous weapons systems, which some NGOs and experts fear will be the inevitable result of the ongoing drones arms race.
_________________________
Why We Are Participating in the Global Action Day on October 4th?
Medea Benjamin, Co-Founder of CODEPINK (USA): Instead of rushing to try to compete with the US and Israel by obtaining their own drones, the nations and peoples of the world could far better protect themselves by working together to enforce an international ban on these dangerous weapons -- an approach has already been successful in the case of chemical weapons, land mines and cluster bombs.
Reiner Braun, Co-President IPB-International Peace Bureau (Germany): People are dying every day from hunger and lack of access to water and food. Our governments' answer to this is to invest more money in weapons, especially drones, which are being used to violate international law. This misguided policy of killing people thousands of kilometers away with the push of a button must be stopped.
Chris Cole, Founder of Drone Wars (UK): The so-called 'risk free' nature of drone warfare tempts us into opting for a military response, even when there is little or no evidence that it will be effective or successful. This is not only a serious threat to global peace and security but will no doubt increase the threat of terrorism right here in Europe. Instead of sending its armed drones from the skies of Afghanistan to the Middle East, the UK should be undertaking a thorough evaluation of the actual impact of these systems on the ground and their long-term implications for both UK and global peace and security.
Bruce K. Gagnon, Coordinator Global Network Against Weapons & Nuclear Power in Space (USA): Keep Space for Peace Week is working together with Global Action Day. We seek to educate people all over the world about the growing and destabilizing of space. This highly profitable space technology now coordinates all warfare on the planet - drones, ships, tanks, missiles, and even troops on the ground use military satellites to direct their war making.
Luehr Henken, Peace Coordination Berlin & Bundesausschuss Friedensratschlag (Germany): Since 80% of all US drone strike victims so far have been Afghans, and since flying kites is a popular national sport in Afghanistan, I support the "Fly Kites Not Drones" actions in Germany on October 4th.
Nick Mottern, Coordinator, Network to Stop Drone Surveillance and Warfare (USA): The illegal, unethical American drone-dependent air war against Iraqis and Syrians is demonstrating beyond doubt the need for an immediate global ban on weaponized drones and drone surveillance.
Chris Nineham, Vice Chair Stop the War Coalition (UK): We are now into a third war in Iraq. Drones and aerial bombardment will kill innocents and spread chaos and inflame violence. We will be demonstrating this Saturday, October 4th, to bring an end to this madness.
Agneta Norberg, vice chair Swedish Peace Council (Sweden): Stop training drones in Sweden. We want windmills instead and a secure nature in the Mountains. In 2015 nEUROn, a coproduction by Swedish Saab, French Dassault Aviation and four other countries will be launched at NEAT in the North of Sweden. It is a prototype drone that cannot be seen on radar.
Elsa Rassbach, CODEPINK & German Drone Campaign (USA & Germany): The UN and the global community must stand up to the US and Israel, insist on respect for international law, and sanction the illegal drone wars. People in countries like Germany, who from their own history understand the disastrous consequences of such lawlessness, can and should play a leading role and, for example, forbid the use of Ramstein and AFRICOM for the drone wars.
Peter Strutynski, Peace Scholar & Speaker of Bundesausschuss Friedensratschlag (Germany): Because people are less and less willing to accept wars and interventions, the deployment of armed drones has become an increasingly important method for conducting war. The new wars for resources and geopolitical goals can be conducted "without risk". It is only "the others" who die.
Laura von Wimmersperg, Peace Coordination Berlin (Germany): Combat drones are not merely bombers without pilots. They are killing machines that will later be programmed so that they can autonomously make decisions regarding military missions and targets and thus regarding life and death. Their introduction must not be taken lightly: with drones a new chapter of modern warfare has begun. Resistance is essential.
CODEPINK is a women-led grassroots organization working to end U.S. wars and militarism, support peace and human rights initiatives, and redirect our tax dollars into healthcare, education, green jobs and other life-affirming programs.
(818) 275-7232LATEST NEWS
'Chilling Attempt to Evade Accountability': Trump to Boycott UN Human Rights Review
One ACLU expert said the move sets "a terrible precedent that would only embolden dictators and autocrats and dangerously weaken respect for human rights at home and abroad."
Aug 28, 2025
The ACLU on Thursday condemned President Donald Trump's administration for refusing to participate in a United Nations mechanism "that calls for each UN member state to undergo a peer review of its human rights records."
The president's decision to ditch the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) follows a February executive order withdrawing from various world bodies, including the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC), which he previously abandoned during his first term.
"The Trump administration's decision to boycott the UPR puts the US among the ranks of the worst violators of human rights," said Jamil Dakwar, director of the ACLU's Human Rights Program. "This move is a chilling attempt to evade accountability, setting a terrible precedent that would only embolden dictators and autocrats and dangerously weaken respect for human rights at home and abroad."
"The ACLU will continue to hold the Trump administration accountable for US human rights obligations and calls on Congress and state and local elected officials to join the fight to defend human dignity and everyone's basic rights and freedoms as promised by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights," Dakwar added.
trump/rubio say they're not participating in part b/c the council doesn't condemn human rights violators. THIS IS TOTAL BS. JOURNALISTS - please do not be stenographers on this. the council is far/very far from perfect. but it has been a major voice condemning violations globally.
— David Kaye (@davidakaye.bsky.social) August 28, 2025 at 11:22 AM
The Trump administration has faced mounting criticism since the February order, including after it missed an August 4 deadline to submit a national report in preparation for the next cycle of the UPR, set to take place in November.
After that deadline passed, the UPR Project at the United Kingdom's Birmingham City University and the UPR Academic Network released a joint statement noting that the US "participated in its previous three cycles of UPR in 2010, 2015, and 2020 and engaged as a recommending UN member state from the UPR's inception in 2008 until recently."
"The UPR is a nonconfrontational, cooperative mechanism which enables constructive dialogue between states on human rights. It is also a method of national self-reflection involving dialogue between civil society and the state," the signatories stressed, calling on the US to resume cooperation and other UN member states, UNHRC President Jürg Lauber, and the wider international community "to take appropriate steps and measures" encouraging the administration to do so.
The Lebanese Center for Human Rights (CLDH) reshared that statement on social media Thursday, declaring that the US position is "threatening global human rights accountability and international dialogue," and this is a "critical moment for human rights!"
The ACLU and CLDH comments came after Agence France-Presse confirmed the Trump administration's refusal to participate in the review, reporting on a Thursday letter that the US mission sent to UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk.
According to AFP:
Thursday's letter said that the UPR system, which was created after the establishment of the rights council in 2006, was meant to be "based on objective and reliable information and conducted in a manner that ensures equal treatment" of all countries.
"However, this is not the case today," it charged, adding that "the United States objects to the politicization of human rights across the UN system, as well as the UN's unrelenting selective bias against Israel."
It also accused the UN of "ignoring human rights abuses in China, North Korea, Cuba and Venezuela," which it said had "tarnished the UPR process" and other rights council mechanisms.
UNHRC spokesperson Pascal Sim told the news agency that "since the inception of the UPR in 2008, the secretariat has occasionally received requests from states to postpone reviews," often due to national crises, and the council will discuss how to proceed on the US review when it meets for a month beginning September 8.
Thursday's letter and the backlash come after US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and his department put out an annual report on other nations' human rights conditions earlier this month—a day after a coalition of LGBTQ+ and human rights groups sued over the administration's delay in releasing the congressionally mandated publication.
Amanda Klasing, Amnesty International USA's national director of government relations and advocacy, said at the time that the report made "clear that the Trump administration has engaged in a very selective documentation of human rights abuses in certain countries." Other critics highlighted Israel as an example of this.
Charles Blaha, a former State Department official who now serves as a senior adviser at DAWN, which advocates for democracy and human rights in the Middle East, called it "functionally useless for Congress and the public " and "nothing more than a pro-Israel document."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Fed Gov. Lisa Cook Sues Trump Over 'Unprecedented and Illegal' Firing
The suit alleges a "pretextual" bid to oust Cook in order to "vacate a seat for President Trump to fill and forward his agenda to undermine the independence of the Federal Reserve."
Aug 28, 2025
US Federal Reserve Gov. Lisa Cook on Thursday filed an anticipated lawsuit in response to President Donald Trump's contentious attempt to fire her—something no president has ever done in the 111-year history of the central bank's governing body.
"This case challenges President Trump's unprecedented and illegal attempt to remove Gov. Cook from her position which, if allowed to occur, would the first of its kind in the board's history," says the lawsuit, which was filed in the District Court for the District of Columbia, and names Trump, the Fed Board of Governors, and Fed Chair Jerome Powell as defendants.
The suit contends that Cook's termination "would subvert the Federal Reserve Act... which explicitly requires a showing of 'cause' for a governor's removal, which an unsubstantiated allegation about private mortgage applications submitted by Gov. Cook prior to her Senate confirmation is not."
The US Department of Justice last week launched a criminal investigation of alleged mortgage fraud committed by Cook. The DOJ referral accuses Cook of misrepresenting her primary residence information on mortgage documents for two properties in 2021 in order to secure more favorable loan terms.
Cook—who has not been criminally charged—denies any wrongdoing.
"The unsubstantiated and unproven allegation that Gov. Cook 'potentially' erred in filling out a mortgage form prior to her Senate confirmation does not amount to 'cause,'" the lawsuit argues. "Allowing the president to remove members of the board over policy disagreements would also render illusory the board's independence."
"The mortgage allegations against her are pretextual, in order to effectuate her prompt removal and vacate a seat for President Trump to fill and forward his agenda to undermine the independence of the Federal Reserve," the filing adds.
Cook's suit asks a federal judge to declare that Trump's bid to remove her is an illegal violation of her due process rights, that Fed governors may only be fired for cause, and that the unproven mortgage fraud claim does not constitute such cause. She is also seeking an injunction to bar Powell and the Fed board from firing her.
Trump's effort to fire Cook has been condemned by critics as another attempt to bully the Fed and Powell as the White House pressures the central bank to cut interest rates. Powell signaled last week that the Fed is inclined to lower interest rates during its meeting next month.
Cook is the third Trump political foe accused of mortgage fraud by his administration.
Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) Director William Pulte, a Trump appointee, has also targeted Democratic New York Attorney General Letitia James, who successfully sued the president and the Trump Organization for fraud, as well as Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), who was the lead manager in the first of Trump's two House impeachments.
Cook, a nominee of former President Joe Biden, has served on the Fed Board of Governors since 2022. Her term is not set to expire until 2038. She is the first Black woman to serve as a Fed governor.
Responding to Cook's lawsuit, White House spokesperson Kush Desai said in a statement that Trump had cause to fire the governor because she was "credibly accused of lying in financial documents from a highly sensitive position overseeing financial institutions."
However, Cook's alleged offense occurred the year before she joined the Fed board.
The president's bid to oust Cook could backfire—for him and Pulte—as the discovery process of her lawsuit may reveal "if the White House ordered a Trump loyalist to move against her," according to journalist Greg Sargent.
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Shut Up... You Should Be Fired': RFK Jr. Sparks Backlash With CDC Purge, School Shooting Remarks
"He is a dangerous man who is determined to abuse his authority to act on truly terrifying conspiracy theories and disinformation," said Democratic Sen. Patty Murray.
Aug 28, 2025
Some US elected officials are now calling for the firing of Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. amid mass resignations at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and comments he made about Wednesday's mass shooting at a Catholic school.
Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) was the first Democratic lawmaker to call for Kennedy's firing on Wednesday night, shortly after news broke that he had ousted Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Director Susan Monarez, who had just been confirmed by the US Senate weeks ago. Monarez's firing subsequently triggered several other high-profile resignations at the agency.
"If there are any adults left in the White House, it's well past time they face reality and fire RFK Jr.," she said. "He is a dangerous man who is determined to abuse his authority to act on truly terrifying conspiracy theories and disinformation—leaving us unprepared for the next deadly pandemic and snuffing out potential cures while he's at it."
Kennedy further angered his critics when he appeared on Fox News Thursday morning and not only defended the purge of the CDC, but also baselessly linked this week's mass shooting at the Annunciation Church in Minneapolis with the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), a class of drugs commonly used to treat clinical depression.
While speaking with the hosts of "Fox & Friends," Kennedy said that "we're launching studies on the potential contribution of some of the SSRI drugs and some of the other psychiatric drugs that might be contributing to violence" such as the shooting in Minneapolis on Wednesday that left two children dead and 17 other people wounded.
This drew the ire of Sen. Tina Smith (D-Minn.), who profanely called out Kennedy for peddling misinformation.
"I dare you to go to Annunciation School and tell our grieving community, in effect, guns don't kill kids, antidepressants do," she wrote in a social media post. "Just shut up. Stop peddling bullshit. You should be fired."
She then wrote a follow-up post in which she noted that "there are 400 million guns in this country," which is larger than the entire population of the US.
"In America, we are 10 times more likely to be shot in a school or playground than any other developed nation," she said.
Rep. Joe Neguse (D-Colo.) didn't explicitly call for Kennedy to be fired, although he labeled the HHS secretary's actions "disgraceful."
"What is happening at the CDC is truly a five-alarm fire and not receiving nearly enough attention," he wrote. "RFK Jr.'s undermining of our public health institutions will have disastrous consequences for generations."
Democratic lawmakers weren't the only ones calling for Kennedy's firing. Pradheep Shanker, a radiologist who regularly writes for the conservative National Review, also said he'd seen enough of US President Donald Trump's HHS Chief.
"RFK is a complete failure, and is making Trump's health policy look like a complete circus," he said. "If Trump has any credibility, he'll fire RFK."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular